A Simple Solution

Rate this post

TSA staff at LAX undergoing transgender training

Saw this on Breitbart this a.m. and definitely had some thoughts about it!
San Francisco (AP) – Transportation Security Administration managers at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) are undergoing mandatory sensitivity training after a transgender employee alleged she was ordered to dress like a man, pat down male passengers and use the men’s restroom. (There’s a pic of the lovely “woman” here).
Ashley Yang, 29, who spent two years as a security checkpoint screener at LAX, was fired last summer after co-workers observed her using the women’s room, according to a copy of her termination letter obtained by The AP. She contested the firing, resulting in a settlement that mandated the training.
Ashley lives her life as a woman. Her co-workers recognized her as a woman. Passengers recognized her as a woman. But her employer didn’t,” said attorney Kristina Wertz of the San Francisco-based Transgender Law Center, which helped her file a civil rights complaint. “She was asked to hide who she was just in order to earn a living.”
The settlement, reached in December and completed last month, also called for Yang to receive five months of back pay and a five-figure award for pain and suffering.
TSA spokesman Nico Melendez said, “It’s part of the world we live in today,” he said. “We need to be aware of transgender issues not only for our co-workers, but for passengers.” LAX, with a staff of 2,500 security officers, could have as many as 100 managers, according to Melendez.
Yang started living as a woman and taking hormones to feminize her appearance in 2006, two years before she applied to work for TSA. Her interviewer never doubted that the delicately featured candidate with artfully applied makeup and finely arched eyebrows was a woman, she said. Her California driver’s license identifies her as female.
She informed the agency she was transgender before a background check revealed the name she used when she was a man. The agency reminded her that agents had to be the same gender as the passengers they search and asked whether she had gone through sex reassignment surgery, which she had not.
When she showed up for training, Yang was told that according to TSA regulations she would have to pat down men and was offered a position working with baggage instead of passengers. She insisted that part of the job’s appeal was working with people.
Yang said she was not trying to be impertinent about the bathroom issue. She said she informed her managers that since California law prohibits discrimination based on gender identity and includes employment protections for transgender workers, she understood that using the women’s room was her right.

A TSA screening director said her behavior constituted a failure “to comply with the instructions given to you by management.” Her supervisors told her they would research the issue, but did not change their position. She was fired.

There’s just a whole lot of wrong in this story.  First, let’s start with the fact that physically this person is a man.  The AP author ignores that little fact and uses the words “she”, “her”, “woman” continuously throughout this story.  I would have preferred the word “it”.
Secondly, “Ashley” refused the position working with baggage because “part of the job’s appeal was working with people“. So it’s appealing to want to interact with passengers, patting them down and feeling them up?  I would rather be a sewer inspector than a groping-TSA agent.
Next, it’s just so wrong for a man to be in a women’s restroom (are they going to provide “it” a urinal as well?).  When I lived in Portland the parking lot attendant at my office was a man pretending to be a woman.  One day it started showing up in the women’s restroom – right in the stall next to me.  I absolutely freaked out.  I told my boss that I couldn’t take it.  Guess what he said? “Well, at least it’s out of my bathroom!”
Lastly, because of “its” personal choice to be confused, it creates havoc within an agency that has strict guidelines specifically designed around gender.  Throwing in a transgender just makes the issue as confused as “it” is.  I’ve got a simple solution to end the confusion: profile.
DCG

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “A Simple Solution

  1. We’re gonna need It restrooms…

     
  2. sorry,but this all makes me really sick,to even know this crap is going on,God made what he made,deal with it.

     
  3. It looks as if the “hope” and “change” that the American people voted for in 2008 isn’t working all that great. I guess the people who voted for the Liberals neglected to tell the general public what would be involved. If this doesn’t wind up in a shooting war, I don’t know what will happen and neither does anyone else. When the rest of our nation goes down the tube don’t expect Obama or the Liberals to take any blame, it is always the other group, I have it, the Tea Party people. This is “Animal Farm” to the hilt. Read a book and you will see what Orwell predicted many years ago. It’s here, in spades.
    Clifton Lee West

     
  4. Sorry to say this, but he is a dude, with a dude’s body, pretending to be a she. Basically, he is a walking-talking lie. I dont think most women would feel ok to share the toilet with a man, despite how he looks like. And even less to be touched by one. If he has issues, that is his problem, why do the rest of the world have to go along and lie as well, pretending that he is not a hairy male but a sweet girl? Come on?!?

     
  5. …I wonder how that one (male?female?none of the above) would fare under Sharia Law ? Probably just stoned to death….hmmmm.
    I suspect our founding fathers might have applied the float test…. or tar and feathers….which is easier on the real estate than fire and brimstone.

     
  6. Referring to people as “freaks” is highly judgmental and automatically puts a negative spin on how their behavior is evaluated. Judgments are based on emotional reactions instead of the facts about a situation and interfere with objectivity.

     
    • Oh, puleeze. As if you never judge.
      Do you realize that you committed a logical fallacy? Your supercilious scold “Referring to peopls as ‘freaks’ is highly judgmental” itself is a judgmental statement.
      Let me ask you this question, again: You are not a conservative. Why do you insist on coming onto FOTM? Don’t you have another blog that would have you? Or have you exhausted their welcome as well?

       
    • Fact: Ashley’s DNA & male body make it a man. No way to change that DNA, no matter how much makeup it wants to put on.
      And I’ll judge all I want, especially when I’ve had to deal w/a person like this. I don’t want a strange man in a restroom stall next to me, nor do I want to have a discussion w/that man about him cutting off his penis & getting ready to “fully become a woman”. I could give more details yet am sick about reliving that day in my head again.

       
  7. if you have a penis you are probably a male… new definition freak=obama

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *