A liberal psychiatrist’s armchair analysis of the POS

Rate this post

Dr. Justin A. Frank is a clinical professor of psychiatry at the George Washington University Medical Center. A left-wing Democrat, in 2011 Frank did an armchair psychoanalysis of the POS in his book, Obama On the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President.

The video below provides a good synopsis of Frank’s attempt at dissecting the psychology of the POS. Frankly, I find Frank downright hilarious in his analysis. Here are his main points (my rebuttals are in green):

  • Having been abandoned, permanently, by his Kenyan dad and periodically by his anthropologist mom (who would go off to do field research for long stretches of time), Obama has major abandonment issues. That’s why he desperately wants Americans to be one big happy family, which is why he’s been so accommodating with Republicans. (Yup. Saying stuff like “If I had a son, he’d look just like Trayvon” and “You didn’t build that” is a sure way to unite the American people. Snark.)
  • Obama doesn’t stand up to the Republican obstructionists and naysayers in Congress because, since he grew up without a father, he looks upon the GOP as a father figure. (Republican obstructionists in Congress? The POS had a Democrat-controlled House and Senate for TWO years, which was how he got the unpopular Obamacare passed into law.)
  • Obama perceives the Democrats as a mother figure but, since he has resentment issues with his mom, he sees Democrats’ and liberals’ questioning why he’s not living up to his campaign promises as whining and nagging. And that’s why he hasn’t delivered on his campaign promises! (Hmm… Didn’t the POS get Obamacare into law? Didn’t he get rid of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell in the U.S. military? Didn’t he appease the Greenies by axing the Keystone Pipeline?)

Justin Frank’s armchair psychoanalysis of the POS confirms what I’ve always thought about the discipline of Psychology. It is, at best, a soft science, which is just a polite way of saying it’s a pseudo-science. More often than not, it’s plain mumbo jumbo, especially when the psychiatrist in question makes no effort toward even a semblance of scientific objectivity by reining in his political partisanship and ideological bias.

H/t FOTM’s beloved LTG.


Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “A liberal psychiatrist’s armchair analysis of the POS

  1. What a subjective diagnosis from a subjective moron, about a subjective POS!

    • Left/libtard “progressive” apologism… why they desire “social-justice dispositions” in Psychology and other “helping” fields today.

  2. Most Psychiatrist enter the field because they want to know what’s wrong with THEIR minds. Carefully pick your doctor and if he seems crazy, get you another one and so-on and so-forth.

  3. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this entertaining post! Psycho-Babble!!! Perhaps he should try narcissistic personality disorder, borderline personality disorder (since Obama has “issues” with abandonment) – perhaps that might be the real words he should use. God help us – the Democratic party a “mother figure” – I have never heard of anything so absurd in my life! Especially in view of the fact that this is the rabid pro-abortion party against children, against life and especially against mothers!!!! Idiot!

  4. On a unrelated subject but one I believe is extremely important,,this year because of huge crop failures in our midwest and other world producers there is a shortage of food in the global supply,,We can not continue to make fuels with this much needed food supply,without causing massive problems in poorer countries..Obama knows this, but will likely choose to starve people to death in favor of his failed energy agenda,,Please everyone take a few moments to contact your congressmen about this issue…We have a moral obligation to do this..Ethanol is another failed energy scheme and has been causing hunger all over the third world by driving up food prices for people who are just surviving. Read about it here https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2012/08/20128218556871733.html

  5. I believe that both the Queen of England and Barack Obama are clinically insane. The difference is, the Queen can and does calculate—to America’s disadvantage, of course. Barack Obama cannot calculate. And this makes all the difference in the world for our survival. Although he is a British agent, he is whatever he is: a psychological cripple. How would Obama handle a real crisis? That answer shall determine our survival, whether the crisis be merely economic or an incoming nuclear missile.
    We are in more danger than we can imagine!


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.