Why no one trusts the media: New York Times gives reporter “reassignment” after claims she dated sources

ali watkins

The face of journalism at the NY Times…

No wonder the truth is hard to come by.

From Fox News: The New York Times reassigned Ali Watkins, the star reporter who was accused of being romantically involved with at least two potential sources, to a new beat outside of the paper’s Washington bureau. The paper’s top editor blasted Watkins’ actions as “unacceptable” but said she deserves a second chance.

The Times announced on Tuesday that Watkins will relocate to New York after an internal review of her romantic history with potential sources. The paper also announced she will receive a mentor and a “fresh start,” executive editor Dean Baquet told staffers.

Last month, a shocking indictment revealed that prior to joining the Times, Watkins, 26, had a three-year romantic relationship with Senate Intelligence Committee aide James A. Wolfe, 58, who was accused by federal prosecutors of lying about leaks of sensitive information to journalists. The indictment strongly suggested he was a source for Watkins and others, though Watkins reportedly has denied using her relationship for scoops.

The Gray Lady then published a blistering report about Watkins, its own employee, which revealed she dated another Intelligence Committee staffer. The report strongly implies Watkins rose to journalistic fame while using her married boyfriend as a source.

The Times report headlined, “How an Affair Between a Reporter and a Security Aide Has Rattled Washington Media,” and featured interviews with roughly 36 “friends and colleagues” of the scandalous former couple. Watkins carried on a three-year relationship with Wolfe, who is 30 years her senior and has been overseeing classified information delivered by the CIA and FBI since “before Watkins was born,” as the paper pointed out.

Jill Abramson, the former executive editor of the paper, blasted the paper for publishing the “horrible” deep dive into Watkins’ past in an email to Daily Beast reporter Lloyd Grove. “That story hung a 26-year-old young woman out to dry. It was unimaginable to me what the pain must be like for her,” Abramson said.

The Times’ decision was announced on the day before a holiday, when negative news is typically dumped to avoid unwarranted attention. The Times typically prides itself on being an advocate for transparency, so the timing has raised eyebrows across the media industry. Baquet sent a memo to his staff about the Watkins situation that was published by the paper on Tuesday.

“We hold our journalists and their work to the highest standards,” Baquet wrote. “We are giving Ali an opportunity to show that she can live up to them. I believe she can.”

Baquet said the Times “must be a humane place that can allow for second chances when there are mitigating circumstances.” Despite the decision not to terminate Watkins, Baquet did express displeasure with her action in the note.

“We are troubled by Ali’s conduct, particularly while she was employed by other news organizations. For a reporter to have an intimate relationship with someone he or she covers is unacceptable,” he wrote.

Watkins covered national security for McClatchy, HuffPost, BuzzFeed, and Politico before joining The New York Times. She has denied receiving information from Wolfe during their relationship.

“Although her disclosures varied in detail, none of her editors barred her from covering the intelligence committee, or explicitly told her that the relationship was inappropriate,” Times media correspondent Michael M. Grynbaum wrote on Tuesday. “She has said the relationship did not turn romantic until after those stories ran.”

Watkins was a finalist for the coveted Pulitzer Prize during her time at McClatchy.

“As she started her career, I believe she was not well served by some editors elsewhere who failed to respond appropriately to her disclosures about her relationships,” Baquet wrote, adding that the Times editors “also bear some responsibility.”

He said the Times’ inquiry “found that during the hiring process she disclosed aspects of her past relationships to some editors.”

Watkins received a letter in February notifying her that the Justice Department obtained her records, but the reporter did not inform the Times until June at the advice of her lawyer, according to the paper. Baquet wrote that those actions “put our news organization in a difficult position.”

Watkins issued the following statement: “I respect and understand the Times’ review and agree that I should have handled aspects of my past relationships and disclosures differently. I sincerely regret putting The Times in a difficult position and am very grateful for the support I’ve received from my editors and colleagues here. I also appreciate the review’s conclusion that my reporting has been fact-based and accurate.”

Wolfe, who was indicted this month on three counts of lying to FBI agents and accused of leaking information to the media, pleaded not guilty in front of a federal magistrate judge in Washington, D.C., earlier this month. Watkins has not written for the Times since his arrest.

“Reporters at The Times, and at other news organizations, have expressed unease over Ms. Watkins’s conduct. Women in particular say the episode has made them more vulnerable to an ugly and false stereotype often lobbed at female reporters, that they exchange sex for information,” Grynbaum wrote.

Baquet said the vetting process at the Times will tighten as a result of the Watkins investigation.

See also:

DCG

14 responses to “Why no one trusts the media: New York Times gives reporter “reassignment” after claims she dated sources

  1. There is nothing like rewarding for bad behavior. That was some serious consequences handed out, sarc. Liberals always seem to skim by.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. And then there are the incestuous relationships (marriages and siblings) between MSM and Democrats in government:

    Liked by 3 people

  3. Whenever anyone claims that the NYT is a reliable or unbiased source of factual news, I laugh in their face .

    Liked by 4 people

  4. The NY Times has no standards. Their only requirement for their reporters is that they can lie through their teeth without batting an eye. They likely hired her because she was sleeping with James Wolfe. The NY Times is only surprised and angry because she knew for months that she had been caught and didn’t tell them. I wonder how much information the feds collected between the time they notified Mr. Wolfe and then this reporter months later? I won’t be surprised if several reporters and congressional leakers aren’t wrapped up in this.

    Liked by 4 people

  5. Dennis Godaire

    The New York Times – “All the news that’s fit to print”. LOL

    Liked by 3 people

  6. “That story hung a 26-year-old young woman out to dry. It was unimaginable to me what the pain (She caused herself – my words YKW) must be like for her,” A traitor to the country, prostitute, being ‘protected’ by her employer for being young and innocent, (BS) instead of security escorting her off of the property.
    And she looks kinda creepy somehow.

    Liked by 5 people

  7. Wow! Who would expect the unethical to suddenly develop ethics? Reassign her to the beat in the Congo.

    Liked by 4 people

  8. We believe in the nyt so much my wife used it for the bottom of the bird cage where it fits right in with the crap division. No reasonable person believes in any of the media any more they have proved over and over again they are not reliable sources if they have none they just fabricate then and write on.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. Aw, poor baby. Imagine “having to” sleep with your sources to get a story.
    Whatever happened to professional standards?
    On the other hand, if she was in love, a twenty-something is likely to consider “love” to be the highest good.

    Liked by 4 people

  10. Freedom of the Press was so right until the pendulum started to tilt to one side and took on a yellow color, how did this happen? Money is a miracle worker and the pendulum swayed to the left, became biased and no longer free. Nobody trusts the press and its very contents are questionable, the press is now the created interest and regarded fake. And who do we trust?

    Liked by 3 people

  11. Who would ever date dragon-girl? Well, yes, she’s young and cute. Perhaps if she didn’t talk.

    Like

  12. I want a girlfriend 30 years my junior…
    Wait, no I don’t! What were they (the men) thinking?
    Then again, Gen. David Petraeus got caught in the same tangled web.
    They should all be tarred and feathered. That would be true pain.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s