Sacramento city homeless program offers bonuses to groups attending meetings and writing policies

government solve all problems

I guess this makes sense when you are using “free” tax payer dollars.

From Sacramento Bee: The city of Sacramento is offering hefty financial bonuses to hospitals, health plans and government and nonprofit agencies for attending meetings and helping to launch its $64 million Whole Person Care program on homelessness.

Mayor Darrell Steinberg and other Sacramento leaders consider the pilot program central to achieving their goal of housing 2,000 homeless people by 2020. It is designed to bring together health service providers to treat homeless patients and avoid costly emergency medical care, as well as to find them a stable place to live.

“Partner organizations” can collect payments of $100,000 to $250,000 for participating in meetings and hitting various “performance targets” at the end of each year of the program, which runs through 2020, said the city’s homeless services coordinator, Emily Halcon. Initial targets include attending a certain number of meetings and developing internal policies, patient screening tools and referral criteria, Halcon said.

Should all partners hit their goals for the duration of the program, incentive payments would total $7.9 million. Whole Person Care is funded by local money and federal matching dollars and administered by the state.

Participants include the Sacramento police and fire departments, hospital systems, federally funded health clinics, health plans, housing agencies and social service providers, including Sacramento Steps Forward and the Salvation Army. These agencies and others are working with the city to develop a system that would keep homeless people out of emergency rooms and steer them toward behavioral health services, insurance coverage and housing.

The financial incentives are an unusual but potentially effective way to ensure that all of the agencies involved give 100 percent to a program that has lofty goals and a short timeline, Halcon said.

“They are in recognition that, to truly change systems and service delivery, you need a lot of intensive work” from service providers, each of which will be a crucial part of the program’s success, she said.

“It’s not just, ‘Show up at a meeting and get funds,'” she said. The monthly steering committee meetings are intensive sessions “where we expect active participation, presentations and input from all of our partners” who then follow up with additional work.

“We see the incentive payments primarily as compensation for efforts already provided,” Halcon continued.

Such payments are highly unusual, several experts said. Bob Erlenbusch, executive director of the Sacramento Regional Coalition to End Homelessness, questioned why entities “are getting paid for something they should already be doing.”

“It’s outrageous,” he said. “I’ve never heard of anything like it in 30 years of working on homeless issues. Attending meetings and working on the project should be part of their job,” Erlenbusch said. “That money could go a long way toward immediately helping people. How many people could we immediately house for that amount of money?”

Whole Person Care pilot projects throughout the state are allowed to pay partners that help “ensure the overall success” of their program, said Carol Sloan, public information officer for the California Department of Health Care Services, which administers the project.

“Sacramento took a creative approach and incentivized their providers to participate in order to encourage and recognize their engagement above and beyond their traditional workload,” Sloan said. The approach, she said, has led to “the development of new relationships and new policies and partnerships that we hope will be sustained at the local levels after the sunset of the pilot project.”

Ryan Loofbourrow, chief executive officer of the nonprofit Sacramento Steps Forward, said he was “pleasantly surprised” to learn that his agency would get incentives for participating in Whole Person Care, locally named Pathways to Health + Home.

“This is the first time I’ve heard of it happening,” he said. “But in this type of effort it makes sense to me. You’re pulling together so many different groups that in addition to fulfilling their daily mission have to invest a lot of time” in a new project.

Loofbourrow said his agency has spent “hundreds of hours” in staff time on the Pathways effort.  “We’re dedicated to it, regardless” of the payments, he said. “But the financial incentives certainly has made making this big commitment a bit easier.”

Sacramento Steps Forward, which distributes millions in federal funding to local groups that aid homeless people, stands to earn $250,000 this year if it fulfills all of its commitments, according to planning documents for the local Whole Person Care program.

Read the rest of the story here.


7 responses to “Sacramento city homeless program offers bonuses to groups attending meetings and writing policies

  1. Since when is a homeless person a patient? The cure for these people is a job. Robots are replacing people at high numbers, so guess what will be the outcome of that?

    Liked by 2 people

  2. We need to stop funding local programs with federal funds. If they want to spend themselves into oblivion fine. But why should my dollars from the east coast fund their madness on the west coast?

    Liked by 4 people

  3. “OPM” (other people’s money) is ALWAYS their “solution”. Money is just some magical thing that shows up when you tax the eaters. If you run out, just tax them some more.

    Sadly, I’m not the least bit surprised by this. You can win valuable prizes by doing the elected guy’s jobs for them. This way we get to pay the elected guys AND the professional think tankers. Meanwhile the homeless are still wandering the streets pestering people and mumbling to themselves.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. Why not take all that money and use it to reeducate the homeless to find new jobs and be productive. Why waste all that money on people showing up and agreeing or disagreeing with others just so they get paid. But its were it is and that stands for itself I guess but give a man a fish and he eats one meal teach him to fish and he can feed himself and get off welfare. Whats a funny thing is the government says that Social Security is steadily running out of money and you never hear of the welfare system running out of money and funny the first group worked for theirs and the second group didn’t.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s