UN admits ‘refugees’ are ‘replacement migration’ for Europe and other low-fertility countries

For those of us who’ve long suspected there’s a hidden agenda behind the invasion of “refugees” and “migrants” in Europe, here’s the smoking gun.

In 2000, the United Nations’ Department of Economic and Social Affairs issued a report, Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?, which proposes “replacement migration” for countries with an aging and declining population.

Below is the UN’s press release on the report, dated March 17, 2000 — that’s how long ago the “refugee” and “migrant” plan was hatched.

Press Release
DEV/2234
POP/735

NEW REPORT ON REPLACEMENT MIGRATION ISSUED BY UN POPULATION DIVISION

NEW YORK, 17 March (DESA) — The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) has released a new report titled “Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?”. Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to prevent population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.

United Nations projections indicate that between 1995 and 2050, the population of Japan and virtually all countries of Europe will most likely decline. In a number of cases, including Estonia, Bulgaria and Italy, countries would lose between one quarter and one third of their population. Population ageing will be pervasive, bringing the median age of population to historically unprecedented high levels. For instance, in Italy, the median age will rise from 41 years in 2000 to 53 years in 2050. The potential support ratio — i.e., the number of persons of working age (15-64 years) per older person — will often be halved, from 4 or 5 to 2.

Focusing on these two striking and critical trends, the report examines in detail the case of eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). In each case, alternative scenarios for the period 1995-2050 are considered, highlighting the impact that various levels of immigration would have on population size and population ageing.

Major findings of this report include:

— In the next 50 years, the populations of most developed countries are projected to become smaller and older as a result of low fertility and increased longevity. In contrast, the population of the United States is projected to increase by almost a quarter. Among the countries studied in the report, Italy is projected to register the largest population decline in relative terms, losing 28 per cent of its population between 1995 and 2050, according to the United Nations medium variant projections. The population of the European Union, which in 1995 was larger than that of the United States by 105 million, in 2050, will become smaller by 18 million.

— Population decline is inevitable in the absence of replacement migration. Fertility may rebound in the coming decades, but few believe that it will recover sufficiently in most countries to reach replacement level in the foreseeable future.

Some immigration is needed to prevent population decline in all countries and regions examined in the report. However, the level of immigration in relation to past experience varies greatly. For the European Union, a continuation of the immigration levels observed in the 1990s would roughly suffice to prevent total population from declining, while for Europe as a whole, immigration would need to double. The Republic of Korea would need a relatively modest net inflow of migrants — a major change, however, for a country which has been a net sender until now. Italy and Japan would need to register notable increases in net immigration. In contrast, France, the United Kingdom and the United States would be able to maintain their total population with fewer immigrants than observed in recent years.

— The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent the decline of the total population are considerably larger than those envisioned by the United Nations projections. The only exception is the United States.

— The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent declines in the working-age population are larger than those needed to prevent declines in total population. In some cases, such as the Republic of Korea, France, the United Kingdom or the United States, they are several times larger. If such flows were to occur, post-1995 immigrants and their descendants would represent a strikingly large share of the total population in 2050 — between 30 and 39 per cent in the case of Japan, Germany and Italy.

— Relative to their population size, Italy and Germany would need the largest number of migrants to maintain the size of their working-age populations. Italy would require 6,500 migrants per million inhabitants annually and Germany, 6,000. The United States would require the smallest number — 1,300 migrants per million inhabitants per year.

— The levels of migration needed to prevent population ageing are many times larger than the migration streams needed to prevent population decline. Maintaining potential support ratios would in all cases entail volumes of immigration entirely out of line with both past experience and reasonable expectations.

— In the absence of immigration, the potential support ratios could be maintained at current levels by increasing the upper limit of the working-age population to roughly 75 years of age.

— The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require a comprehensive reassessment of many established policies and programmes, with a long-term perspective. Critical issues that need to be addressed include: (a) the appropriate ages for retirement; (b) the levels, types and nature of retirement and health care benefits for the elderly; (c) labour force participation; (d) the assessed amounts of contributions from workers and employers to support retirement and health care benefits for the elderly population; and (e) policies and programmes relating to international migration, in particular, replacement migration and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants.

Note that, unlike Europe and other developed countries, the United States is a lone exception. Instead of population decline and ageing, our population is projected to increase by a quarter in the next 50 years.

That means America does not need to open our doors to immigrants, migrants and refugees. In fact, the UN report concludes that we only need to bring in 1,300 migrants per million inhabitants per year.

The U.S. population in 2018 is 327.16 million. That means that, at most, we need to bring in less than half a million (425,000) migrants a year — if even that.

See also:

~Eowyn

58 responses to “UN admits ‘refugees’ are ‘replacement migration’ for Europe and other low-fertility countries

  1. They want to repopulate the earth by about 90%, then they spew this? Who are they kidding?!

    Like

    • At best it’s woefully dumb liberal social engineering– who knew unskilled violent third world migrants wouldn’t assimilate and get high-paying jobs in Germany?

      Liked by 2 people

      • Anonymous . . . . God Bless you for bringing up the most important facts regarding immigration, particularly those going to countries like Germany. Germany is known for the precision in all things: cars, knives, machinery. They are (we are speaking of, those native born Germans) a highly skilled population.

        So does anyone gain by bringing in peoples who greatest feat is making babies. We see from information that has come to those in our country, that almost all of the immigrants who are coming HAVE TO IMMEDIATELY GO ON WELFARE. THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO HAVE LITTLE OR NO SKILLS (other than producing children.) They are not assimilating with the native population. What is most unfortunate is that due to the fact that the Muslimes that are immigrating have extremely reduced IQ’s, in part due to the fact for thousands of years they have practiced marrying cousins, or close relatives.

        I rather doubt that individuals who have reduced IQ will replace people in occupations like pattern making (which is the art of building forms that would produce, let’s say things like machine parts, mag wheels, etc. first there has to be a “precision pattern” before any of these things can go into production.) There is a huge need for pattern making, so many of the products that are manufactured must initially have a pattern built in order to produce the needed items. My Father was a pattern maker, and in his shop there were several German men who had immigrated to the US, who were tops in their field.)

        When this influx of low IQ, uneducated peoples come in who need public assistance in order to “get by.” How is it that these people are so how magically going to be the saviors of these aging societies? They will first be a drain on the treasuries of those nations they go to . . . we see this in our country.

        There is even a large number of these Muslime immigrants who will decidedly move from one state to another–based on the gaining larger welfare payouts in another state.

        Why would any young native female wish to align herself with an immigrant of lower IQ just so that she can say she has a man and can product children to supposedly sacrifice to the idea of replacing a declining population? That is the absolutely craziest idea. The fabric of these various native countries will be torn in shreds.

        Not only that, but how many people would really want to subject their fair daughters to men who are intellectually their inferior, and subject they to becoming the slaves of men who think nothing of raping goats? I daresay, I would not want that for myself, nor would I wish to subject any young female in my family to such a life of degradation.

        I dare say the UN, as most of us have already surmised, is one of the most insidious groups ever assembled under the stars. It is with good reason that many people say . . . . Get the US out of the UN . . . and the UN out of the US.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Transnational left/libtard progressives in action…

    Liked by 4 people

    • Anonymous . . . . That you for posting the actual document.

      The biggest question in my mind is, since the UN is an organization of countries on this Earth, not outer space, and I see that this memo is available in English, French, German, Japanese, Russian, and Spanish . . . didn’t anyone from any of these countries actually read the document, and propose an investigation of just how well it would work out to have non-similar peoples foisted off on other societies?

      If this kind of thinking is the best that the UN can come up with, then they are a monumental waste of the US taxpayer’s money. Those who proposed this kind of thinking should, if they are still alive, should be sued for the carnage that has been done to peaceful societies’ such as Norway, Sweden, England, Ireland, Scotland, Australia, France, and all the other nation’s who now have resident gang’s of murderous, raping thugs within their boarders.

      Liked by 1 person

      • If you think that’s bad, go on one of their peacekeeping missions. (The 1994 Van Damme movie “Street Fighter” is, unfortunately, quite realistic.)

        Liked by 1 person

  3. The UN and all the minions that believe them first tell us that the earth is over populated and leads to global warming and the earth will run out of resources if we do not curtail world population growth. Then they come along and tell us that we have to accept immigration because western countries are not replacing themselves and those countries need to be repopulated. Does any one besides me see the irony in this? The plan for the UN and all the minions that believe in the UN want a New World Order and this is how they plan on tearing down Western countries to accomplish their dastardly deeds.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Well said Cabin 1954, I was thinking the same, and was going to make pretty much the same Comment. Here’s another Fun Fact, a few days ago I was watching a video on the Boston Bombing, it was a compilation of News clips. Almost every other word was instilling fear of radical islamic terrorists, like bush, “either you are with the terrorists or with us”. Now, if you say anything bad about a muslim, it’s deemed hate speech, in Canada and other Countries you can be Arrested!!! They totally did a 180*, just like the Population issue. People responsible, and these evil entities, need to be held accountable, they’re on their way to destroying the Planet and everything on it, including themselves…It’s a Scorched Earth mentality, us good people are just considered Collateral Damage.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Stovepipe . . . . Excellent comment! Particularly the fact that we now are faced with a “Scorched Earth mentality, and us good people are just considered Colateral Damage.”

        Liked by 2 people

    • Cabin 1954 . . . . Congratulations! Excellent comment. It truly boggles the mind how such a turnaround happens, but then, it has not been that many years since we were told that we were going to go into an “ice age.” Now, our planet is going to incinerate itself!

      I personally am going to stick with my own belief. That is whatsoever happens here on this Earth was foreordained by the Creator. If so peoples are taken home to their Eternal resting place due to climatic changes, so be it. Other generations of people had to struggle with the Black Plague, or rampant Influenza, polio, starvation, floods, fires, etc. No one including our Heavenly Father promised us that the time we would spend on this Earth would be free of problems. Each of us has a set time to spend on Earth, we will each be called home in the time that is allotted to us, and by whatever means. We can either rail against God, or we can just accept that He has all things in HIs conscientiousness, and in the Eternal end all things will come to fruition as they should be.

      I don’t like everything that is going on, but I don’t spend all day every day worrying about what catastrophes will befall me, or my family.

      I will say very honestly, what with the news today the DNC is suing Russian, Donald Trump and WikiLeaks for their loss of the last election is a greater immediate threat to this nation than anything else. We are either going to be a people who observe the rule of law . . . . or we are going to be a lawless people stepped in anarchy.

      Liked by 1 person

      • “the news today the DNC is suing Russian, Donald Trump and WikiLeaks for their loss of the last election”

        I say let the Demonrats sue. A year of Mueller’s investigation turned up ZERO evidence of a Trump-Russia collusion. Demonrats should fear the discovery phase of the trial, which is sure to turn up evidence of real fraud on the part of Hillary and the DNC, some of which are known already, e.g., DNC’s collusion with Hillary against Bernie Sanders, and Uranium One.

        Liked by 1 person

        • What on Earth do “Russians” have to do with the election. I don’t even understand what they’re suggesting. Ever since the USSR failed the leftists have been anti-Russia. It’s insane.

          I don’t need an investigation to prove that Hillary is SO BAD she lost a rigged election. “Russians” didn’t decide to run her. Maybe “Russians” are making them stupid.

          Liked by 2 people

        • It’s just a publicity stunt and a perversion of our justice system (what there is left of it). There’s no evidence of anything. I’m sure the DNC shopped a sympathetic (pathetic) judge to hear their non-case. The suit won’t go anywhere but the barking and clapping seals in the media will get a few days out of it.

          Just look at who the DNC is suing… The Russian Federation and the Russian Military… 10 John Does…

          My first witness for the defense would be William Binney, former Technical Head of the NSA. He proved the DNC data dump came from the United States, NOT Russia. It was an inside DNC job. The DNC better be careful… They might not get what they wish for.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Well, most believed that the UN was set up to end wars and settle disputes peacefully. That was the sales pitch. Those who have studied it realize that it is really just a headquarters for one world government.

      People were well meaning initially. They wanted an end to wars. They wanted better health for the disadvantaged. They wanted better education for everyone.

      It wasn’t long before its true nature became apparent. It has become a rubber stamp for wars and a facilitator of eugenics world domination. The simple questions remain.

      Why would we need some outside entity to decide what is “best” for us? Why do we need to eliminate sovereignty? Who in their right minds signs up for things like this?

      Look at the EU. We are looking at the same thing with the other treaty for Pacific nations. They are pushing these hard. All they are is the elimination of elected, representative governments and their replacement with totalitarian forms.

      They want a gentler, dumber, mutt breed of cattle. They will kill off all but the necessary number of yacht washers and golf caddies. Then they will retire to a life of utter decadence serviced by morons.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. this is pure bs,they out of touch w reality ,or its their reality which ,well,fit well…in italy theres absolutely no way to find a job but for the africans who ,,migrated,,here theres a job! maybe not for all,for many yes,im not talking about the way they get payed,which btw its yuuge they ,,earned,,home…and one more thing,here its an albergo a nice one ,first used for the tourists but now…all rooms for black ppl,the authorities paying the owner 30 or 40,000 euro/monthly…UN is only a masonic chit organization ,i truly believe we dont need them,the world will b a better place without UN,believe me! Peace&God Bless all!

    Liked by 3 people

    • palcan ioan . . . . Bravo! Thank you for the insight into what is going on in Italy at the current time. I would agree whole heartedly with you . . . “the world will be a better place without the UN.” I believe that many of the nation’s that belong to the UN suck up all the monies the US gives, and the delegates from these countries live far beyond anything they could imagine in their own respective home lands.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. 425 migrants per yr? get them all fixed first and make sure they have all their shots.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. As I recall the Lord said go forth and multiply I think he has a plan that covers this but who is God as far as they are concerned. Leave God’s plan alone and all will be fine. But no greed will supersede that and it comes down to total control of all. We are headed towards NWO at break neck speed. And most of the world is too stupid to realize it or don’t believe it.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Brian . . . . Thank you for such an insightful comment. I also believe that God has a plan, and if we will be still, believe in Him, the plan will unfold in the precise manner that it should. Nothing that any criminal minds, or organizations do, will impact the unique blessings than any one of us has earned in Eternity. All will be well, if we will love the Lord, and believe in his commandments.

      I hope that you are feeling well!

      Liked by 2 people

  7. If White Eurotrash women don’t start spreading some leg to replenish their population, they deserve to be Mohamed aBaIaTaCaHa.

    Like

  8. Reblogged this on Roberts Thoughts 2 and commented:

    Below is the UN’s press release on the report, dated March 17, 2000 — that’s how long ago the “refugee” and “migrant” plan was hatched.

    Note that, unlike Europe and other developed countries, the United States is a lone exception. Instead of population decline and ageing, our population is projected to increase by a quarter in the next 50 years.

    That means America does not need to open our doors to immigrants, migrants and refugees. In fact, the UN report concludes that we only need to bring in 1,300 migrants per million inhabitants per year.

    The U.S. population in 2018 is 327.16 million. That means that, at most, we need to bring in less than half a million (425,000) migrants a year — if even that.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Our “white” population is not expected to increase.

      Liked by 3 people

      • lophatt . . . . You are absolutely correct. The “increases” in population are among particularly what we used to call “minority peoples.” These same people are adding to our population at a startling rate. The population increases are seen among brown skinned immigrant peoples.

        I think it is unfortunate that among white American’s, many of whom have forgotten their God, have decided to either have no children, or possibly one to two children. This makes us unable to reproduce the Western European peoples who built this nation.

        There is trouble brewing among any people’s who turn their backs on the God of this Earth. That includes those who reside in the USA.

        Liked by 1 person

        • “it is unfortunate that among white American’s, many of whom have forgotten their God, have decided to either have no children, or possibly one to two children”

          or abort their children before they’re even born.

          Liked by 1 person

  9. Amazing. Excellent piece.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Pingback: NEWS: Military Helicopters Seen In NYC At Night, Christians Need To Armor Up, Japan’s 28Ft. Gundam Mecha Robot, MS-13 Gang Issues Orders To Take Out A Cop, & More – Light has Come

  11. Reblogged this on kommonsentsjane and commented:

    Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.

    For your information.

    kommonsentsjane

    Liked by 2 people

  12. This has been obvious for decades. Our “masters” have decided that white people are a potential problem for them so they have decided to eliminate us. What other reason could there conceivably be for this?

    So, if you were going to eliminate a “breed”, you would prevent them from reproducing (PP anyone?), and you would flood them with undesirable foreigners.

    Liked by 2 people

    • lophatt . . . . Excellent comment. You are right on point.

      I think the reason that “Our ‘masters’ have decided that white people are a potential problem for them so they have decided to eliminate us.” is because for generations it was white Europeans who came here to the land “where the streets were paved in gold,” and each generation that came had the fervent dream that they would leave this country, and the educational status of their children better than what they themselves had.

      I see this pattern so clearly in my own family. The hard work my Grandfather put in, who immigrated from Norway in 1903. His wife worked equally hard, since she was put out to work at a rather early age, she went back to school in her adult years to gain an “Eight Grade” graduation certificate. In bygone years, having an eighth grade education was assumed to be adequate; and judging from how hard the studies, based on written media from that time, those people were better educated that today’s high school graduates. Then my Father came along, finished high school. But due to the depression there was little work available–so he went back to high school at Benson Polytechnic High School and got more specific education regarding machinery, etc. My mother had a partial education towards getting a “nursing degree,” but quit school to marry my father. When Mother was about 33 years old, she went back to college, and was going to study to go into teaching. Trying to finish a degree via night school is terribly hard. She later went to business school, at the same time they were putting me through college. She eventually became a “unit secretary” at St Vincent Hospital, where she could partially use some of her nursing education.

      Let’s face it, the “masters” can control an ignorant, lowly educated group of people than they can a highly educated people, who indulge themselves in “critical thinking.” This is the very reason why the curriculum in public schools is aimed at dumbing down the populace. I think I can say in all candor that adding an “immigrant class of peoples” who are not driven to seek education, has the effect of diluting the education that the children of the original Western European settlers, and immigrants can get. This is achieved by the fact that many immigrants (as lophatt said–undesirable foreigners) of today do not want an education, and teacher’s spend a immense amount of time “baby-sitting” these children, instead of teaching the class as a whole.

      Like

  13. What a truck load of manure!!!
    This is nothing but a cover your ass White paper for the mess that they knew would evidence itself.
    The original smoking gun is the Kalergi Plan. This is about killing off European peoples. Remember when they told us all in the 70’s the world was over populated and we should have less have kids? I know a lot of people that bought that one and had fewer or no children.Then there is feminism that sold careers to young women for the last 40 years, and told them being a wife and mother was oppressive.How many women took those messages to heart? Quite a few as we can see by the demographics. The other day I heard that sperm count in American men is half of what it was some 40 or so years ago. Mistake? Remember the illustrious John Holdren saying the gov should place sterilants in our water to lower birth rates? How bout those Georgia Guidestones?
    And as far as Korea and Japan, no one is forcing their countries to take in Africans and Muslims. Nor do they have Jews in their legislatures changing their immigration laws such as has happened in EVERY European peopled country around the world in the last 50 years. Nor have their people been brainwashed to have Asian guilt so they would roll over for policies that promote the demise of their people and cultures.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Yes, like most “breeders” they prefer docility over intelligence. They have been able to effectively manipulate the “people of color” far more easily than they have whites. So in designing their new servant class they want less trouble and more “step and fetchit”.

      Anyone that has studied eugenics can easily see this. This is why we have such a muddle in the Middle East and Africa. These groups are constantly played off against one another and the result is chaos and confusion.

      If they were capable of realizing who their enemy really was they could start determining their own futures. That was our fatal mistake. We set about making better lives for ourselves and our children. In doing that we came to see the obstacles to that path. Those who are our obstacles don’t like that.

      Liked by 2 people

      • lophatt . . . . Excellent comments! I must agree, us white folks certainly are “less servile,” than many other peoples. If it had not been for that “stubborn streak” that exists among Western European peoples–this land would not have prospered. It took that grit, gumption and determination to stay on point and push forward that has created a country without equal. . . . . Now if we can just hold onto it !!!!!

        Like

    • Lana . . . . Thank you for your excellent comment. You certainly have given proof that there is a “foul plan afoot.”

      Like

      • Thanks Auntie. And I would also add you your comment above, that along with the grit and determination of our European ancestors, there are also others attributes that contributed to Europeans making of such successful civilizations. Each culture is an out picturing or creation of race whether some folks want to hear it or not. Each race creates according to it’s attributes and consciousness. And in that respect, the European peoples have attributes that others don’t seem to have, at least not in the same quantity. No other race has demonstrated the level of inventive abilities as Europeans. The Native Americans have called Europeans the fire race because of our abilities in technology. The only reason China and the rest of the world now pose a threat to us is that all our inventions and technology have been traitorously given to others who would use it against us.
        Then there is the drive to make things better which puts the welfare of all ahead of clannishness and tribe. In Middle Eastern, Asian, and African cultures, everything is centered around tribalism. That translates into uncle so and so getting the job instead of who is the best person for the job. The former helps only the clan while the latter benefits society- everyone outside of the clan. In this way of functioning there is an abstract conception taking place that looks to the future and the bigger picture where immediate benefits are either put on hold or given second place in importance. The coupling of these two traits seem to be what has set the civilizations of European peoples apart from other civilizations- at least in modern history.

        Like

    • Well of course. That is their goal. It isn’t a “secret” goal, although they usually don’t like to talk too much about it with the cattle of course.

      Ask them if they have a goal of “diversity” for Israel. Fat chance. No, they want to destroy us and they have just the people in mind to help. And, if you call them on it, you’re an antisemite.

      Not only do they shine and demand, they laugh at us for being so gullible. So there are them (.4% worldwide), and all their cohorts. These fall into different classes. Some are simply bribed. Others blackmailed. Some get both. Some are such total scumbags that they sell their own culture out for promised goodies when they come to power.

      Sweden is such an extreme example. They are literally committing cultural suicide to please the Jews. In your video she simple states that this must happen. Why? Because nothing else is “acceptable” to them. She freely admits that she is part of Jewish facilitation of this debacle.

      People are no longer safe there because of this. The politicians and the cops don’t want to discuss it. It looks like they plan to simply let them do it.

      I have to wonder. At a certain point, and they are past it, most men would simply quit worrying about the consequences and go roust them out of office. It’s pretty obvious that they get their asses handed to them in Muslim “no-go” neighborhoods already. What good are they?

      Liked by 1 person

  14. Kevin J Lankford

    So,..They prefer quantity over quality.

    Liked by 2 people

  15. Michael J. Garrison

    Revelation Chapter 9. The Locust Army. In the original manuscripts, it’s clearer….the word “locust” is “arraba” and it is the same as Arabia. In later verses read about “crowns of gold.”. “Crowns” is a word that describes a “turban.” “Gold” is a word that means “to supply what is needed.” So, who supplies “what is needed” besides America, Russia, Great Britain, etc?? Funny, these are all Christian Nations, almost as if the world’s leaders are trying to kill the sheep in a final world war…….just like Albert Pike predicted!!!
    Saudi Arabia owns America’s largest refinery. And you’ll be seeing some real high gas prices soon, as Saudi begins to gain investors in the oil reserves of Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Syria, and Iran (very soon). Saudi wants the investors when gas is at 100 bucks-a-barrel (or more, prefereably) because it drives up what the investors invest (they get less for more money, which favors Arraba.)
    Folks, major false flags against refineries may be in the works (or, it may NOT be in the works. Hell, war drives it up just as quickly)
    Just the same, something major this way comes!!!

    Like

  16. How wicked this really is.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Those running things have been chastising the Western world for having more than 2 children per family for the last 5 decades now, in the name of saving the planet. So now the UN is trying to convince us that migrants are good for us because our populations are declining? Double speak then; double speak now…..

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Europe and Europeans deserve this. Why? I will tell you why…because you are cowards. FIRST you turned away from God..1st mistake. There is no courage without faith and belief in supernatural.
    2nd which is a side effect of the 1st you stop procreating. Where did you think that would lead? 3rd the white woman became a race traitor to her own race by blending out the white race and mixing with black men. 4th the white male became i hater of his own race by giving to the demands of political correctness.
    5th white European men became such sissies to sit and watch your women be raped and your country be burned and do nothing! 6th European cowards sit and let your governments betray you and you dont rise up in revolts! Everyone in your countries government halls need to hanging in the streets…but you do nothing. COWARDS! You deserve what is coming to you. FIGHT! OR STFU! You copy that!?

    Liked by 1 person

  19. The only reason the population has been declining in these places is because 40 years ago they started telling everyone in the predominantly white Christian nations such as the United States that they were over populated and were running out of resources. So believing the propaganda the citizens quit having children. Little did they know that the plan was to flood the country with those from third world countries that didn’t value our freedoms and constitution, respect our laws or share our religion, culture , language or values and would not to assimilate. But who could have imagined back then that there was a plan to destroy this great nation and that both parties were willing participants. The globalist agenda continues, unfortunately most are still blind unable to see what’s truly going on.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. We all know plenty of “younger” Americans who procreate at replacement (or less) levels……. Certainly NOT the Baby boom. White Europe has been in a negative growth rate for a few decades now. It is all about having enough people to pay taxes to pay for the socialist agenda. If you run out of young working aged people then you are fooked. I guess that the assumption is that the third world invaders will (after a generation or two) eventually assimilate and become responsible, tax paying citizens. Truth be told, there will not be any more white people running about soon. I have four siblings and I have five children, but even three of my siblings had only one or two. I pray for my Children and Grandchildren and encourage them to procreate.
    “Speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act.” Geo. Orwell

    Liked by 1 person

  21. First, they tell us we have too many people and just when it’s about ready to naturally get down to where it should be, they infuse us with people that won’t assimilate and really don’t have to. Now we will have to deal with them when we are older and vulnerable. I’m sure they will take care of the aging population by death.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. well if they would not have done the over population propaganda in the 60s and 70s ,, this might not have been such a big problem ,, when we had no access to REAL INFO ,,,,,,,THEY DID THIS TO US

    Liked by 1 person

  23. Pingback: News You May Not Have Heard About — 04/22/2018 — Early Edition – News You May Not Have Heard About

  24. What’s fascinating is that for DECADES the UN and other leftist groups urged people, primarily people of the West, to have smaller families and reduce population. We had many books like “The Population Bomb” by the Ehrlichs, to convince us to have smaller families or the planet would die from over-population. The Left has also promoted abortion and birth control in the West for decades. THEY are responsible for our de-population! So this has not been a program about addressing planetary concerns for over-population – it has been a program of DELIBERATE GENOCIDE for the West and especially White & European populations. We have to STOP listening to these destructive people, their social planning never benefits anyone but themselves!

    Liked by 2 people

  25. The UN needs to back off and let said countries make their own decisions. They have once again proven the point we need to withdraw and kick them out of our county. We give them billions and they have never worked for us. They are one of the largest purveyors of sex traffic and abuse.
    Personally I think we need to find a way to secretly sterilize all those wanting to bring harm.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Cynthia J Abernethy

    Yea, it’s a real crock of corrupt doo doo. In most of Europe, 85% of the muslim invaders are still on Welfare which defeats “their” reasons to replace declining populations.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. Well, someone where they once lived convinced them that they were bound for the land of milk and honey where they could rape all the women they liked and get tons of free stuff.

    When they arrive they immediately start complaining and set about making their new digs as much like home as possible. Of course the white people are supposed to feel guilty (for some undefined reason) and simply give them anything their hearts desire.

    If I proposed something like this as a plan for the future would anybody buy into it? Just asking.

    By the way, here are the Antifa reserves:

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s