Known by the company you keep: Demorat Keith Ellison dined with Louis Farrakhan, Iranian president

ellison obama and farrakhan

From Fox News: Democratic National Committee Deputy Chair Keith Ellison attended a private dinner hosted by Iranian President Hassan Rouhani in 2013, along with the head of the black nationalist group Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan.

First reported by The Wall Street Journal, Ellison, the Democratic congressman from Minnesota, also visited with Farrakhan in 2015.

Ellison attended the 2013 dinner with two other members of the Congressional Black Caucus—Reps. Andre Carson, D-Ind., and Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y. Rouhani invited Muslim leaders from around the U.S. to dinner after addressing the United Nations General Assembly.

The Nation of Islam website confirmed the attendance of “the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan” to the dinner on Sept. 23, 2013 across the street from the U.N. headquarters in New York City. FinalCall.com, the Nation of Islam’s publication, confirmed Ellison’s attendance with an article, and photos of Ellison and Farrakhan at the tables.

“After the guests were hosted at a dinner, the Iranian president entered and engaged in warm discussion with guests, including Democratic congressmen Greg Meeks of New York, Keith Ellison of Minnesota, who is a Muslim,” Final Call wrote on Oct. 2, 2013.

Iran has been listed by the U.S. government as a “state sponsor of terrorism” since 1984.

But the dinner was not the first time Ellison was associated with Farrakhan. Ellison attended Farrakhan’s Million Man March in 1995, and even publicly defended Farrakhan – who has repeatedly made anti-semitic remarks, and has called Jews “satanic” – according to a report by the Daily Caller.

Ellison has attempted to distance himself from Farrakhan, especially during his run for DNC chair in 2016, writing an op-ed for The Washington Post, painting his relationship with Farrakhan as limited to the 1995 march.

But Farrakhan slammed Ellison, posting a video to Facebook saying that Ellison and Carson visited him in 2015.

Neither the DNC nor Ellison’s office responded to Fox News’ request for comment.

Former White House press secretary, now Fox News contributor Ari Fleischer slammed the media for not covering the latest Ellison-Farrakhan development. “Once again, no feeding frenzy by the media. Don’t let anyone tell you the press is neutral. They’re not. Their silence is deafening. Ellison Attended Private Dinner With Iranian President and Louis Farrakhan in 2013 via @freebeacon,” Fleischer tweeted Monday.

The Congressional Black Caucus also has been tied to Farrakhan in recent months – especially with the surfacing of a photo taken in 2005, with then-Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. smiling alongside him. A Final Call photographer, according to the Daily Caller, said he kept the photo hidden for 13 years at the request of the CBC in order to protect Obama’s political career.

Just last week, Democratic Rep. Danny Davis of Illinois defended Farrakhan as an “outstanding human being.”

Farrakhan’s past extreme comments include praise for Adolf Hitler as a “very great man,” blaming Jews for the 9/11 attacks, and saying white people “deserve to die.”

“I don’t regard Louis Farrakhan as an aberration or anything, I regard him as an outstanding human being who commands a following of individuals who are learned and articulate and he plays a big role in the lives of thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of people,” Davis told the Daily Caller last week, and noted that “it wouldn’t be anything out of the ordinary” for him to meet with Farrakhan.

DCG

48 responses to “Known by the company you keep: Demorat Keith Ellison dined with Louis Farrakhan, Iranian president

  1. This guy is a subversive. No question about it. His constituents are either braindead or suicidal. He is a symtom. Voters ate the cause.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. Democrat Party logo:

    Liked by 6 people

  3. Reblogged this on On the Patio and commented:

    Despite the MSM not covering this connection between Iran, Farrakhan and Ellison the common people know or at least suspect. I find the simple name of the Congressional Black Caucus to be racist in and of itself. English 101. And these are Congressman! So much for being for the people. Black people apparently. Anyone associated with that name is suspect and obviously definitely have a hidden agenda. And if you don’t feel it is racist recite the name three times and make your own conclusion!

    Liked by 2 people

  4. As I said yesterday, the enemy all of us have is from within undermining us with their “guests” that want our NATION destroyed. Farrakhan, sitting on the devil’s throne with his followers Obama, Ellison and the rest setting the welcome mat to the intruders.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. I love it when someone denies knowing someone and the preponderance of evidence is overwhelming.
    Looks like a very racist dinner to me.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Why has the Jewish press been defending this man, who in his college days was attacked by his Jewish classmates for his anti-Jewish rhetoric? Jews, so I’ve read, own the Democratic Party as well as the Progressive (=communist) Caucus in Congress, which happens to be numerically the largest caucus in Congress. So, what is the significance of having a race-baiting and poverty pimping Cloward-Piven Muslim operative as their ally, as figurehead leader at DNC, and as co-chair of the communist caucus in Congress?

    Ellison’s father was a psychiatrist and ironically his son Keith is a real psychopath who showed his bullying tendencies way back in law school by joining the black law-students group, whose only purpose was threatening professors who’d dare challenge black racist gibberish being passed off as knowledge.

    Liked by 3 people

      • I like to put it this way, they don’t have “friends”. One is either “useful” to them or not. They frequently sacrifice their own to achieve particular ends. They have no problem inviting Muslims or Christians to “befriend” them (at least superficially). It is not forbidden (religiously) for them to do that. Besides, most are not “religious” at all.

        The Moors used them to run the cities they captured in Spain and Portugal. After 800 years of looting and usury there was INDEED a fair amount of hatred built up. I would call that understandable.

        In Europe their leaders demanded ghettoes. That is how they controlled them and kept them from intermingling with the Goy. Today they paint that as something the Gentiles did to them.

        When discussing this subject one should always be aware that virtually all of it is a lie. They placed THEMSELVES outside their immediate environment, not the other way round. There is only one reconciliation and that is real conversion. It happens, but not often.

        Liked by 1 person

    • it seems to me that the attack is two pronged. Black Christians and White Christians can and do get along. But combine the two..Black and Muslim and you have the perfect hate machine ready and motivated to be tools do the Jews bidding. Jews have their goals and they don’t get their feelings hurt when it comes to getting their agenda through. It was communist Jews like Joe Slovo who tore South Africa up and have put incompetent and hate filled Blacks at the helm while they continue to pull the strings from behind the scenes. For a model on what they have planned for the rest for the White countries look at South Africa. It’s open season on Whites there.Torture, rape, murder of Whites all condoned by the Blacks and their commie Jew overlords. I guess it can be referred to as strange bedfellows.

      “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.” Israel Cohen

      Liked by 3 people

      • “The Jew … Judaizes … he provokes religious indifference, but he also imposes on those whose faith he destroys, his own concept of the world, of morality, and of human life. The Jews detests the spirit of the nation in the midst of which they live.” ~ Bernard Lazare

        None of this is new, none of it. For the young it is easy to simply leave this part of their education unfulfilled. For the older, it is necessary to keep them distracted and introduce what appear to be “new” concepts to cloud their thinking. All of it is underhanded.

        We talk a lot about “Communism”, but that’s just another manifestation of the perpetual Jewish attack on humanity. “Zionism” is the same. The Talmud is full of this. The Moors used the Jews (as willing accomplices) to raid Europe. In Spain they stole everything left in their charge.

        The constant whining of “you hate us for our religion” is utter nonsense. Nobody cares about what passes for their “religion”. They care about their behavior. In a real sense, this is the personification of the perpetual war between good and evil.

        Remember my stats: 3% (tops) in the US, .4% (four-tenths of one percent) worldwide. The next time you’re accused of something or you start to feel “outnumbered”, remember this. They must relay on the Goy as a multiplier. They rely on the Goy being indebted to them. The Goy needs to get off their knees.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Revelation 2:9: “I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”

          Liked by 3 people

        • Yes you are right that none of this is new and yet it bears repeating…repeating every chance one has available to them because there are so many who do not know. I was one such until only ten years ago, maybe less, as I stumbled upon the JQ going further down the rabbit hole. For any of us born after WWII, we never heard from our parents to “beware of the Jews” as generations of native Europeans had from their parents who tried to apprise their children of the dangers of Judaising, or getting too close to a Jew and winding up sold to a Muslim to become a eunuch or a sex slave.
          As for Jews and thei evil they do being older than the hills, I have become aware that it appears ito goes back not centuries, but aeons. Tony Mclaughin has done amazing work on what he calls the Saturn Death Cult. When and how Jews became the inheritors of this cult I do not know, but I suspect it was their captivity in Babylon, not as some assert, with Jacob Frank and his merry band of Satanists only two hundred years ago. If you look at the symbols in Judaism, whether those black cubes they put on their foreheads, or the hexagram, these are Saturn. Think that big ugly black cube in Mecca may well be the same. No wonder Jesus chose to incarnate in the ME. It seems it is in the belly of the beast.
          https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/the-crimes-of-the-saturn-death-cult
          https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/the-saturn-death-cult-the-polar-configuration

          Liked by 2 people

          • Good point about the Mecca black cube and the Tefillin — the black cube (supposedly containing parchment inscribed with verses from the Torah) that rabbis wear on their foreheads.

            Liked by 3 people

            • Yes, that’s it. And no matter what it contains, the black cube is a pure Saturn symbol. Think control, structure, power, Chronos devouring his own children – that’s Saturn. Think too about “the sabbath”. That is Saturday, Saturns day. Judaism – Saturn worship.
              Yes the highest levels of Islam are of the same….they have put up the illuminati pyramid in Iran. Birds of a feather.

              Liked by 3 people

              • I have heard of a very similar mythology revolving around Venus. Indeed, the person and concept of “Lucifer” derives from that. The Middle East was really the “cradle of civilization” and the birthplace of the Mystery Religions.

                None of the religions we’re familiar with developed totally on their own. They borrowed from concepts they were familiar with. One could trace this concept through the Egyptians and probably before.

                In early Christianity many of these themes were not considered “good” or “evil”. The Platonic Dualism comes from Greece. This is when we start associating values to some of the earlier concepts.

                When we read the Synoptic Gospels we see essentially Semitic thought patterns. When we read John, we see Greek concepts, especially as it relates to time. In John we see how God sees time. This relates to another discussion we recently had on Free Will.

                The Greeks viewed time in two planes. They had absolutely no problem with this. We today have problems with it because we live our lives in “chronos” or sequential time. Much of Greek life and history was lived in Kairos (the eternal now).

                The best modern example of this is The Mass. The Mass is not a “reenactment of the Last Supper”, it IS the Last Supper. This is truly Kairos. So when God sees something He sees it as it was, is now and evermore will be.

                So, from listening to the Saturn theory I couldn’t help but relate it to something I’m familiar with. The concept sounds very familiar with a few differences.

                Liked by 2 people

                • “The best modern example of this is The Mass. The Mass is not a “reenactment of the Last Supper”, it IS the Last Supper. This is truly Kairos. So when God sees something He sees it as it was, is now and evermore will be”
                  That’s a beautiful explanation.

                  Liked by 2 people

          • “We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General (Eisenhower)…The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result remembering it.” ~ General Patton in Germany, diary entry Sept 17, 1945

            A little something to mull over. My father used to talk to me about this too.

            Like

            • lophatt . . . . Thank you for the walk down memory lane. When I worked at Swan Island Dairy, we had to purchase a “Kosher seal,” every six months; this included having a Rabbi come and walk through the plant to make sure that we were not storing things next to each other that were forbidden. I was always extremely cordial to “Our Rabbi,” but the thing that made the greatest impression on me was . . . . .the Rabbi came in clothing that had not perhaps been recently laundered, his hair was greasy from having not been washed in quite some time, and I remember that frankly, he was unwashed–in other words, he really needed to take a bath, and put on fresh underclothing, as well as outer clothing. I must confess this came as a shock to me. I naturally thought of “religious leaders” including Rabbis, as individuals who bathed regularly, and wore clean clothing while out on their appointed religious rounds . . . but that is not so, when it comes to Rabbis. Never the less, I always treated him in a respectful manner, although he really did not smell very good, and it wasn’t much of a pleasure to be in his company. That experience really kind of put me off of Jewish men.

              Liked by 3 people

              • Just what you expect from a “food inspector”. I had to work with this lawyer for a couple of years who was like that. Everything had to be kosher for him to eat it. You could tell because it was always all over the front of his suit.

                Liked by 1 person

      • In discussing this we should remember that there are reasons and there are methods. When attempting to set limits on methods we are wise to remember that they will use ANYTHING to achieve an end.

        We have seen rebellions, wars, the breakup of the Christian Church, further splintering into ever more bizarre factions, Darwinism, social engineering. What is the common denominator? Jews.

        By acting as a whole (even though its a small one) and manipulating others to assist, they can do much damage. Usually, when a group does damage, it isn’t intentional. In this case it is.

        So using race, pitting one group against another, attacking core beliefs that Make us strong and united as a culture are all weapons for their use.

        Like

        • “Historically, Jews had always thrived in nations and empires with multicultural, pluralistic and tolerant environments, while they fared badly in strong ethnic or nationalistic societies. European Jews have always been the emblematic stranger or ‘other’. Therefore, by definition, a society where the stranger is welcome is good for the Jews, although they have not always appreciated this link. The future of European Jewry is dependent on our ability to shape a multicultural, pluralistic and diverse society.” ~ Göran Rosenberg, Jewish author and journalist

          Does this sound familiar given what we know about Europe and the United States today?

          Liked by 1 person

  7. Mohammed Ali was a member of the Nation Of Islam and possibly left so as not to damage his image ………. just sayin’.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Unmistakable evidence.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. What does it matter that he had dinner with Louis Farrakhan; white politicians have dinner and play golf with known racists and members of the KKK all the time. People should stop casting stones…..

    Liked by 1 person

    • White politicians are racists. You could have stopped there since that is the mantra of the left today.

      Republicans golf with members of the KKK? Whatever…show me a photo where they are kissing up to their KKK buddies, like this:

      Liked by 1 person

      • They definitely kiss Israel’s arse like that though.

        And just an FYI, there was an article of a recent visit by Barry O to some Israeli (maybe aipac) NYC event, where he is quoted as saying something to the effect of, “he’s more Jewish, than anything else.”

        Liked by 1 person

      • Why do you think I’m talking about Republicans? Democrats and others hang out with racist and KKK members also…

        Liked by 1 person

        • My first sentence said “white politicians.”

          In my second sentence, I asked which republicans golf with KKK members. I then provided an example of a white demorat politician who hung with a KKK member, providing visual evidence for your last statement.

          Liked by 1 person

    • What are you talking about? When was the last time you heard even a racist White declaring that blacks should be killled, that they deserve to die and on and on? Please check out Farakhans quotes. he doesn’t just criticize Whites which he is welcome to do in a free country, but is hate filled and vitriolic. A person like David Duke who left the klan years ago has stated over and over that he just does not want to be forced to fraternize with Blacks etc. He is a racial separatist, but that is a long way from advocating death, violence or harm. The Nation of Islam is so hate filled they cannot see straight. I have heard Farrakhan is a black Freemason…wouldn’t surprise me.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Oh Please the Indians used to say the “White man talk with fork tongue” and the gov’t had a policy of genocide towards them.
        So the Police and courts who are heavy handed approach to blacks don’t need to say anything their actions speak for themselves. Racist politicians don’t need to go on a platform and say extreme things their actions or in action towards another group speaks. So meeting with racists who doesn’t say extreme things in public means nothing. As if Duke suddenly stop feeling the way he felt while he was in the klan……Duke may be a Mason also

        Like

        • There is no disputing what was done to Indians both here and in Canada — it made me sick as a child, and it still sickens me. But how long would you like to bludgeon everyone for things of the past?
          Saying Whites speak with forked tongue is equivalent to LF calling Whites devils- yes big deal, but he has said far worse. What it comes down to in my mind is this: supposedly we are trying to move beyond race as a society, which means that we should have a collective standard of what is tolerated as far as incendiary rhetoric. No one can legislate or control the thoughts or sentiments in another’s mind and heart, nor would we want to ( unless you’re a liberal), but there is a glaring double standard by the very power structure you criticize that allows people of color to say every violent and viscious thing without censorship- on twitter, or wherever, and yet a White doesn’t have to say squat – he’s labeled hateful, supremacist or whatever merely for his skin color. It will never lead to anything good for society as a whole, or for those of any color who love peace.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Yes, exactly. Why would anybody be discussing race anyway? The whole idea in society is that everyone gets treated equally, not specially. The society provides the “opportunity”, they don’t give you the product.

            We’ve already talked to death the Communist ploy of divide and conquer. If all of these “races” believe themselves to be “special” and demand that they’re catered to, we are going to have to divide the country.

            It should be obvious that the goal is to make as many divisions as possible (think “diversity”) then demand special treatment for each until the country can no longer function as a country.

            This is a clear and obvious manipulation.

            Liked by 1 person

          • Saying things and doing things is not the same. Farrakhan has never sent his people to go beat up or kill any whites or Jews. Yet there are many examples of whites collectively destroy communities of people of color then when people of color say things that are considered threats they are told to move past it; they are told not to dwell on the past. Sounds hypocritical…..
            You’re right no one can legislate sentiments and thoughts, but as far as using influences to control thoughts and sentiments it is done all the time. Programs of propaganda and indoctrination, mind control techniques are doing a good job of putting thoughts and ideas into the heads of many people. Whites are violent people by nature look at what they have done the world over; there is a double standard people of color can say what they want but whites can kill people of color without warning and given the benefit of the doubt….. so what is your point? remember a dogs bark is worse then his bite

            Like

            • I can see this discussion is not going to progress much. You have your point of view which is not going to change because it appears to be based mostly on past grievences. Blacks are given all sorts of help and advantages in scholarships, affirmative action and on an on. They are now lawyers, teachers, mayors, policeman, presidents, attorneys general postal workers..blah, blah, blah, but it is all about the past. You really have not done you homework at all. The only difference between Whites and others is that Whites have excelled in every manner of invention and exploration- in other words they had the power to dominate. To think that any other race would not have acted similarly if they had had the might and power is simply delusional, dishonest or both. This world is populated with warring peoples, conquering and invading, stealing and enslaving. Chaka Zulu was not native to South Africa. He and his tribesman came from the north killing and absorbing all other tribes in their wake until they met up with the Boers. Blacks are killing and enslaving other Blacks now in Africa. Blacks caught and sold their brethren to the Jewish slave traders. The Lakota Indians warred with Crow and Pawnee and took their women and children as slaves. The Mohawk annihilated the Huron Indians into extinction. The North African Muslims invaded port cities all over Europe for hundreds of years and took Whites slaves- that’s where the word slave came from; from all the Slavic peoples who were taken into slavery. Poor Whites were kidnpped off the streets of London and forced to work on British naval ships. Irishmen were shipped to the Americas to work as slaves too, only it didn’t matter if they were worked to death because they hadn’t been purchased like the Black slaves. They had no monetary value. I could go on. So get off the Whites are more violent. The question seems to be at this point, can we live together, do you want to live together in peace ?

              Liked by 3 people

              • The question seems to be at this point, can we live together, do you want to live together in peace ? …..If you do then condoning the type of speech coming out of Farrakhan’s mouth is incompatible with that goal.

                Liked by 2 people

              • The discussion won’t progress because you fail to recognize that black people did not progress because whites destroyed the communities whenever gains were made. The Politicians made laws that took away inheritance rights and stole property. One of the worst destruction occurred in Tulsa, OK after the death and destruction of the community laws established made it impossible for them to rebuild their houses on their own plot of land then it was stolen from them. I can cite another well known practice where the KKK run people off their land. There was a case in SC where one farmer refused to leave; him and all his family were murdered and the land was absorbed by the neighbor but to the neighbor’s credit they left that portion of the land undeveloped for until this day cause they know that it was paid for in blood and the blood did not belong to them nigher does the land. Many other examples exist. You say that these and other unjust oppression actions are past grievances to get over it even though the oppressive actions arrested the development of an entire community. Are you going to tell the Jews that their Holocaust in Germany are past grievances; are you going to tell the Armenians that the mass murders by the Ottoman Turks are past grievances. Tell them to get over it?
                As far as blacks being Teachers, Doctors, Lawyers, Police etc that was not a result of Affirmative Action blacks many blacks were in professional titles way before Affirmative Action was even thought of; despite the oppression and closed doors. Affirmative Action was a recent measure that put blacks in areas where the good old boys kept the door closed. Yeah, old laws and attitudes were in place so affirmative action made a hole so that qualified can get equal consideration. But many people have a problem with that. Still law suits had to be done to open the doors of opportunity. Did you hear how blacks were able to become airline pilots check it out see how an Air Force pilot who had more then average credentials was turned down by every commercial because he was black; the courts had to step in to stop the foolishness. Don King said that blacks can be the top person in their field of profession, they could be one of the richest people around but in America they will always be considered just another ni**er. Every right that blacks have was not given to them it was fought for and paid in blood.
                White on white oppression is another subject all together. I would say the Irish got a raw deal and they know what it is like to be under oppression.
                Let’s face it after the generation of Irish immigrants passed on their descendants skin color gave them an advantage. Whites are violent no other ethnic group cause the mayhem on Earth.
                Sure we can live in peace but the profiling, Police brutality racist actions will have to stop before we can truly live in peace….

                Like

            • ” Saying things and doing things is not the same.”

              Semantics. And words/rhetoric matter:

              ““If the federal government will not intercede in our affairs, then we must rise up and kill those who kill us. Stalk them and kill them. Let them feel the pain of death that we are feeling.” — Louis Farrakhan speech at Mt. Zion Baptist Church in Miami on July 30, 2015.

              Liked by 1 person

            • “Farrakhan has never sent his people to go beat up or kill any whites or Jews.”

              Yet who proclaimed that the death of Malcolm X, in the name of Elijah Muhammad would be worthy?

              Words matter.

              Liked by 1 person

  10. Well, he wasn’t wrong about 9/11.

    Like

  11. Kooks of a feather.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Komrade mullah Keithie is a mooooooooooooooooslim communist.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s