CUNY professor says having “white nuclear family” promotes white supremacy

jessie daniels tweets

From Fox News: City University of New York sociology professor reportedly said in a tweetstorm last week that “the white-nuclear family” promotes racism, prompting a backlash on social media.

Jessie Daniels, described as an expert on “the Internet manifestations of racism” on her CUNY page, infuriated social media users after reportedly saying that white families promote racism by default.

The professor began her argument saying she learned that “the white-nuclear family is one of the most powerful forces supporting white supremacy,” adding that that families “reproducing white children” are “part of the problem” as they facilitate white supremacy in the country, Campus Reform reported.

She reportedly tweeted: “I mean, if you’re a white person who says they’re engaged in dismantling white supremacy but … you’re forming a white family (and) reproducing white children that ‘you want the best for’ – how is that helping [and] not part of the problem?”

She reportedly ended her argument suggesting that “white people” should confront their racism and stop perpetuating inequality by leaving their homes for their children.

“Until white people are ready to confront their own family’s racism (and) participation in systemic white supremacy, it’s not getting dismantled,” she wrote. “Beyond just calling out interpersonal racism, white people who want to be engaged in the work need to ask themselves about housing wealth.”

She added: “White people: do you own your home? When you die, where’s wealth in that house going? If it’s to your children, you’re reproducing (inequality).

The professor locked her account in response to the criticism. Fox News reached out to the professor and the university early Tuesday and did not receive an immediate response.

DCG

Advertisements

34 responses to “CUNY professor says having “white nuclear family” promotes white supremacy

  1. This is one crazy delusional nut-job, who can kiss my grits. I seriously think people like her have been subjected to some kind of nefarious subliminal processing.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Too much Bill Ayers telling them this was bad and should be eliminated:

      Liked by 4 people

    • filia.aurea . . . . . Amen to that. She needs to go back to having her head buried in the sand, or up her . . . . . . . .

      Liked by 1 person

    • WHITE SUPREMACY?

      SLAVE MASTERS BRED THOUSANDS OF MULATTO BLACKS
      Louis Epstein, author of Sex Laws and Customs in Judaism:

      “The female slave was a sex tool beneath the level of moral considerations. She was an economic good, useful, in addition to her menial labor, for breeding more slaves. To attain that purpose, the master mated her promiscuously according to his breeding plans. The master himself and his sons and other members of his household took turns with her for the increase of the family wealth, as well as for satisfaction of their extra-marital sex desires. Guests and neighbors too were invited to that luxury.”

      SEYMOUR B. LIEBMAN
      “They came with ships carrying AFRICAN BLACKS TO BE SOLD AS SLAVES. The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the JEWS were often appointed as AGENTS OF THE CROWN in their sale….[They] were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping business WAS MAINLY A JEWISH ENTERPRISE….

      “THE SHIPS WERE NOT ONLY OWNED BY JEWS, BUT WERE MANNED BY JEWISH CREWS AND SAILED UNDER THE COMMAND OF JEWISH CAPTAINS.”

      New World Jewry 1493-1825: Requiem for the Forgotten (KTAV, New York, 1982), pp. 170, 183. [Liebman is an attorney; LL.B., St. Lawrence University, 1929; M.A. (Latin American history), Mexico City College, 1963; Florida chapter American Jewish Historical Society, 1956-58; Friends of Hebrew University, 1958-59; American Historical Society Contributor to scholarly journals on Jewish history.

      RABBI BERTRAM W. KORN
      “It would seem to be realistic to conclude that any Jew who could afford to own slaves and had need for their services would do so….Jews participated in every aspect and process of the exploitation of the defenseless Blacks.”

      “Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865,” in Abraham J. Karp, The Jewish Experience in America: Selected Studies from the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society (Waltham, Massachusetts, 1969), pp. 184, 189. [Dr. Korn is a rabbi, historian; A.B., Cincinnati, 1939; Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Cincinnati, Ordination M.H.L. 1949; Sr. rabbi, Reform Congregation Keneseth Israel, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, 1949-; Chaplain, USNR, 1944-; Visiting professor, American Jewish History, Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, New York, 1962-; Honorary Overseer Gratz College of Pennsylvania; visiting professor, American Jewish History, Dropsie University of Pennsylvania; 1970-; Recipient Merit Award, American Association for State & Local History, 1969.]

      ARNOLD WIZNITZER
      “The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of JEWS The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always JEWS, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300% of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates….If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on Friday, October 21, 1644.”

      Jews in Colonial Brazil (1960), pp. 72-3; [Note: Wiznitzer, Arnold Aharon, educator; Born in Austria, December 20, 1899; Ph.D., University of Vienna, 1920; Doctor of Hebrew Literature, Jewish Theological Seminary of America; Emeritus research professor, University of Judaism, Los Angeles; Contributor to historical journals in the United States and Brazil including the Journal of Jewish Social Studies and the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society. Former president, Brazilian-Jewish Institute of Historical Research.]

      The American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society Report of 1853
      “The Jews of the United States have never taken any steps whatever with regard to the slavery question. As citizens, they deem it their policy to have every one choose whichever side he may deem best to promote his own interests and the welfare of his country. They have no organization of an ecclesiastical body to represent their general views; no General Assembly, or its equivalent. The American Jews have two newspapers, but they do not interfere in any discussion which is not material to their religion. It cannot be said that the Jews have formed any denominational opinion on the subject of American slavery….

      HERBERT I BLOOM
      “The Christian inhabitants [of Brazil] were envious because the JEWS owned some of the best plantations in the river valley of Pernambuco and were among THE LEADING SLAVE-HOLDERS and SLAVE TRADERS in the colony.”1

      “Slave trade [sic] was one of the most important JEWISH activities here [in Surinam] as elsewhere in the colonies.”2

      , “A Study of Brazilian Jewish History 1623-1654, Based Chiefly Upon the Findings of the Late Samuel Oppenheim,” Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, vol. 33 (1934), p. 63.
      The Economic Activities of the Jews of Amsterdam in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Port Washington, New York/London: Kennikat Press, 1937), p. 159.
      [Bloom is a rabbi; B.A., Columbia University, 1923, Ph.D., 1937; M.H.L., Jewish Institute of Religion, 1928, D.D., 1955; rabbi, Temple Albert, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1928-31. President Kingston Ministerial Association, 1945-46, and 1959-60; B’nai B’rith; Zionist Organization of America; vice-president, National Prison Chaplain Board, since 1962; Social Action Committee of Central Conference of American Rabbis, since 1947; Author: The Jews of Dutch Brazil, 1936; The Economic Activities of the Jews of Amsterdam, 1937.]

      RABBI MORRIS RAPHAL
      “[I]t remains a fact which cannot be gainsaid that in his own native home, and generally throughout the world, the unfortunate Negro is indeed the meanest of slaves. Much had been said respecting the inferiority of his intellectual powers, and that no man of his race has ever inscribed his name on the Parthenon of human excellence, either mental or moral.”

      THE DOGMA THAT THE BLACK IS A SLAVE BY NATURE IS RABBINIC IN ORIGIN

      Canaan is identified as a black man and blacks as in inferior people, only in the Gemara, which is to say the latter part of the Talmud, the Midrash and later writings of the rabbis. This invective, this racism, is not anywhere in the bible concerning the black race.

      The rabbinic account of the malediction against Ham stipulates that his son Canaan, and all Canaan’s offspring, are to fated to suffer perpetual slavery and black skin without the chance of their condition being ameliorated. It is this anti-Old Testament, Rabbinic gloss that influenced those fifteenth century Renaissance humanists who had crossed over into the forbidden territory of the Talmud, the Midrash and the Kabbalah as part of a supposedly enlightened act. It is an irony of history that as a result of this supposedly progressive development, the abominable view of blacks as a perpetual race of slaves became entrenched among the western liberal intelligentsia for at least the next three hundred years.

      JEWISH RACISM:

      MOSES MAIMONIDES
      The Encyclopedia of the Jewish Religion refers to Moses Maimonides as “THE SYMBOL OF THE PURE AND ORTHODOX FAITH.”
      The book GUIDE TO THE PERPLEXED is considered the greatest work of Jewish religious philosophy, but his view of BLACKS was pure evil:

      “[T]he Negroes found in the remote South, and those who resemble them from among them that are with us in these climes. The status of those is like that of irrational ANIMALS. To my mind THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RANK OF MEN, but have among the beings a rank lower than the rank of man BUT HIGHER THAN THE RANK OF APES. For they have the external shape and lineaments of a man and a faculty of discernment that IS SUPERIOR TO THAT OF APES.”

      “Those who are incapable of attaining to supreme religious values include the BLACK coloured people and those who resemble them in their climates. Their nature is like the MUTE ANIMALS. Their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey.”

      (Maimonides, Guide To The Perplexed, Translation from the Hebrew Version)

      Like

  2. Daniels — another white-hating Jew?
    Interesting how white-hater Jessie Daniels dyes her hair blindingly blonde.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Thanks for the photo – worth a thousand words.

      Has a male name, Jessie.

      Bleached blonde fake rivaling Milo, lol.

      Dumpy Daniels.

      Probably a dyke so hates families anyway.

      Probably Jewish (as you stated) so hates WHITE families in particular (even though she looks VERY White herself).

      No way her attempt to “guilt trip” us will work on me, no way, no how. Hate yourself, fat lady, if you want!

      The Communist Manifesto includes ridding everyone of private property. I suspect this is their attempt to get people to GIVE IT UP WILLINGLY (as they have done with everything else via pre-mental-programming: give up health to their druggery & vaccines; give up morals to their debauchery; give up heterosex to become homos-pedos; give up Christianity to become atheist; give up free speech to soothe the snowflakes; give up your privacy for “peace & safety”; give up your very life to their euthanasia & wars, etc.) Then someday, for those who have not given it all up willingly & voluntarily, they will come take it by force.

      Like

  3. Do races other than white realize how many of mixed races are famous and wealthy living in the USA? And the blacks say whites are up for extinction? Even back in the eighteenth century. BLM are pure idiot morons.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. So,if muslims or blacks or Mexicans or Jews leave their home to their kids what type of supremacy is that promoting? It has to be something because whites doing it is bad so if others do it it’s good? Which way does it go, nutcase?

    Liked by 4 people

    • Captain Obvious . . . Bravo! That is an astounding thought. I furthermore agree . . . she really is a N-U-T-J-O-B! How very sad that she is teaching any young adults, or teaching . . . Period!

      Liked by 4 people

  5. Pingback: CUNY professor says having “white nuclear family” promotes white supremacy — Fellowship of the Minds – NZ Conservative Coalition

  6. As a white woman who inherited a four-Plex that had been my grandparent’s place, was inherited by their only son, my father, and then came to me upon his death. I view this place, where I happen to now live, and have for 50 years, as a product of the sweat and tears of my grandparents, Otto and Esther Tweed, then the work that my parent’s William and Grace Tweed put into this place; I view myself as put a caretaker of what they amassed. Why would ANY parents work hard and product tangible objects, and then not bless and prosper their own children on their demise. The fact that this dingbat woman thinks that giving the hours of one’s labor to the poor, or people of color will not turn around what is wrong. When individuals are not willing to apply themselves, get an education, teach their children to read, and to prosper themselves . . . they will not have the faintest idea how to manage what they do have. Generations building on what their progenitors have been able to accomplish is certainly a trait that is available to everyone, black, white, yellow, brown! It is not a trait that is exclusive to white people. God Bless all parents who make every attempt to prosper themselves, and teach their children correct principals.

    My father had a saying, that I think is extremely true . . . “Poor people have poor ways!” I think it is true that when parents do not teach correct principals such as education, work ethic, saving, they do a great disservice to their progeny. Often the children are never able to escape the bad habits of the parents.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Very well said Auntie! Only a mentally ill, deranged and educationally ignorant white person would push her idiotic agenda. Actually, we whites world wide are producing less offspring than blacks, Mexicans, and of course, muslims, who breed like rabbits and don’t really care about the well being of their wives and daughters….and probably, most of their sons.

      Go ahead Daniels and promote your own demise, but don’t try to project your lunacy on the rest of us. I hope you don’t have children. I bet your parents and relatives are totally embarrassed over your rants.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Well said Auntie, like you I refuse to give in, bend over or apologize for being white. Like you, I came from a long line of family hard workers. Many of us worked two and three jobs and if this hack thinks she will shame me into thinking otherwise, she is in for a surprise.
      I refuse to be made to feel guilty of my heritiage. You don’t hear white people wanting blacks to change their thinking. My family came here and worked hard and fought for this country.
      And yet this hack alters her appearance to hide who she is.
      Those that insist on repeatedly bring up race, are the racist.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Glenn47 . . . God Bless you for sharing your history. I think it is supremely true that all of us who come thru lineage that can be traced to white immigrants . . . they came here with a fire in their belly’s, with the whit and will to make the most of their blessing to come to the new land. As we look around, we see amongst all of our collective parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, and so on a will to be Americans, to fight for this country if necessary, and to built the best legacy they could for those who follow. I think it would be a horrific shame to turn our backs on those who went before, and throw away their sweat, and tears on the cockamamie ideas of someone as deranged as this woman.

        Liked by 1 person

  7. Jeepers, I guess I’m a white supremacist then. White husband, two white kids, and I’ll be leaving my house to them and their white supremacist spouses and children, if they have any. I do have a blue wiener dog though, in case that counts!

    Where do these people get off thinking it’s any of their flipping business what other people choose to do? Who told them their opinions are superior to everyone else? If she is so concerned about racism, why doesn’t she wear black foundation makeup and a hairstyle that looks black?

    I would rather be a white supremacist than a hypocrite any day of the week.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Maryaha . . . Bravo! With an attitude like that, I rather doubt that we will be seeing your children in the welfare office lines anytime soon.

      I am reminded of a program that was put on by James Manning (hopefully, I have the name correct.) He is a black pastor, and he really tells it like it is. The program I watched was where he was telling his black congregation, in essence to stop feeling that the cradle of their history in Africa was all that great. He went on to mention that ancient ruins can be found in China, in South America, North America (various indigenous Indian tribes) various parts of Europe, Egypt, etc. . . . . . yet, on most the continent of Africa, there are NO CITIES that date back 200-300 years, or farther. This is because the peoples that lived in these various regions of Africa just did not build anything to be inhabited by further generations. I can tell you that it was an extremely sobering idea to even contemplate. No one had ever brought this idea to my mind before, and I guess I was to stupid to think it up on my own, but the moment he brought this idea to the forefront–there was no denying the fact that this was not something that blacks from these areas engaged in. They did not build for permanency, nor did they build that those who came after them would have the blessing of their efforts. I am sue that those in attendance had a pretty heavy load to contemplate when they went home that night. (If you are interested in watching this same video, I believe that you can see it on YouTube. It is certainly well worth viewing, and it gives you a completely different stance on things) Just as in your case, leaving your house to Y-O-U-R children seems to be the most sane, logical, smart thing a loving, concerned parent could ever do.

      I guess I will just go along with my same white supremacy views, as I see that the views of many other’s are rather toxic to their children.

      Liked by 2 people

  8. Ummm,..

    And so, what does the ‘Jewish’ nuclear family promote,.?

    But anyway,.

    .’White Supremacy,..’ is an obvious fact of nature, & we White people should not allow the Jews to make us forget that obvious fact,..

    Liked by 1 person

  9. This strikes me as an attempt to actually promote what it purports to condemn.

    How would any normal person react to attacks comments such as this?

    She has to be trolling or worse.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. alan . . . Well, after seeing what her views entail, I think for many of us white folks . . . it just ingrains the teachings of our parents all the more, because we see that “their ways are the right ways.” Perhaps she is trolling, or she is out of her bloody mind!

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Oh my, so then….the inverse MUST be true, too—the black nuclear family must THEN LOGICALLY promote BLACK SUPREMACY. So—DOWN WITH BOTH THE BLACK AND WHITE NUCLEAR FAMILIES!!!!! In fact NO NUCLEAR FAMILIES ever again!!!! Set up the camps! Start shipping children away from their nuclear families at birth! FINALLY institute the REAL “NANNY STATE” to dispassionately raise children from cradle to age 18……Send parents apart..ship one South and the other North! In fact—maybe even IMPOSE birth “bans.” This woman is bat-shit crazy, AT LEAST. Send her to China. They NEED her as an advisor on how to destroy the nuclear family/set children out to die or to be “taken in” by others…..discourage the actual nuclear family from becoming “normalized” and acceptable….

    Does this woman have a PhD or an EdD or something of the kind? If so then, she should have a passing knowledge of how to state and prove a hypothesis. I want to see her do this with her “white families = white supremacy” hypothesis. NOT GONNA HAPPEN. EVER. She can be “taken down” in one “swoop” of historical records on Quaker abolitionists or other like-minded WHITE families throughout our history. She can be disposed of handily by an overwhelming historic army of Northern volunteers who where WHITE, esp at the outset, who offered up their lives to keep this nation as ONE…and to banish the practice of slavery from it’s boundaries…AND THEN wrote it into its governing documents through a complicated ammendment system…. This woman needs to have her earned “degrees” revoked. If only! MALPRACTICE!!!!! How come we can sue doctors but not acameditions like her? Well….I know deep down the answer….but still…..she’s a disgusting example of academia…yet AGAIN.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Reblogged this on kommonsentsjane and commented:

    Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.

    What is going on in the liberal muslim/socialist colleges. Where are these professors coming from? It looks like they are sniffing too many drugs or they have some rusty, loose screws and are turning “mental” on us.

    Maybe one of the other loopy professors is putting something in the water which makes these people crazy?

    The big thing that you would think that this professor who is making this noise about “white supremacy” doesn’t have enough sense to realize that none of us have anything to do with what color we are when we are born. Sister, we just have to go with the flow and do the best we can. So don’t be jivin’ with us.

    Just do the job you were hired to do is to teach – which is something you aren’t doing in a positive manner.

    My recommendation – just go take a long walk off a short pier and we will be all be better off because you are what we call “loopy.”

    Sure am glad you aren’t teaching my kinfolks and feel sorry for the students that have to endure your loopy-ness. The nutty professor.

    kommonsentsjane

    Liked by 1 person

  13. I invite everyone to read, are white men God’s, by Fred Reed.

    Like

  14. Dingbat Professor Claims Families are Incubators for White Supremacy…

    https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/feminist-family-white-supremacy/

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Kevin J Lankford

    I am out raged!…..Nothing worse than being a victim of ‘racial profiling’.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Despicable woman.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. WHITE SUPREMACY?

    SLAVE MASTERS BRED THOUSANDS OF MULATTO BLACKS
    Louis Epstein, author of Sex Laws and Customs in Judaism:

    “The female slave was a sex tool beneath the level of moral considerations. She was an economic good, useful, in addition to her menial labor, for breeding more slaves. To attain that purpose, the master mated her promiscuously according to his breeding plans. The master himself and his sons and other members of his household took turns with her for the increase of the family wealth, as well as for satisfaction of their extra-marital sex desires. Guests and neighbors too were invited to that luxury.”

    SEYMOUR B. LIEBMAN
    “They came with ships carrying AFRICAN BLACKS TO BE SOLD AS SLAVES. The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the JEWS were often appointed as AGENTS OF THE CROWN in their sale….[They] were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping business WAS MAINLY A JEWISH ENTERPRISE….

    “THE SHIPS WERE NOT ONLY OWNED BY JEWS, BUT WERE MANNED BY JEWISH CREWS AND SAILED UNDER THE COMMAND OF JEWISH CAPTAINS.”

    New World Jewry 1493-1825: Requiem for the Forgotten (KTAV, New York, 1982), pp. 170, 183. [Liebman is an attorney; LL.B., St. Lawrence University, 1929; M.A. (Latin American history), Mexico City College, 1963; Florida chapter American Jewish Historical Society, 1956-58; Friends of Hebrew University, 1958-59; American Historical Society Contributor to scholarly journals on Jewish history.

    RABBI BERTRAM W. KORN
    “It would seem to be realistic to conclude that any Jew who could afford to own slaves and had need for their services would do so….Jews participated in every aspect and process of the exploitation of the defenseless Blacks.”

    “Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865,” in Abraham J. Karp, The Jewish Experience in America: Selected Studies from the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society (Waltham, Massachusetts, 1969), pp. 184, 189. [Dr. Korn is a rabbi, historian; A.B., Cincinnati, 1939; Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Cincinnati, Ordination M.H.L. 1949; Sr. rabbi, Reform Congregation Keneseth Israel, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, 1949-; Chaplain, USNR, 1944-; Visiting professor, American Jewish History, Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, New York, 1962-; Honorary Overseer Gratz College of Pennsylvania; visiting professor, American Jewish History, Dropsie University of Pennsylvania; 1970-; Recipient Merit Award, American Association for State & Local History, 1969.]

    ARNOLD WIZNITZER
    “The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of JEWS The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always JEWS, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300% of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates….If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on Friday, October 21, 1644.”

    Jews in Colonial Brazil (1960), pp. 72-3; [Note: Wiznitzer, Arnold Aharon, educator; Born in Austria, December 20, 1899; Ph.D., University of Vienna, 1920; Doctor of Hebrew Literature, Jewish Theological Seminary of America; Emeritus research professor, University of Judaism, Los Angeles; Contributor to historical journals in the United States and Brazil including the Journal of Jewish Social Studies and the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society. Former president, Brazilian-Jewish Institute of Historical Research.]

    The American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society Report of 1853
    “The Jews of the United States have never taken any steps whatever with regard to the slavery question. As citizens, they deem it their policy to have every one choose whichever side he may deem best to promote his own interests and the welfare of his country. They have no organization of an ecclesiastical body to represent their general views; no General Assembly, or its equivalent. The American Jews have two newspapers, but they do not interfere in any discussion which is not material to their religion. It cannot be said that the Jews have formed any denominational opinion on the subject of American slavery….

    HERBERT I BLOOM
    “The Christian inhabitants [of Brazil] were envious because the JEWS owned some of the best plantations in the river valley of Pernambuco and were among THE LEADING SLAVE-HOLDERS and SLAVE TRADERS in the colony.”1

    “Slave trade [sic] was one of the most important JEWISH activities here [in Surinam] as elsewhere in the colonies.”2

    , “A Study of Brazilian Jewish History 1623-1654, Based Chiefly Upon the Findings of the Late Samuel Oppenheim,” Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, vol. 33 (1934), p. 63.
    The Economic Activities of the Jews of Amsterdam in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Port Washington, New York/London: Kennikat Press, 1937), p. 159.
    [Bloom is a rabbi; B.A., Columbia University, 1923, Ph.D., 1937; M.H.L., Jewish Institute of Religion, 1928, D.D., 1955; rabbi, Temple Albert, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1928-31. President Kingston Ministerial Association, 1945-46, and 1959-60; B’nai B’rith; Zionist Organization of America; vice-president, National Prison Chaplain Board, since 1962; Social Action Committee of Central Conference of American Rabbis, since 1947; Author: The Jews of Dutch Brazil, 1936; The Economic Activities of the Jews of Amsterdam, 1937.]

    RABBI MORRIS RAPHAL
    “[I]t remains a fact which cannot be gainsaid that in his own native home, and generally throughout the world, the unfortunate Negro is indeed the meanest of slaves. Much had been said respecting the inferiority of his intellectual powers, and that no man of his race has ever inscribed his name on the Parthenon of human excellence, either mental or moral.”

    THE DOGMA THAT THE BLACK IS A SLAVE BY NATURE IS RABBINIC IN ORIGIN

    Canaan is identified as a black man and blacks as in inferior people, only in the Gemara, which is to say the latter part of the Talmud, the Midrash and later writings of the rabbis. This invective, this racism, is not anywhere in the bible concerning the black race.

    The rabbinic account of the malediction against Ham stipulates that his son Canaan, and all Canaan’s offspring, are to fated to suffer perpetual slavery and black skin without the chance of their condition being ameliorated. It is this anti-Old Testament, Rabbinic gloss that influenced those fifteenth century Renaissance humanists who had crossed over into the forbidden territory of the Talmud, the Midrash and the Kabbalah as part of a supposedly enlightened act. It is an irony of history that as a result of this supposedly progressive development, the abominable view of blacks as a perpetual race of slaves became entrenched among the western liberal intelligentsia for at least the next three hundred years.

    JEWISH RACISM
    MOSES MAIMONIDES
    The Encyclopedia of the Jewish Religion refers to Moses Maimonides as “THE SYMBOL OF THE PURE AND ORTHODOX FAITH.”
    The book GUIDE TO THE PERPLEXED is considered the greatest work of Jewish religious philosophy, but his view of BLACKS was pure evil:

    “[T]he Negroes found in the remote South, and those who resemble them from among them that are with us in these climes. The status of those is like that of irrational ANIMALS. To my mind THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RANK OF MEN, but have among the beings a rank lower than the rank of man BUT HIGHER THAN THE RANK OF APES. For they have the external shape and lineaments of a man and a faculty of discernment that IS SUPERIOR TO THAT OF APES.”

    “Those who are incapable of attaining to supreme religious values include the BLACK coloured people and those who resemble them in their climates. Their nature is like the MUTE ANIMALS. Their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey.”

    (Maimonides, Guide To The Perplexed, Translation from the Hebrew Version)

    Here is what Schorsch writes in his book, JEWS and BLACKS in the EARLY MODERN WORLD:

    “Few Jewish thinkers understood Ham’s curse to initiate his or her progeny’s blackness.”

    That is an out and out prevarication. The classic rabbinic texts hold that the punishment visited upon Ham was the transformation of his son Canaan, and all Canaan’s progeny, into BLACKS.
    Rabbi Hiyya said,

    “Ham and the dog copulated on the ark. Therefore Ham came forth dark skinned.”

    Jonathan Schorsch is Professor at Columbia University and is the author of the book “Jews and Blacks in the Early Modern World.”

    The most notorious anti-black racist in Judaism happens to be Judaism’s most influential and revered sage, Moses Maimonides, who taught in his book “Guide of the Perplexed,” that blacks are subhuman.

    Schorsch has written 546 pages on the relationship of JEWS AND BLACKS. One would think he would be able to explicate Maimonides’ teaching about BLACK PEOPLE at length since it forms the heart of Judaism’s attitude towards Blacks. Since Maimonides is indefensible, Schorsch dares not. Hence, like any propagandist, the Columbia University Professor buries the inconvenient Maimonides in his footnotes where we find the offending statement quoted in small type with no comment or exegesis of any kind — as if it were the doctrine of some long ago forgotten village rabbi instead of the major Halakic authority in Judaism.

    Neither can he bring himself to quote the Talmudic and Midrashic accounts of the CURSE OF HAM which form the canonical Judaic understanding of BLACK PEOPLE. By shying away from a confrontation with these texts, he does little to dispel the critique of Tony Martin and others. Professor Tony Martin quotes these anti-black rabbinic teachings you are about to see. How can Schorsch claim to debunk the Martin’s of the world when he can’t even bring himself to confront the problem’s sacred Judaic texts?

    The Talmud’s creators, first of all, were lawyers. Let’s observe lawyer Schorsch in action. In his book on page 139 he says:

    “Seeing a Jewish curse of Ham behind every English notion of Black accursedness will not do. If one looks carefully, the explicit citation of Jewish authors remains extremely rare in early modern writings. Some of course did indeed cite Jewish authorities. Overall, the curse of Ham seems to comprise a case of intra-Christian discursive influence. The Jewish having the Bible being claimed as a Christian text already long before the mediaeval period, early modern Christian authorities continued to make use of it as a component of the Christian canon.”

    Well, nice try Professor. The fact is the Israelite Bible was misappropriated by the Rabbis, not the Christians. Furthermore, Schorsch misleads readers into thinking that it is the biblical teaching about Blacks that is the pivot of anti-Black racism in the West when he knows very well that the anti-Black rabbinic dogma is diametrically opposed to the Old Testament. Therefore, citing the Old Testament in a racial context as the curse of Ham’s “intra-Christian discursive influence” is nothing more than a lawyer’s trick with a fifty dollar phrase.

    The mendacious chutzpah represented here is truly audacious. Such a gambit can only be sustained before an audience that is almost totally ignorant of the relevant foundational rabbinic texts.

    The curse of Ham, as taught by the Rabbis, is what Avraham Melamed rightly terms, “the locus classicus” of Judaism’s historic antipathy toward Black people and the exegetical source of its racist teaching from the Amorim of Babylonia to Moses Maimonides.

    THE AFRICAN HOLOCAUST

    Jews played a significant role in the African holocaust. Much is recorded in history about the Jewish Holocaust by German Nazis, but very little is said about the major part JEWS played in the African Holocaust.

    The first major role and one of the most significant, was played by Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon, Talmudist, Halachist, physician, philosopher and communal leader, known in the Jewish world by the acronym “Rambam” and to the world at large as “Maimonides,”. He is one of the most important figures in the history of Torah scholarship and has a direct descendant of Moses through his father Maimon, that on his gravestone are inscribed the words, “From Moses to Moses, none arose as Moses.”

    The most notorious anti-Black racist in Judaism happens to be Judaism’s most influential and revered sage, Moses Maimonides, who taught in his book “Guide of the Perplexed,” that BLACKS WERE SUBHUMAN.

    Maimonides, in the twelfth-century, a Rabbi who is considered one of the greatest thinkers in medieval European thought, was one of THE MAIN ARCHITECTS OF RACISM, when through his mythological “curse of Ham” stated that Black people were “biologically inferior” and that Black Africans were “lower than the ranks of man but higher than the ranks of apes.”

    Maimonides’ Jewish tale signalled and marshalled the very beginnings of racism and white supremacy, creating much mischief and causing the shedding of much blood. It is shown to be the root justification of the slave trade and the displacement and murder of the American Indians; used also to attack the Civil Rights Movement, undermining abolitionism, to buttress the pro-slavery Confederacy, and an instrument of Jim Crow control.

    Rabbi Maimonides was considered “the symbol of the pure and orthodox faith,” and his writings are considered “the greatest work of Jewish religious philosophy.” His works later wielded great influence on the scholastic philosophers of the Middle Ages, and was extensively quoted by many of them, notably Albertus Magnus, Thomas Aquinas, Duns Scotus and Roger Bacon.

    Maimonides, who occupied a most prominent place in the annals of general theological philosophy created racism although he is considered a holy man. The Hamitic Myth is derived from the JEWISH Biblical story of Noah, taken alone as presented in Genesis 9:21-27, the characters are without a racial or geographical identity. It is the later interpretation of this race/religion/nation-neutral parable which assigned the curse specifically to the Black race such that by 1460 the institution of slavery would be universally believed to be the lot of the Africans.

    Former Trinidad-born professor of Africana Studies at Wellesley College, USA Dr. Tony Martin highlighted,

    “The curse of Ham, as taught by the Rabbis, is what Avraham Melamed rightly terms, “the locus classicus” of Judaism’s historic antipathy toward black people and the exegetical source of its racist teaching from the Amorism of Babylonia to Moses Maimonides.

    The dogma that the black is a slave by nature is rabbinic in origin. Canaan is identified as a black man and blacks as inferior people, only in the Gemara, which is to say the latter part of the Talmud, the Midrash and later writings of the rabbis. This invective, and racism, is not anywhere in the bible concerning the black race. The rabbinic account of the malediction against Ham stipulates that his son Canaan, and all Canaan’s offspring, are fated to suffer perpetual slavery and black skin without the chance of their condition being ameliorated.

    It is an irony of history that as a result of this supposedly progressive development, the abominable view of blacks as a perpetual race of slaves became entrenched among the western liberal intelligentsia for at least the next three hundred years”.

    Beyond the Orthodox Judiasm of Maimonides there was also the similar racist approach taken by reform Judiasm.
    Reform Judaism was founded in America by Isaac Mayer Wise. Wise was a rabid, recalcitrant, racist rabbi who referred to Jesus as a “near lunatic,” and, like his predecessor Maimonides, considered Black people as subhuman. Rabbi Wise openly boasted that White Jews gave Christians a God and a religion.

    Rabbi Wise’s students were some of the most notable Jewish clerics in American history. Among them were Max Heller, Morris Newfield, Isidore Lewinski, Max Raisin, David Marx and Moses Jacobson, all of whom served in the south.

    KOSHER REBELS

    A troubling alliance developed between racist rabbis and members of the Confederacy. This alliance led to a symbiotic relationship between and among members of the southern slavocracy and the Jewish religious leadership. Rabbi James Gutheim, the New Orleans Rabbi and ideological student of Rabbi Wise, in 1862 encouraged Southern Jews to support the Confederacy, and prayed to God to bless the Confederate slaveholders. When desegregation of the New Orleans school system was proposed, Rabbi Gutheim came up with an alternative: he founded a Hebrew school in protest.
    Among the Jews and southern slave owners, it was an open secret that rabbis owned and rented slaves. Rabbi Morris Raphall of New York, the nation’s highest paid clergyman, defended slavery and like others of his coreligionists claimed that God had sanctioned it.

    Rabbi and historian Dr. Bertram W. Korn, an acknowledged expert on nineteenth-century American Jewry, was not shy in stating that:

    “Jews participated in every aspect and process of the exploitation of the defenseless Blacks.”

    Wise, Maimonides, Raphall and other Jewish rabbis used the Talmud to justify their concept of racial superiority over Black people. In the southern Jewish ethos Blacks were scapegoated and demonized so that Jews could develop without the impediment of racism. The rabbis played a crucial and strategic role of supplying “spiritual air cover” for racist Jewish and Gentile slave owners to justify their dehumanization of Black people in the institution of American slavery.

    History shows that Rabbis have benefited financially from the enormous profits gained from African enslavement. It was the Rabbis who invented the Curse of Ham Myth, which enabled and facilitated the enslavement of the Black man. Therefore, this conspiratorial relationship between the rabbis and their slave-dealing co-religionists benefited the entire Jewish nation in America and throughout the world. A part of this conspiratorial relationship included the deafening silence of those Jews who knew what was happening to the Black man was wrong but remained silent, especially since the question of what accounts for the entire absence of Jews from the abolition movement is yet to be answered.

    They were said to have participated in the Civil Rights Movement whenever their self-interests coincided with Black interests. More important, however, is Jewish control of the Civil Rights Movement through their control of the civil rights organizations.
    Jews used their wealth, power, and influence as board members, board directors and presidents of Black organizations to steer these organizations in the direction they desired, not in the direction Black people wanted.

    With the documented historical past of hundreds of years of discrimination against Black Americans and African people, there is great reluctance to openly discuss these issues.

    BLACK SLAVERY

    RABBI MARC LEE RAPHAEL
    “Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta (Jewish tax) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jew purchased from the West Indies Company. Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.

    “This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the ‘triangular trade’ that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750’s, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760’s, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760’s and early 1770’s dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent.”

    IRA ROSENWAIKE
    “In Charleston, Richmond and Savannah the large majority (over three-fourths) of the Jewish households contained one or more slaves; in Baltimore, only one out of three households were slaveholding; in New York, one out of eighteen….Among the slaveholding households the median number of slaves owned ranged from five in Savannah to one in New York.”

    “The Jewish Population in 1820,” in Abraham J. Karp, ed., The Jewish Experience in America: Selected Studies from the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society (Waltham, Massachusetts, 1969, 3 volumes), volume 2, pp. 2, 17, 19.

    CECIL ROTH
    “The Jews of the Joden Savanne [Surinam] were also foremost in the suppression of the successive negro revolts, from 1690 to 1722: these as a matter of fact were largely directed against them, as being the greatest slave-holders of the region.” History of the Marranos (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1932), p. 292.

    JACOB RADER MARCUS
    “All through the eighteenth century, into the early nineteenth, Jews in the North were to own black servants; in the South, the few plantations owned by Jews were tilled with slave labor. In 1820, over 75 percent of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond, and Savannah owned slaves, employed as domestic servants; almost 40 percent of all Jewish householders in the United States owned one slave or more. There were no protests against slavery as such by Jews in the South, where they were always outnumbered at least 100 to 1….But very few Jews anywhere in the United States protested against chattel slavery on moral grounds.” United States Jewry, 1776-1985 (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1989), p. 586.

    Marcus describes the mockery of the Indian by Hyam Myer’s “Wild West Show” in his book, The Colonial American Jew:

    “[Myer sought] formal permission to exhibit some Mohawks in Europe. Myers sailed with the Indians before the proper certificate was forthcoming from the Indian Commissioner, and had already begun to parade them in Holland and in the taverns of London when the Lords of Trade urged Lieutenant-Governor Cadwallader Colden in New York to have Johnson put an end to the undertaking. From all indications Myers made no money on his grand European tour, for he ended up owing the Indians money – or refusing to pay them. Then, as now, there was “no business like show business!”

    Isaac Mayer Wise, the leader of the American Reform Jews, wrote of the California Indians:

    “…though not total savages, [they] are very primitive and ignorant….[They do] nothing besides loafing and begging….They catch trout in the river, and then sell them to buy ammunition, shoot rabbits, birds, eat various roots and wild plants, also snakes, frogs, dogs, cats, and rats, and say, ‘Me work no.’ In conversation with several of them I found that they have no particular home and are heathens.”

    JULIUS KAHN, SAN FRANCISCO JEW
    In turn-of-the-century San Francisco the 12-term Congressman Julius Kahn was a Jew who was affiliated with Temple Emanu El.

    “The oath to the Japanese,” he said, “would be but a hollow mockery, an empty formality signifying nothing. We do not want that kind of citizenship, and we do not intend to have it, if we can prevent it.”

    He spoke vehemently against Japanese immigration and naturalization even as Jews pushed mightily for Eastern European immigration. The early 1900 saw passage of the Chinese Exclusion Acts which were enthusiastically supported by Kahn and his constituents. He was such an advocate that the Acts were called the Kahn Exclusion Acts.

    JEWS IN THE SOUTH
    W.E.B. DuBois, future NAACP leader
    “The Jew is the heir of the slave-baron in Dougherty [Georgia]; and as we ride westward, by wide stretching cornfields and stubby orchards of peach and pear, we see on all sides within the circle of dark forest a Land of Canaan. Here and there are tales of projects for money-getting, born in the swift days of Reconstruction-‘improvement’ companies, wine companies, mills and factories; nearly all failed, and the JEW fell heir.”

    The Souls of Black Folk (1903) note: When DuBois tried to republish the book in 1953, he succumbed to pressure to replace the word “Jew” with “foreigner.”

    Philadelphia Jewish weekly The Jewish Record of January 23, 1863:

    “We know not how to speak in the same breath of the Negro and the Israelite. The very names have startlingly opposite sounds; one representing all that is debased and inferior in the hopeless barbarity and heathenism of six thousand years the other, the days when Jehovah conferred on our fathers the glorious equality which led the Eternal to converse with them, and allow them to enjoy the communion of angels. Thus the abandoned fanatics insult the choice of God himself, in endeavoring to reverse THE INFERIORITY WHICH HE STAMPED ON THE AFRICAN, to make him the compeer (equal), even in bondage, of His chosen people.

    “There is no parallel between such races. Humanity from pole to pole would scout such a comparison. The Hebrew was originally free and the charter of his liberty was inspired by his Creator.

    The Negro was never free and his bondage in Africa was simply duplicated in a milder form when he was imported here….The judicious in all the earth agree that to proclaim the African equal to the surrounding races, would be a farce which would lead the civilized conservatism of the world to denounce the outrage.”

    MAJOR MORDECAI MANUEL NOAH (1785-1851)
    He was considered the most distinguished Jewish layman in his time. He was such a prolific proponent of slavery, that the first Black American periodical, The Freedom’s Journal, was launched in response to Noah’s racist propaganda. He actually defended slavery by calling it liberty:

    “There is liberty under the name of slavery. A field negro has his cottage, his wife, and children, his easy task, his little patch of corn and potatoes, his garden and fruit, which are his revenue and property. The house servant has handsome clothing, his luxurious meals, his admitted privacy, a kind master, and an indulgent and frequently fond mistress.”

    He argued that “the bonds of society must be kept as they now are” and that:

    “To emancipate the slaves would be to jeopardize the safety of the whole country.”

    The Freedom’s Journal called Noah the Black man’s “bitterest enemy” and William Lloyd Garrison, the leading White abolitionist, called him the “lineal descendant of the monsters who nailed Jesus to the cross.”

    Like

  18. I did not read all of Buddy Silver’s post….but it is historically true that the Jews of Europe handled the money-end of the slave trade for their Christian Kings and nobles b/c they (the Christians) believed that that Bible admonished them about “the love of money being the root of all evil,” among other related “isms.” Since their Jewry did not follow the teachings of the New Testament…they (the Kings and nobles) thought when they employed Jews as intermediary–they were religiously “blameless” for the profits of the slave trade. These profits primarily concerned the Spanish and Dutch, but others in Europe of that time were involved in this whole concept of Christian “profit by proxy” in using the Jews as their CPA-s and “bankers.” Of course…this whole concept of “Jews as Bankers” followed into the modern ages…and set the Jews up in Europe, ripe for Hitler’s scapegoating—for being historically involved in banking in Europe……

    Sorry to condense it so…but NOTHING in history happens in a vacuum..it’s all cause and effect…knee bone connected to the ankle bone—–ad infinitum.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s