Screenwriter Scott Rosenberg says “everybody knew” about Weinstein

scott rosenberg and harvey weinstein

Scott Rosenberg (r) now eternally sorry he didn’t say anything about his buddy Weinstein

So many, many “brave” folks coming forward now to discuss Weinstein’s sexual harassment. What a shame no one had the gall to stand up to him. Guess a soul-selling career is more important than Hollyweird’s #waronwomen.

From Daily Mail: Screenwriter Scott Rosenberg claims that everyone knew about about Harvey Weinstein – despite many in Hollywood claiming not to have known about his history of sexual harassment when the scandal first broke.

Rosenberg, who worked for Weinstein at Miramax Films during what he described as the ‘Golden Age’, penned a lengthy Facebook post on Monday weighing in on the Weinstein drama.

‘Let’s be perfectly clear about one thing: Everybody-f***ing-knew,’ Rosenberg wrote in the post, which appears to have now been taken down.

The Beautiful Girls writer clarified that while the allegations of rape had come as a shock, most were aware of a ‘pattern of overly aggressive behavior that was rather dreadful’.

‘We knew about the man’s hunger; his fervor; his appetite. There was nothing secret about this voracious rapacity; like a gluttonous ogre out of the Brothers Grimm. All couched in vague promises of potential movie roles. (And, it should be noted: there were many who actually succumbed to his bulky charms. Willingly. Which surely must have only impelled him to cast his fetid net even wider),’ he wrote.

‘But like I said: everybody-f***ing-knew.’

Rosenberg noted that the Weinstein brothers gave him his career by making his first two movies – Beautiful Girls in 1996 and Things to Do in Denver When You’re Dead in 1995.

‘Do you know how I am sure this is true? Because I was there. And I saw you. And I talked about it with you. You, the big producers; you, the big directors; you, the big agents; you, the big financiers,’ he said.

‘And you, the big rival studio chiefs; you, the big actors; you, the big actresses; you, the big models. You, the big journalists; you, the big screenwriters; you, the big rock stars; you, the big restaurateurs; you, the big politicians. I saw you. All of you.God help me, I was there with you.

‘Again, maybe we didn’t know the degree. The magnitude of the awfulness. Not the rapes. Not the shoving against the wall. Not the potted-plant f*cking. But we knew something. We knew something was bubbling under. Something odious. Something rotten.’

Rosenberg admitted to staying quiet while Weinstein continued to throw lavish parties and make everyone’s movies.  

‘And for that, I am eternally sorry. To all of the women that had to suffer this… I am eternally sorry,’ he said.

‘I’ve worked with Mira (Sorvino) and Rosanna (Arquette) and Lysette (Anthony). I’ve known Rose (McGowan) and Ashley (Judd) and Claire (Forlani) for years… Their courage only hangs a lantern on my shame. And I am eternally sorry to all those who suffered in silence all this time. And have chosen to remain silent today.’


17 responses to “Screenwriter Scott Rosenberg says “everybody knew” about Weinstein

  1. Of course, everybody in Hollywood knew. They all sold their souls (silence) to the Devil for career ambitions and, in so doing, enabled Weinstein to continue to sexually –and physically (he was a violent man) — abuse countless others. We must NEVER forget their decades of silence when they, once again, lecture down to us about morality or ethics, what we should or should not do about “climate change,” “social justice,” politics, the latest “Progressive” pseudo-moral crusade…. They are worse than hypocrites.

    Liked by 5 people

  2. How hard would it have been for all those that “knew” to do an intervention and tell him to knock it off. Was he going to fire everyone?
    Silence means approval and there is nothing worse than for good people to do nothing.
    Corey tried to tell the world, but he had youth against him and was chastised, even by Barbara Wawa. I often have wondered over the years, if that is what pushed River Phoenix over the edge.
    I live thousands of miles away and I knew of this horrible behavior.
    Shame on them all, especially those that didn’t protect the young. I want to witness their karma train arriving.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Agreed-if EVERYBODY knew,but nobody saw fit to DO anything about it,then EVERYBODY shares the blame and shame.I’ll bet that not all of them,but MANY of them have been complicit in Harvey’s (mis)behavior. Maybe THEY can get adjoining cells….

      Liked by 2 people

    • I understand what you are saying about “speaking out”, but I have uncovered a corruption in state courts, NOT CO and as I have tried to get the “victims to speak up with me”, they have all run for cover and broke ties with me. They were threatened by lawyers who said “we are your lawyers, judges and police force”- they got the threat! I have been threatened by the same, though I live in another state which offers me some protection, tho’ I have a feeling if I drive through that state, my car will be impounded and planted with “illegal mj” (and I am not a mj user). Sometimes a person has no choice but to remain silent, or live in fear, because the judiciary system is so corrupt. Any lawyer who touches on these cases, will be disbarred by the Bar association of that state, which is usually run by judges. Meaning good lawyers are without a livlihood as well. Make no mistake, I am not making an excuse for the slimebags in hollywood, and I DETEST LAYWERS, but its the (corrupted) “judicial system”, (that is very politically connected, as weinstein was with the dems) that needs to take some (alot) (most) of the blame here. I am a nobody, trying to get justice, for a whole bunch of us, but the threats to someones livlihood, whatever that may be, shuts them down, has shut me down. And unfortunately, it means a whole lot more unknowing people, become victims, with no voice, no chance. Its big bad “cement wall” that one goes up against and it cant be blasted through.
      I am just glad Ronan Farrow had the “guts” to out this disgusting corrupt deviance. As we have seen, ABC didnt have the “guts” to do it, or was more than likely PAID to keep quiet. It is “bigger” than the victims, and potential victims, i.e. those trying to speak up. Corruption of any kind, is a true CLUSTER ____ !

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea culpa… but like everything else in (un)Holly-weird, is it even true, or just more pretend for the camera, more make believe, more political correctness, just a waiver (sign on the dotted line, please!,) stating, “we are not with him, now, we are better than that, we can point a finger at the evil man!” But, like my kids used to say, when you point a finger at someone, you have three other fingers pointing at yourself! Why does it sound familiar?…
    “Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.”
    Maybe everyone is indeed sorry, I can’t know that, so let me get the beam out of my eye, and just watch the movie.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. Why, if everybody knew, didn’t anybody come forward and denounce these violations? Fear or Money? If you know a violation being committed and keep silent you become part of the crime, however, those the crime was committed against them kept silent, Fear or Money. All are participants!

    Liked by 6 people

    • Alma, you’re right…fear or money. Or perhaps, fear of not making as much money as they want.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Maryaha,they kept quiet for so long while money was rolling in, so let’s see who will come forward and testify against him, I’m sure most will say “it was so long ago, I’m famous, got my Oscar and I owe all to him, might as well move on” Hollywood is a fantasy, a make believe world,

        Liked by 3 people

        • Alma, I don’t think any of these harlots will do anything more than accuse. I smell a big fat rat with this whole thing. Everyone in Hollywood knew, so why are they all piling on now? There has to be a money issue that’s driving it, because that’s always what it’s about. The love of money…

          Liked by 3 people

  5. Reblogged this on kommonsentsjane and commented:

    Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.

    The reason, NO ONE WANTED TO BE THE SNITCHER ON THE RABBI. Now that everyone is jumping on the band wagon – no one person is held accountable because it is everyone’s fault for leading the charge.

    We all know how the power system works.


    Liked by 3 people

  6. Weinstein is just like his father Satan:

    Matthew 4: 8-9: “Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.”

    Weinstein told all those young actresses, all they had to do was feed his voracious sexual appetite and he would give them fame and fortune in the Kingdom of Hell (Hollywood).

    Liked by 4 people

  7. Sorry but I am not feeling real sorry for any of Weinstein’s victims. They knew exactly what they were doing and they did it willingly in order to get in the movies. We should be angry at these women who allowed this happen for decades and all the other victims that had to put us with this disgusting troll because no one stood up and exposed him. If they would have opened their mouths long ago they could have spared others and maybe got roles in the movies because they had talent in front of the camera instead of on the casting couch.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Kendra . . . You have hit on the idea that at least in my mind rings of TRUTH! So many of the women just shut up, and went along, and men in Hollywood were Weinstein’s enablers. Shame on the whole pack of them.

      Liked by 4 people

  8. Sorry, Rosenberg, you were born at the end of the golden age of the movies. Granted the casting couch has been in use since the beginning of films, but overall there were better actors, most of whom had not given their souls to Satan, and the big movies displayed more depth.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. As others have commented in other posts, I believe as repulsive as Weinstein is, the overwhelming outrage expressed by Hollywood is used to cover up and divert attention from the real and more sinister abuse of children in the entertainment industry. That is something no one in the industry wants exposed on a large scale.

    Liked by 5 people

  10. “What a shame no one had the gall………………………..”
    BALLS is the word you needed to put in that sentence!


    Screenwriter and director, Billy Wilder, has had an enormous impact on the public, as substantiated by his numerous Oscars and other film awards. Responsible for famous films like Hold Back the Dawn, Five Graves to Cairo, Double Indemnity, The Lost Weekend, Sunset Boulevard, Stalag 17, Sabrina and The Apartment, Wilder’s cinema successes were granted him as he was just another pawn who was utilized with evil acumen to help abolish society’s established code of ethics. His own authorized biographer who worked closely with him, Maurice Zolotow, wrote:

    “Of course, I did not know what I was getting into when I had started this. It became, as all such journeys have become, a journey to find out the secret springs of this most devious and perverse of Hollywood’s personalities.”

    Wilder loved to transport the viewer into the depravity of his own heart and did this by tricking the censors who sought to enforce the old Hollywood Production Code of Hollywood’s “Golden Age.” Wilder recalls, “We had to operate cunningly to outwit the censors and this made us write more subtly.” What subtleties did he scatter throughout his films? Perversion. In his movie, The Major and the Minor, Wilder admits that the motif was child sexuality, stating:

    “Ray Milland falls in love with Ginger as a twelve year old child. We had here the first American movie about pedophilia. The Major is sexually aroused by her. He can’t help himself. I was worried that audiences would be shocked by this story, but it seems that they were not.”

    This goes to show that if a story is entertaining and “cute,” it can bypass the normal reaction to such filth and translate into apathetic disregard on the slippery slope of corruption. Where did this movie minister of perversion receive his material? Wilder was given his creative material by another supernatural force. In addition to stating that he is “demonically possessed and slightly crazed,” Zolotow reports of Wilder:
    “He could not stop his creative machinery from functioning. He was enslaved by his art…One sometimes felt as if one were moved by powerful invisible forces. I forgot to tell you that Wilder never starts a new screenplay without typing two words on the first page: Cum Deo (‘With God’). He has a pantheistic feeling about the universe.”

    Demon possession leads many from the truths of God to the pantheistic lies of the New Age movement because Satan uses those who will serve him most faithfully in preparing humanity to embrace him as the god of this world. Wilder’s responses upon completion of his show make it readily apparent which god he aligned himself with. Scientologist screenwriter of the Sound of Music, Ernest Lehman, recalls:

    “He looked at the heavens and screeched F— you!” It was…a victory cry, as if he were calling out to God and saying,

    ‘I completed this picture despite everything you did to make me surrender.'”

    Dr. Lycurgus Starkey rightly announced on the NBC network: “His movies have overturned all the sexual mores, glorified promiscuity, glamorized prostitution and elevated adultery to a virtue.” Dr. Starkey was prophetically right in predicting the social effect and outcome of Wilder’s films that we currently face in our day. The atheist author of communism, Karl Marx, explains the reasons why this is so:

    “The ideas of the ruling class are, in every age, the ruling ideas: i.e., the class which is the dominant material force in society is at the same time its dominant intellectual force. The class which has the means of material production at its disposal has control at the same time over the means of mental production.”

    The gross immorality in Hollywood that makes its way on the screen and thus influences the masses reflects the lives of those who operate within it. An intimate friend of the late Steve McQueen related:

    “He’d kill for a part in a movie…he’d suck anyone’s [expletive]…he’d get f—– or f— anyone who’d get him a part in a show…then he’d wish-he’d pray- that person would have a heart attack or a stroke and die, and then there would be no way for anyone to know how McQueen had got the part.”

    This disgusting ambition is what keeps the infamous casting couch warm and desirous hopeful actors willing. Hollywood insider, Phyllis Diller, clarifies this fact:

    “The casting couch is the name of the game in Hollywood. I know there are stars, especially women, who have made a career from sexual favors.”

    Would you invite a person whom you knew to be ethically bankrupt and an absolute moral degenerate into your home to influentially instruct your wife, your husband, and your children or loved ones? These are the very ones that America invites into their home every night via the television to submissively share their lives with.

    Faye Dunaway said that the ghost of Joan Crawford is haunting her. Actress Jean Seberg believed that her “devils” kept her from ever being free. She stated:

    “The devils will stop that sort of stuff in a second. They ride right here. (Touching her collar bone with her fingers) Sitting here and here. There’s one on each side…these are both unfriendly influences. They tell me to run my car into other cars, or drive off a cliff.”

    A friend later reflected on her life and pin pointed the cause as the “acting classes at Columbia Studios…[which] had the power to influence Jean’s devils.” Like countless others in the Hollywood movie star system, this lead to psychiatric hospitals and suicide. Actor Sal Mineo was in regular contact with psychics and spoke of the “vibrations” of James Dean’s spirit that haunted him, stating, “I’ve got to get him off my back because I don’t want to join him down there.” Mineo was murdered under mysterious circumstances. Is fame worth the extorted fees that Satan demands of his servants of the silver screen?
    As Alan Alda declared:

    “There’s plenty of money to be had…But you also lose your soul.”


    Almost all the films you’ve ever seen of the Holocaust were staged. Using Allied propaganda as a rough script, directors from Hollywood were shipped to Germany and Poland to direct propaganda films for post-war use. One of the most notable of these was Billy Wilder, director of many very well-known films, such as “Some Like It Hot” with Marilyn Monroe.

    If you thumb through the photographs and film macabre film clips made by these directors, you will notice something odd. Among the living, many of the forlorn faces of the “death camp survivors” look oddly familiar. That is because some of the same actors were used in several shots, from totally different locations! The involvement of film crews also goes to explain why almost all of the “concentration camp” shots were dated at least 4-5 days after the camps were liberated. They were location shots, sometimes using prisoners (minus their usual camp clothing), and sometimes actors.

    Real footage of the concentration camps was almost never used in the Allied propaganda films. But, you can find some of this real footage on Internet Archive.

    In the 1970’s, the stories passed down about the WW-2 German prison camps were welded together into a narrative we now call “the Holocaust” – meaning “the burnt offering.” Through telling and re-telling, the Holocaust has grown to a multi-million dollar industry, and has changed to mean something particular to Jewish history. It has been used to found a nation (Israel), and to justify many exceptions to morality.

    Investigations of physical evidence and original documentation, however, have cast doubts on the Holocaust narrative that has been formed. For example, areas claimed to be mass graves, have been found with modern investigative technology to contain no human remains. Testimonies of accused perpetrators show evidence of outright fabrication, or were obtained through torture. Many of the supposed eyewitnesses have provided stories riddled by inconsistencies, describe physically impossible events, or were even total frauds who were never actually in the camps.

    If the Holocaust narrative is false, the ramifications are far reaching. Ethnic Germans have been slandered for decades on the basis of the Holocaust. Terrorism used in the founding of Israel was justified through it. It was even used to justify the slaughter, rape, and murder of millions of ethnic Germans after World War 2.



    Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 64a

    Soncino 1961 Edition, page 437

    Following the Mishnah is a discussion among the sages. One of the Talmud Sages, Rabbi Ashi, comments as follows:

    GEMARA. R. Ashi propounded: What if one caused his blind or sleeping son to pass through, (3) or if he caused his grandson by his son or daughter to pass through? — One at least of these you may solve. For it has been taught: [Any men … that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall he put to death … And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off
    from among his people;] because he hath given of his seed unto Molech. Why is this stated? — Because it is said, there shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire. From this I know it only of his son or daughter. Whence do I know that it applies to his son’s son or daughter’s son too? From the verse, [And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man] when he giveth of his seed unto Molech [and kill him not: Then I will … cut him off.]

    — Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 64b

    Soncino 1961 Edition, page 439

    Rabbi Dr. Freedman, one of the translators of the Soncino Tractate Sanhedrin, clarifies the passage. In a footnote, Rabbi Dr. Freedman confirms that the Talmud Sages use “seed” to denote living children,
    in the same sense as the Biblical translators understand the term in the above Biblical quotes. In this footnote, Rabbi Dr. Freedman paraphrases the question from Rabbi Ashi:

    Is ‘thou shalt not cause to pass’ applicable only to a son who can naturally pass through himself, but not to a blind or sleeping son, who must be led or carried, or does it apply to all?

    Rabbi Dr. Freedman

    Other footnotes within the same context clarify the fine point of distinction being drawn in the Mishnah and subsequent debates among the sages:

    Lev. XVIII, 21. This proves that the offence consists of two parts; (I) formal delivery to the priests, and (2) causing the seed to pass through the fire.

    Rabbi Dr. Freedman (2)

    As two separate offences, proving that giving one’s seed to Molech is not idolatry. The differences [sic] is, that if one sacrificed to Molech, or caused his son to pass through the fire to some other deity, he is
    not punished.

    Rabbi Dr. Freedman (3)

    Following the Mishnah, Sanhedrin 64a and 64b contain a rousing debate between the Sages concerning:

    the circumstances under which worshipping an idol is idolatry,
    which idols may be worshipped without indulging in idolatry,
    which parts of child sacrifice in what combination are punishable, and
    how children may be sacrificed without violating Leviticus.


    Welcome to my website. I am Rabbi Solomon Cohen and I am happy to be your host. Please feel free to browse around the different topics that I will be discussing here by clicking on the individual tabs at the top of the page.
    This site is currently a work in progress and it is my hope to continue adding to it in the coming days.
    Kol Tuv,
    Rabbi Solomon Cohen]

    In the Torah it is written:
    “It shall be a jubilee unto you; and you shall return every man to his possession and you shall return every man to his family.”
    In the Torah, the word for תשבה, teshuva, “return” is missing the letter ו (vav), ordinarily it would be spelled תשובה. The Zohar tells us that the Torah writes teshuva without the letter vav to hint at the year when the Jewish people will return to our land from the long and bitter exile.
    The gematria (numerical value) of teshuva is 708 (tav = 400; shin = 300; bet = 2; vav = 6). Therefore the missing vav in the word תשבה, as written in the Torah (which equals the number 6) was a prophecy that the Jews would be allowed to return to Israel minus 6 million of our people:
    “You shall return minus 6 million”;
    while the combined numerical value of the word teshuva = 708, indicates the year of our return.

    “WHERE DID THE 3,000,000 JEWS GO?”
    Well, ask yourself: where did 3 million people go, when the official record of Auschwitz was changed (about 1990) from 4 million dead to 1 million dead.
    They just…disappeared…somehow…

    “6 million Jews” first saw the light the 11th June 1900 in New York Times. Up to 1945, the number “6 million Jews” has been repeated about 20-25 times. The “6 million Jews” has absolutely nothing to do with WWII. The word “Holocaust” appeared in American Hebrew 1919 by Martin H. Glynn, as well as “6 million Jews”. The gas chamber claim is also from WWI.

    Some people are incredible… Just a few photographs, and claims of “holocaust” (what a nice ‘sound bite’) repeated over and over by the most powerful men and women in the world (Jews), is enough to convince you that there was a “Holocaust” in WWII against the Jews ! With so few facts necessary for you to make your judgment, and with the absence of serious and honest reseach on your part about the people who claim the opposite of the official story (how many hours of your time did YOU devote to that??) – You are an easy prey for those you want to manipulate you.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s