Bloodsuckers: Seattle council members target big business with new tax

government solve all problems

There’s never enough taxpayer money that Seattle demorats can’t get their hands on. Earlier this summer the Seattle city council approved a tax on the wealthy (for individuals making over $250,000 per year), yet that will face a legal challenge.

Since the beginning of their homeless crisis, the city of Seattle has been spending a lot of tax payer money to try and solve the problem. They have also hired many folks to address the problem. Alas, homelessness within the city persists.

To address the city’s major homeless problem, Seattle demorats now want to tax big businesses an additional “fee.”

In their minds, more taxpayer money is always the solution.

From MyNorthwest.com: As the Seattle City Council considers its next budget, two council members are proposing a new business tax that will place fees on the city’s top earning companies to fund programs for the homeless.

“It is our large employers who have benefited most from Seattle’s economic boom,” said Councilmember Kirsten Harris-Talley. “As a result, big business is best positioned to help relieve some of the pressure created by rapid growth. We need a systematic fix to help address the resulting lack of affordable housing and dearth of places for people to go. This is a solution that protects the most vulnerable in our city and will help small businesses thrive.”

Harris-Talley is proposing the new tax along with Councilmember Mike O’Brian. They call it the H.O.M.E.S. proposal — Housing, Outreach and Mass-Entry Shelter.

Mayor Tim Burgess recently gave the council his proposed budget. According to O’Brien and Harris-Talley, it doesn’t go far enough to fund programs for the homeless. The two council members believe their tax will raise up to $24 million to go toward 24-hour shelters, encampments, and tiny homes. They also want to fund outreach, safe zones for people living in their vehicles, and rental assistance for people making less than 30 percent of the area’s median income.

To reach the $24 million revenue mark, the council members are proposing:

  • A tax on the top 10 percent of the highest-grossing businesses in Seattle.
  • Those businesses would pay 4.8 cents per hour, per employee.
  • This will equate to roughly $100 per employee, annually.
  • If approved, the tax would begin in early 2018.

 The city council is expected to discuss the tax proposal at 10:30 a.m., Monday, Oct. 16.

Harris-Talley is an interim council member standing in for Tim Burgess who has taken over the role of mayor after Ed Murray resigned. She was selected by the council last week out of three nominated options, and is expected to serve until the November election is verified and a replacement is voted in.

DCG

Advertisements

8 responses to “Bloodsuckers: Seattle council members target big business with new tax

  1. Seattle and Portland both filled with left-wing fools. Oregon now charges a bicycle tax and it’s a great place to go if you want Other, “O” stamped on your drivers license, rather than M or F.

    Liked by 5 people

  2. When someone tells you it’s not as bad as it could have been that’s just their way of telling you to grab your ankles you are about to get fucked.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. And for the terminally confused, we have Oregon allowing drivers to specify O rather than Male or Female. They will do well in prison.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. Seattle’s local Government is working as hard as they can to make Seattle a Ghost Town,only inhabited by transient street people and Government employees.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Now I just wonder . . . do you think that these “large businesses” will turn around and increase their prices, or fees in order to cover this additional drain on their bottom line? How many extra homeless people are there in Seattle because the transient population knows “the living in Seattle is better than other places, where the city does not put monies into taking care of the homeless.” This is ludicrous, plain and simply. So many of the homeless are in that situation because they do not wish to assume the responsibilities of having a job, where they have to show up each and actually do something. There is also a large percentage of the homeless who have chronic alcohol and drug issues. Are these factors actually due to situations that large, healthy business have deliberately forced upon the homeless segment of society? This is just another “enabling scheme” the Libtards wish to see paid for by some entity that actually works and is successful. . . . . the exact opposite of the traits we see in homeless individuals. This is just another load of _______, brought to you by the Progressives.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. What kind of mental disorder afflicts the people of the Pacific Northwest?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s