Feminists are insufferable: Tweet of a man rescuing a woman and child is “sexist”

houston rescue

Toxic masculinity at work in Houston/AP Photo

A picture of a man rescuing a woman and her child in the Hurricane Harvey tragedy surfaced on the internet (see the above precious photo). It has caused much scorn for the feminists and gender study professors about the role of men and women in society.

Matt Walsh, a columnist for The Blaze, tweeted out the above picture with the caption, “Woman cradles and protects child. Man carries and protects both. This is how it ought to be, despite what your gender studies professor says”

This tweet and the accompanying photo set the internet ablaze with cries of his tweet being “sexist,” “outdated” and “misogynistic.”

Time Magazine (via Fortune) had an “actual gender studies professor” weigh in on the “controversial” tweet.  Christina Wolbrecht, associate professor in the Department of Political Science and director of the Program of American Democracy at the University of Notre Dame, responded to Walsh’s message in a series of 12 tweets.

Here’s what the gender studies professor had to say:

Care work (for children, infirm, elderly) is necessary for human flourishing & has been traditionally performed by women for free, which contributes to women’s lesser financial & politics power. As care work has moved into the market, it remains poorly paid & overwhelmingly female, which again makes women more vulnerable. We [love] to laud a woman “cradling her child” but don’t provide paid maternity leave or support quality childcare & good pay/benefits for childcare workers (women, immigrants). But wait! There’s more! As budgets for care work (mental health, health care) have been cut, a lot of that work has shifted to agencies like police & fire, who often lack training & capacity, and result in troubling outcomes. At same time, economists note that a central challenge to male workers is skills mismatch – men reluctant to take jobs in expanding care sector, partly bc jobs are “female”, partly bc they are low paying, low prestige (bc their “women’s jobs”). IN SUM your rigid and illogical sexual division of labor, & related hierarchy of value, hurts both women & men, the US economy, & the flourishing of society as a whole. The value of work – holding the baby or carrying the mother should be recognized & rewarded, no matter who performs it. Given how much care is needed, all hands on deck.”

If I am mistaken, I believe Mark’s original tweet DID recognize and reward the mom for protecting her child. But that’s not good enough for the libtards who can’t see the natural and instinctual beauty in a man rescuing and protecting a mother and child.

Of course, the idea that a man should have to rescue a woman and child is a NO NO for feminists. In their minds, we need to erase the social and cultural constructions of masculinity. After all, they don’t need a man to save them!

Here’s the difference between feminists and conservative women (who absolutely LOVED that tweet/photo): We understand the physical and mental differences that God gives men and women. God designed the fundamental biology of each sex for specific reasons that we should celebrate.

We completely adore the strong men in our lives who protect us, shelter us, love us, and would give their lives for us. We value them for being the testosterone-filled manly-men that they are!

IN SUM, this toxic masculinity is a beautiful thing!

DCG

Advertisements

35 responses to “Feminists are insufferable: Tweet of a man rescuing a woman and child is “sexist”

  1. Feminists like Christina Wolbrecht are not just insufferable, they are insane. And to think she teaches at the University of Notre Dame (Our Lady), a Catholic university. Just another example of how Catholic universities and schools are no longer Catholic.

    Liked by 5 people

    • That’s very true. They no longer mirror the beliefs and expectations of the Institutional Church. This has been happening by degrees for many years. Catholic schools, for example, are largely no longer run by clergy and religious.

      At any rate, this “movement” is just another element in the quest to destroy our culture. You can’t reason with insane people. First they make them victims, then they assign a cause. The rest is completely illogical.

      Liked by 3 people

    • I am a lesbian and a feminist. When I look at that picture of that man carrying the woman to safety, I say ” This country needs 200 million more men just like him. He is a keeper, and he has my respect and admiration. The wimpy disgusting feminised men simply suck shit!”

      Liked by 3 people

    • I took my daughter to an open house @ Loyola (Chicago) U – and I was shocked to see GTBL & Islamic groups there. Maybe I shouldn’t have been, since Chicago has the Boystown neighborhood a few miles south, and the muslim-friendly suburbs just to the north of the campus. It’s a Jesuit school, so I guess it’s not really all that surprising.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Leave it to an academician to make a mountain out of a mole hill. Sorry Dr. E. I know there are still some very good dedicated people teaching in our institutions of higher learning, albeit few and far between. Why can’t we just accept this picture for what it is? One person helping another person, in a terrible situation. There is absolutely no need to bring in sexism, racism, or what ever. Beautiful picture.

    Liked by 5 people

  3. Cue SJW heads EXPLODING: Here are the best photos of ‘toxic masculinity’ out of Houston (so far)

    https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2017/08/29/cue-sjw-heads-exploding-here-are-the-best-photos-of-toxic-masculinity-out-of-houston-so-far/

    h/t DCG

    Liked by 3 people

  4. The left is so petty, misguided, and just plain WRONG! It never ceases to amaze me, the idiocy that they promote! (I loved all those pictures of “toxic masculinity” on the link!) Thanks for sharing it! This is what people were made for: helping one another….

    Liked by 4 people

  5. Hadenoughalready

    WTF is wrong with these morons? (don’t answer that!) We can’t win. No one can win in their world. Not even them…

    Liked by 5 people

    • Exactly…. Even if these people got everything they ever wanted, they would still come up with something to be a victim about. It is a battle that can’t be won, short of getting them off the face of the earth, or them converting to Christianity.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Btw…. I am only condoning one of those methods for winning the battle, and depending on the day and mood, the condoned method may switch from one to the other ;). Lol, *sarcasm.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. We do too have paid maternity leave…it shouldn’t matter that it isn’t a federal thing, it’s there.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. Pingback: Feminists are insufferable: Tweet of a man rescuing a woman and child is “sexist” — Fellowship of the Minds – World Faithful Catholics

  8. What does she say about the d-bag with the Nikes who just couldn’t help?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Let’s breakdown the elements of your posted pic…
      1) the woman clearly didn’t want to be rescued, and obviously the man insisted to such a degree that she needed to be rescued, that after half a morning of arguing about it, she finally let him carry her against her will “to safety”. Her facial expression says it all…
      2) the man carrying her obviously was only doing so in an effort to get some free groping in, while nobody was looking, but unfortunately he was caught on camera (when he saw the camera, he obviously tried to hide his shameful face!). As you can see, he has no ring on (obviously divorced due to being an intolerable male) and is hard up desperate for touch of a female. She is clearly holding her arms and legs in such a way to prevent this unwanted touchy feely.
      3) the man with the Nike shoes is the woman’s husband, and knows very well she was not in the need for saving at all, and in fact, is merely performing his husbandly duties by carrying her things because clearly she is carrying HER (not his in any way) child. The look on his face is merely a reflection of irritation at the previous argument by the man and woman, which he knew was fruitless and will later result in his wife giving him a private tongue lashing at how men MUST boost their ego and existence by insisting women need protecting and help. She will also degrade him further because he did not stand up to the man more, in telling him the woman did not need rescue assistance.
      4) the infant, clearly upset over the whole deal, is only closing her eyes to keep from having to look at the misogynistic male, and hoping he will just let them be. Also trying to shield her eyes from the man groping her mom.

      Yes, total sarcasm… But I can picture any of these 3rd wave feminists making those arguments. I am 48, Christian white male (yes, I know… I am evil racist, sexist pig)… But I remember in the not too distant past, that women expected ( and WANTED) men to be looking out for them. This is the natural way, and how God created us. That is not to say women can’t or ought not to be strong (read proverbs 31), but my goodness people, this is way out of hand insanity. If that man was carrying another man to safety, people would likely say very differently, or nothing at all… This is clearly one person simply helping another person, who just happens to be female. Why can’t it be left at that? I will tell you why. Because Satan. Non believers have their hearts, minds, and souls corrupted by everything anti-God, and these things are just more examples of it. The days are becoming more dark and evil by the minute, and we need more workers and prayer than before. God be with us all.

      Liked by 3 people

    • He is carrying the families belongings, the rescuer im sure offered to carry the woman just as a courtesy because she is carrying the precious baby.

      Like

  9. It is obvious from Ms. Wolbrecht’s tweet that her values in life center around
    money, power, and prestige certainly not the priorities that Christ espoused. Refusing to accept the God mandated order of civil society is as old as Genesis 3:16.

    Liked by 3 people

    • I fully appreciate your statement, especially coming from a woman. It is God’s mandated order of civil society, and my oh my how both men and women have allowed that train to derail, and in my opinion especially within the Body of Christ (or proclaimed “Bodies” anyway… Almost all churches are false or apostate anymore). Neither sex seems to know their proper role anymore, people just “exist”, and whatever happens, happens. Very sad.

      Liked by 1 person

  10. so where the hell are the feminist’s?, if they don’t want the men out there doing what men do, then get your ass out there and forever hold your peace.
    I would not want to live in a world that was devoid of men, there would be a lot of drowning women and children.

    Liked by 4 people

  11. These people (woman) won’t be happy until they have destroyed all that is natural and good between men and women. Have a nice life, all by yourself.

    Liked by 3 people

  12. To heck with the feminazis. They are their own worst enemies.

    What we need: “A Few Good Men”

    What this dying world could use is a willing Man of God
    Who dares to go against the grain and works without applause;
    A man who’ll raise the shield of Faith, protecting what is pure;
    Whose love is tough and gentle; a man whose word is sure

    God doesn’t need an Orator who knows what just to say;
    He doesn’t need authorities to reason Him away;
    He doesn’t need an army to guarantee a win;
    He just needs a Few Good Men

    Men full of Compassion, who Laugh and Love and Cry-
    Men who’ll face Eternity and aren’t afraid to die-
    Men who’ll fight for Freedom and Honor once again-
    He just needs a Few Good Men

    (A song by the Gaither Vocal Band)

    Liked by 4 people

  13. Ever see how the feminazis treat their household help. Yep. Like poop. Think they give their lawn guys and housecleaners any time off for birth or child care? Think they let them have time off for personal days. Nope. What these women want and expect is only for these women, no one else. There is no true equality when dealing with feminists.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. Dad’s Rock…

    Liked by 3 people

    • Ahhh, that video is SO CUTE!!! Boy oh boy, those Dads have split-second perfect timing, catching or grabbing the toddlers just in the knick of time, wow! I wonder if men have faster natural reflexes than women?

      ~~~

      As for “…the idea that a man should have to rescue a woman and child is a NO NO for feminists,” I’m sure if we asked the mother in the photo, that she would say, “I hated every second of THAT MAN carrying me & my baby, because I would have felt SO MUCH SAFER in the arms of a big-boned lesbo bull-dyke.”

      😀

      Liked by 2 people

  15. Apparently, none of the virginal, attractive, desirable sort-of women — Spring chickens — will be carrying large men. Otherwise, we would be sharing in the responsibilities. Consider yourself free to accept or refuse my help, on my time and my terms. I think, you will find they are practical and humane.

    But, no, you will not be dragging me down, with you, or keeping me from helping the deserving people. At least, the stranded animals were innocent and apolitical, about it, actually value such a thing as comfort and physical safety. ffs.

    Liked by 2 people

  16. Lesson to be learned here is there is no use in trying to please these people. No matter what is said or done their own misery tells them it will never be enough. I can imagine a far flung day when they get their wish. There are no more men; just societies of women assuming all and every role. There would still be these shrills harping on endlessly about the days when men existed to make their lives unbearable.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Yeah, I suppose the proper answer is “who cares what you think?”.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Hadenoughalready

      These people are called “insatiable”. No matter what you do, say, give them or sacrifice for them, they’ll never be content. Their greed and lust for power and control are everlasting and it’s pointless to even try to accommodate them.
      If you gave them the world in their desired image, there would still be something lacking. Better to tell them to piss off than to even address their demands.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Yeah. Said another way, their reward is of this world. They get desperate realizing that their end is nigh. That’s what I was alluding to below. They have no faith. They think they are their own “god”.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Hadenoughalready

          You’re absolutely correct. I didn’t see your comment until after I posted mine. But I concur, entirely.
          They’re out to declare themselves gods of their own making, of this world. They can have it, as far as I’m concerned. But they have yet to realize that it’ll be short-lived. That’s why Satan is ramping up his aggression, globally; his time is short and he knows it. We ARE, and he knows it, in the last days.

          Liked by 1 person

  17. Maybe in answer to DCG’s post, “God” is conspicuously absent in the feminist’s assessment. For them there is no God. As a result, there is no “plan”, save whatever they cook up in their minds.

    Instead of honoring the beauty and perfection of it all, they are “recreating” the world in their own image. It’s an ugly, competitive image.

    Liked by 3 people

  18. There Are great woman out there but astarte keeps popping his/ her ugly head into certain lives in order to destroy mankind. remember the saying “as above so below”, ? well Jesus Christ when asked by a man of law (or lawyer) about a woman having so many husbands but each dying and no child produced, then asked after in the resurection who shall have her as a wife ? Jesus then replies they shall neither marry or be given in marriage but shall be likened unto the Angels in Heaven. so obviously Lucifer is trying his damnedest to interweve man into woman, the true Hybrid!, that is what is going on.

    Like

    • We are told that there are no marriages in Heaven. Neither are there man or woman. This should not be a cause for concern. What is necessary here is not necessary in the Divine.

      Liked by 1 person

  19. barryoldwater@gmail.com

    As in the design , the two sexes make up one whole unit. Both sexes need each other to make life fulfilling. Nothing more hilarious than to see two of the same sex together and one looks butch the other feminine, artificially trying to make a whole unit. This artificial lifestyle is not even close to fulfilling or it would not appear as it is, butch, feminine, maybe the reason why they demand acceptance and treatment the same as a God inspired, holy union family, it is an unatainable position that even mankind cannot give them.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. I bet the woman being rescued only believes in 2 pronouns (he & she, his & hers), not the 27 or whatever the GTBQL community wants us to believe, either. She probably also believes Special Forces should be male-only.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. ‘How stupid can you get?’ is a question. Not a challenge.

    Oh, and what kind of shoes were they wearing? They didn’t report that. Boy they sure are getting sloppy with their reporting.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s