Ed Klein: Hillary Clinton rejected DOJ’s plea bargain offer

Edward “Ed” J. Klein is a journalist — the former foreign editor of Newsweek and the former editor-in-chief of The New York Times Magazine from 1977 to 1987 — and well published author of, among others, a 2005 biography of Hillary Clinton, The Truth About Hillary.

On August 8, 2017, writing for NewsMax, Klein reported that the Trump administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ) has reopened the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified material on her private email system while she was secretary of state.

According to a Clinton attorney, late last month (July), in “exploratory talks” with a high-ranking DOJ official, the Clinton attorney was told that despite former FBI Director James Comey’s decision last July not to prosecute Hillary, the Justice Department has reexamined the email case and believes there are ample grounds for prosecuting Hillary on a number of counts. 

The DOJ offered Hillary a plea bargain if she will agree to plead guilty to charges of breaking the law by signing a document admitting that she had committed a prosecutable crime. In return, the DOJ:

  • would agree not to bring charges against Hillary in connection with the email probe.
  • would not proceed with an investigation of Hillary’s pay to play deals with foreign governments and businessmen who contributed to the Clinton Foundation or who paid Bill Clinton exorbitant speaking fees.

According to Klein, Hillary turned down the plea bargain offer. The unnamed Clinton attorney points out that normally a plea is offered by a prosecutor only upon arraignment, and Hillary has not yet been charged with any crime.

So, charge her already!

What are you waiting for, AG Jeff Sessions?

Now you know why the Left have gone even more insane with Antifa, the all-out war against whites, and their American Taliban campaign against Confederate symbols and monuments.

See also:

~Eowyn

Advertisements

47 responses to “Ed Klein: Hillary Clinton rejected DOJ’s plea bargain offer

  1. The fact that both Hillary and rapist Bill are still walking free and always will be speaks volumes about American government corruption and at least so far Trump is doing nothing.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. This is what sicken me about this country. Anyone esle would have paid huge fines and be in jail for years. So if you’re connected you get off Scot free?

    Liked by 3 people

  3. No plea deal for Hillary! That is not justice.

    Liked by 4 people

  4. Prosecute her and ANY politician that is or has used their position for profit or favors with any foreign government. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg did NOT get to plea to a lesser charge. They were executed!!!!!

    Liked by 4 people

  5. This is a little off topic, but does concern Hillary, as well as Obama, Biden, Soros, and John Podesta.

    Have yall heard anything about information from Wikileaks, that may show that the five people I mentioned may have conspired for the removal of Pope Benedict, the choice of Pope Francis, and a planned “Catholic Spring” back in 2012-2013?

    "Did they use America’s intelligence agencies, and our nation’s diplomatic machinery, political muscle, and financial power to coerce and blackmail “regime change” in the Roman Catholic Church?"
    

    Liked by 2 people

    • I have no doubt the current Jesuit Pope was selected because of his Communist affiliations. Funny as he tells us to open our borders he has a wall around Vatican City and I haven’t seen him open the doors to welcome refugees. The likes of Obama understand the power the Pope has over many people in the world and whatever he says to do they will do. Not this Catholic!!

      Liked by 5 people

    • That’s very possible. Despite Benedict’s weird looks, he was a master theologian and enemy of “Liberation Theology”, which is Communism by any other name.

      He used to head the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (used to be The Office of the Holy Inquisition). He was not a “leftist”.

      Liked by 4 people

      • In 1968 Ratzinger denied the physical resurrection of Jesus and the physical resurrection of the saints at the final judgment. Again, both he and Francis are kicking the CC toward the gates of hell and as a useful tool toward the global religion of Lucifer.

        Like

        • “In 1968 Ratzinger denied the physical resurrection of Jesus”

          Your source, please.

          Like

          • Michael Hoffman’s book, ‘The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome.’ I can probably find original source and the page of quote from MH’s book.

            Like

            • I have never heard anything even close to that. Indeed, the Latin American Bishops, of which our Francis is one, abhorred Ratzinger. I would be very surprised to see evidence of this.

              Ratzinger was NOT an activist. He WAS in favor of reducing the impacts of Vatican II, which I totally agree with.

              Like

            • “I can probably find original source and the page of quote from MH’s book.”

              Please do.

              Like

          • Ratzinger wrote a book ironically titled ‘An Introduction To Christianity’ where he states the physical resurrection of Jesus is a stumbling block of the mind. This is the original source referenced in Hoffman’s book ‘The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome on pages 89 and 90 with direct quotes about the resurrection and the Apostles Creed on page 90.

            Like

    • Here is more from the article I read, but the entire article is much longer, so I will just post the link to it at the bottom.

      Are you aware that a group of respected Catholic leaders recently sent a letter to President Trump asking him to launch an official investigation into activities connected to the people mentioned above? It appears that Team Obama was involved in a different coup similar to the one currently focused on Trump, but this time against the Vatican and which the authors of the letter believe forced the aging Pope Benedict to step down for sinister reasons.

      In a top-notch piece of investigative journalism, William F. Jasper at the New American asks:

      Did billionaire speculator George Soros, President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Vice President Joe Biden, and Obama/Clinton adviser John Podesta conspire to overthrow the conservative Pope Benedict XVI and replace him with a radical, Pope Francis? Did they use America’s intelligence agencies, and our nation’s diplomatic machinery, political muscle, and financial power to coerce and blackmail “regime change” in the Roman Catholic Church?

      Far from being some wild conspiracy theory, there is sound prima facie evidence to indicate that this is a serious effort to expose a political scandal of the highest order, involving flagrant, criminal abuse of power at the top levels of the U.S. government.[xiv]

      Here is the letter that Jasper refers to in its entirety that was written and sent by Catholic leaders from The Remnant newspaper:

      Full article http://skywatchtv.com/2017/08/24/saboteurs-part-6-helping-force-steve-bannon-west-wing-will-pope-francis-facilitate-rise-grey-champion/

      Liked by 3 people

      • That’s very interesting. I would welcome an investigation into this. Benedict’s leaving is EXTREMELY suspicious. They did not even attempt to provide a logical explanation for it.

        Traditionally, popes are very cautious with their public statements and in their writings. When official pronouncements or comments are released, every word has been parsed and you can rest assured it means exactly what it says.

        Francis’ comments about a number of traditions and rules are alarming. I find him very suspicious, both as a person and by what I know of his history.

        I am not a big Jesuit conspiracy guy. I think most of that is nonsense. If Francis holds unorthodox beliefs it doesn’t automatically suggest that it comes from the Jesuits. On the other hand, I do recognize that a lot of the proponents of “Liberation Theology” were Jesuits.

        The MOST important job of the Pope is the preservation of orthodoxy. I hardly see how this obligation could be applied to Francis. Secondly, he shows no pastoral consideration for those whom his radical statements harm. He is clearly attempting to “remake” the Church from the seat of Peter.

        Liked by 2 people

        • It’s amazing how much information Wikileaks has discovered, that would never have seen the light of day otherwise. These wicked people meeting and plotting together like a bunch of poisonous spiders weaving a web, never thinking their deeds would be discovered.

          Liked by 3 people

          • Just wondering-How do we know Wikileaks is telling the truth? They’re considered supremely credible-what better cover for “steering” the story where it normally wouldn’t go?

            Liked by 1 person

            • That’s a good point. There are times I’m as suspicious of them as the manipulators. We’re told that they’re really good at “verifying” information. We simply have to take them at their word for that.

              I really think we should be cautious with anything. We know that we don’t have “journalists”, at least the type that are played by actors on TV. We have copy readers. None of these are looking to uncover anything.

              Also, at least on the surface, it appears that no matter how much nastiness is leaked, nothing happens. There’s a lesson in that as well. It may be simply to abandon hope.

              Liked by 1 person

            • TJ, I can understand you skepticism, Hannity covered this just the other night. He said in over 10 years, they have never given false info. I have followed Assange for years and can’t remember once.

              Liked by 1 person

          • Yes, Wikileaks does seem to acquire a lot of information. Of course, as “Truckjunkie” says, it might be easy to fabricate information and feed it to them. Also, most of the time the information is sketchy and we are left to discern motives and methods.

            Don’t get me wrong, I put nothing past these people. When I read something like this I wonder about the “hows” of it. As Joseph mentioned in another context, these thugs can be pretty “persuasive”.

            I only know Benedict by reputation over many years. He was not likable, but he was trustworthy. I have heard at least a couple of theories for his departure. I have no evidence either way.

            I mentioned Fr. Martin’s plot in “Windswept House”. It is alarmingly similar to reality. In interviews he said that his book was based on fact. Perhaps it was.

            Liked by 2 people

            • Windswept House seems to be based upon fact, with the names changed.
              We had a “cheat sheet” as to who the pseudonyms were.
              According to the “maurice pinay” (blog) Malachi Martin was a triple agent. The Pinay blog has lots of (convincing) evidence about that.

              As for Assange, there is someone I’ve listened to over the years who has a website and he says that Assange comes from an interesting family. He wouldn’t give details. He wanted to continue to be able to put out info and certain things can only be hinted out rather than actually stated, if you want to continue to be able to work. But as for the info Assange obtains, my opinion is it has to be leaks from intelligence services who (obviously) want the info leaked. (Deep State left and Deep State right or whatever name you wish to attribute to the various players.)

              Liked by 1 person

  6. Once again, Hillary is acting like “the fix is in.” She is confident of her safety because of something that’s already set in place.

    Liked by 6 people

  7. Unfortunately, our President, his Cabinet, and the Congress do not run our country or make the crucial decisions about our or our country’s continuing existence.

    Liked by 6 people

  8. Yet another reason…

    Liked by 3 people

    • Why isn’t she six feet under?

      Liked by 6 people

      • Well, Mary, her enemies are. Be assured that Trump’s 180 degree about face was because the TPTB dressed him down, then set out the procedures they’d use against his family, same as they did to my departed friend Dr Tom OBrien, FORMERLY the Clintons major financial advisor on their way to the Presidency. RIP, Tom, I did my best to expose her in time.

        Liked by 7 people

        • Yes sir. Few understand just how few run things. It’s a very exclusive club. Sure, there are a lot of hangers on, but they don’t really make the decisions. Those people are immune.

          In fact, that’s their whole purpose in being. If they could be held accountable they wouldn’t be occupying one of those positions.

          Liked by 2 people

  9. Americans who demand equal justice for all number in the tens of millions. We are being led by corrupt individuals who actively and passively abuse their Oath of Office on a daily basis. The left and right wings of Congress are on the same bird, it’s not an eagle any more, it’s a vulture.

    Stop all contributions to both Republicans and Democrats. Stand up, citizens who are able, because we most VOTE OUT EVERY single incumbent politician, at the Local, State and especially Federal levels.We have the power to cure all that ails us by imposing Constitutional remedies, without violence. We must avoid civil chaos at all costs, because that’s the path we’re headed on.

    Liked by 8 people

  10. My prediction, for what it’s worth: Hillary Clinton will SKATE, and NEVER be charged for ANYTHING. This is because she sold her soul to Satan. She will live out the rest of her days in her Chappaqua manse and die in her sleep. But I hope Mrs. Clinton understands that EVERY deal with the Devil comes with an EXPIRATION DATE.

    That being said, I have GRAVE DOUBTS about Mr. Sessions. Jeff Sessions is a perfect Southern Gentleman, and he is well-educated. But the mere fact that as Attorney General, he has announced to go after marijuana and reinvigorate the War on Drugs is a strategem so flawed, he MUST know it: He MUST understand that the constitutional issues at stake with civil asset forfeiture are enormous. He MUST know this. I know he does.
    So we must remember that ANY Cabinet member is only the glove; The President always functions as the HAND.
    Memo to President Trump: The “War on Drugs” is over. The drugs won. I don’t like that, you don’t like that. But from having pondered what Dr. Henry Makow has posted about you, Mr. President, I fear you will blow your unique chance at history. I fail to understand what you have to gain from this. Hillary has made her deal: What Say You???

    Like

  11. Just lock her up already. Look at all the lives that have been destroyed by these evil people.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Treasonous Hag. HANG, DRAW, QUARTER.

    Didn’t Hitlery do worse than Jonathan Pollard?
    Here is some of what Pollard did (from Wiki) and we KNOW HRC did much worse than Pollard:

    “Pollard grew up with what he called a “racial obligation” to Israel,and made his first trip to Israel in 1970, as part of a science program visiting the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot. While there, he was hospitalized after a fight with another student. One Weizmann scientist remembered Pollard as leaving behind “a reputation of being a troublemaker”.

    After completing high school, Pollard attended Stanford University, where he completed a degree in political science in 1976.W hile there, he is remembered by several of his acquaintances as boasting that he was a dual citizen of the United States and Israel and said he had worked for Mossad, and to have attained the rank of colonel in the Israel Defense Forces. None of these claims was true. Later, Pollard enrolled in several graduate schools, but never completed a post-graduate degree.”

    “Pollard was paid well by the Israelis: he received a salary that eventually reached $2,500 a month, and tens of thousands of dollars in cash disbursements for hotels, meals, and jewelry. In his pre-sentencing statement to Judge Robinson, Pollard said the money was a benefit that was forced on him. “I did accept money for my services”, he acknowledged, but only “as a reflection of how well I was doing my job”.

    Like

  13. Dominoes. Think Dominoes. Trumps’ setting them up and with the flick of a finger they’ll ALL FALL DOWN.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Reminder the lie- “i do not exist” lucifer
    the luciferian ascension is real

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s