House Judiciary Committee asks for second special prosecutor to investigate Clinton-Comey-Lynch

House Republicans are doing their utmost to bring Hillary Clinton to justice.

On July 26, 2017, Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee ingeniously turned a Democrat resolution witchhunt (HRes. 446) of President Trump’s firing of FBI director James Comey inside out into an amended HRes. 446 calling for an investigation into Comey’s mishandling of the FBI’s criminal investigation into then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of an unauthorized private email server. (See “House Republicans are going after Hillary Clinton!”)

A day later, on July 27, Rep. Bob Goodlatte and other Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee redoubled their effort by sending a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein calling for the appointment of a second special counsel to investigate matters connected to the 2016 election which are not addressed by HRes. 446 or Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller, including many actions taken by Obama Administration officials like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and FBI Director James Comey.

Below is the full text of the letter:

July 27, 2017

Dear Attorney General Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein:

We are writing to you to request assistance in restoring public confidence in our nation’s justice system and its investigators, specifically the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). We need to enable these agencies to perform their necessary and important law enforcement and intelligence functions fully unhindered by politics. While we presume that the FBI’s investigation into Russian influence has been subsumed into Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, we are not confident that other matters related to the 2016 election and aftermath are similarly under investigation by Special Counsel Mueller. The unbalanced, uncertain, and seemingly unlimited focus of the special counsel’s investigation has led many of our constituents to see a dual standard of justice that benefits only the powerful and politically well-connected. For this reason, we call on you to appoint a second special counsel to investigate a plethora of matters connected to the 2016 election and its aftermath, including actions taken by previously public figures like Attorney General Loretta Lynch, FBI Director James Comey, and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Many Democrats and members of the Washington media previously called for a “special prosecutor” to investigate Russian influence on the election and connections with the Trump campaign. Not surprisingly, once you actually made the decision to appoint a special counsel, the calls for further investigations by congressional committees continued, focused on allegations that have heretofore produced no evidence of criminality, despite the fact that over a year has passed since the opening of the original FBI investigation. Political gamesmanship continues to saturate anything and everything associated with reactions to President Trump’s executive decisions, and reveals the hypocrisy of those who refuse to allow the Special Counsel’s investigation to proceed without undue political influence. It is an unfortunate state of affairs.

Your stated rationale for recommending Director Comey’s termination as FBI Director was his mishandling of former Secretary Clinton’s email investigation and associated public disclosures concerning the investigation’s findings. We believe this was the correct decision. It is clear that Director Comey contributed to the politicization of the FBI’s investigations by issuing his public statement, nominating himself as judge and jury, rather than permitting career DOJ prosecutors to make the final decision. But many other questions remain unanswered, due to Mr. Comey’s premature and inappropriate decision, as well as the Obama Justice Department’s refusal to respond to legitimate Congressional oversight. Last week, the Republican Members of this Committee sent a letter to the Justice Department, asking for responses to those unanswered inquiries. These questions cannot, for history’s sake and for the preservation of an impartial system of justice, be allowed to die on the vine.

It is therefore incumbent on this Committee, in our oversight capacity, to ensure that the agencies we oversee are above reproach and that the Justice Department, in particular, remains immune to accusations of politicization. Many Congressional entities have been engaged in oversight of Russian influence on the election, but a comprehensive investigation into the 2016 Presidential campaign and its aftermath must, similarly, be free of even the suggestion of political interference. The very core of our justice system demands as much. A second, newly-appointed special counsel will not be encumbered by these considerations, and will provide real value to the American people in offering an independent perspective on these extremely sensitive matters.

Our call for a special counsel is not made lightly. We have no interest in engendering more bad feelings and less confidence in the process or governmental institutions by the American people. Rather, our call is made on their behalf. It is meant to determine whether the criminal prosecution of any individual is warranted based on the solemn obligation to follow the facts wherever they lead and applying the law to those facts.

As we referenced above, Democrats and the mainstream media called for a special counsel to be appointed to investigate any Russian influence on President Trump’s campaign. Their pleas were answered, but there are many questions that may be outside the scope of Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation. This was clear following Mr. Comey’s recent testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee on June 8, 2017, which ignited renewed scrutiny of former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and the actions she took to mislead the public concerning the investigation into the Clinton email investigation. Last year, this Committee inquired repeatedly about the circumstances surrounding that and other matters, but our inquiries were largely ignored.

During his testimony, Mr. Comey referenced a meeting on the Phoenix airport tarmac between Ms. Lynch and former President Bill Clinton. Mr. Comey raised concerns about Ms. Lynch’s conduct, and questioned her independence, stating:

At one point, the attorney general had directed me not to call it an investigation, but instead to call it a matter, which confused me and concerned me. That was one of the bricks in the load that led me to conclude, ‘I have to step away from the department if we’re to close this case credibly.’

In addition, in preparing to testify in front of Congress for a September 2015 hearing, Mr. Comey asked Ms. Lynch at the time whether she was prepared to refer to the Clinton investigation as just that, an “investigation.” Mr. Comey testified that Ms. Lynch said, “Yes, but don’t call it that, call it a matter.” Mr. Comey retorted, “Why would I do that?” Ms. Lynch answered, “Just call it a matter.” Mr. Comey stated that he acquiesced, but it gave him “a queasy feeling,” since it gave him the “impression that the attorney general was trying to align how we describe our work” with how the Clinton campaign was talking about it.

Notwithstanding the fact that the FBI is the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and not the Federal Bureau of Matters, one is hard-pressed to understand why Ms. Lynch directed then-Director Comey to call the Clinton investigation a “matter” unless she intended to use such deceptive language to help wrongly persuade the American people that former Secretary Clinton was not, in fact, the subject of a full-scale FBI investigation, or to otherwise undermine the integrity of the investigation.

Following Director Comey’s Senate Intelligence Committee testimony, Senator Dianne Feinstein was asked about the testimony while appearing on CNN’s “State of the Union.” Senator Feinstein stated, “I would have a queasy feeling too, though, to be candid with you, I think we need to know more about that, and there’s only one way to know about it, and that’s to have the Judiciary Committee take a look at that.”

We share Senator Feinstein’s and Mr. Comey’s concerns – specifically, that during the midst of a contentious Presidential election, which was already rife with scandal arising from Secretary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information, that our nation’s chief law enforcement officer would instruct the FBI Director, her subordinate, to mislead the American public about the nature of the investigation. Following Ms. Lynch’s directive to downplay the Clinton investigation as a “matter,” Director Comey infamously terminated the Clinton investigation, stating, “[a]lthough there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”

Mr. Comey’s testimony has provided new evidence that Ms. Lynch may have used her position of authority to undermine the Clinton investigation. At any other point in history this accusation would entail a shock to the conscience of law abiding Americans who expect a DOJ free of political influence. We only have, however, an investigation into Russian influence on the 2016 election, including any ties to the Trump campaign. To limit our nation’s insight into just this this single component of the 2016 election will only cause the special counsel’s work to be derided as one-sided and incomplete. The special counsel’s work must begin and end unimpeded by political motivations on either side of the aisle. For these reasons, the following points must also be fully investigated – ideally, via a second special counsel. This is imperative to regain the cherished trust and confidence in our undoubtedly distressed law enforcement and political institutions.

We call on a newly appointed special counsel to investigate, consistent with appropriate regulations, the following questions, many of which were previously posed by this Committee and remain unanswered:

  1. Then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch directing Mr. Comey to mislead the American people on the nature of the Clinton investigation;
  2. The shadow cast over our system of justice concerning Secretary Clinton and her involvement in mishandling classified information;
  3. FBI and DOJ’s investigative decisions related to former Secretary Clinton’s email investigation, including the propriety and consequence of immunity deals given to potential Clinton co-conspirators Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, John Bentel and possibly others;
  4. The apparent failure of DOJ to empanel a grand jury to investigate allegations of mishandling of classified information by Hillary Clinton and her associates;
  5. The Department of State and its employees’ involvement in determining which communications of Secretary Clinton’s and her associates to turn over for public scrutiny;
  6. WikiLeaks disclosures concerning the Clinton Foundation and its potentially unlawful international dealings;
  7. Connections between the Clinton campaign, or the Clinton Foundation, and foreign entities, including those from Russia and Ukraine;
  8. Mr. Comey’s knowledge of the purchase of Uranium One¹ by the company Rosatom, whether the approval of the sale was connected to any donations made to the Clinton Foundation, and what role Secretary Clinton played in the approval of that sale that had national security ramifications;
  9. Disclosures arising from unlawful access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer systems, including inappropriate collusion between the DNC and the Clinton campaign to undermine Senator Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign;
  10. Post-election accusations by the President [Trump] that he was wiretapped by the previous Administration, and whether Mr. Comey and Ms. Lynch had any knowledge of efforts made by any federal agency to unlawfully monitor communications of then-candidate Trump or his associates;
  11. Selected leaks of classified information related to the unmasking of U.S. person identities incidentally collected upon by the intelligence community, including an assessment of whether anyone in the Obama Administration, including Mr. Comey, Ms. Lynch, Ms. Susan Rice, Ms. Samantha Power, or others, had any knowledge about the “unmasking” of individuals on then candidate-Trump’s campaign team, transition team, or both;
  12. Admitted leaks by Mr. Comey to Columbia University law professor, Daniel Richman, regarding conversations between Mr. Comey and President Trump, how the leaked information was purposefully released to lead to the appointment of a special counsel, and whether any classified information was included in the now infamous “Comey memos”;
  13. Mr. Comey’s and the FBI’s apparent reliance on “Fusion GPS”² in its investigation of the Trump campaign, including the company’s creation of a “dossier” of information about Mr. Trump, that dossier’s commission and dissemination in the months before and after the 2016 election, whether the FBI paid anyone connected to the dossier, and the intelligence sources of Fusion GPS or any person or company working for Fusion GPS and its affiliates; and
  14. Any and all potential leaks originated by Mr. Comey and provide to author Michael Schmidt dating back to 1993.

You have the ability now to right the ship for the American people so these investigations may proceed independently and impartially. The American public has a right to know the facts – all of them – surrounding the election and its aftermath. We urge you to appoint a second special counsel to ensure these troubling, unanswered questions are not relegated to the dustbin of history.


Bob Goodlatte, Chair
Jim Jordan
Lamar Smith
Matt Gaetz
Tom Marino
Steve Chabot
Blake Farenthold
Steve King
Louis Gohmert
Ted Poe
Doug Collins
Raul Labrador
Ron DeSantis
Andy Biggs
Mike Johnson
John Rutherford
Martha Roby
John Ratcliffe
Trent Franks
Karen Handel


Note¹: Uranium One is a uranium mining company, headquartered in Toronto,  Canada. It has operations in Australia, Canada, Kazakhstan, South Africa and the United States. In January 2013, Russian state-owned enterprise Rosatom, through its subsidiary ARMZ Uranium Holding, purchased Uranium One for $1.3 billion. For Bill Clinton and John Podesta’s involvement in Uranium One and Rosatom, click here.

Note²: Fusion GPS is a commercial DC-based intelligence firm that conducts opposition political research on political candidates, such as on Mitt Romney. The company was hired by Planned Parenthood (PP) to investigate pro-life activists who took a series of “sting” videos showing PP selling aborted baby parts to medical researchers. In the 2016 presidential campaign, Fusion GPS was first hired by Republicans to conduct “opposition research” on Donald Trump, which ended when Trump became the GOP’s presidential nominee. Hillary Clinton then became Fusion GPS’s client to dig up dirt on Trump. Fusion GPS hired former MI-6 agent Christopher Steele to compile a dossier on Trump, which became infamous for its entirely-fake allegation that Trump had hired Russian prostitutes to urinate (“golden shower”) on a Russian hotel bed supposedly used by Obama.

Send a “thank you” to Congressman Bob Goodlatte!:


33 responses to “House Judiciary Committee asks for second special prosecutor to investigate Clinton-Comey-Lynch

  1. Please make something happen. I’m tired of holding my breath.

    Liked by 6 people

    • DCG . . . I’m with you, we get our hopes up, we hold our breath that something is going to imminently going to happen . . . . . . and a big fat nothing happens. This same scenario has been played out several times. Let this be the “real deal.” Get Rudy Gulianni to be this new Special Prosecutor, if anyone can ferret out the truth, it would be him.

      I still am in a quandary, since Robert Mueller, was the one who actually leaked stuff that Comey gave to him to leak . . . why isn’t he under some threat of legal action. Don’t they all know that it is illegal to “leak” top secret information?

      I plan on praying that we get some forward momentum on this whole debacle, and I do mean soon. You must admit how the GOP turned things inside out on the Dems was the best masterpiece we have seen in a while.

      Liked by 4 people

  2. I pray that something resembling justice will come out of this investigation. I’ve read a couple of articles this past week, saying that Hillary has been offered a plea deal of some kind. If true, I don’t know anyone that would call that justice! I hope and pray it’s not true. There are so many news outlets putting out hearsay instead of truth, I don’t even know who to believe anymore. I’m not even talking about MSM, but rather, some of the main conservative, alt-right news outlets.

    Today’s events in Virginia, if actually real and not orchestrated in some way, remind me of scenes from some third-world country. At first glance, it sure looks like a lot of coincidences in one place, so I’m watching pretty closely.

    I want my country back. 😎

    Liked by 5 people

    • Maryaha . . . I’m with you on that thought! I am sick and tired of all the civil disobedience, that seems to be leading to deaths, catastrophic dollar amounts of damage, and the fact that we have lost our freedom to “peacefully” assemble.

      Liked by 5 people

    • I believe today’s actions in VA were organized for an anti-Trump narrative. The nationalists had a permit, antifa did not. The governor knew this and had anticipated the clash yet did nothing preventative to stop it. And no doubt Soros had his evil hand in the antifa antics.

      Liked by 5 people

    • Don’t forget the actions of the Virginia governor’s son. His son is a member of the antifa. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree…

      Liked by 4 people

  3. What happened in Virginia was a bad joke and the media’s coverage was bad. Defending your heritage makes you a “white nationalist?” So does that make those who opposed them anti-white nationalists?

    Nothing will come out of any investigation into the swamp. Remember the Benghazi investigations? We have the best government money can buy.

    We know Obama was funding and arming Muslim extremists and government agencies were his willing hand maidens. Are we to expect them to turn themselves in? Remember the Waco investigations? Remember Ruby Ridge?

    Burn it down and start again. No one should get to vote who hasn’t served in the military; isn’t a taxpayer; and doesn’t have a clean criminal record.

    Liked by 3 people

    • The media’s coverage was predictable and expected. We all know their agenda.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Re-writing history was a favorite of the old USSR. The South has nothing to be ashamed of, especially not the generals. This PC crap is reminiscent of what started the Civil War in the first place.

      This is all orchestrated psychological warfare. Little snowflakes and imaginary “victims” (several generations removed), dictating what we’re “allowed” to think and do. They should just gather them up, take their passports and put them on the plane to Tel Aviv.

      Liked by 4 people

    • I see what you’re shooting for,but your limits for voting are problematic. I wasn’t in the Military (insulin-dependent Diabetic),I’m not what you’d consider a Taxpayer (on SSD),but I have a clean record and I DID sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
      Given MY choice,I’d like to see Liberals locked into rubber rooms and relieved of their rights to vote,drive and to hold political office. As a group they’re FAR too dangerous to allow any power. I also support Workfare whenever possible-There’s PLENTY of work available. It’s also important to retain the low minimum wage,but EDUCATE the new workers on the history and PURPOSE of it. Minimum wage jobs were NEVER meant to be CAREERS-only “beginner” jobs,so people new to the workforce can LEARN how to work,get skilled at their jobs and move up the scale to BETTER jobs,leaving job openings for the NEXT beginners.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Well said. I’d only add mandatory re-education of liberals so they see the deceit of what they’ve been brainwashed to believe. Conversion… maybe end up with some productive members of society rather than gate crashers trying to tear down everything this country has ever stood and fought for.


  4. “Oh, what difference does it make?”. Just kidding. I’m afraid these investigations may seriously impact Hillary’s dates on the preaching circuit. She probably has her tents booked well in advance of her engagements.

    I can’t wait to see traveling circus come rolling into town.

    Liked by 5 people

  5. If anyone pays any attention to this, at least most of it is out there now. Honestly, I cannot remember when I’ve seen this much corruption. Clinton (both of them actually) are so guilty its pathetic. Still, look what’s happened.

    As the letter points out, they go after Trump. They might also ask how Lynch and her cohorts manage to amass such fortunes on civil service pay? They might ask why the Clinton Foundation manages to avoid audits that other “non-profits” and any other group that runs afoul of them manage to get with some regularity.

    They might ask why she and her old crew keep their security clearances, in light of all we know to date of her “mishandling” of classified information.

    I will be surprised if anything happens with this. If they do appoint a prosecutor, they will “slow roll” the process. Sessions can’t be trusted anymore than any of the other swamp creatures.

    Liked by 4 people

    • While they’re asking,they might look into how Harry Reid managed to get so rich on the salary HE was paid. Remember,he said repeatedly he could commiserate with the low income people,having started out in Politics “dirt poor”…..BTW-there’s a pretty extensive history out there regarding his family history. He has precious little to be proud of in his past,and he’s added nothing good to it except political Titles. If I can find the link I’ll post it.


  6. This governmental corruption reminds me of creeping brain cancer–the govt. is the head of this country, sort of like it’s ‘brain’, since it’s supposed to process input from us, it’s citizens, then put our wishes/will into action. Right now, the creeping cancer seems to have progressed to the point at which no matter what the true input is from us, it’s citizens, the ‘PROGRESSIVE cancer’ is short-circuiting our will, and what is coming out as it’s ‘actions’ are nothing but a totalitarian-style form of garbage–“good groceries in–worthless-perverted garbage out”.

    It’s not only pathetic, it’s criminal and dangerous–the ‘cancer’ is the ‘progressive’/communist-socialist/fascist political-and-social movement’–it’s a ‘movement’ alright, but what movement is really is is unmentionable in polite company. If there are not enough members within our cancer-riddled govt. to help turn the tide within this current govt. back to where it belongs[adherent to the nation’s constitution], I have no idea what will come next–but, I’m sure the ‘progressive communists’ will have a real doozy to spring on us–hitting all of us who love our country below the belt, which is how all cowards fight–dirty.

    I am thinking that, the reason the Va. governor did nothing, in spite of knowing what might be coming[which automatically makes the man a criminal–even though being a ‘progressive’ already puts him in that category, imo] was nothing short of the beginning of ‘progressive’ retribution, due to what Congressman Goodlatte[from Va., himself], and the other congressmen with him, did by requesting the “Special Counsel” to investigate what should have been investigated as soon as what happened was revealed, yet was consciously ignored by the so-called “Justice Dept.”, which was run by, guess who–the “progressive communists” who call themselves ‘democrats’.

    I think most of us now recognized that the ‘democrat’ party has successfully been commandeered by social-political forces that are totally foreign to our country’s makeup, and they are quickly trying to change our govt. to reflect a more ‘soviet’ style of govt. They’ve even convinced their ignorant ‘followers’ in this country that utopia awaits them if only they will do the ‘party’s’ bidding, while it overthrows the govt. of the United States–this is more than horrendous.

    This govt. either has terminal ‘brain cancer’ that’s successfully eating it completely away, or this ‘cancer’ is able to be excised, and a recovery is still possible–we desperately need the latter to be true, so I’m going to pray to our heavenly Father, asking that, if it be His will, that our govt.’s cancerous ‘brain’ be cured of it’s terminal condition, and asking that in Jesus’s name[amen], of course!

    Liked by 5 people

    • Very nicely done. I personally think the two party system is just another false dialectic. What’s happened is that they’ve taken the existing one and converted it into two impossibly unsatisfactory “alternatives”. It’s like a Chinese menu. You get one from Column “A” or “B” but no substitutions. That way they control both the limits and direction of discussion.

      You are either a little Satanic fruitcake, or an overly aggressive war-monger, you decide. It is all garbage. We need to disengage from it and start chasing them through the streets.

      Liked by 2 people

  7. Loretta Lynch Used Her Grandmother’s Name as Alias to Communicate with Department of Justice Officials during Clinton Investigation […]

    Source –

    BOMBSHELL! Loretta Lynch used ALIAS in efforts to THWART Hillary Clinton Investigation!

    Liked by 4 people

  8. FBI Leaked Classified Flight Plan of AG Loretta Lynch to Set Up Bill Clinton’s Tarmac Ambush

    Liked by 5 people

  9. Reblogged this on kommonsentsjane and commented:

    Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.

    We must reverse this charade by the Democrats into what the problem really is – THE DEMOCRATS AND HILLARY CLINTON ARE GUILTY OF CRIMES AGAINST AMERICA – WITH OBAMA AND THE REST OF THE GANG WHO ARE COMPLICIT.


    Liked by 3 people

  10. I would love to see all of them locked up, the system owes JUSTICE to each and very American for what this bunch of thieves and traitors have done to US, including the swamp gators, so far it is blah, blah, blah…….

    Liked by 4 people

  11. Hey! Look at what we’re doing here to prove we really care about laws and justice while we screw everything else up over there.


  12. If granted and properly done, they should be found guilty and never see the sunlight again. I am not holding my breath, they always slide.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Yes, they slide, but that just shows us what is really going on here–as lophatt said in his reply above, that they’ve positioned their own people on both sides, in positions that will serve them in their hour of need, such as corrupt judges, corrupt legislators, corrupt FBI people, etc.–that way, no matter which way ‘the wind blows’ they can make it blow ‘good’ for their cause.

      I believe that most of those involved with that bunch have not one clue as to whom they’ve thrown in with, since their little heads are constantly filled with ‘visions of sugar plums’ by the nwo villians at the helm of the left’s ’cause celeb’–world domination–yet, the ‘sugar plums’ think utopia awaits at the end, once their ‘side’ wins–whoops, wrong again–what awaits them turns my hair grey every time I think about it! However, so long as the Lord’s people are here, too, we’ll be getting what the ‘sugar plums’ get–not a happy thought! 😦 That’s why our praying for help from the Lord is one of the very best things we can do!

      Liked by 2 people

        • Oh–and, pardon me for this but–barf!! Looking at that ugly ‘rogues gallery’ of miscreants turns my poor stomach over! Yuck, what a bunch of ugly bananas! But, I totally agree with what you said–no matter who we elect, they end up ruling over us–not a nice thought! But, how this all ends helps cheer me up tremendously! 🙂 “Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.” Amen!

          Liked by 3 people

        • On the real rulers of America’s shadow government, this blogger asks if NBC’s Tim Russert (how I miss him) was assassinated:

          H/t MomOfIV

          Liked by 1 person

          • Dr. E., do you think that those whom they are calling “Khazar Jews”, are really false Jews, whom Jesus referred to as members of “the synagogue of satan”? At least maybe most of them are? Because, this whole thing about the “Jews” being behind the ‘deep state’ actors who are working towards that ‘one world govt.’ is truly confusing me.

            I know that none of us are ‘angels’, but the way those particular “Jews” are portrayed it’s as though they are agents directly working for the devil! If so, then they might be those of whom the Lord spoke in Revelation 3, as He addressed the Church in Philadelphia:

            “9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.”[Revelation 3:9 KJV]

            Those “which SAY they are Jews, and are not, but do LIE…”


  13. No pockets in a shroud. No sceptre, either. I’ve been wondering for the last few years if any of the above wizened wise-asses realize this yet? They don’t just have ONE FOOT in the grave….they are hanging on by a fingernail to terra firma above ground. You’d THINK that anyone who had such a DRIVE to have an impact AFTER death, would want to be associated with positive outcomes, instead of scandals, hired vandals, anarchists, and “anti” schemes of any and every kind…..

    Liked by 3 people

    • They made their choice a long time ago. They are getting their earthly rewards. Then, when they leave the building to be eternally tortured, we leave for our reward. They chose badly.

      Liked by 3 people

  14. Is Jeff Sessions part of the establishment swamp?

    Napolitano Infuriated – Dirty Little SECRET Why SESSIONS DOJ Protecting LYNCH (VIDEO)

    Liked by 1 person

  15. The Justice Department heavily redacted the documents under Exemption b (5), which allows agencies to withhold draft or deliberative process material. The blacked-out material centers around talking points drafted and used by Justice to respond to press inquiries about the Lynch-Clinton meeting.

    This is a bullshit excuse and will not hold in front of a judge so expect eventual uncovering of the talking points.

    Here’s a judge saying that formulations for press releases should not be redacted:

    Communications that ‘do not make recommendations or express opinions on legal or policy matters’ Are not part of the deliberative process.

    Source –

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s