Are humans breeding with animals? Lambs born with human-like heads

Before you read further, look at the pic below and tell me what you think the head looks like.

Does that look like a sheep’s head to you? Or does the head look human?

Jamie Pyatt reports for Daily Mail, June 22, 2017, that villagers of Lady Frere in the Eastern Province of South Africa have been living in fear since a sheep gave birth to the creature in the pic above, believed by elders to be a half-human half-beast sent by the devil. “Many” of the 4,000 residents and farmers think bestiality and witchcraft had led to the birth of the creature.

A villager was quoted as saying: ‘”he elders when they saw it said it was sent by the devil and was born after a coupling between a man and a sheep and then there was panic. Many people are afraid and will not be happy until it is burned.”

The panic got so great that the Eastern Cape Department of Rural Development sent out experts to carry out tests after pictures of it spread like wildfire through the community.

Chief Director of Veterinary Services Dr. Lubabalo Mrwebi said the photo is not a hoax and admitted that at first glance the lamb which was born dead did resemble a human being. He insisted the creature was not part human, but was a severely deformed lamb that was sired by a sheep that had been infected by a Rift Valley Fever at an early stage of its pregnancy.

Dr. Mrwebi explained that humans cannot breed with sheep:

“It is worth noting that a sheep has 28 pairs of chromosomes while humans have 23 pairs which is important in dispelling the myth that a union of a sheep ovum and a human sperm can lead to a development of a viable life form. The deformed lamb exhibits signs that are consistent with an early foetal development that went wrong as a result of a viral infection and nothing more.”

Dr. Mrwebi said that the gestation period for a sheep is five months, which meant that the deformed lamb had been conceived in late December 2016 or early January 2017 — a time of plentiful rainfall that brought many mosquitoes and midges which are carriers of viruses that cause the Rift Valley Fever in sheep. Dr. Mrwebi concluded:

“It is fair to assume, therefore, that the [mother] sheep was infected by the RVF virus. The resultant circulation of the virus in the blood found its way through the maternal blood into the uterus and the foetus, which was at a very critical stage of development. The infected foetus then, as a result, failed to form properly, leading to the deformity that it became. It does look like a human form but it is not part human at all.”

The department’s veterinary officials would conduct a post-mortem on the creature and its results will be communicated to the public.

What happened in South Africa is not the first case of a lamb born with a humanlike face.

In 2010, a sheep in Turkey gave birth to a stillborn lamb (see below) with a human-like face. It had human features  of eyes, nose and mouth; only the ears were those of a sheep.

On January 13, 2010, AFP reports (via Daily Telegraph) that the lamb was born in a village not far from the city of Izmir, Turkey.

Veterinarian Erhan Elibol, 29, performed a caesarean on the pregnant sheep to take the lamb out, but was horrified to see that the features of the lamb’s snout bore a striking resemblance to a human face. Elibol said:

“I’ve seen mutations with cows and sheep before. I’ve seen a one-eyed calf, a two-headed calf, a five-legged calf. But when I saw this youngster I could not believe my eyes. His mother could not deliver him so I had to help the animal.”

Vets said that the lamb was a rare mutation due to the mother sheep’s fodder being abundant with vitamin A.

In September 2009, a goat in Zimbabwe, Africa, gave birth to a baby also with a human-like head. The mutant creature was hairless. Local residents said that even dogs were afraid to approach the bizarre animal. The locals burnt the body of the little goat, and biologists had no chance to study the rare mutation.It stayed alive for several hours until it was killed by frightened villagers.

The governor of the province where the goat was born said it was the fruit of an unnatural relationship between the female goat and a man:

“This incident is very shocking. It is my first time to see such an evil thing. It is really embarrassing. The head belongs to a man while the body is that of a goat. This is evident that an adult human being was responsible. Evil powers caused this person to lose self control. We often hear cases of human beings who commit bestiality but this is the first time for such an act to produce a product with human features.”

So can humans actually breed with animals, albeit the offsprings being still births?

Ewen Callaway reports for New Scientist, April 21, 2010, that a genetic study of nearly two thousand people from around the world suggests that some of our ancestors had bred with other species of humans, such as Neanderthals, at least twice — about 60,000 years ago in the eastern Mediterranean and, more recently, about 45,000 years ago in eastern Asia, Nature News reports from tge 2010 annual meeting of the American Society of Physical Anthropologists in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Since humans had bred with the different species of Neanderthals, can humans mate with other animal species today?

Writing for Slate, Nov. 14, 2006, Torie Bosch answered “Probably not.” But we don’t really know because ethical considerations preclude definitive research on the subject.

Nevertheless, Bosch insisted that:

“it’s safe to say that human DNA has become so different from that of other animals that interbreeding would likely be impossible. Groups of organisms tend to drift apart genetically when they get separated by geographical barriers . . . . When the two groups come back into contact with each other many, many years later, they may each have evolved to the point where they can no longer mate.

Bosch explains there are two types of changes that prevent animals of different species from interbreeding:

  1. Pre-zygotic reproductive isolating mechanisms: After so many generations apart, a pair of different species animals might look so different from one another that they’re not inclined to have sex. And if the animals do try to have sex, incompatible genitalia or sperm motility could pose another problem: A human spermatozoon may not be equipped to navigate the reproductive tract of a chimpanzee, for example.
  2. Post-zygotic reproductive isolating mechanisms: factors that would make it impossible for a hybrid animal fetus to grow into a reproductive adult, resulting in a miscarriage or sterile offspring. The further apart two animals are in genetic terms, the less likely they are to produce viable offspring.

Note that the two reasons given for why humans can’t interbreed with animals like sheep and goats are not iron-clad compelling:

(1) The assumption that humans look so different from animals that humans won’t find animals sexually attractive is belied by the fact that there are bestialists. See my posts:

(2) That a human-animal hybrid can’t grow into a reproductive adult, resulting in a miscarriage or sterile offspring, doesn’t mean that such hybrids don’t exist. It simply means that the offspring of a human and an animal is not viable, as in  the still-born human-face lambs in South Africa and Turkey, and the human-face goat in Zimbabwe.

Here’s another reason why the still-born grotesqueries in South Africa, Turkey, and Zimbabwe may in fact be human-animal hybrids: Ten years ago, scientists had created a a sheep that was 15% human.

Claudia Joseph reports for Daily Mail, March 27, 2007, that scientists had created the world’s first human-sheep chimera, with the body of a sheep and half-human organs. The sheep had 15% human cells and 85% animal cells.

Why would scientists do that? To grow animal organs for transplant into humans.

Professor Esmail Zanjani, of the University of Nevada, spent 7 years and £5 million perfecting the technique, which involved injecting adult human cells into a sheep’s foetus. He created a sheep liver with a large proportion of human cells and hoped to precisely match a sheep to a human transplant patient by using the human patient’s own stem cells to create his/her own flock of sheep. The process would involve extracting stem cells from the donor’s bone marrow and injecting them into the peritoneum of a sheep’s foetus. When the lamb is born, two months later, it would have a liver, heart, lungs and brain that are partly human and available for transplant.

Prof. Zanjani said:

“We would take a couple of ounces of bone marrow cells from the patient. We would isolate the stem cells from them, inject them into the peritoneum of these animals and then these cells would get distributed throughout the metabolic system into the circulatory system of all the organs in the body. The two ounces of stem cell or bone marrow cell we get would provide enough stem cells to do about ten foetuses. So you don’t just have one organ for transplant purposes, you have many available in case the first one fails.”

Ethical considerations aside, Dr. Patrick Dixon, an international lecturer on biological trends, warned: “Many silent viruses could create a biological nightmare in humans. Mutant animal viruses are a real threat, as we have seen with HIV.”

The creation of a sheep that was 15% human happened ten years ago. Since then, biologists’ helter-skelter creation of human-animal chimeras has advanced even further. See:

Expect to see more lambs and goats born with human-like faces in the future.

God help us.

H/t Will Shanley


29 responses to “Are humans breeding with animals? Lambs born with human-like heads

  1. Is that Michael Moore’s baby picture? He was crotchless from the start.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. I have been seeing more and more pictures of half-humans / half-animal and they make me so sick. I always quickly pass on by, but they still make me want to vomit. We live in such a sick, evil, satanic world that every day that goes by surprises me that we still exist. I know that I now live in a protected environment and cannot even imagine what happens in other places. May the Lord have mercy.

    Liked by 4 people

  3. As sick as it is, we know men have been breeding with animals for as long as we go back. Whether a fetus could become viable is doubtful, but some of the excuses the above vets gave is pretty shaky. With all the rain, why did only one sheep have a deformed birth, same for the sheep that her fodder was abundant in vit A. Why was she the only one having a deformed birth? In both cases, deformed births should have been rampant.
    Men have been going against Mother Earth and God for centuries.
    Now we have an over abundance of contamination of earth now, giving us hell only knows what in the future. We have twisted behavior going on resulting in things we can only imagine.
    We have all seen the frogs with extra legs and calves with two heads, etc, etc, but they all still looked like frogs and calves, etc. now they are taking in the shapes of humans. God help us.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Glenn47 . . . Most excellent post! As you have said, “God help us.” Men do not know the evil that they do! I would hope that in all cases such as this that the animals born of such evil unions would be stillborn. It is an insult to God to mix the the properties of His human children, with that of the animals He created. I find it so reprehensible that people would indulge in this kind of evil doing.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Hadenoughalready

    Chimeras have been around since before the time of Noah. Egyptian, Greek, and Hindu gods, just to name a few, all incorporated animal-like deities. The “kicker is: they didn’t maintain animal qualities, only their appearances. They can from somewhere, right? Every myth contains a kernel of truth.
    Since we’re living in those “days of Noah”, again, this is to be expected. Trust me, worse will come.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Biblical penalties should apply to those who engage in bestiality and also to those who engage in experimentation between humans and animals.
    If not we may begin to witness the Island of Dr. Moreau.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. These are the “play” projects of Dr. Mengele’s progeny. Our government invited this evil madness into the U.S. with Operation Paperclip. Many of these creatures (dead) have been found in the desert near “experimental” facilities.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. In the third world farm animals are just another orifice to rape.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Between our complete inability to manage the nuclear waste we create, the unknown consequences of continuing experiments at CERN, the proliferation of genetically modified foods & plants, the production of harmful synthetic pharmaceuticals, dangerous human/AI melding experiments and now this utterly satanic chimera experimentation – “scientists” and their money-grubbing enablers are destroying everything God created. I can only hope there’s a heaven, because we’re creating hell on earth.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Yours is a wonderfully well-written statement of my sentiments, filia, so I’ve nothing to add, Perhaps my background in animal & plant breeding may assure some that we will never see true ‘interbreeding’ between animals that don’t have the correct genetic sequencing, as Nature/God/the Kosmos will not –as far as know– support mismatched ‘instructions’.

      The Problem lies in humankind’s ceaseless striving to be as God, always our first and last sin. In pursuit of that end we fall into infinite evil.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Thank you for words of comfort, Joseph. The more I learn , the more shame I feel for being human, failing to recognize technology’s inherent potential to “cross the line”. I’ll be silent no longer.

        Liked by 1 person

  9. Alex Jones has reported that “scientists” (names and locations unspecified) have created human-animal hybrids or chimeras. At first I didn’t believe it. But I am willing to lend this credence.
    I have looked on the internet for any investigations into Rockefeller University, located on York Avenue at E. 67 St., in Manhattan. The Rockefeller Foundation has been at the vanguard of the eugenic movement in the United States. I see doctors entering and exiting the main tower at the south end of the campus, located at E. 63 St., but I have never seen students entering or leaving the main gate at E. 67 St. So my question is, what goes on in there? I would love to find out. But I suspect that a lot of “medical” research is going on there. (If anyone reading this has any information or can point me to that information, I’d be grateful).

    Let us assume that scientists (read: MAD scientists) could actually create such a chimera, one that is “15% human,” as Dr. Eowyn’s post states, or any other percentage—say, 1% “human.” WOULD IT ACTUALLY BE “HUMAN?” WOULD IT ACTUALLY HAVE A HUMAN SOUL? I would certainly hope NOT! Actually, it would be an interesting question: How would we put this question up to and against each one of the heresies the Church has had to battle throughout Her History? Specifically, I am wondering about the Manichean Heresy: Would a sheep, goat or bear, for that matter, that is “15% human” have 15% of a human soul? For the Manicheans maintain that if one loses a finger, toe or limb that he has that much less of a soul—which the Church has successfully repudiated.
    But I think THIS is one of the things the eugenicists are after: They are looking for cheap beasts of burden, to be sure: Incapable of breeding (so numbers can be controlled and inventoried), cheap to maintain (they would probably eat filth or garbage), would not be rational, and would have no rights. And they are also looking for ways in which they can cull humanity of its “useless eaters”: I believe a world-wide genocide is what they seek.

    At any rate, this is the beast-side of the formulation. On the other end, we are up against a technocratic elite that eagerly awaits TRANSHUMANISM, and Bill Gates, Elon Musk, et al., are all in favor of this.

    The Trappist monk Thomas Merton (d. 1968) said something very interesting and very telling. He wrote that “science is the child of magic.” When I read this 40 years ago, I was puzzled. But from all I’ve learned over the past few years, this is more relevant today than ever before: Humanity is under systemic and systematic attack, and that attack will employ all the tactics and procedures that medicine and the other sciences can employ. Again, it flows from Benthamite utilitarianism and British Eugenics, with its hallowed (false) dogma of evolution, through Nietzschean and Satanic nihilism, right on through to the technocracy and transhumanism awaiting us today.
    Excellent post, and I will scour You Tube on the scientific methods used to attain this monstrosity!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yeah, Thomas Merton was right. Whether this is the product of “science” or “degeneracy” is an open question. It is true that in countries where beastiality is common it would be more likely to produce some viability.

      While it is generally taught in school that human/animal couplings do not produce viable offspring I wouldn’t be too certain of that. If you enhance the odds through science it could increase incidences such as these.

      Humans are arrogant. They observe things and mistake that for understanding. I remember as a student fertilizing anemones and rabbits with saline solution. Sometimes the offspring lived for a short time. These, of course, were missing chromosomes.

      The Church does not teach that such things are impossible. It teaches that there are some things that humans should not experiment with. Playing God is chief among them.

      I concede that there are mutton heads out there who welcome this “enhanced” form of being. There are also those who would create new definitions for “gender”. They want to “boldly go where no one has gone before”. In my view people like these are ungrateful idiots.

      As to the case at hand, I believe that “science” has the ability to do things like this. Given the location, unless there is more here than what’s in the article, it looks more likely like the result of Dr. Eowyn’s Muslim goat-lover’s amorous adventures. .

      Liked by 1 person

  10. Scientist have been genetically modifying animals for some time now-most likely these animals are human-pig hybrids that were created for tissue transplantation-I consider this a crime against sentient beings

    Liked by 2 people

  11. “Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!”
    Was there actually something darker, deeper behind that line?


  12. It’s those Muslim studs do in their thang.


  13. There must be a goat shortage.


  14. Does not the Bible read “Every Kind after itself”? One kind cannot reproduce with another kind, from what I can tell, and if humans could reproduce with animals you can be sure there would be shockingly more “hybrid” creatures found, both living, and dead, on a regular basis because bestialists/zoophiles are a more common vileness than society at present likes to admit (There are even guides to having sex with dolphins out there.), even this year I can think of one case I heard of, where a “artist” woman was acquiring dogs for the sole purpose of having sexual relations with them, and she has not yet born any hybrid.

    More importantly though, the concept of this kind of hybridism is a gnostic doctrine, and these occurrences may be a media soft-sell for it, as the premise of the false doctrine of “serpent seed” and “the nephilim” stem directly from saying angels (their own kind) reproduced with human beings, producing spawn anywhere from 450 ft tall (per the gnostic “book of enoch” the r.h. charles translation, and the “book of giants” out of the dead sea scrolls) to almost two miles tall (per the laurence translation of the same gnostic “book of enoch”). no human woman can support even the foetal developmental stages of such things, meet the nutritional intakes necessary, and not explode well before the thing even comes to term. Both the false “serpent seed” doctrine and the “nephilim” doctrine have spread like a virulent disease due to the likes of neo-gnostics like steve quayle, tom horn, chuck missler, and others who really should know better, as well as william branham, arnold murray, and eustace mullins (yes the same mullins lauded as a hero in the “conspiracy”/research circles, I can no longer trust any of his work after what I’ve found.), and are at the core of racist concepts, the “christian identity” (decidedly not christian, also promoted by mullins) cult has this as a core doctrine.

    I would also like to point out that gnosticism is satanism, both aleister crowley (readers here should already be familiar with him) and one “ida cradock” were fans of the gnostic “book of enoch”, Ms. cradock’s main claim to infamy was spectrophilia. She alleged to have an angelic/spirit husband that she had intercourse with, yet never produced children by him. This amid many others with claims of the same, or assaults by “succubi” or “incubi” demons. Another point, another gnostic text also posits the false doctrine that humankind reproduced with animals, the so-called “book of jasher”, also utilized by quayle & horn, alleges that humans produced offspring by animals.

    None of this is so, I’d say, grossly deformed animals are a product of our decaying world, near as I can tell. Consider the Indian “Tree Man” who was not actually part tree, but merely looked it due to unchecked growth of warts due to viral infection, his appearance vastly changed due to the problem being untreated. Then there were the “wolf boys” from mexico, having thick hair all over their faces, leading some to think they were werewolves etc. despite that it was a flaw in their genes, and finally the case of the “Elephant man” a sad case of a very drastic defect in the face, no part of him was truly animal. I posit that animals are not immune to such drastic & appearance-altering defects either, which is what I would suspect these poor creatures pictured are.

    A final note, consider how the neo-gnostic doctrine of evolution plays into this, and how quotes like those of Ms. Ewen Callaway could be construed, asserting that there was some “other species” humans that regular mankind bred with, producing modern man (Some adapt the nephilim malarkey to this.), all without any solid evidence, but a veritable orchestral hall of “yes men” and “peer-reviewers” shouting the same lies from the rooftops, in the public (and even private) school system, etc. Should this really be surprising though? The “popular science” movement, and secular society in modern day are both heavily “gnosticized” if I may coin a term, even many churches too, after all it wasn’t “scientists” that came up with the “big bang” malarkey, the orphic cult in ancient times already had that one, only their model was a “cosmic egg” that shattered, instead of an ambiguous “singularity” that exploded. How long shall it be until popular science decides to move into the next phase, and declare that something came out of the “bang” other than the universe? The orphics called him “phanes”, a primordial deity of “Light“, what then shall popular science deem theirs… perhaps “lucifer” or some more science-y sounding term? Oh right, gnostic freemasonry already does that, more or less.

    I don’t suspect Dr. Eowyn of any misdeeds here, and I can understand your alarm considering the things gnosticized science tries to do these days, perhaps humans can jam DNA into things (I’m unsure if this really is true as claimed. Can we really trust what these people say without seeing it ourselves, how do we know if they’re lying, or if they themselves have been lied to? How do we know if the sheep with the 15% etc. or other stories aren’t another piltdown man ploy, so to speak?), but that is far from a true hybrid. Also, isn’t it a bit… ignorant shall we say, of scientists to claim they have ethical prohibitions from studying if mankind can reproduce with animalkind, considering thousands of years of human history to reference, that amoral “science” has no qualms about testing anything on prisoners (as seen by the grotesque history of biological and chemical warfare, such as that done by the U.S. govt.) not to mention the stories you cite, showing the decay of society are producing more than enough “case studies” for these “scientists” to examine to confirm or deny their concepts (And lest we forget what the filthy satanist kinsey got away with in experimenting on children for “sex education”). Although I’d suspect they will leave an air of uncertainty there, in accord with the “externalization of the hierarchy” (as occultist jerk alice bailey called it) that may well be going on at present, in order to ensure people will take to the false doctrines presented, especially when “scientists” back it.

    Take heart Dr. Eowyn, and know that the puppets of evil have a vested interest in trying to convince people that these things happen, probably to lead people to the gnostic texts like “enoch” and “jasher” and to cast doubt on God’s ability to order the world. Besides, would God really be so careless in His Creation that He would make animals and people able to reproduce as such, (or even angels and people) especially knowing the kind of horribleness that would give rise to, and would He even issue a Soul/Spirit to such a thing? (Lest we forget transhumanism’s lesser known side, which falls along making animal-human hybrids, and lest we forget who started the whole transhumanist push.)

    Also Apologies for the length of this post, but I am unsure how much more I could have cut it down without losing the point… I hope wordpress can handle it.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Probably not… but each time one of these animals with human-looking features gets born, six jihadists there leave town.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. the poor animal was raped by men, that simple explanation…

    Liked by 1 person

  17. traildustfotm

    Can we see now why the Lord declared some kinds of interbreeding to be abominable? The sheer tragedy to such misbegotten creatures is terrible. Years ago, Christian philosopher Francis Schaffer stated that one of the biggest challenges we face now is that there are things scientists can do, but which we must NOT do. And creating a human/animal chimera would seem to be such a case.

    Liked by 2 people

  18. I believe GMOs were created for more use than modifying the DNA of corn, soybeans, sugar beets, wheat, cotton, alfalfa, papaya, canola, apples, tomato, potato, squash, cantaloupe, rice, flax, radicchio….I believe these are the trials and the goal is for GMO “humans” .
    the FDA/USDA/EPA recently approved a new GMO technology for monsanto called: “RNAi” (RNA interference)…it’s a gene-silencing “insecticide” that you don’t spray…the insect consumes the crop and and newly “encoded” crop silences a gene in the insect that kills it…
    “With Monsanto and Dow’s genetically modified corn, however, the DvSnf7 dsRNA is actually silencing a gene in another living organism, the western corn rootworm.”
    I would not be surprised if “scientists” were using this and other technologies to modify the gene expression of animal-human hybrids to produce viable “eggs”.
    so much evil.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. I think the top one kinda looks like podesta.


  20. Is it Rosie O’Donnell?


  21. Is this the Democrat’s nominee for President in 2019?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s