Colombia gets first ‘polyamorous family’ as three men legally established as unit

polyamorous throuple in columbia facebook photo

Polygamy is now a “validation” of a household

As Dr. Eowyn has noted before, there is a slippery slope of legalizing homosexual same-sex marriage. Once that barn door was opened, there is now agitation to legalize and normalize polygamy, bestiality, pedophilia and pederasty. See the stories here, here, and here.

Now another country has accepted polygamy because after all, #loveislove, or something like that.

From The Telegraph: Three gay men say they have gained legal recognition as the first “polyamorous family” in Colombia, where same-sex marriages were legalised last year.

“We wanted to validate our household… and our rights, because we had no solid legal basis establishing us as a family,” said one of the men, actor Victor Hugo Prada, in a video published by Colombian media on Monday.

He said he and his two partners, sports instructor John Alejandro Rodriguez and journalist Manuel Jose Bermudez, signed legal papers with a solicitor in the city of Medellin, establishing them as a family unit with inheritance rights.

This establishes us as a family, a polyamorous family. It is the first time in Colombia that has been done.”

Lawyer and gay rights activist German Rincon Perfetti said there are many three-person unions in Colombia but this was the first one to be legally recognised. “It is a recognition that other types of family exist,” he told AFP.

A ruling by the constitutional court in April 2016 made Colombia the fourth South American country to definitively legalise same-sex marriage, after Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay.

See also:


15 responses to “Colombia gets first ‘polyamorous family’ as three men legally established as unit

  1. God Almighty Shall NOT be mocked. God sees the truth, but waits (but not forever).

    You know, I was kind of hoping that the “Columbia’ your post here refers to would have been the University rather than the Country. (But then again, Columbia University has done more damage to society than the Country of Columbia!)

    We are on the road, in a P.T. Barnum Circus Mr. Barnum could not have imagined, to a MORAL APOCALYPSE. I, for one, am glad I have no children to be tempted into this abyss. In another context, the poet Alan Ginsberg (a moral degenerate himself) had it at least partially correct: “I have seen the best of my generation destroyed by madness.”

    Somewhere Nietzsche and his pals, Lou Salome and Paul Ree, are smiling, and placing their bets….

    Liked by 3 people

  2. Although on the surface this looks like morality gone amuck (and it is) if you dig deeper the real agenda is these people are being used to push Communism in countries where it does not exist today. Just read the Communist Manifesto. Connect some dots. Nothing is ever as it seems. All battles: the war on drugs, the war on poverty, the war on terrorism, women’s rights, rights of the sexual deviants, gay rights are all a ruse for a hidden agenda. Remember the words of Saul Alinsky….the issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.

    Liked by 4 people

  3. “A ruling by the constitutional court in April 2016 made Colombia the fourth South American country to definitively legalise same-sex marriage,”
    yeah, more plant “judges” undoing society’s sanity….it’s becoming an epidemic…
    now that these delusionaly-deviant useful idiots for satanism have legally established themselves as a “family”, the only thing “missing” are children…
    I pray for the children.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Sharon Tuggle

    Legalization of same sex marriage can not be paralleled with bestiality or pedophilia. There is no comparison.


    • Sharon,
      I disagree…..If a person chooses to live as a homosexual, that is their choice, but to shred apart the institution of marriage to feel acceptance for deviant behavior by sacrificing children is wrong.
      God created marriage to protect the child that was produced from the physical union of man and woman. Two males cannot (nor can two females) produce a child, even though “science” is working to blaspheme God’s work by making 3-parent babies, designer babies (GMO babies) and artificial wombs.
      Marriage held husbands accountable for their actions (through legal monogamy)…accountable to their wives and their offspring. Without marriage, children would have no safety net of “family” to protect them. The husband and wife worked as a team to provide and care for the child, they established stability in the home for the child, they went to church. The child knew where he belonged and had parents who were legally and biologically responsible for him and society/govt protected and promoted that. The mother and father were complements of the other, not competitors. Marriage was about parents sacrificing for their children as a unit, now marriage is a mockery by homosexuals and their supporters who probably celebrate their “ceremonies” with “nacho parties”.

      By useful idiots making marriage an “equal rights” issue and planted judges legalizing it, children have been pushed to the proverbial “backburner” of the marriage “stove”. Marriage is now about feelings of “happiness” and “fairness” for adults. Children have become a byproduct instead of the cause for marriage through love. homosexuals are now showing up as foster “parents”, adoptive “parents”, and hiring surrogates to use their wombs to give them babies and these surrogates disappear from the child’s life after birth.
      Children are appearing out of nowhere and the only ones to claim them are homosexuals. Children are being conceived for the sole purpose of homosexual pleasure……and children and babies disappear without a thought. This is the first time in history that society placed the adult’s “needs” ahead of the child’s needs and children are being put in “families” where they are being deliberately denied knowing who his/her mother/father is and it’s sanctioned by the state.
      Through the generations, we have had an assault on marriage by attacking Christianity through: feminism (communism = atheism), divorce, illegitimate children, abortion, porn, single motherhood, drugs, poverty, CPS, and now “equal rights” for marriage, all of these only succeeded in removing the barriers that natural marriage had established for the nuclear family and protected children. Today, children are treated as chattel instead of blessings.
      Once you have erased the line that maintained morals and civility, then anything goes: homosexuals getting “married”, pedophiles/pederasts demanding “rights” to “marry” children, human “rights” for “marriage” to animals (bestiality) or objects….all they have to say today is that they have a “right” and “discrimination”.
      Everything celebrated in marriage, homosexuality opposes: faith, man/woman, monogamy, childbirth, protection, femininity, masculinity.
      Through satan’s followers’ use of PC politics and deviancy, the sanctity of marriage no longer exits in this society; and as a result, children have lost the natural protection that marriage through a man and woman under God had provided.
      Child disappearance, trafficking, molestation, rape, and child sacrifice are at all-time highs. As the family unit deteriorates more and more, children are the ones who suffer.
      While people celebrate their new “rights”, who will protect the children?

      Liked by 4 people

    • “Legalization of same sex marriage can not be paralleled with bestiality or pedophilia. There is no comparison.”
      To you that might make sense. Yet to us, when we refer to the slippery slope of the legalization of homosexual marriage, we are referring to the redefinition of civil rights. When you allow one group to have their “civil right” recognized, how can you ignore the civil rights of other groups?
      Here’s my comparison:
      Pedophilia: Eliminate age of consent
      Liberals and the ACLU have eroded parental rights and the legal standards required for minor status/capacity under the guise of civil rights. Parental consent is no longer required for many acts: Minors who “feel” they are of the opposite gender are now allowed to alter their bodies. Minors who want an abortion are allowed to get one. Minors who want to visit a doctor are allowed to do so. All of this is allowed without parental authorization, under the guise of civil rights, with a minor’s consent.
      Once a minor has become a mini adult, with full legal rights to alter their bodies and make life-changing decisions, how can you not let them speak for themselves if they desire to have a consensual relation with the person of their choice? After all, #loveislove.
      You should read the ACLU book, co-authored by Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg, which favors decriminalizing pedophilia: Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in April 1977.
      Here’s the link:
      Bestiality: A case for it to be a civil right
      Bestiality proponents argue several points of why they should have their “civil right” to perform their acts with/marry an animal:
      Discrimination: Why should the government deny them their liberty when it doesn’t hurt anyone else? It does not hurt the animal and it does not hurt the man. It is a private act and what a man or a woman do in their own bedroom (or their own barn) should be their own business.
      First Amendment right: Bestiality is a first amendment right where the majority may not impose their will on the minority, but permit the minority the same due exercise as the majority enjoys. The legalization of a man marrying an animal is not a religious decision; it is a civil decision, which the state determines according to its own interests.
      Consent with animals: Since when have humans cared about consent with animals? We already do a great many things with/to animals for which no consent is required: kill them so we can eat them, use them in races (horse, dog and camel races), use them for farming/labor purposes, etc. And how exactly do you obtain consent from an animal? Animals may not speak yet they can communicate. How sophisticated does this language need to be in order to identify consent?
      The slippery slope of allowing homosexuals their civil right to marry has been set to allow other groups to seek their civil rights based upon their perceived grievances. They have many common denominators of which they argue: consent, discrimination, freedom to love, liberty, etc.
      Whether or not one wants to recognize this slippery slope is up to them. The internet has an ample supply of material, in the form of legal standard/case/precedent and opinion matter.

      Liked by 3 people

  5. Well, they do say that cocaine rots your brain. These three are proof of that. Ugh. What is next, ‘marrying’ your cat? I mean, our neighbors already um….have ‘relations’ with their animals…but making this sort of thing legal boggles the mind! C’mon, those three gay guys are NOT A FAMILY. NO FRIGGIN WAY!!!

    Liked by 3 people

  6. they asked for it now they’ve got it…….LOL

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Yeah those three guys look totally normal…. nothing at all like faggy dweebs….. he he he.


  8. Whats next? A guy, a horse and of course a dog!!!!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s