New law allows Canadian government to seize children from parents who don’t support ‘transgenderism’

On June 1, 2017, by a vote of 63 to 23, the Legislative Assembly of Ontario, Canada, approved a bill — Bill 89: Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act, 2017 — which enables the government to legally seize children from families who refuse to accept their children’s “gender identity” and/or refuse to provide them with treatment such as “sex-reassignment” surgery.

Bill 89 replaces the existing Child and Family Services Act by, among other changes, adding “gender identity” and “gender expression” as factors to be considered in determining what’s “in the best interests of the child.”

As reported by LifeSiteNews, Michael Coteau, Minister of Children and Youth Services and a member of Ontario Liberal Party who introduced Bill 89, told QP Briefing:

I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying, no, you need to do this differently. If it’s abuse and it’s within the definition, the child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”

The new bill replaces Bill 28: The Child and Family Services Act, which had stated that the parent of a child in care has the right “to direct the child’s education and religious upbringing.” That right is now voided by the new law, Bill 89.

This is what Bill 89: Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act says:

The paramount purpose of the Act — to promote the best interests, protection and well-being of children — remains unchanged from the current Act.

The additional purposes of the Act are expanded to include the following:

To recognize that services to children and young persons should be provided in a manner that respects regional differences wherever possible and takes into account, physical, emotional, spiritual, mental and developmental needs and differences among children and young persons; a child’s or young person’s race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression; and a child’s or young person’s cultural and linguistic needs. […]

One change is that societies are now responsible for investigating allegations that a child is in need of protection and for protecting children in their care, for all children up to the age of 18; in the current Act, these responsibilities are limited to children younger than 16 and to 16 and 17 year olds who are subject to protection orders. […]

The rules for allowing a program supervisor to enter and inspect certain premises to determine compliance with the Act and the regulations are expanded. This Part now sets out rules for such inspections without and with a warrant. […]

The matters to be considered in determining the best interests of a child are changed. The child’s views and wishes, given due weight in accordance with the child’s age and maturity, […] must be taken into consideration. […]

Part V: Child Protection […]

(2)  A child is in need of protection where, […]

(e)  the child requires treatment to cure, prevent or alleviate physical harm or suffering and the child’s parent or the person having charge of the child does not provide the treatment or access to the treatment, or, […] the parent refuses or is unavailable or unable to consent to the treatment on the child’s behalf; […]

(j) the child suffers from a mental, emotional or developmental condition that, if not remedied, could seriously impair the child’s development and the child’s parent or the person having charge of the child does not provide treatment or access to treatment, or […] refuses or is unavailable or unable to consent to the treatment to remedy or alleviate the condition; […]

81 (2) A justice of the peace may issue a warrant authorizing a child protection worker to bring a child to a place of safety if the justice of the peace is satisfied on the basis of a child protection worker’s sworn information that there are reasonable and probable grounds to believe that,

  (a)  the child is younger than 16;

  (b)  the child is in need of protection [….]

Furthermore, Schedule 3 of the new law (Bill 89) deletes previous references to and provisions for a child abuse register:

This Schedule [3] amends the new Child, Youth and Family Services Act, 2017 as follows.

Sections 133 and 134 of the Act, which provide for the maintenance of a child abuse register, are repealed.  Consequential amendments are made to other sections to delete all references to sections 133 and 134.

Bill 89 also removes “the religious faith, if any, in which the child is being raised” as a factor to be considered when deciding what’s in the best interests of the child, and replaces it with the child’s own “creed.”

See also:


24 responses to “New law allows Canadian government to seize children from parents who don’t support ‘transgenderism’

  1. Reblogged this on kommonsentsjane and commented:

    Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.

    This sounds like a bunch of liberals – it all sounds CATAWAMPUS to me. Where are the stand-up people against this law and did they allow this to happen and put children in jeopardy? What are they going to do about it – stay drunk as Cooter Brown in the future? Come on you guys and gals – you can do better than that.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Inside every liberal is a fascist screaming to get out.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. satanism at work…they are essentially targeting Christian families; the muslims/atheists are left alone.
    I’m sure at some point there will be similar laws in the usa worded so that the most important right is that of the lgbtqrstuv child/teen and “protecting” that child/teen.
    this stuff is unnatural but society/media/govt is convincing people, esp children, that it’s a great way to go.
    “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” Matthew 18:6

    SRS for a child…..govt-sponsored mutilation of children…satanism.
    What happens when a child develops blood clots from the fake hormones and has a stroke or cardiac arrest?
    What happens when the child realizes he/she made a mistake and wants their genitals/breasts back, but can’t get back what was removed?
    What happens when a 2 year old says he wants to wear a dress, will he be put on hormones?
    What happens when they’ve committed suicide AFTER receiving treatment?
    What wicked people will house the children after they have been stolen from their Christian parents?
    What happens when a child simply disappears after being stolen?
    Who will be held responsible?
    What happened to govt staying out of family business and allowing parents to actually “parent” their child(ren)? Govt is becoming the new “parent” and people are basically the vessels for producing children for the govt to parent.

    Who is benefiting from this horrible act on children?….satanists, govt, big pharma….all seek control over our lives, even our thoughts and actions.
    We have been welcoming in the era of the “police state” for a while now, it is only a matter of time before it fully bears fruit.
    Hold on to Jesus, He is the only Truth, the Way, and the Light.

    Liked by 5 people

  4. Canadians, please, please don’t let this happen. Don’t let them get away with this!

    Liked by 3 people

  5. The INSANITY isn’t restrained by mere Borders…..

    Liked by 2 people

  6. This proposed law is only in Ontario and has only been approved by Ontario’s legislative assembly. It must go to the executive council and then the premier before becoming actual law. And even if it does all that which is unlikely, it would still only be for Ontario.


  7. Though most people scoff at the document, “The Gay Manifesto” , authored by Michael Swift in 1987, it is real and it was even entered into the Congressional Record. If it was written merely as satire, why have its stated intents been fulfilled so successfully?

    My suspicion is that children taken from their parents will be given to NAMBLA and other such disgusting groups.

    Liked by 3 people

    • If their CPS or CYS or CRS services like the ones in the USA, probably. Just look at what happened with the documentary film The Canadian Holocaust with over 500,000 Indigenous children murdered. The queen still refuses to say anything about it.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. We’re next.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. traildustfotm

    Canada has slipped into insanity.

    Liked by 4 people

  10. Pingback: New law allows Canadian government to seize children from parents who don’t support ‘transgenderism’ – NZ Conservative Coalition

  11. William Brandon Shanley

    This is pathetic. Oh dear, Jesus, hurry up!

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Notice the wording of the terms. “Caregiver” vice “parent”. The “State” knows best. While it is true that some people probably should not be parents, I’m willing to take the risk in the interest of traditional family life, as opposed to Frankfurt School-type Hegellian state-worship.

    People should be willing to go to the mat over attempts like these.

    Liked by 4 people

  13. The war on parental rights marches on. Between the courts and the schools the corruption of children is assuring foot soldiers for the satanic agenda in the world.

    Liked by 4 people

  14. Pingback: Now the Canadians have fallen into the cesspool of insanity! – On the Patio

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s