France outlaws pro-life websites

abortion-rights

AFP reports (via the French-language Le Point) that on Feb. 16, 2017, by a show of hands, France’s left-leaning National Assembly (the lower house of France’s Parliament) passed a law against pro-life, anti-abortion websites, on the grounds that such websites “spread misleading information” about abortion, a crime punishable by a maximum of two years imprisonment and a $30,000 fine.

The new law is an expansion of the existing crime of “hindrance to abortion” to include pro-life websites. The original crime of “hindrance to abortion” was established in 1993 against pro-life activists who “disrupt” abortion clinics by organizing demonstrations near the clinics, speaking to women entering the clinics, or “threatening” the abortion personnel. The new law adds the word “digital” to the original crime of “hindrance to abortion”.

On the basis of the 1993 “hindrance to abortion” law, Dr. Xavier Dor, a well-known elderly and almost blind pro-lifer, was fined heavily for having given knitted baby boots to a woman he spoke to in the public stairway of the building where Planned Parenthood has its Paris offices.

Minister of Women’s Rights Laurence Rossignol said that the new law targets pro-life websites that “mimic” or look similar to pro-abort institutional websites or seemingly-official hotlines. Rossignol said “Anti-abortion activists remain free to express their opposition to abortion provided they honestly say who they are, what they do and what they want.”

Writing for LifeSiteNews, Jeanne Smits points out that since the new law’s “wording is not restrictive . . . any person or group aiming to call public attention to the dangers and risks of abortion will be potentially at risk of prosecution.”

Smits explains:

The upper house repeatedly tried to impose less severe wording without trying to scrap the law entirely. In the absence of an agreement between the two governing bodies, the National Assembly has the last word and so it achieved its aim of virtually outlawing pro-life speech.

The law was adopted by a show of hands – an indication that few lawmakers were present in the Chamber – during which all left-wing representatives present as well as a majority of the centrists voted for the measure. It is the latest in a series of pro-abortion laws that have made “voluntary interruption of pregnancy,” as the French euphemism [for abortion] goes, a purely elective and 100 percent publicly-funded “fundamental right” since socialist François Hollande came into power five years ago.

The criminalization of negative information on abortion is the result of a process that began when members of Hollande’s socialist government realized that Google searches were linking women to pro-life groups. These sites explain the risks and realities of the procedure and where to find assistance to help women keep their baby.

The Republican (center right) party voted against the law, saying that it is a deliberate infringement of freedom of expression. The Republican party intends to submit the text to the Constitutional Council in the hope of having it declared contrary to the French Constitution.

~Eowyn

Advertisements

10 responses to “France outlaws pro-life websites

  1. That’s proof that STUPIDITY is a Universal language.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. We are used to censorship in other countries, but in the last few weeks, we are starting to see the results of censorship coming from Google here in the US via their ties to the deep state. Infowars, Breitbart, Drudge and others are being censored. AdRoll, the advertising agency which is a subsidiary of Google cut off Infowars advertising through them. I receive a wonderful web email from a site called “Natural News” and Google shut them down for a few days and they’ve just been reinstated. I haven’t read the reason they shut them down yet but, you can surmise, Google’s reason(s) are nothing but lies. I just sent a petition to the White House to support Natural News. This site provides great information on holistic and alternative products and treatments. They sponsor a yearly conference where they interview holistic doctors and researchers who are sharing the latest information to improve one’s health and how to avoid some cancers and how to treat some cancers.

    Alex Jones said the evil powers that be are using this first wave of censorship to see how sites like his and the public react to these actions. He stated that it’s like a beta test. And, it sets a dangerous precedent. As citizens, we have to fight back! Please sign petitions as you come across them and contact your legislators. I never thought we would see blatant “in your face” censorship in the US!

    Liked by 5 people

  3. This is why our ancestors left Europe and we have a 1st Amendment…

    Liked by 4 people

  4. Government Axiom #4: “Being nothing but a criminal syndicate concerned only with stealing and killing under cover of providing security and “services,” government must always monitor and control the thoughts, attitudes, behavior, and speech of their subjects, victims. All statements otherwise are lies.”

    An American citizen, not US subject.

    Liked by 4 people

  5. And Israel is pressuring Amazon to stop selling books that dispute the Jewish, ‘Holocaust’ naritive

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Pingback: France Outlaws Pro-Life Websites | The Olive Branch Report

  7. I’m 74 as of a few days ago. In my lifetime France has slipped from its former stature with Italy as one of the two greatest European RC-Christian nations to now being little more than an abused street waif, soon to be torn apart by the two greatest European terrorist entities, Islamo-fascism and the Zionazis, the latter having learned their lessons all-too-well!

    From age 9 or 10 on I was raised in large part by the two Sams who were my father’s partners in their Chicago medium-sized plumbing & heating business. They were why I learned Yiddish –not Italian– as my 2nd language, and though Sam Silberstein was US-born & raised, and Sam Windstrauch was Polish-born & raised, both told me identically in regard of Israel [then a newly created political entity], it is was the WORST thing ever for Jews, and that I should stay away from it and never send money or support. Of course at that age they never told me their reasons, and even if they had, I’d not be able to understand the complexities.

    Twenty years later I began to learn true history, to unravel the tangled webs of lies, deceit, and duplicities played on so many levels by Britain, the USA, IsraHell, France, the USSR, etc., etc., as they scrambled, plotted, made deadly alliances, and undermined our nation as they did evil unto our enemy de jour.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. CHILDREN AT CONCEPTION by steve finnell

    Life begins at conception. Children are children at conception. Women do not conceived non-human fetuses.

    Matthew 1:20 But while he thought about these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take to you Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit.(NKJV)

    Mary did not conceive a dead fetus. Mary conceived Jesus, and He was alive. Life begins at conception.

    2 Samuel 11:3-5…….5 And the woman conceived; so she sent and told David, and said “I am with child.”(NKJV)

    Bathsheba did not conceive a fetus, she conceived a child.

    Job 3:3 “May the day perish on which I was born, And the night in which it was said, ‘A male child is conceived.'(NKJV)

    Job was a child at conception. Job was conceived alive, as a child. Job was not conceived as a dead fetus nor as a live fetus. Human life begins at conception.

    Luke 1:36 “Now indeed, Elizabeth your relative has also conceived a son in her old age; and this is now the sixth month for her who was called barren.(NKJV)

    John The Baptist was John at conception.

    PRO-CHOICE WAS NOT AN OPTION!

    Mary did not have the choice of aborting Jesus.
    Bathsheba did not have the choice to abort Solomon.
    Job’s mother did not have the option of aborting Job.
    Elizabeth did not have the choice of aborting John The Baptist.

    GOD IS PRO-LIFE NOT PRO-DEATH (AKA AS PRO-CHOICE.)

    YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY BLOG>> steve-finnell.blogspot.com

    Like

  9. traildustfotm

    What is more sure to bring God’s wrath than the murder of babies? But before condemning the French, let’s see if their country comes to its senses the way America is trying to do. For a very long time, the US government has grossly misrepresented the majority on issues like abortion. Maybe that is true of the French, also. At least I hope so.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s