Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking

The legal definition of “age of consent” is:

Age of consent refers to the legally defined age at which a person is no longer required to obtain parental consent to get married. It also refers to the age at which a person is held to have the capacity to voluntarily agree to sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of consent may lead to criminal charges of statutory rape or sexual assault . . . .

Statutory rape is sex between an adult and a minor below the age of consent. Every state has a statutory rape law in some form. The age of consent varies from state to state, but is generally from 16 – 18 years of age. . . . Consent of the victim and belief that the victim is of the age of consent are usually considered immaterial.

A pedophile is an adult with “sexual fondness for and activity” with children, i.e., minors below the age of consent. Pedophilia is legally defined as sexual child abuse, i.e., any sexual activity with a minor below the age of consent, which includes fondling a child’s genitals, intercourse, incest, rape, sodomy, exhibitionism, and commercial exploitation of children through prostitution or the production of pornographic materials.

Since the age of consent in the United States which varies from state to state is  from 16 to 18, lowering the age of consent to 12 would legalize pedophilia of children age 12 and above.

That is exactly what Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a Clinton appointee and daughter of Russian Jewish immigrants, recommends in a co-authored book that led to sweeping changes made by the federal government in the name of sex equality.


In 1977 when Ginsburg was General Counsel of the ACLU, she co-authored (with Brenda Feigen-Fasteau) Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in April 1977, for which Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau were paid with federal funds under Contract No. CR3AK010.

The 230-page Sex Bias in the U.S. Code identifies hundreds of federal laws alleged to discriminate against women and recommends an avalanche of government and social changes, including:

  • Military draft and combat duty for women.
  • Legalization of prostitution (see pages 97, 99, 215-216 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code)
  • Sex integration of prisons, reformatories, schools and colleges and their activities (including sports), all-girls and all-boys organizations, and fraternities and sororities.
  • Changing the names of the Boy Scouts, Girls Scouts and Big Brothers of America to reflect sex integration (see pages 145, 205 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code).
  • Elimination of the traditional family concept of husband as breadwinner and wife as homemaker.
  • Comprehensive government child-care.
  • Adoption of sex-neutral language, e.g., “artificial” instead of “manmade”; “person, human” instead of “man, woman”; and plural nouns “they” and “them” instead of “singular third person pronouns”. At the same time, however, Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau hypocritically insist that the U.S. Department of Labor retains its “Women’s Bureau”.

On p. 102 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, under the sub-heading “Recommendations,” Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau recommend a revision of 18 U.S.C. §2032 from “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” to “A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and . . . the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old“. Below is the pertinent paragraph:

18 U.S.C. §2032 — Eliminate the phrase “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” and substitute a Federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense patterned after S. 1400 §1633: A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person’s power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old.

Ginsburg (and her co-author) also recommends that the Mann Act be repealed. The Mann Act is a federal law passed in 1910 which makes it a felony to engage in interstate or foreign commerce transport of “any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose”.

From Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, pp. 98-99:

The Mann Act . . . poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form. The Mann Act also is offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates . . . . It was meant to protect from ‘the villainous interstate and international traffic in women and girls,’ ‘those women and girls who, if given a fair chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and useful citizens. . . .’

In other words, if Ruth Bader Ginsburg has her way, sexual abuse of children 12-years or older would not be a crime, nor would child sex trafficking.

Ginsburg will be 84 next month. May President Trump be given the opportunity to nominate her replacement on the Supreme Court.

H/t Executive Director of Eagle Forum Susan Hirschmann’s Testimony Re. Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Senate Judiciary Committee, July 23, 1993.

See also:

This post was revised on February 23, 2017.



114 responses to “Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking

  1. Pingback: A Really Sick Mind – Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg | Sue's Pen2PaperBlog

  2. Pingback: Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg(Jew) Favors Decriminalizing Pedophilia And Child Sex Trafficking? « Socio-Economics History Blog

  3. She should be impeach from her position on the Supreme Court. She has gone off the deep end. Put her in a mental institute.

    Liked by 1 person

    • And what, pray tell, Madam, do you have against the poor patients and staff of said mental institution, that you’d saddle them with the presence of this deranged old bat?


  4. Justice Ginsburg is getting very old, senile and loves to hit the bottle, she needs to create her vacancy so we can have another judge -young, conservative, and fair. Hey, Ruthie, move over (hic).

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Many inaccuracies in this report, making it susceptible to claims of “fake news.”

    The comments below can be verified by anyone by referring to the original document, which is immediately available at .

    There is no call to “rename” the Boy Scouts or Girl Scouts. There is a lot of discussion about how laws offer benefits to one but not the other. The document decries the “stereotyped sex roles” inherent in the laws’ descriptions of the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, without acknowledging that these descriptions were almost certainly supplied by the leadership of those organizations themselves.

    There is no call for legalization of prostitution. There is only recognition in passing that there exists a growing national movement advocating this.

    Most surprisingly, the ’12-year-old” language does, in fact, appear in the document. Since it is 40 years old, we can’t blame this on senility, but in all fairness, this may be nothing more than the world’s most embarrassing typographical error (for which Ginsburg still is ultimately responsible and must answer).


    • Thank you, Henry, for locating an online copy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Sex Bias in the U.S. Code! The brief search I conducted found a citation on Amazon, which indicates it’s out of print and Amazon doesn’t have a copy for sale. I will now update this post with a link to Sex Bias in the U.S. Code.

      As for your accusation that I misrepresented Ginsburg’s call to rename the Boy & Girl Scouts, & to legalize prostitution, as I made clear in my post, my source is Executive Director of Eagle Forum Susan Hirschmann’s “Testimony Re. Ruth Bader Ginsburg” to the Senate Judiciary Committee on July 23, 1993. I stand by Hirschmann after reviewing the primary source, Sex Bias in the U.S. Code. Here are quotes from Sex Bias in the U.S. Code:

      (1) Decriminalization or Legalization of Prostitution:
      On p. 93, Ginsburg wrote, “Within recent years there has been a growing legal movement in this country advocating the decriminalization of prostitution, i.e., laws classifying or referring to prostitution or solicitation by or on behalf of a prostitute should be repealed.” The purpose of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code was to identify alleged sex bias in U.S. law, and to recommend changes to render sex- or gender-neutral the language of U.S. law. The subject of decriminalizing prostitution, therefore, is beyond the stated purpose and concern of the book, but Ginsburg nevertheless made note of it.

      On p. 97, Ginsburg wrote: “Prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” On p. 99, Ginsburg wrote, “retaining prostitution business as a crime in a criminal code is open to debate. Reliable studies indicate that prostitution is not a major factor in the spread of venereal disease,39 and that prostitution plays a small and declining role in organized crime operations.” On pp. 215-216, Ginsburg wrote: “There is a growing national movement recommending unqualified215 decriminalization as sound policy, implementing equal rights and individual privacy principles, as indicated by empirical investigation and experience in other nations.” All three quotes are indicative of Ginsburg favoring decriminalizing/legalizing prostitution.

      (2) Boy and Girl Scouts:
      On p. 145, Ginsburg wrote: “The Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, while ostensibly providing ‘separate but equal’ benefits to both sexes, perpetuate stereotyped sex roles”. On p. 205, Ginsburg recommended that Congress pass “an omnibus bill aimed at eradicating all discriminatory or unnecessary gender-based provisions or references”“eradicating all gender-based references” would necessarily require the renaming of the very gender-based names of Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts.

      (3) On lowering the age of consent to 12:
      While I’m happy you agree with Hirschmann and me that Ginsburg, in Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, indeed calls for lowering the age of consent to 12, I am incredulous that you attribute the number of 12 to a typo — FOR WHICH YOU HAVE ZERO EVIDENCE, and for which the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights — the federal agency that published Sex Bias in the U.S. Code — issued neither denial, disclaimer nor correction. Therefore, I stand by the claim and title of this post: “Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking”.


  6. WHAT?!!! IS she still alive???!!! If I were in charge of planning for a “suite” of bunk-mates at the “US Gov’t Service Home for Eternal Care of Dementia Sufferers,” I’d pencil in Ruth Ginsburg, Nancy Pelosi, and Maxine Waters. PALEEEEEZE, DEAR GOD, DELIVER US, & save us from these poor, logic-losing, brain-matter-shrinking/compromising, familial tremor, rambling, vapid justices and legislators. THIS is the MAIN REASON our founders championed (but did not codify….:( ) the idea of CIVILIAN public servants who served and THEN went HOME to their own districts/regions after a term or two….like Washington…..and that ELECTED GOVERNMENT SERVICE OF ANY KIND…is NOT a career…but rather a public service, a duty, and that one should return HOME to civilian live, to be followed by ANOTHER civilian/servant elected by his/her peers at home…….

    Liked by 1 person

  7. The psychiatric definition of pedophilia is one who is sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children. So this article is flawed from its premise.


    • This post states at the very beginning that it employs the LEGAL definition of pedophilia — “Pedophilia is legally defined as sexual child abuse, i.e., any sexual activity with a minor below the age of consent” — which makes your comment flawed from its premise.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Whether pedophilia, pederasty, or enebophilia, it’s still sick perversion, and for Justice Ginsburg to not recognize it and do what in her power as a Justice of the SCOTUS she can do to combat it, she betrays her oath of office and her supposed religion. Time for this deranged old bat to go.


      • The Talmud permits pedophilia and pederasty –especially with goyim.
        If the pervert is able to find someone under the age of 3, it’s as if it were a ‘poke in the eye’. See the double mind at work.. No harm done!
        See the video titled “When Israel is Mighty” wherein Yossi Gurvitz gives a cursory, but interesting indication of what the Talmud teaches.


  8. Disgusting, sick Satan worshiping animal !


  9. Trump had this vile Talmudic beast pegged the moment she opened her filthy mouth against him.


    • The Moronic Talmudic WHORE Beast For the globalists only did this because her and there ilk are in deep trouble with pedophile and the pizza gate scandal. There is a host of names from the senate, Congress, judiciary and the media who are pedophile maniacs and they drink the blood of there victims, because they believe it keeps them young, these are evil people and they must pay a price for there wickedness. but lets not forget Muslims also take part in these practices , just like Muhammad did, so both of these cults are both the same with different variations. the Jews dont follow the books of Moses , they are filthy Ashkenazi KhazarianTalmudic Jews and Christian haters and the Muslims follow after a Political movement not a religious movement, Sorry to say this but Islam is not a religion, its a cult of death, It’s in there Koran and Hadith. I always find it amazing how Muhammad was white skinned and many in the third world are a dark/Brown skinned and follow after this cult, and the same ones who follow after it, are white haters, dont that seem interesting to you. so whats up with this, black and brown skinned fanatics screaming for the murdering of all white people, but then there following after a white skinned man from the Arabian Peninsula from 650 AD. I dont know what your religion is , but if it’s Islam, please get out of it, it will only bring you death in the end and everlasting torment in hell.


  10. Why did we allow this monster on the bench?? NEVER AGAIN!

    Liked by 1 person

    • I don’t think “we” allowed anything.
      Bubba Bill Clinton put her in there. May they both receive their just rewards.


      • No, we DID allow this. We allow everything every time we vote for the wrong candidates – because we failed to properly research them and lazily relied on false and fake liberal media to tell us the truth that wasn’t!


      • I believe it was Bush Sr. Who put her on the bench so he could undermine the constitution by using this ACLU freaking IDIOT PERVERT JEW.


        • Bill:

          I’m no fan of Bush Sr., but you need to stop asserting outright factual untruths.
          From Wikipedia‘s entry on Ruth Bader Ginsburg:

          “President Jimmy Carter appointed Ginsburg to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on April 14, 1980…. President Bill Clinton nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on June 14, 1993, to fill the seat vacated by retiring Justice Byron White. Ginsburg was recommended to Clinton by then-U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno after a suggestion by Utah Republican Senator Orrin Hatch. At the time of her nomination, Ginsburg was viewed as a moderate.”


          • Hey stupid, If you read my comment I said I believe which translates to, I was not sure sure if it was Carter or Bush, so watch your smart mouth.


            • “stupid” “your smart mouth”

              Thanks for revealing to all our readers that you are an uncouth, nasty person who resorts to insults when found to have made a factual mistake. You should also look up the meaning of “narcissistic rage”.


              • AMEN, Dr. Eowyn! his response was definitely uncalled for…
                “narcissistic rage” fits perfectly.
                I do wonder if he has a criminal history of domestic abuse.

                Liked by 2 people

              • Let us be honest here about the origins of such subversive rewriting of these laws. The roots are Communist/ judaic. These laws reflected what most would consider to be christian moral values. We all know where these types reside today.


  11. Pingback: FAKE NEWS: ‘The Underground Report’ on Obama running pedophile ring from White House – pennine_rainbows

  12. I was researching Ginsburg’s all too good to be true statement about lowering the age of consent to 12 years old and found that it was indeed BS. She makes reference to an EXISTING Senate bill which was defining “rape” and her entire focus was on the gender neutral wording. If you want to get mad at the lowered age of consent, get mad at whomever introduced that 1973 senate bill. (And it’s actually page 70 of her document)


    • You are wrong. On p. 102 (not p. 70) of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, under the sub-heading “Recommendations,” Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau recommend a revision of 18 U.S.C. §2032 from “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” to “A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and . . . the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old“.


      • it makes no difference this evil bitch has a long history of evil rulings that are unconstitutional. she is  khazar jew plain and simple and if you don’t know what that means then i would suggest you research it out. she is an evil wicked old hag jew and she should have never been appointed to sit on the court. We can thank the Nazi Rino Bush Sr. for giving us this toilet crap who worked for the ACLU.


    • I’ve always thought Justice Ginsburg was a poor jurist because she has repeatedly ruled that the constitution was some mysterious guiding document rather than the law that it is. It is difficult to change, but it is changeable if enough Americans want it changed. To ignore plain verbage in favor of finding things that are not included, is fakery and miscarriage to me. The Senate bill introduced in 1973 was run at the desire of the nambla group, in florida if I have it right still.


    • You insult the good name of one of Berkeley Breathed’s prize characters, Sir…I suspect that in a battle of wits against HIM, you’d be completely unarmed!


  13. Impeach TRUMP? It seems that this deranged old woman is the one that ought to be impeached, if for nothing else, that her mind is addled with the effects of old age and dementia.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Pingback: Thighing: Pedophilia makes allies of Islam and the Left – pennine_rainbows

  15. Pingback: Please pray for Pizzagate journalist David Seaman – pennine_rainbows

  16. Look at Ruthie s EVIL, UGLY, Cold, VILE, horrible face..she looks like a rat like mini monster..She looks really SCARY..Really wicked..Rat Ruth is Evil Personified…


  17. It’s always the jews who favor this kind of shit, isn’t it? Just look at her ugly rat face! Founder of NAMBLA is dirty jewish poet Allen Ginzburg.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s