Feminist Hillary Clinton laughed, recalling her defense of man who raped 12-year-old girl

We are told that we must vote for Hillary Clinton because she’s a woman. (See “Women will go to hell if you don’t vote for Hillary Clinton“)

But the real question is: What exactly has Hillary done for women?

Not only has she stood by while her husband Bill leched, harassed, and raped women, she actively enabled his sexual predation by blaming the women, calling them “bimbos”.

Hillary also defended a 41-year-old man who raped a 12-year-old girl, knowing full well he was guilty. Worse still, in recalling her defense of the rapist, she displayed no concern or sympathy for the child victim. Instead, Hillary was flippant and actually laughed about it.

Hillary's weird eyeballsAs recounted by Alana Goodman for The Washington Free Beacon, in 1975, 27-year-old Hillary Rodham had just moved to Fayetteville, Arkansas, and was running the University of Arkansas’ newly-formed legal aid clinic. She was asked by prosecutor Mahlon Gibson to “do a favor for him” by defending Thomas Alfred Taylor, 41, a factory worker accused of raping a 12-year-old girl. Taylor was a friend of the girl’s family and had been living in their home.

In a recording almost a decade after defending Taylor, you can hear Hillary casually and flippantly discuss her client and the trial for rape of a minor. Note that Hillary, who was born and grew up in Chicago, spoke with a southern drawl — a precursor of the phony southern drawl she affects in campaign appearances before a black audience.

Hillary knew full well Taylor was guilty. She said (1:57 mark):

“It was a fascinating case, it was a very interesting case. This guy was accused of raping a 12-year-old. Course he claimed that he didn’t, and all this stuff. I had him take a polygraph, which he passed – which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs.”

At that point, Hillary laughed.

At the 4:56 mark, she laughed again. What is so funny?

At the end of interview, when she was asked “How did it turn out?,” Hillary casually answered (5:56 mark):

“Oh, he [Taylor] plea bargained! Got him off with time served in the county jail, he’d been in the county jail about two months.”

Taylor pleaded guilty to unlawful fondling of a child and was sentenced to one year in prison, with two months reduced for time served. He died in 1992.

Ronald D. Rotunda, a professor of legal ethics at Chapman University, told the Washington Free Beacon that for a lawyer to disclose the results of a client’s polygraph and guilt is a potential violation of attorney-client privilege: “You can’t do that. Unless the client says: ‘You’re free to tell people that you really think I’m a scumbag, and the only reason I got a lighter sentence is because you’re a really clever lawyer.’”

Now 52, Taylor’s victim resides in the same town where she was born. Divorced and living alone, she blames her troubled life — a stint in prison for check forgery to pay for her addiction to methamphetamines — on the rape. To a Free Beacon reporter who knocked on her door and requested an interview, she expressed a deep and abiding hostility toward her assailant’s defender, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Read the full case file here: State of Arkansas V. Thomas Alfred Taylor.

In March 2002, Hillary Clinton was suspended from the Arkansas bar for failing to keep up with continuing legal education requirements, according to Arkansas judicial records.

Hillary makes devil signLet’s look at the attributes displayed by Hillary in that recording:

  • Glibness
  • Callousness and lack of empathy for the 12-year-old victim
  • Emotional shallowness
  • Cunning/manipulative; grandiose sense of self-worth: “Oh, he plea bargained! Got him off with time served in the county jail!”
  • Lack of remorse or guilt
  • Pathological lying: fake southern drawl

Those are all traits of a psychopath, I kid you not — the psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R), a 20-item inventory of personality traits and recorded behaviors, developed by criminal psychologist Dr. Robert D. Hare.

To find out if you’re a psychopath like Hillary Rodham Clinton, presumptive Democratic Party presidential nominee, go here.

H/t FOTM‘s josephbc69

See also:

~Eowyn

Advertisements

20 responses to “Feminist Hillary Clinton laughed, recalling her defense of man who raped 12-year-old girl

  1. In that face shot, Killary has the exact same eyes of satan as does Calvin. Odd gleam sets in after soul sale deal consumated.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. FotM readers know that my loathing of Hilda Beast and her lickspittable man-dab Billy Boyo is infinite, after what they did to my recently deceased friend, Dr Tom OBrien.

    Believe me when I tell you they will lie, steal, murder, cheat and deceive w/o end to have their ways, and our world is the worse for their miserable existences. I’m going to take my HBP med now!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Killary must have moved back to Arkansas after she was fired from her job working on the Watergate trial. This information is well known, but I haven’t heard anyone talk about it lately. Below is an excerpt from an article Daniel Calaprese wrote on her history from 2013 regarding Killary’s lies and unethical behavior. If Trump wants to really stick it to Killary over the next months, he should talk about the following and talk about it often.

    Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

    Why?

    “Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Former Clinton insider Larry Nichols and political insider Roger Stone have identified and described Hillary Clinton as her husband’s enabler and “equilizer” in his all-but-admitted rapes of women on Alex Jones’s radio show. Mr. Stone’s new book, “The Clintons’ War on Women” (2015) goes into the sordid details.
    A guest on Hagmann & Hagmann within the past few months (I cannot recall the name right now), discussed pacts some famous entertainers and others have either made with the Devil or were plausibly said to have made with the Devil. He mentioned some names, e.g. Jimi Hendrix and Jim Morrison of The Doors. At any rate, the one interesting detail that he mentioned was that every “contract” or agreement, in which fame and fortune are promised, is that the “contract” comes with an EXPIRATION DATE.
    We can insist that the cat-eyed or lizard-eyed photo of Hillary in your post is photoshopped; We can insist that it is a computer-generated image, a meme, we can insist that it is a joke. After all, I have seen a video on George H.W. Bush with the same eyes. But the point, made by the Protestant guest on Hagmann & Hagmann, was that every contract comes with an expiration date, and that includes any deal anyone makes with the Devil.
    And it stands to reason: After all, we know that all life itself comes with an expiration date, and Jesus said that NO ONE can extend that date “by a single cubit.” So I inferred from this Protestant’s comment that the expiration date of any deal done with Satan can only move that date BACKWARD from God’s original date and not FORWARD.
    So we know that God’s Hand of Justice cannot and will not be stayed forever, that a Day of Reckoning is coming for us all. Every human being that has ever lived has, or will have, an APPOINTMENT with the Almighty, and when that time of appointment comes, if a person runs, God Will, in all likelihood, allow that person to KEEP RUNNING—straight into the pit of Hell.
    We do not know what happened to Hillary. We do not know if her parents were Satanists, or if she was molested, or had a head injury, or has the DNA of a psychopath (if such a thing is possible). But the concealed (or little recognized) quality of the sinner is that (s)he is the one who has TAKEN OFFENSE. Adam & Eve, at least implicitly, took offense at the limit God Had Placed on them in the Garden. I’ve taken offense, you’ve taken offense, and so has every single human being who has ever lived, or ever will live. But Hillary has gone over to the other side.
    Yes, Madeleine Albright said, in the contrary context, that “There is a special place in Hell for women who do not help each other.” Yep, that applies to Hillary, also.
    I am a Catholic, and I was reared not to wish this or to say it. But I will, without apology: I HOPE HILLARY CLINTON GOES TO HELL. By her behavior, she has exhibited every sign of committing that sin against the Holy Ghost of FINAL IMPENETENCE, that this is her choice, it is her final answer, she makes no apologies, and she obviously has delusions of grandeur. She committed a horrible crime, against a child, a crime that CRIES OUT TO HEAVEN FOR VENGEANCE. There are two items in the Bible to support my righteous anger. First, someone in the Old Testament said, “Your enemies are my enemies, O Lord. I shall hate them with a perfect hatred.” AND SO I SHALL. Second, I believe it was God Himself who said to someone in the Old Testament, “May the Devil take you.” AND SO I SHALL SIDE WITH GOD.
    And Hillary has never (to my knowledge) repudiated or taken back or expressed regret over this episode—or of ANY OTHER EPISODE of her husband’s. MAKE NO MISTAKE: She is the FEMALE LENIN. THIS is what we are dealing with. If Hillary Clinton ever becomes President, the killing of innocent human life will continue, and it will continue on a MASS SCALE: This woman was ARROGANT and psychopathic enough to get four Americans killed at Benghazi! YES, this woman WILL BE ARROGANT ENOUGH TO GET THIS COUNTRY NUKED, IF IT SERVES HER PURPOSES.
    Thomas Jefferson—no believer he—said, “Disobedience to tyrants is obedience to God.” This perfect hatred is not a personal vendetta: IT IS A CIVIC VIRTUE. DO WE WANT AMERICA TO SURVIVE THIS WOMAN, YES OR NO?

    And God, for His Part, WILL ALLOW this woman to be elected President as a sign of His Ire and His Judgment, if We the People allow it.

    It’s that simple. And that desperate.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Madeline Albright was another Secretary of State morality challenged.
      Maybe it’s a prerequisite for the job.

      Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?

      Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price–we think the price is worth it.

      —60 Minutes (5/12/96)

      I got in a small exchange with Dr. Morgan Reynolds recently over at his nomoregames.net – his recent VietNam article about psychopaths.

      Interesting subject. People can become evil or become without conscience in many ways, I think. The term “psychopath” is often misused or misunderstood.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Yes, I remember Albright’s exchange. And she at least implies that not only did she think “it was worth it,” but that the entire Establishment, at least corporately, thought the same. The term “psychopath” may well be misapplied or misunderstood, but not in this case—or in Hillary’s. Let’s not say that, because their response would be right out of Lenny Bruce: “Whom are you going to believe—me or your lying eyes?”
        I’m not about to be gaslighted!

        Liked by 1 person

        • Hope you don’t think I was trying to gaslight you. I just looked that term up in the urban dictionary. Agree that Killary and Mad are probably psychopaths. I’m just saying for hundreds of years there has been a, let’s call it, brotherhood of darkness and they and their secret societies operate on the end justifies the means. Most people do not seem to regard these people as evil or mentally ill, or “psychopaths.” Many are just identified as atheists or agnostics.The values of the people have been operated upon for centuries. All is upside down now. Ordo ab chao.

          Liked by 1 person

      • “The term “psychopath” is often misused or misunderstood.”

        Please explain.

        Like

        • “The term “psychopath” is often misused or misunderstood.”
          Please explain.
          _____
          I just think people in general seem to think psychopath means crazy.

          However, it is psychosis, or “a psychotic” that more meets my idea of being mentally deranged or “crazy” or out of touch to some degree with reality

          Here is a brief description from book, Corporate Psychopaths Organizational Destroyers by Clive R. Boddy. [Available free online]
          “..socially dangerous people who appeared to be rational but failed to follow conventional morality and act in accordance with societal.

          In a weird sort of way, psychopaths are acting consistent with whatever is going on in their thought processes. They seem to desire power, influence, prestige and money and some are able to get to the top, “corporate psychopaths”, and some act violently and ruthlessly to access those same things and these end up in prison and are termed “criminal psychopaths.”

          In contrast, in my opinion, psychotics do not seem to operate toward a goal. It is not possible to determine what goals they desire. Their behavior appears totally disjointed, disoriented, and not consistent with any discernible thought process.

          I just think there are many people and groups throughout history who operate by the end justifies the means, e.g. Machiavelli*. We do not seem to think of these people, people for example from the top levels of Freemasonry or the Club of Rome or the top United Nations population control people, as “crazy” or as “psychopaths.” They are just “atheists” or “agnostics” who value working toward a one world, novus ordo system for all and to do all that will most efficiently bring about that total control of all people. They do not value human life above any other matter and their “moral compass” is programmed by their worldview.

          It is error to think that humans are “basically good” or that humans are “inherently evil.”
          The Christian viewpoint is that people are born with original sin and have a tendency all of their lives to sin, but with God’s grace, humans can attain to righteousness and even sainthood.

          To me, the “world revolutionary movement” thoughout the ages, associated with communism, socialism, fascism, NAZIism, etc., is where these evildoers operate. They operate in utilitarian ways, “whatever works”, but they are single-minded, think long-term, and are unwavering. These are not qualities of those we normally think of as “crazy.”

          (I think MacArthur and Patton were honest, sane, moral men who did not operate but the Albright philosophy. MacArthur was fired and Patton was murdered. I think military enlisted and officers need to see “reason” and good in their activity and when they cannot but have to continue on blowing people up, they become alcoholics or suicidal.)

          There is some debate as to there being a physical brain abnormality that causes there to be “no conscience.” (“…abnormalities in the ventrolateral, orbitofrontal cortex and amygdale…) but doubt if that riddle will ever be solved. I personally think it has more to do with “nurture” or something that happens to a person in their environment after birth.)

          *
          From RadioLiberty.com January 2008
          newsletter by Dr. Stan Monteith
          “Who was Niccolo` Machiavelli, and why is his political philosophy important today? Machiavelli was a member of the revolutionary government that ruled Florence from 1494 to 1512, and Machiavelli was forced to leave Florence after Pope Julius II helped the Medici family regain control of the city. In the years that followed, Machiavelli wrote The Prince, which established his place in history. What did Niccolo` Machiavelli believe? He believed people are inherently evil, people cannot rule themselves, and a successful State needs an authoritarian ruler (a Prince). To succeed, the “Prince” must wage war, he must be willing to use deceit and cruelty, and he must believe “the end justifies the means.” Where did those concepts originate?” 5

          There are a few “psychopaths” who are with us daily, in our families and our workplace. They seem to function and coast along in life fairly normally and not end up in prison or as a “corporate psychopath.”
          We tend to regard these “mild psychopaths” as “flaky” — cannot be trusted or relied upon, and just “no damn good” but not really as “crazy.”

          Lastly, the desire for the values of this world, power, influence, prestige and money, are what Christ calls mammon.

          Matthew 6:24 – No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

          and the prince of this world is Satan, so I do not rule out Satan taking possession of a person’s soul and that that can be sometimes what “creates” psychopaths.

          There are various ways to the top and various ways to the bottom of this world system, this valley of tears.

          God bless us each and every one in the Name of the One Who is Truth.

          Liked by 1 person

          • You do raise an important point, that psychopaths are different from people with psychosis. There is a difference between psychopathy and psychosis, and a psychopath is not necessarily a psychotic. I think we see this clearly delineated with Hillary Clinton, who has no morality at all. And my fear about Donald Trump is that he may be another psychopath, only one who just happens to be on our side of things.
            I will say this, however: The government and media seek to cripple the right judgment of the public by inducing psychotic breaks in us through their gaslighting and their mind-control, that’s for sure!

            Like

          • Only the ignorant think psychopathy is psychosis, that psychopaths are psychotics. The late psychiatrist M. Scott Peck, M.D., had proposed a new psychopathology to his profession — that of the Evil Personality Disorder, which describes psychopaths, sociopaths, as well as Borderline Personality Disorder. Characterization of BPDs as “evil” is in Theodore Millon’s superb tome, Disorders of Personality.

            Liked by 1 person

  5. The crimes and sins of Hillary are long and well documented. From those that worked with and for her. Several books have been written about both Clinton’s and their den of evilness. Her hatred of the military, those she felt underneath her and just about everyone else on earth. The only thing important to her is money and power, everything else is valueless to her.
    She deemed Bills, heart surgery unworthy of a quick trip to the hospital. Her daughter has taken second place and don’t even mention the grand child.
    Reading up at Nachumlist, the Clinton Deadpool, is duct tape worthy.
    She has no empathy nor sympathy for anyone or anything.
    And this case with the child’s rape was a good example. A few months back, I read the letter written by the victim and the damage done to her life.
    With all her crimes and evil, what scares me just as much are those that still support her. Not just those big money people set up to profit handsomely, but the everyday lemmings blindly following her. Proving they are party voters and to heck with all the laws broken.

    Liked by 1 person

    • “She has no empathy nor sympathy for anyone or anything.”

      Here is a free downloadable copy of Dr. John Coleman’s Book,

      The Tavistock Institute Of Human Relations: Shaping The Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, And Political. And Economic Decline Of The United States Of America,
      wherein he postulates that the whole world is run by psychopaths.

      http://la.indymedia.org/news/2007/09/207750.php

      Liked by 1 person

  6. I hope the Trump people are planning to use this in a campaign commercial.

    Of course, it won’t sit well with See BS, but who cares?

    http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2016/05/17/cbs-worries-about-risks-trumps-aggression-smart-or-stupid

    Liked by 1 person

  7. something is really off with her……I do wonder if she was molested/raped as a child or teenager because her actions/words seem to point toward a hatred of women and children: alleged to have had multiple abortions, is still married to a man who has a long past of abusing women, she has abused the women her husband abused, proud to have defended a child rapist, shows loyalty to anyone who gives money, laughs at inappropriate times, has a narcissistic personality, history of sex and drug parties, was “proud” when her daughter had an abortion as though it was a right of passage http://blogs.christianpost.com/confident-christian/celebrating-chelsea-clintons-abortion-21026/
    the list goes on and on…

    Liked by 1 person

    • Larry Nichols said in his recent interview with Greg Hunter that Killary has a strong ambition to be president since she was four years old. She was one of those corporate psychopaths from an early age.

      Nichols and Rense and others are strategically release their closelyheld dirt on her.

      What amazes me is that there are apparently so many brain-dead-like people who will vote for her. It would be better they should write in the name of their dog.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Hillary Clinton is no champion of women’s rights.
    In fact, Hillary has hurt more women than men so she could have her greedy way.
    This rape case is an example of that.
    To hurt a 12 year old girl in court with accusations that were not true is typical of what Hillary has done all her life.
    Her only interest is self-interest.
    She does not belong in the White House.

    George Vreeland Hill

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s