Lenny Pozner’s HONR Network: The Fine Art of Online Stalking and Harassment

In their December (Florida) Sun-Sentinel op/ed, Lenny and Veronique Pozner claim that James Tracy had harassed them with a registered letter demanding proof that their alleged son, Noah, had ever lived. That is a misrepresentation of Tracy’s letter, which actually requested Lenny to produce proof of his claim of copyright over Noah’s images.

Mere days after Sun-Sentinel‘s publication of Pozners’ op/ed, Florida Atlantic University (FAU) moved to fire Tracy, a tenured professor.

Since then, the Pozners’ accusation has been repeated in countless media reports and vicious comments by readers of those news articles. An expert on tenure and academic freedom interviewed by NBC even said on camera that FAU’s termination of Tracy’s employment is justified by Tracy’s (alleged) “harassment” of the Pozners, which trumps tenure and First Amendment right of free speech.

This important post by Tony Mead demonstrates that it is Lenny Pozner and his cronies who have been doing the harassing, character assassination, and other machinations. My blog, Fellowship of the Minds (FOTM), is one of the WordPress blogs targeted by Lenny, who was successful at getting WordPress unilaterally to take down images of Noah over which Lenny claims — but has not proved — copyright. WordPress even threatened to shut down FOTM if we ever post images of Noah again. I also know of at least one blogger, a college kid Timothy Hunter, whom Lenny successfully hounded and, as a result, is no longer blogging. Curiously, while he relentlessly goes after YouTubers and bloggers for supposed copyright infringement, Lenny continues to be incurious about how and why an image of Noah was included among the posters of those massacred at the Army Public School in Deshawar, Pakistan, on Dec. 16, 2014.

Mr. Mead also raises an important and fascinating question: Just who/what is bankrolling Lenny and his HONR Network? This post by Mr. Mead deserves to be widely disseminated. Please help the cause of truth by spreading this post via email and on social media.

To read Tony Mead’s post, go here.

UPDATE (Feb. 10, 2016):

This morning, at 10:30 a.m., Fellowship of the Minds (FOTM) received an email from Lenny Pozner – HONR Network, demanding that this post be taken down on the grounds that this post:

  1. Contains “false information concerning the Pozner family”;
  2. Was published “without authorization”;
  3. The intent of which is “for the sole purpose of harassment”.

This is Fellowship of the Minds‘ response:

  1. Pozner’s accusation that FOTM published “false information concerning the Pozner family” is vague, overly general, and unspecific.
  2. In reblogging Tony Mead’s post from Memory Hole Blog, FOTM is simply exercising and conforming to the free speech and free press rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, for which FOTM requires neither “authorization” nor permission from Lenny or anyone else. Lenny Pozner is not the owner of FOTM, has never had a relationship with FOTM, and has no legal claim over FOTM.

  3. According to Law.com, the legal definition of “harassment” is:

“the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of one party or a group, including threats and demands. The purposes may vary, including racial prejudice, personal malice, an attempt to force someone to quit a job or grant sexual favors, apply illegal pressure to collect a bill or merely gain sadistic pleasure from making someone anxious or fearful. Such activities may be the basis for a lawsuit if due to discrimination based on race or sex, a violation on the statutory limitations on collection agencies, involve revenge by an ex-spouse, or be shown to be a form of blackmail (“I’ll stop bothering you if you’ll go to bed with me”). The victim may file a petition for a “stay away” (restraining) order, intended to prevent contact by the offensive party. A systematic pattern of harassment by an employee against another worker may subject the employer to a lawsuit for failure to protect the worker.”

Nothing in the legal definition of “harassment” applies in FOTM‘s re-blogging of Mr. Mead’s post for the simple reason that FOTM does not have a relationship with Lenny Pozner, nor is the reblog addressed to Mr. Pozner. Specifically:

  • FOTM has issued no demands or threats at Mr. Pozner. Ironically, it is Mr. Pozner who has issued demands and threats at FOTM.
  • Nor has FOTM forced Mr. Pozner to quit his job or grant sexual favors.
  • Nor has FOTM applied pressure to collect a bill from Mr. Pozner.
  • Nor has FOTM attempted to induce anxiety or fear, or intended to do so, or derived sadistic pleasure in so doing.
  • Nor has FOTM discriminated against Mr. Pozner’s race or sex.
  • Nor has FOTM blackmailed Mr. Pozner.
  • Nor is FOTM the employer of Mr. Pozner.

The purpose of FOTM‘s re-blogging of Tony Mead’s post is expressly and solely to inform — a purpose that is stated in FOTM‘s “About” page, specifically our Fair Use Disclaimer:

“In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes.”

UPDATE (October 14, 2017):

Today, at 11:15 am, FOTM received another email from Lenny Pozner, demanding that FOTM take down this and several other posts on the grounds of “harassment.” In this latest email, Mr. Pozner threatens that he will file a “police report” if this and the other posts are not removed.

Once again, FOTM repeats what was stated a year and 8 months ago:

  1. This and other posts on FOTM conform to the free speech and free press rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, for which FOTM requires neither “authorization” nor permission from Lenny or anyone else.
  2. Neither this nor any other post on FOTM constitutes “harassment” against Mr. Pozner according to the legal definition of “harassment” in Law.com, which any police jurisdiction recognizes.

On the contrary, it is Mr. Pozner’s repeated demands and threats that conform to the legal definition of “harassment”. If he continues, FOTM will consider legal action.

Advertisements

25 responses to “Lenny Pozner’s HONR Network: The Fine Art of Online Stalking and Harassment

  1. vincent ciccone

    Does anyone know if the faculty at FAU is unionized. If so, has he filed a grievance?

    Like

  2. Kevin J Lankford

    Yes….I can see where such an organization would be needed, to keep the truth from spreading.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Evil, pure and simple. Going after family…really I think they will stop at nothing even murder. HONR Network must be a leviathan group.

    I pray for you and Dr. Tracy, we live in such evil times. Protection and Peace from our Savior.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. God Bless you Dr Eowyn for standing valiant even in the face of people who would persecute you. I think we all know the answer to the question . . . “Who is bankrolling this smuck.” I’ll just bet there is a special little account that the US taxpayers have provided money to that maintains Pozner, Frankly, although it would be expensive, I think Pozner should be taken to court and made to submit the supposed letter he received asking for proof that his son had ever lived. and if he cannot provide such document–then he should be held legally and financially responsible for the havoc he has wrecked in the life of Dr. Tracy. I am just wondering if Dr Tracy shouldn’t seek help from the EEOC for being illegally fired. My most fervent wish is that Pozner one day becomes entangled in a snare. People of this ilk are the lowest of the low.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Good grief, I am so sorry for the things you are going through. It goes back to the statement, thou doust protest too much.
    I agree with Auntie, they need to show proof of the letter they keep lying about. Pushing back or complete silence is the only way to silence them.
    I also agree they are getting so serious help from higher up and Like Auntie said, we are probably paying for it.
    Whatever happened to the days when a good investigative reporter could ask those same questions and not be silenced.
    Maybe this is a job for the Enquirer, they seem to have a way of exposing things.
    I will continue supporting you, for we have much to lose to let this continue. We have the truth on our side.
    I have noticed those that oppose, but not in on the scam, never cite exactly why they disagree, you can tell they have not spent one minute reading and watching the evidence.
    Bless you.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Obviously the “HONR” group is a terrorist organization, this fits perfectly the definition of terrorism. As far as Tracy goes, mister Ponzi Pozner made the claim that a letter was sent harassing him, I would suggest that Tracy get the post office’s statements about if he sent the letter or not, per the NSA and citizen-spying mandates in the U.S.A. the post offices make “covers” of all mail sent (a misleading word for they take pictures of things and spy) The post office, or the workers there should be able to dispel the idea that Tracy sent a letter, and if not their “cover” records (if they can be obtained legally/with a warrant if need be) should demonstrate that a letter was never sent.

    In addition, claiming copyright over an image is a sure-fire way to make sure its spread as far across the internet as possible, mister Pozner effectively has ensured that the photographs in question will be spread across the internet, thats usually how it goes.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Tracy did send a registered letter. Lenny’s lie is in claiming Tracy demanded Lenny to prove Noah really is dead. What Tracy asked was that Lenny demonstrate his relationship with Noah, because Lenny claims copy right over Noah’s images.

      Like

      • That seems perfectly all above board. Since all these supposedly “dead children” have been thrust out into the media–it is very difficult to then claim “invasion of privacy” or the like. Since Noah’s image was not only put forth relative to what happened in SH, but it was put forward again at the time there were deaths abroad. What the deacons is up with that!

        Liked by 2 people

      • Did Lenny let the Palestians know he had the copy right over Noah’s images.
        Makes me think one day, the real Noah will turn up or someone will recognize the picture.
        Like the little girl, I think her name is Lily that was being used without permission.

        Liked by 1 person

  7. Who is bankrolling Lenny? Soros is my first guess. His evil ways are spread all over the world through his “philanthropy.”

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Has anyone investigated any possible ties between the Southern Poverty Law Center and the HONR network?

    Like

  9. hoaxer hostility and harassment=asking questions

    Liked by 1 person

  10. you’ll have to pardon lenny. he’s just bitter he was honred with the bronze instead of the gold.

    (catch it now before the poznerati have it taken down for ‘pointing out the obvious’)

    Liked by 1 person

  11. The response was excellent! Keep fighting for the Truth!

    Expose these criminally corrupt psychopaths for the scum that they are.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this important post. As Kevin Scott King said, “The response was excellent! Keep fighting for the Truth.”

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Thanks your stalwart courage in the face of evil and for staying faithful.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Ole Lennie seems to work under the liberal double standard. I can bully, push, lie and demand but you can’t. He would make a great Muslim.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Thank you, Dr. Eowyn, for your integrity, bravery, honesty and courage!
    “Lennie”s” actions demonstrate he and his gang are nothing more than a bunch of cowardly sellouts. SHOW YOUR FACE LENNIE! LOL!!! NEVER HAPPEN, Right?????

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Thank you, all, for your moral support — a fellowship against evil.

    Like

  17. They took my whole site down for this reason!!!!

    Like

  18. UPDATE (October 14, 2017):

    Today, at 11:15 am, FOTM received another email from Lenny Pozner, demanding that FOTM take down this and several other posts on the grounds of “harassment.” In this latest email, Mr. Pozner threatens that he will file a “police report” if this and the other posts are not removed.

    Once again, FOTM repeats what was stated a year and 8 months ago:

    (1) This and other posts on FOTM are protected by the free speech and free press rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, for which FOTM requires neither authorization nor permission from Lenny or anyone else.
    (2) Neither this nor any other post on FOTM constitutes “harassment” against Mr. Pozner according to the legal definition of “harassment” in Law.com, which any police jurisdiction recognizes.

    On the contrary, it is Mr. Pozner’s repeated demands and threats that are consistent with the legal definition of “harassment”. If he continues, FOTM will consider legal action.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s