Homosexuals are more narcissistic and more prone to pedophilia and murder

The media blitzkrieg to brainwash Americans into accepting homosexuals and transgenders tells us it’s all above “love”.

What they’re not telling you is that the “love” is not monogamous love. Promiscuity is notorious among homosexuals. In fact, some openly admit that “gay marriage” is not about monogamy and that wedded homosexuals have no intentions to be sexually faithful. As Andrew Sullivan puts it: “there is more likely to be greater understanding of the need for extramarital outlets between two men than between a man and a woman.” Citing a study of 556 homosexual male couples, a 2010 New York Times article says the same thing.

If “gay marriage” isn’t about fidelity, then what’s its purpose?

Lesbian activist Masha Gessen acknowledged what supporters of traditional marriage have long suspected — the push for gay marriage is about diminishing and eventually destroying the institution of marriage and redefining the traditional family. (See her on video, here.)

Another truth the orchestrated media aren’t telling you are the horrific and decidedly non-gay medical consequences of “gay” sex. (See my post “Medical consequences of homosexual sexual behaviors“.)

This post is about the psychopathology of homosexuality that the media also are not telling you. Studies show that homosexuals are more narcissistic and more disposed to be pedophiles, murderers, and child and serial killers.

But first, a qualifier.

The validity of scientific surveys and studies increases with the size of the sample: The larger the population sample, the more likely that the findings are accurate. Studies of homosexuals, however, are constrained by at least two factors:

  1. Homosexuals comprise only 2-3% of the U.S. population, according to the CDC and a UCLA institute that specializes in LGBT research.
  2. Researchers are hesitant to study homosexuals because it’s not politically correct.

As a consequence, the scientific studies on homosexuals are spotty and based on small samples. That being said, their findings are what we have at this point, until more scientists have the courage to conduct more studies.

Gay Pride Parade, Miami Beach, 2013

Gay Pride Parade, Miami Beach, 2013

#1: Homosexuals are narcissists

In 2010, behavioral scientist G. Rubinstein undertook a study on narcissism and self-esteem among homosexual and heterosexual male students at Netanya Academic College in Israel. The results were published in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. 2010;36(1):24-34.

Here’s the journal article’s abstract:

According to orthodox psychoanalytical theory, narcissism and homosexuality are strongly associated. This association played a major role in pathologizing homosexuality. The present study compared self-esteem and two measures of narcissism among 90 homosexual and 109 heterosexual male students, who filled in a demographic questionnaire, Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale, the Narcissistic Personality Inventory, and the Pathological Narcissism Inventory, which addresses both grandiose and vulnerable subtypes of narcissism. The hypothesis, which is based on the Freudian connection between narcissism and homosexuality, is supported by the results, indicating that the homosexual students score higher in both measures of narcissism and lower on the self-esteem measure, compared to their heterosexual counterparts. Intra-psychic, as well as environmental, interpretations of the results are suggested in the discussion.

Subway Jared

Subway Jared

#2: Homosexuals more prone to pedophilia

In his report “Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement” published in v. 14 of the Regent University Law Review, Stephen Baldwin, executive director of the Council for National Policy in Washington, D.C., provides extensive and compelling evidence of homosexual men’s propensity to pedophilia:

  • Homosexuals account for between 25% and 40% of all child molestation, according to psychologist Paul Cameron, founder of Family Research Institute, in a 1985 Psychological Reports article, after reviewing more than 19 different academic reports and peer-reviewed studies.
  • Homosexuals account for 86% of all male child molestation, according to Erickson, Walbek, Sely, in a 1988 Archives of Sexual Behavior article.
  • A 1992 study published in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, sex researchers K. Freud and R. I. Watson found that homosexual males are three times more likely than straight men to engage in pedophilia and that the average pedophile victimizes between 20 and 150 boys before being arrested.

Homosexual serial killers

#3: Homosexuals are more prone to be serial and child killers

Morgan Mayhew writes for Liberty News Now, Jan. 10, 2015, that “the 800-pound gorilla in the room” of the LGBTQ community is the correlation between sexual orientation and violence.

According to the article, “Homosexual Serial Killers,” serial killers are nearly always men (93%). Despite their small percentage in the total population, 43% of serial killers are known to have had homosexual experience. Many of the most famous serial killers (e.g., Jeffrey Dahmer, Andrew Cunanan, John Wayne Gacy, etc.) were homosexuals.

Homosexual serial killers have most frequently chosen young boys or gay men as their victims, although some have victimized females as well. Most of the killers have raped their victims either before or after killing them, although in some cases they have killed after consensual homosexual sex.

According to a study by Dr. Paul Cameron, published in the Journal of the Family Research Institute, Vol. 18 No. 1, Feb. 2003, “The homosexual historical footprint is large when it comes to the rape and murder of children.”

Dr. Cameron used the online search service Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe to scan the whole text of over 50 English-language regional and national newspapers in the U.S., Australia, England, Canada, and New Zealand from 1989 through 2002, for every news story that included “child molestation.” The search came up with 90 news stories on the rape and murder of children, 40% of which involved homosexual molestation. The perpetrators in the 90 news stories numbered 95, at least 43% of whom (41 out of 95: 39 men, a boy, and a woman) were engaged in homosexuality.

In the most unusual case, an “educated and relatively wealthy” leader recruited two other men and a boy. This team raped and murdered 100 boys. The leader had had prior arrests for suspicion of sodomizing boys, but his social status kept him from being convicted for many years.

Worse still, Dr. Cameron found that “All of the cases involving eating or torturing the victim were committed by homosexual practitioners.

Murder also appears to be disproportionately associated with homosexuality. Dr. Cameron wrote:

Jim Warren did the intake interview for almost all younger murderers (i.e., those under age 36) at the Washington State Corrections Center from 1971-82…. Warren said that he was struck with how frequently homosexuality turned up in the cases. Starting with a trickle of 2 or 3 murders/year in 1972 until dozens/year by the early 1980s, he noted a recurrent pattern: Although the motive listed in the report was often robbery or theft, he said that “about 50% of the time” it was associated with homosexuality. Typically, he said, a homosexual would meet someone at a bar or park and invite him to his home. Eventually, an argument would ensue and he or his visitor would be dead.

In Amsterdam, police spokesmen have stated that in “one out of four of all murder cases the victim was homosexual” (quoted by Gemert, 1994, p. 150). Gemert opined that “[e]lderly homosexual men often don’t have much to do in daily life. When they know that they will be unwanted in the gay world in the future, they will… seek this form of excitement. Visiting Central Station and ‘hunting’ boys is very important to them” (p. 172)….

Although murder and rape of children are not common events, they are extremely frightening and can greatly impact the communities in which they occur. As its most precious resource, our society takes great pains to protect children and to ensure their safety. Amazingly, our society is also at the vanguard of the pro-gay rights movement. But consider: a group constituting perhaps 1% to 5% of men (1.3% in the 1996 National Household Survey of Drug Abuse; higher in Black, et al.7, Anderson & Stall8, and Cameron & Cameron9) generated 43% of those who were recorded in the most recent 14 years of news stories as having raped and killed children. That this group also accounts for around a third of child molesters, commits between a third to two-thirds of child rapes, and may be involved in up to half of all murders, adds substance to the traditional belief that participation in homosexual activity is anti-social.

Most child molesters, child rapists, murderers and serial killers are male. Homosexual males account for 1% to 2% of the population. That means 1% to 2% of the population commit 1/3 of child molestations, 1/3 to 2/3 of child rapes, 1/2 of all murders, and more than 2/5 of serial murders.

Let the horror of the above information sink in.

And yet the media, pop culture and pop entertainment industries are whoring for this group who disproportionately commit these horrors.

Why is that?

See also:

~Éowyn

Advertisements

45 responses to “Homosexuals are more narcissistic and more prone to pedophilia and murder

  1. I guess that sheds some light on o’bama!

    Like

  2. Lived in Berkeley in the mid and late 70s, and I NEVER met a GAY person. All of them were very unhappy and very bizzaro and many were downright extremely sadistic and self destructive and dangerous. The whole movement soured me ever since.Now I see where things have gone in todays world,and I guess I was right. I still get the creeps from a lot of cultural Marxism and the like nowadays.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. When does this air on “60 Minutes” or appear in the New York Times?

    Like

  4. That pic from Miami Gay Pride Parade actually brings tears to my eyes. How sad that these people are so unhappy with who God created them to be that they pervert themselves in this manner. I know many gay men who are so beautiful, intelligent and talented in the extreme. Some seem happy enough on the surface, but there is an underlying emotion, be it self-esteem issues, or confusion, or anger. It is such a shame. Is this at the heart of why they want us to affirm their lifestyle? Can they not accept themselves, and so they need others to affirm them? And don’t they see how they are the useful idiots of the elite? To be used, and when their usefulness is over, to be tossed away?

    Liked by 2 people

  5. What a chilling account!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Polyamorous marriage is traditional marriage. Some of my ancestors were polyamorous. They lived on the coast. Every sailor/pirate had a wife in every port, right? And how was each wife supposed to cope all alone for months at a time without a man? What’s the problem there? I don’t see one. No shock horror or outage over polyamory here, great system.

    http://www.celticlyricscorner.net/oldblinddogs/wife.htm

    Like

    • “And how was each wife supposed to cope all alone for months at a time without a man? ” By her own strength and family/friend support systems.

      And, according to feminists, she either is strong enough on her own or doesn’t need no stinking man!

      Like

    • Ms. you seem to be mistaken about the subject, polyamory has always been invalid amongst the tribes of mankind, regardless of the culture, infidelity was always infidelity, regardless of how the new age apologists or fluffball neo-pagans try to rework the history to fit their corrupted ideaologies. All cultures of mankind do have a conception of what is right and wrong, the only difference among them is which ones chose to ignore that & to what extent.

      After all, what culture in history has looked favorably on traitors or treachery, and what is “polyamory” or adultery, but treachery/being a traitor to marriage/a relationship?

      Liked by 1 person

      • No.Polyamory was normal for seafarers and their spouses in a lot of places in Britain. Sexual tolerance is traditionally high in a lot of countryside places. All traditional. All moral.

        Like

  7. I found nothing to disagree with. Sad, isn’t it?

    Liked by 1 person

    • While of course polyamory occurs, especially in places where difficult living conditions prevent people from having more stable relationships, it has been frowned upon and discouraged by the vast majority of societies.

      And this is part of the reason pirates and seafarers were looked upon as untrustworthy and suspicious. Many of them were labelled “scoundrels”. So if you want to make the comparison between pirates and the gay community, you aren’t thinking too hard about what that analogy implies.

      If pirates/seafarers would have had polyamory “pride” parades it wouldn’t have gone over well. It’s simply an unintelligent comparison.

      Like

  8. homosexuality is not a “lifestyle”, it is a “death”-style.
    I believe homosexuality is propagandized so strongly today because it is an all out assault again Jesus and His followers. It also serves as a ‘divide and conquer’ maneuver between families (separating natural husband and wife), organizations (BSA had to choose between professed faith and homosexuality and chose homosexuality) and churches (many falling under because they are turning secular…or “coming out” secular).
    I still take this one road that has a high school on one side, and a fake “church” with a fake “rainbow” flag on the other. I shake my head every time I pass and think about teens walking out of school and seeing the “church” associated with the “rainbow” flag, and believing it’s normal and that Christians are OK with homosexuality. True Christians love the sinner, but hate the sin and speak the truth when rebuking the sinner. Fake christians embrace the sin and do not identify the sinner….this is their fake, unoffended “love”. It takes more love and strength to speak the truth and risk “losing” certain people than to bow down to timidity and PC culture and “gain” a few “friends”. I would rather “lose” my “friend” and “gain” with the Lord any day.
    This division of the church began when christians wanted to have their proverbial PC cake and eat it too. Jesus was, is, and never will be PC. Jesus is truth and PC is the antithesis to truth. Homosexuals (sodomites) deny the truth and embrace the PC culture. Practicing sodomy not only diseases the body, but the soul, and the spirit as well.
    So much of sin is associated with homosexuality: rape, molestation, orgies, polygamy, hedonism, narcissism, transgenderism, murder, pedophilia, alcoholism, drug addiction, suicide, disease….all a pandora’s box of sin. The only way to be cleansed of sin is to repent to Jesus, trust in Him, become purified in the blood of Christ, and become empowered through the Holy Spirit to deny that “death”-style and other sinful activities.
    All the evil going on today is working to show who the true Christians are and maybe, just maybe, a sub-population living in such carnal filth can reawaken its senses to morality and purity and run screaming to the arms of Jesus. For not everyone will be saved, but everyone has the chance at salvation even though we are not deserving, the question is who will accept His amazing grace and mercy?

    Liked by 1 person

    • homosexuality is not a “lifestyle”, it is a “death”-style.

      Well put!

      Like

    • I agree, Mom of IV, and I think what you are saying, in part, is this: The other side, which is on the offensive, is able to exploit our reluctance to fight. It is exploiting our natural modesty in that we’d prefer not to dwell on such things. The other side is adept at embarrassing us in front of ourselves, and when we cannot answer their objections to their satisfaction, they win (so they think). Long story short: Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky, and their heirs, the Frankfurt School and their descendants, have mastered the tactics to corner and checkmate us. They are NIHILISTS. And they are SATANISTS.

      Like

      • Steven,

        Why do you insist we’re not fighting? We are fighting this. But with the media on their side, unless people make the effort to seek out the Alternative Media, we end up preaching to the choir. What do you propose we do to show you that we’re fighting?

        Like

        • It seems to me, Dr. Eowyn, that these freaks are getting all the press they want, and they insist it’s favorable to them! We need to organize and protest. We need to get favorable press. We need to get some politicians to come out and get on our side. (I realize it’s a tall order).

          Liked by 1 person

  9. I volunteered doing psychotherapy in a jail. Sadly, one homosexual would cause more trouble in a cell block than all the other inmates combined. As soon as they step out of their cell the drama starts. I remember one particular case of a young 19 year old gay in on 5 cases of attempted murder.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. This confirms what I feel every time I see the more extreme participants in the Gay Pride parades. I would never associate with such people. And keep in mind what brought destruction onto Sodom. Was it the sexual perversion? I think it was the extreme inhumanity and cruelty shown to the woman who was thrown to the crowd of perverts. Just my opinion, but one I can easily defend.

    Like

    • Was it the sexual perversion?

      Yes, it was. Nobody wants to talk about it, but the fact is homosexual sexual behaviors are against Natural Law:

      1. Simply put, the anus is not designed for sexual penetration — by penises or fists. 22% of homosexuals (nearly 1 of every 4) in one survey admitted to having participated in fisting.

      2. Nor are feces and urine designed for ingestion.

      3. Nor is semen meant to be ingested, as Nacho dip. https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2015/01/14/demonic-nacho-party/

      4. Nature did not design creatures to be promiscuous. Why? Because sexual reproduction between males and females result in fertilization and birth of the young — all of which takes time. The females of most creatures would have sex only in oestrus, when the female is ovulating. Homosexual sex has none of Nature’s constraints, which leads to promiscuity on a scale unimaginable to most of us. A 1978 study found that 75% of white gay males (3 of every 4) claimed to have had more than 100 lifetime male sex partners; 28% (that’s more than 1 of every 5 white gay men!) claimed more than 1,000 lifetime male sex partners. Even non-human animals don’t remotely approach that level of sexual promiscuity. In fact, many birds and animals mate for life.

      It is no wonder, then, that homosexual sexual practices lead to such horrific medical consequences. See: https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2011/07/28/what-theyll-never-tell-you-in-homosexual-education/

      Like

  11. Wow, MomofIV you have a way of stating it so well.
    I too worked in an industry almost totally populated with homosexuals. Some were very nice people but an inordinate amount of them had a huge chip on their shoulder and were very mean. We all have crosses to bear, but in true narcissistic fashion homosexuals demand the whole world to change so they can feel OK about themselves and their lives -I think what Masha Gesson said is revelatory of this. But I would say that she and so many others of her kind are not just narcissistic, but psychopathic. Psychopaths are compelled to destroy what they cannot control. In this case, they can’t control peoples attitudes or feelings about their identity and they can’t have the love and happiness of a heterosexual relationship so they are compelled to destroy what they can’t have. Any normal person wants to just be left alone to live their life. These radical homosexuals are hell-bent on destroying everyone else’s life. It all seems very Stalinist to me. And as far as why this is being pushed …well the financial backers of all this are of the same ilk too. I think by now most know the elite are into this very type of depravity and more. As they remake the world in their image, or should I say the image of Satan, it leaves ordinary people, esp. the children open and defenseless to their predations – that’s the agenda.

    Liked by 1 person

    • True, I think they are flooding the world, in hopes they can justify their actions, they know darn well goes against society and God. It is to make themselves feel better.
      If they want to be gay, be gay, but have some dignity about it. They are making fools of themselves with these outrageous actions.

      Liked by 1 person

    • “We all have crosses to bear, but in true narcissistic fashion homosexuals demand the whole world to change so they can feel OK about themselves and their lives”

      Well observed, Lana.

      Like

  12. The problem with psychology is that so little of it can be replicated. Not that we would wish to replicate any of the horrors described here, of course.
    I have seen similar statistics before, and I believe them. The scientific problem is this: Correlation DOES NOT EQUAL causation. There is a strong correlation between homosexual activity and the consequences described, but there is no causation. (At least not directly).
    What, then, can be the matter?
    This is where we have to make the jump from mere science to the spiritual. Henry Makow, who is Jewish, stated his belief in an article about three years ago (check his archived articles on his site) that sexual promiscuity, beyond a certain point, leads to, or can lead to, demonic possession. This makes sense, at least on the face of it, because we know that sexual promiscuity (as well as excessive alcohol usage or drug use, degenerate gambling, etc., etc.) can serve as a PORTAL for demons to enter. I have witnessed this in some people so affected.
    We can document so many cases of venereal disease, molestation, rape, etc., etc., and we can count it in a number of ways—per capita, percentage, rate per 100,000, etc. And these numbers can be true. They show a correlation, but not causation.
    What, then, can be the matter?
    Psychology, as I have noted above, can tell us many things. But unless it is replicable or replicatable (whatever the correct word is), it is NOT objective science. Indeed, psychology can only tell us so much about human nature. Much of it is necessarily SUBJECTIVE, and, therefore, NOT empirical, at least per se.
    But when we look at the matter in a SPIRITUAL manner, or in SPIRITUAL TERMS, the causation may not necessarily be seen EMPIRICALLY, but it can be seen PHENOMENOLOGICALLY: Things exist only according to their natures, and pathologies exist only according to their deprivations, or the deprivations they cause in their host. This is what horrifies people not so affected.
    Put another way, God always acts with a specific intent and a purpose beforehand. Therefore, whatever He creates was created with a purpose, an aim, a function, to achieve the end He has Ordained. We can leave God out of it—for the sake of the argument—and speak of Nature instead. The same result maintains. So when people not affected with same-sex attraction or homosexuality recoil in horror at the results described in this article, they are responding according to a sound nature, whether correlation equals causation or not. THIS is why we MUST NEVER APOLOGIZE for our position, what we stand for. THIS is why we must GO ON THE OFFENSIVE and not allow the other side to exploit our natural modesty or reluctance to fight. Not all homosexuals are monsters—far from it. But the condition itself is a DEPRIVATION and has to be acknowledged as such.
    We have to study the strategies and tactics of the Left, from Lenin and Trotsky and the Frankfurt School on down, or we will never win.

    Liked by 1 person

    • “psychology can only tell us so much about human nature. Much of it is necessarily SUBJECTIVE, and, therefore, NOT empirical”

      Steven, it would be useful if you were trained in and are knowledgeable about epistemology, the types and nature of knowledge. The studies I cited have NOTHING to do with human beings’ subjective thoughts & intents. The studies I cited are EMPIRICAL (i.e., this world & fact-based) studies of human beings’ BEHAVIORS — how they scored on narcissism tests; pedophilia; child rapes; child murders; and serial murders. Those are OBJECTIVE, verifiable behaviors. Except for the Israeli study on narcissism, replication is not even relevant: How does one “replicate” serial killers?

      Yes, correlation does not equal causation. However, any good epistemologist would tell you that a necessary condition to establish a causal relationship between X and Y is consistent correlation, i.e., where you have X, you find Y. All of which means these studies that found a significant correlation between homosexuality (not just disposition, but sexual practices) and criminality should not be so casually dismissed. Establishing correlation is the first and necessary step to causation.

      As for Henry Makow’s notion that sexual promiscuity is a portal for the demonic, I would rather look to theologians and priests on this matter, than someone (Makow) who does not even believe in the existence of God. And yet he talks about the demonic.

      Like

      • I’ve been reading Makow for over six years now. I cannot remember any article in which he states he’s an atheist. But for a non-Christian to state that he believes in demonic possession, and that he believes it can occur due to sexual promiscuity, adds to our side of the argument, No?
        You are right: I am not trained in psychology and empiricism. But it seems to me that the Left want to have their cake and eat it, too: They won’t admit to causation with homosexual behavior, yet they insist that sex education won’t lead to promiscuity! They won’t admit to the possibility that television modifies behavior, yet they want violence off television! (At least they used to).

        Liked by 1 person

        • Makow, whom I like, and I are email correspondents. He admitted to me his atheism. I said I will pray for him.

          Like

          • I would not have guessed Makow an atheist. This really surprised me.
            I have read multiple times in his own articles where he defines God as Love, Truth, Beauty etc.

            I think I know of which article Steven refers to about Homosexuality and demonic possession. For what it is worth, I know of a Catholic mystic who claims in her visions she has been shown that an inordinate amount of homosexuals do have what she calls gull demons attached to them. These particular demons according to her are associated with perversity and unbridled lust. Is it a coincidence that the gull demon seems to be represented in Venetian carnival masks, and scenes from the movie ” Eyes Wide Shut”.

            Like

            • Lana,

              Our Lady, in one of her appearances at Fatima, had said that “More souls go to Hell because of sins of the flesh than for any other reason.” https://archive.org/stream/TheMessageOfOurLadyOfFatimaWithPicture/fatimaSelectionspic_djvu.txt

              Fascinating point about gull demons and that grotesque Venetian carnival bird mask. Here’s what this website says about the mask:

              Medico della Peste (Plague Doctor): The birdlike mask actually was not worn by carnival goers; instead it originated in the 17th century by French physician Charles de Lorme and was worn by plague doctors to protect them from airborne diseases. Carnival goers eventually started wearing a decorated version as a memento mori, a rememberanceof their mortality.

              Why de Lorme chose a bird-beak mask to wear to protect himself from plague is a mystery.

              Like

          • I did not know that. Still, my hat is off to Dr. Makow: He is surprisingly empathetic to the Christian side, and he tells it like it is.

            Like

  13. 1. An AIDS infected homosexual is guaranteed to drain $618,000.00 from the Social Security Trust Fund before it dies. AIDS research is now in first place at the National Institutes of Health (sic). Pediatric cancer has been abandoned. 2. Some 35% to 45% of all the ashkenazi jews in the world have a gene (ccc-5 gene) that protects them against an AIDS infection. The inheritance is mendelian. One dose provides resistance, two doses almost complete protection. Jews acquired this gene through the process of natural selection. Hence jews are all promiscuous, raping homosexuals.

    Like

    • “Some 35% to 45% of all the ashkenazi jews in the world have a gene (ccc-5 gene) that protects them against an AIDS infection. Jews acquired this gene through the process of natural selection.

      A scientific source(s), please.

      “Hence jews are all promiscuous, raping homosexuals.”

      That’s a logical non sequitur.

      Like

      • Thanks for asking for a source. Most ‘scholarly papers’ (sic) written by jews conceal their culpability behind a claim the ccc5 gene increases in frequency as one moves towards the north pole. They pretend the ccc5 gene is something you get by behaving like a Viking. This jew tells the truth because he thinks only jews read his posts. http://jewcy.com/featured/brilliant_resistant_to_hiv_and_more
        If you doubt jews are raping homosexual pedophiles you need to read the Talmud. Or, ask yourself why are jews at the forefront of legalizing homosexual behavior and ‘inter generational attractions’.

        Like

        • Thanks for the link. Interesting article and interesting site.

          That being said, the fact that some Ashkenazi (North European) Jews have a mutation in their CCR5 gene (assuming that is true) which has a protective effect against HIV still doesn’t follow that “Hence jews are all promiscuous, raping homosexuals.” If that were true, there wouldn’t be any Ashkenazi Jews left.

          However, I don’t dispute with you that Jews are at the forefront of many cultural corruptions, notably the porn industry. See:
          http://www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38

          Like

  14. The CCR5 gene can only increase its prevalence in a population as a result of natural selection. Maybe I should say survival of the fittest. If promiscuous homosexuality occurred at the same frequency across all the races, all the races would have the CCR5 gene at the same rate or prevalence- 35% to 45%. Might I add, blacks are 10X more likely, browns are 4X more likely to have AIDS than whites. Homosexual promiscuity correlate directly with skin color.

    Like

  15. Sadly, Obama’s divide and conquer agenda has totally accomplished its
    goal. I am deeply saddened by what I am reading here. Homosexuality
    is not a choice, and if you think it is, you’re bat shit crazy. Who would
    choose to live a life as you describe.
    I am so disappointed in all of your comments.
    You don’t know it, but you all have friends who are gay. Some day you
    will awaken. God bless.

    Like

    • “Homosexuality is not a choice, and if you think it is, you’re bat shit crazy.”

      Show me where in my post I said “homosexuality is a choice.” However, homosexual sexual behaviors as I’d described them in my comment response to Trail Dust are a choice — intentional, deliberate, the results of conscious choice, and all contrary to Natural Law. And pedophilia, rape & murder of children (mainly boys), and serial murders are also decidedly CHOICE, all criminal behaviors.

      But you’re defending those behaviors. And you call us “bat shit crazy”! That’s some feat of scapegoating.

      I hope some day you will awaken. And may God have mercy on you.

      Like

  16. Pingback: Studies of Identical twins show homosexuality is acquired, not genetic | Fellowship of the Minds – The Americanist

  17. Pingback: A Really Sick Mind – Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg | Sue's Pen2PaperBlog

  18. The gay propaganda book After the Ball, co-written by Erastes Pill (Erastes is Greek for pedarest.) Nambla is waiting in the wings! The LGBTQ is a sinister organization indeed.

    Like

  19. Pingback: Mack Beggs, transgender wrestler, should not eat her cake and have it

  20. Pingback: No Words that I can Repeat | Sue's Pen2PaperBlog

  21. Pingback: No Words I can Repeat | Cyber Support Group

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s