Boston Bombing: 2 reasons to doubt jury’s guilty verdict

Yesterday, April 8, 2015, in a U.S. district court in Boston, after only 12 hours of deliberation, the jury convicted 21-year-old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on all 30 counts of the Boston Marathon bombings on April 15, 2013. 17 of the 30 counts carry the death penalty. The same jury will now decide whether to sentence Tsarnaev to death or give him life in prison without possibility of parole.

Tamerlan & Dzhokhar TsarnaevTamerlan (l) and Dzhokhar (r) Tsarnaev

Incredibly, Tsarnaev’s defense team didn’t say he was innocent. Instead, the defense admitted he had carried out the bombings, but blamed Dzhokhar’s older brother, 26-year-old Tamerlan, for having “masterminded” the bombings. Tamerlan Tsarnaev didn’t make it to trial because, we are told, he was gunned down in the evening of April 18, 2015, in a shoot-out with police in Watertown, a suburb of Boston, then run over by his younger brother in a stolen SUV.

I wrote “we are told” because there’s this video showing what appears to be a naked, unwounded and very much alive Tamerlan being handcuffed and escorted into a Boston Police Department vehicle. According to 21stCenturyWireTV that uploaded the video to YouTube on April 20, 2013, the video had appeared on Brazilian TV earlier that day (April 20).

Please make a note of the image of “Tamerlan” with a well-trimmed beard at the 0:17 mark. Here’s a screenshot I took.

Tamerlane Tsarnaev being arrested on 4-18-2013

There are at least two reasons for us to be skeptical of the culpability of Dzhokhar and his older brother Tamerlan.

Reason #1: FBI video showing tsarnaev setting down a backpack doesn’t exist

Remember this much-publicized image of the Tsarnaev brothers at the marathon?

The image is from an FBI video, and was widely circulated by the media. Note that the Tsarnaevs were not actually depicted as depositing their backpacks that presumably contained the bombs. But just the image of the two was enough to convince us they had been present at the marathon.

The only problem is the FBI video doesn’t exist.

On April 18, 2013, Richard DesLauriers, Special Agent in charge of the Boston Division of the FBI, gave a press conference in which he asked for the public’s help to identify two suspects (who later were identified as Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev) for the bombings. DesLauriers said:

After a very detailed analysis of photo, video, and other evidence, we are releasing photos of the two suspects. They are identified as Suspect 1 and Suspect 2. They appear to be associated.

Suspect 1 is wearing a black hat. Suspect 2 is wearing a white hat. [Jurors at Dzhokhar’s trial were told he was the one wearing the white hat.]

Suspect 2 set down a back pack at the site of the second explosion just in front of the Forum Restaurant….

As you can see from one of the images, Suspects 1 and 2 appear to be walking together through the marathon crowd on Boylston Street in the direction of the finish line….

Further, on, we have videos of the suspects. The photos and videos are posted for the public and media to use, review and publicize.

Here’s the video released at the press conference:

Note that although Special Agent DesLauriers clearly said at the press conference that “Suspect 2 set down a back pack at the site of the second explosion,” the actual image of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev setting down his back pack was never released to the public, nor does the surveillance video above depict Tsarnaev setting down the back pack.

Why is that?

New York Daily News reports that in a pre-trial hearing on March 2, 2015, Dzhokhar’s defense attorney David Bruck made a “stunning assertion” that a video billed by the FBI as a caught-in-the-act piece of evidence “does not exist.” From the Daily News:

The feds claimed the video, which was never made public, showed Dzhokhar Tsarnaev dropping a backpack concealing a homemade bomb next to a 6-year-old boy who was killed.

At the time, FBI officials only released still photos of Tsarnaev mingling with finish-line revelers near where little Martin Richard was standing. Other photos made public showed both Tsarnaev brothers walking through the crowd before the explosions carrying backpacks.

So how is it that so many people believe they’ve seen a video that doesn’t exist — a video showing the Tsarnaev brothers dropping a backpack at the marathon? Indeed, on April 21, 2013, I had asked about precisely that video in my post “Where is the video showing the Tsarnaev brothers placing the bombs?

WhoWhatWhy points out that what we’d seen is merely a TV re-enactment in a National Geographic docu-drama entitled, “Inside the Hunt for the Boston Bombers.” The National Geographic video, however, was not actual footage of the Tsarnaevs, but a re-enactment of the video the FBI claimed to have but never released. To add to the irony, the National Geographic’s reenactment wasn’t even shot in Boston—actors created the scene on the streets of Phoenix, Arizona.

Note: Yesterday (April 9) when I wrote this post, I was able to view the above video on YouTube. Today, however, we are told that the video is no longer available. Hmm . . . .

Reason #2: Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s now-you-see-it now-you-don’t beard

As presented by Professor Jim Fetzer for Veterans Today, Tamerlan Tsarnaev had a well-trimmed beard when he was seen in a video working out at the Wai Kru gym on April 12, 2013, three days before the Boston Marathon. But FBI images of Tamerlan on April 15 depicted him as clean shaven. Three days later, however, when he was killed in a shoot-out with the police on April 18, Tamerlan again had a well-trimmed beard.

A friend of Tamerlan, Manatov Khairullozhon, said he had dinner with the Tsarnaev brothers at the Somerville Cafe on the evening of April 15, 2013, where he observed Tamerlan was wearing a beard. Khairullozhon went to the authorities when he saw the FBI images of a clean-shaven Tamerlan at the marathon to inform them that he and Tamerlan, sporting a beard, had had dinner the night before, but they did not want to hear it. For coming forth, Khairullozhon has been targeted and abused and is being prosecuted for obstruction of evidence.

↓ Click image below to enlarge ↓

Tamerlan Tsarnaev's beard

Tamerlan’s now-you-see-it now-you-don’t beard is why his aunt, Maret Tsarnaev, believes the surveillance video and the images of the two brothers at the Boston Marathon are fake.

There are so many questions we can ask Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s defense team:

  1. Why wasn’t former CIA agent Robert David Steele, who says Boston bombings were a false flag, called as a defense witness?
  2. Why wasn’t Hollywood producer Nathan Folks, who says Boston bombings were a false flag, called as an expert witness for the defense?
  3. Why weren’t Boston police witnesses asked why Catholic priests were turned away from ministering to the bombing victims? (Was it because if the priests were allowed, they would discover that the victims were crisis actors?)
  4. Why didn’t the defense ask a medical expert how is it that Jeff Bauman, who supposedly had both legs blown off by the first Boston Marathon bomb, was fully conscious when he carted away in a wheelchair, when his severe injuries would have knocked him unconscious? Why wasn’t a medical expert asked how Bauman could  so quickly recover from losing both legs that he appeared at a Bruins hockey game a mere 19 days later?

H/t 21st Century Wire, WhoWhatWhy, and FOTM’s josephbc69.

See also Jim Fetzer’s “Boston Show Trial: Dzhokhar ‘Guilty!’ on All 30 Counts.”

For all the posts FOTM has published on this subject, go to our “Boston Marathon Bombings” page.


26 responses to “Boston Bombing: 2 reasons to doubt jury’s guilty verdict

  1. As I wrote in a Care2 column comment a few days ago on this:
    “…I only found three sensible comments so far, all the rest are the predictable emotional responses that the real perps count on to distract We the Sheople from the truths.”

    Both these fellows were FBI patsies being set-up for this false flag & black ops event, complete w/the usual suspects, crisis events, actors, and LOADED w/the DOCUMENTED RESEARCH that Eo has once again brought to our attention.

    Poor Dzhokhar is even more of a victim than his brother, who was killed to keep him from talking, while Dzhokhar’s supposed ‘defense counsel’ did NO defending, only scaring him into plea bargaining as ‘Guilty’. What kind of ‘defense’ is that?

    These miserable women –and sorry, but I think they are both lesbians w/an agenda– did not allow him to introduce a SINGLE PIECE of evidence on his behalf, MOST IMPORTANTLY the fact that he carried a WHITE BACKPACK, while the two Catalyst Corp agents had the black ones which they left as planned at the scene!!

    This farce is almost as bad as 9-11, when we’re all supposed to believe a feral gubbmint ‘official story’ that’s so poorly done and full of holes it can be used as a fly swatter.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Outstanding post, Dr. Eowyn!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Excellent points and facts Dr. Will we ever learn the truth? Hardly.
    But something has been nagging me since day one. Who exactly was the Saudi boy that was caught running from the scene with shredded legs on his exercise suit? We were told he was just a college student, completely innocent. So why was he taken to the hospital and both BO and MO saw fit to visit him along with a recently arrived Saudi official? Really, the only one he visited? Then he was suddenly spirited out of the country, why, if he was innocent, why not stay and continue college? Saudi official, really?
    Something smells.
    Who is he and is he the missing son of OBL that swore to get us? He sure could pass for him, if you can find a picture left.
    Sure hope someone can scratch this itch.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Pingback: Boston Bombing: 2 reasons to doubt jury’s guilty verdict -

  5. Kevin J Lankford

    I do become so discouraged sometime. I know there are many out there who know not to accept without question what they see and hear on mainstream news, who know how and take the time to search the real from the fake, and that do know the truth. But as I sitting in a local bar and grill this past wednesday the trial verdict news came in on the overhead tv and all were pleased about the outcome. As I attempted to point out different issues of concern and discrepancies their only response was rolled eyes, or blank looks, as they turned back to the screen. Actually I get this a lot on many different issues.

    Clearly, many just do not want to be bothered with to much that will disturb their sense of isolation and false security.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Pingback: Boston Show Trial: Dzhokhar “Guilty!” On All 30 Counts, (Not Even Probable Cause to Warrant an Indictment, Much Less Proof to Justify a Conviction) - The Liberty Beacon | The Liberty Beacon

  7. Dr. Eowyn, I hope you are right about our numbers. I get discouraged about so many things like this that seem beyond our control. I have to keep reminding myself that God is our Shield and Defender. Greater is He that is in us than he that is in the world.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Take heart, Prisca!

      To quote St. Paul’s Letter to the Romans: “With God on our side who can be against us?… Nothing therefore can come between us and the love of Christ, even if we are troubled or worried, or being persecuted, or lacking food or clothes, or being threatened or even attacked. These are the trials through which we triumph, by the power of him who loved us.”


  8. Excellent post. I should also add the FBI released some photographs from INSIDE the brothers apartment and look what’s laying right in plain sight.


    But I wasn’t that backpack stuffed with 30lbs of pressure cooker filled with low-grade black powder extracted from fireworks and assorted metal shrapnel?

    Anyone who has taken apart fireworks understands that the powder is low quality, and there isn’t even very much. It would take a pickup truck bed full of fireworks to get a few pounds of powder for each bomb. It would have been much easier to go down to the local gun store and buy a few cans of smokeless powder for reloading.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Oh yeah… did anyone happen to notice how the Jeff Bauman had kinky hair, yet the one in the hospital had straight? Two different colors too.

    Also, i’m trying to find the website… but a year or so ago someone had discovered the manufacturer of Jeff’s “simulated gore accessory” and had a side by side picture. Here is one photo..

    Liked by 1 person

  10. I look every day and see more people waking up. Hang in there, Americans. The sheep have started waking. Become the sheepdog. Again, spread the examples. Show fact! The reason the communal society in America is so effective is they push talking points and goosestep behind the leaders. Once freedom loving Americans get organized and sift the disinformation out, nothing will stop us from returning to greatness. Stand fast, and never give up!

    Liked by 2 people

  11. That picture is so d÷€#&£”d disgraceful. Where the HELL are the tendons? Where is the muscle? Where is the blood on the bone? Where is the other half of his leg? Why on EARTH would a bystander be standing in the middle of these people with their back TURNED to man that would be dead in a matter of minutes without a tourniquet. Why the hell is he conscious? That is not the look of a man who just lost his legs.

    This is disgusting. The fact they have tried to pull the veil over our eyes is UNSPEAKABLE. I almost posted a picture of an IED victim to show what a REAL wound looks like, but it would be TOO GRAPHIC. This is garbage.


  12. I just figured out why the official report clarified the bombs using firework powder, as Andrew mentioned. If the bomb had used smokeless powder, as anyone wanting a much more potent, stable mixture would have chosen, there would not have been an explanation for the massive lingering smoke cloud needed to apply fake blood and prosthetic limbs.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Damn, but we have VERY well-informed readers! Y’all make me proud to be with you!!

    Is it not amazing that We the People became We the Sheople?

    If anyone needs a date I’d say likely when Fast Eddy Bernays published his 1928 classic work on Propaganda: how to hoodwink the greatest number of people in the cheapest way for the longest time. That was after his war ‘work’ during WW1, and to get it going, he “promoted the term “Public Relations”. Looking back, it seems to have worked all-too-well…. []

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this well-researched and documented post. It is the questions you have set forth that are substantially material to the truth.


  15. Yeah, I woke up 10 years ago. I realized I’ve wasted money (taxes), time (following orders & unconstitutional laws) and my how my freedoms were nothing more than illusion. The most distressing part is how we (everyone without authority & guns) have been duped. How those that are truly brain-washed to extreme levels will defend this illusion of our country with as much violence & aggression as those ISIS fighters (well maybe not by beheading) Yet when shown facts & truth, will just call you names and, internally, want to kill you for disrupting their “safe” perspective. We have descended into a bottomless pit of which we can’t escape without our children been raised with facts, truth and confidence to stand against the evil surrounding us. The one thing no one realizes, we have been conditioned to obey laws, fight by legislation and debate. Well people, that does NOT work… People with authority & power never fear the people because of this, so they never yield their power. Peer (social) pressure looks down on violence, yet when kept in check, will be the only way to remove those who abuse us…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s