Did Obama really declare a NWO at Bilderberg?

I received an alarming email that claims Obama declared a new world order (NWO) at the Bilderberg Group conference on May 24, 2014, in Brussels, Belgium.

The email was accompanied by a very brief 19-second video snippet of a speech that Obama had purportedly delivered at the Bilderberg meeting:

“…and for the international order we have worked for generations to build. Ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign.”

Even before I began my research to verify Obama’s alarming  declaration, my suspicion already had been aroused because:

  1. The Bilderberg is a secretive elitist group, but the video showed Obama’s audience to be many people in a big hall.
  2. While the 2014 Bilderberg Group did meet in late May, they had met in Denmark, not Belgium.
  3. The video was a 19-second snippet lifted from a longer speech, which means Obama’s words could have been taken out of context.

So I went on the whitehouse.gov website and typed the words “Obama Brussels Belgium speech” in the search bar.

Among the links that popped up was one to a speech the POS gave on March 26, 2014, to European youth at the Palais des Beaux Arts in Brussels, Belgium. Click here for the transcript of the speech.

As I had suspected, the purported NWO video snippet was taken entirely out of context, as shown in the three paragraphs I excerpted from Obama’s March 26, 2014 speech (see below). The words in the very misleading video snippet are colored red.

Leaders and dignitaries of the European Union; representatives of our NATO Alliance; distinguished guests:  We meet here at a moment of testing for Europe and the United States, and for the international order that we have worked for generations to build.

Throughout human history, societies have grappled with fundamental questions of how to organize themselves, the proper relationship between the individual and the state, the best means to resolve inevitable conflicts between states. And it was here in Europe, through centuries of struggle — through war and Enlightenment, repression and revolution — that a particular set of ideals began to emerge: The belief that through conscience and free will, each of us has the right to live as we choose. The belief that power is derived from the consent of the governed, and that laws and institutions should be established to protect that understanding. And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men — and women — are created equal.

But those ideals have also been tested — here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often, this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others, and that individual identity must be defined by “us” versus “them,” or that national greatness must flow not by what a people stand for, but by what they are against.

I’m the last person to defend Obama the POS. But to take his words out of context so as to portray him as having publicly and brazenly declared a New World Order is being deceptive. Doing so just makes us look devious, and the people who swallowed it hook, line, and sinker look stupid.


17 responses to “Did Obama really declare a NWO at Bilderberg?

  1. Yeah, I have seen the speech. A valid point made in more balanced articles is that it was 1984 doubletalk. Obama in that quote said “what he really meant” (and believes)… and was doing classic doublespeak.


  2. As much as I detest that man, it is wrong for his speeches to be spliced apart to make it appear to be what it is not. I thank you very much for your research and for posting the truth. The question that I have is: If he believes all that he said in his actual speech, then why is he taking away our rights and helping those savages whose goal is to conquer and enslave the world in Islam? I think we know that Obama is a would be tyrant.
    Again, thank you for an excellent article.


  3. I too disagree w/ a lot of the platform of the Democratic party, but I can also say the same about the Republican party’s platform. While I love to hate Obama for the things he’s done to our Constitutional rights, I don’t think he deserves to be slandered this way. Enough legitimate violations can be brought into the light to warrant his impeachment!


  4. Eowyn, great work. Can’t stand him, but this is wrong.


  5. The ever vigilant eyes and ears of Dr. Eowyn…Because We All Fear The Cage 🙂


  6. Lord knows he does enough bad and evil things on his own, we sure don’t need anyone helping to add to the pile with lies. Good detective work Dr. Eowyn.


  7. Looks like somebody doesn’t want this video published on FOTM.


    • Last night I left a comment on the video’s YouTube page, pointing out that the video is deceptive and gave a link to Obama’s speech transcript. Maybe the person who’d posted the video to YouTube was shamed to take it down. We can hope. 🙂


  8. I can admit that I was one of the stupid or rather, gullible ones who posted that “edited” video, because first off, it sounded like something he actually might have said. Before the evening was out, another person posted under it and informed me as to what you just posted, without all the speech that you posted. So, it is good to have the whole context in front of us.

    I agree. Although many of us detest the ground O walks on, needless slander or lies, makes us ALL look like idiots. He does enough, on his own and publicly, to cause concern.


  9. Great job, Dr. Eowyn. My only concern now is like that of everyone else, that he meant what he said.


  10. One thing is apparent reading Obama’s speeches, he is no spiritual or political leader. So far it looks like casual roto-rooting; as if most of his changes will require change. He qualifies as sincere in declaring, in his case, that power (and a lion’s share of glory) is derived from the consent of the governed. As a result he deserves some credit as an office-bearer in that he’s proven to be the classic steward to the masses. That’s his business. He has really only expressed himself on the national channel with the AVA (Affordable Vouchsafement Act) and there (and, so far, only there) may have tapped some means to some ends for the poor and needy and for the nation’s future generations; even though his moral affair now seems to have transformed, ideally, into a comport of alleged new world order objectives.


  11. It’s no big deal…there are videos of old H.W. Bush saying that we ‘need’ a New World Order’. He spoke of it frequently.


    • Unfortunately, whether stated or not, that is the objective of all the Bilderbergers, and they will not give up until they either succeed or leave. They follow Lucifer and are rebuilding Babylon. The spirit of Nimrod I still with us.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s