Is Sandy Hook’s Robbie Parker who he says he is?

Please take a good, careful look at the photos below, and tell me if you think man #1 and man #2 are the same person, recognizing that the pics were taken at different times.

Robbie & Robby ParkerRobbie & Robby Parker - teeth

Would you agree with me that #1 and #2 are the same man? Think “preponderance of evidence” and “probability.” Note that #1 and #2 have the same:

  • V-shaped widow’s peak hairline
  • Eyebrow shape
  • Vertical frown line between the eyebrows
  • A “Rumpole” nose with a fleshy tip
  • Ear shape and size
  • An inverted triangle-shaped face
  • U-shaped chin
  • Same upper front teeth

Man #1 and man #2 also share other traits. Both:

1. Are in their early 30s.
2. Have lived or living in Utah.
3. Attended Brigham Young University.
4. Have identical names and almost identical nicknames:
Man #1 is Robbie Parker (Robbie is a nickname of Robert)
Man #2 is Robby Parker (Robby is a nickname of Robert)

Man #1 is the Robbie Parker of Sandy Hook — the father of 6-year-old Emilie Parker who was shot to death by Adam Lanza on December 14, 2012, at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

The same Robbie Parker who, in a blink of an eye, went from laughing and joking to choking back his tears as he made a statement to the press on Dec. 15, 2012, about the murder of his daughter by a crazed gunman. Here’s the video:

The same Robbie Parker who, with his wife Alissa, happily posed with a grinning Barack Obama a mere two days after their precious daughter had been brutally killed, when Obama visited Newtown on Dec. 16, 2012.

Parker family photoop with OFrom left to right: Robbie Parker (his face obscured, holding one of his daughters), Obama, Alissa Parker, unknown woman holding another Parker girl.

The first pic of man #1 Robbie Parker was taken on Dec. 20, 2012, 6 days after Emilie had been killed, at a public memorial service for Emilie in Ogden, Utah. Here’s the pic again, followed by the AP’s account of the service:

Robbie Parker 12-20-2012

Here’s the AP story (via, Dec. 20, 2012:

Family members who brought blond-haired Emilie Parker back to Utah for her final resting place were remembering the 6-year-old girl killed in the Connecticut school shooting at a public memorial service Thursday night in Ogden.

Emilie’s parents, Robbie and Alissa Parker, have roots in the town about 30 miles north of Salt Lake City. Friends running the “Emilie Parker Fund” Facebook page said Thursday’s memorial would start at 7 p.m. at Ben Lomond High School.

Robbie Parker, a 32-year-old physician’s assistant who landed a job in Connecticut less than a year ago, became one of the faces of the tragedy early on when he appeared before cameras to describe the couple’s grief. Their oldest daughter was one of the 20 schoolchildren and six adults gunned down Friday at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

[…] The parents have asked for privacy at a funeral set for Saturday. Emilie Parker will be buried in a favorite white dress with an American Girl doll at a gravesite next to a grandfather, who died earlier this year.

As in the AP story above, a CNN report on Dec. 17, 2012, also described Robbie Parker as a physician’s assistant: “He moved his family from Utah to Connecticut eight months ago after accepting a job as a physician’s assistant in the newborn unit at Danbury Hospital.”

Danbury Hospital is in Danbury, CT, a city that is 11.7 miles (14 mins. by car) west of Newtown.

I just conducted a search for “Robert Parker” on the Danbury Hospital website. This is the result:

Robert Parker, PA-C (Physician Assistant – Certified):

Specialties: Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine

Affiliations: Danbury Hospital

Office Location: Onsite Neonatal, PC
1000 Haddonfield Berlin Road
Voorhees, NJ 08043

Sandy Hook’s Robbie Parker is working in New Jersey???

Remember man #2, Robby Parker, who looks just like man #1, Robbie Parker?

I got the photo of man #2 Robby Parker from a LinkedIn page for “Robert Parker.” This is what the page says:

Robby ParkerRobby Parker LinkedIn1

Note that Robby Parker CSSBB is not a physician’s assistant, but is employed as a “quality assurance engineer” at Spotter RF from May 2010 to “present” (3 years 9 months).

3 years 9 months from May 2010 = February 2014.

CSSBB is Certified Six Sigma Black Belt. Wikipedia says Six Sigma is a set of quality management methods used in many businesses and industries, and creates a special infrastructure of people within the organization (“Champions”, “Black Belts”, “Green Belts”, “Yellow Belts”, etc.) who are experts in the methods.

What is SpotterRF?

SpotterRF is a U.S. defense contractor. Its web page describes itself as “We provide the world’s smallest Surveillance Radar. In fact, we are the leader in a whole new type of radar called compact surveillance radar or CSR, which is radar that has wide area coverage with the ability to automatically cue cameras in a sub 5 lb. package . . . providing a wide-area, all-weather sensing capability . . . .”

This is what Wikipedia says about Compact Surveillance Radar:

Compact Surveillance Radar are small lightweight radar systems that have a wide coverage area and are able to track people and vehicles in range and azimuth angle. They weigh less than 10 pounds, consume less than 15 Watts of power and are easily deployed in large numbers.

Compact Surveillance Radar have the same characteristics of the larger Ground Surveillance Radar(GSR) namely; the ability to track many moving targets simultaneously, all weather day & night operation, wide coverage areas and the ability to track targets and cue cameras automatically.

Here’s the rather sinister-looking banner on SpotterRF’s webpage:


SpotterRF has associations with:

  • The Department of Homeland Security: A Sept. 11, 2012 article on Security Today says: “SpotterRF recently announced that its new, patented radar technology will be used to protect public bridges managed by the Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA) . . . MDTA is planning ahead to reduce homeland security threats.”
  • The CIA: FinSMEs reports on Aug. 13, 2010 that “received a strategic investment of undisclosed amount from In-Q-Tel.” Wikpedia describes In-Q-Tel as “In-Q-Tel of Arlington, Virginia, United States is a not-for-profit venture capital firm that invests in high-tech companies for the sole purpose of keeping the Central Intelligence Agency, and other intelligence agencies, equipped with the latest in information technology in support of United States intelligence capability.”

To conclude, the statistical probability — that two men of the same age, with very similar facial features, who are both from Utah and attended Brigham Young University, and are both named Robert Parker — are two separate individuals instead of the same person must be so infinitesimally small as to make it highly unlikely.

Unless Robbie Parker of Sandy Hook has an identical twin (which no media account ever claimed and who, strangely, did not attend the memorial service for his niece), he is the same Robby Parker who’s a “quality assurance engineer” at SpotterRF, a defense contractor that’s linked to Homeland Security and the CIA, which specializes in a formidable new kind of light-weight surveillance radar that can track people and vehicles, day and night, in all kinds of weather, and which “are easily deployed in large numbers.”

The deception just never ends . . . .

H/t FOTM reader Susan S. and Godlike Productions.

For the links to all the posts we’ve done on Sandy Hook, go to our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page.

Update (May 17, 2014):

See Professor Jim Fetzer’s follow-up on Veterans Today, “Sandy Hook and the Real ‘Robbie Parker’: SpotterRF, DHS and the CIA.”


56 responses to “Is Sandy Hook’s Robbie Parker who he says he is?

  1. Pingback: NewsSprocket | Sandy Hook’s Robbie Parker Isn’t Who He Says He Is

  2. I agree with you. I’m no expert but it sure seems like they are the same person. The picture of the family looks odd, also. The mother’s left arm is hanging down. She’s not even touching her other daughter. I don’t think that other woman is really holding her. The little girl looks suspended. I think that picture of the little girl was inserted into the photo. If this entire incident is a hoax, it’s sick. Has anyone seen any graves? Were all the dead children new to the community? If this was set up by Obama in order to get his gun ban passed, then there have been other shootings that have been set up. Every time that there is a shooting, Obama is right on top of it. Oh yes, what is keeping the police and emergency response people quiet? The community has to know if it was faked or real. That entire incident is fishy.
    Thank you for putting so much of this together. It must have taken a lot of time and research.


  3. I don’t think they’re the same person, there are several differences.


  4. The Sandy Hook incident was created years ago by people giving orders to our presidents. Look at Robby Parker CSSBB, then below to Robby Parker CSSBB’s Summary, then the lines below that, which read, “…an insatiable desire to create order out of chaos.” “Order out of chaos” is so sacred to the Illuminati that they have an insatiable desire to create the chaos itself so that they can then develop the particular order they want.


  5. I usually agree with you, Dr., but this time I think these are two different people. 1) Their right ears are very different, 2) Robbie #1 (left picture) has another peak in his hair line, extending towards his right eyebrow. Robby #2 has a hair line that goes straight down, 3) I compared Robby #2’s teeth to the video of Robbie #1 (with his fake crying). Robbie #1 has straighter teeth than Robby #2. Ears, hairline and teeth. Just IMHO.


  6. I think it’s really creepy what the CSSBB Robby Parker had on his profile if you consider they are one and the same person. However, the looks really aren’t there for me (although it’s hard to say definitively on the strength of one photo). The Robby we know has a much more defined indentation or “stop” around the eyes (the other guy has more of a Grecian profile); the tip of his nose is not at all “fleshy” and is very sleek and seems to protrude more; the mouth seems more fleshy and not as small.
    But there are many anomalies in the Parker family I will agree.


  7. While there is a lot of suspicious activity around “Robbie #1” and the name coincidence is very odd, I agree with Gingercake that based on the photos provided here, the similarities are not compelling. Possibly better photos would clear that up.


  8. Very close, but I just drew this sloppy line with paint and the hair line seems different to me. What do you think? Otherwise I would say identical.


    • I beg to differ.

      1. You’re ignoring the distinctive widow’s peak.
      2. Look at the side hairline of #2 again. There’s the same protrusion midway down the side, but it’s fainter and the hair is lighter in color than on #1.
      3. The nose is the same — a very distinctive shape, resembling male genitalia.


      • Sorry I just got back to it. You are probably right now that I look at it more. The head is angled a bit differently and that would make up for my slight difference in hairline I noted. As I said other then that identical.
        Also I remember how he came to microphone and laughed.
        I now have a family friend who has lost a child and trust me on day 2 all he did all day was wail. Not turn it on and off.
        Great catch as usual..Wow!!


  9. Parker #1 could be an older photo of Parker #2 which looks like a younger version of Parker #1. Angles of photos always makes people look a little different. Maybe they are related in some way, if not the same person, as they definitely look very similar.

    Parker #2’s job is beyond creepy, so it would make sense he could be an optional “actor” for DHS/CIA. His LinkedIn self-description, as already mentioned, is the Masonic motto, Ordo Ab Chao = Order Out of Chaos.

    And that SpotterRF website, they are not shy about their motive! “RADAR FOR THE ELITE.” Unbelievable! Can they get any more obvious?

    Great report all around!


  10. The ears are not the same shape.
    And, it’s difficult to tell from the photograph but it appears that the teeth of
    Robby Parker #1 are not as straight as #2.

    The entire Sandy Hook saga is REALLY creepy. So many details that have been revealed on many blogs leads me to believe that it was an elaborate hoax. I hope people are doing the research online so that the hoax will be exposed.


  11. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this fascinating post. I agree with you that Nos. 1 and 2 are the same person. Looking at both pictures, an observation of the teeth shows that the teeth are fairly large, and I ditto all of the other similarities already pointed out by Dr. Eowyn, wherein the hairline on Parker’s right side of his head is still very similar, with the hairline growing on Picture 2 which would look like Picture 1. He probably had a haircut, but you can see the hair growing back.

    From his background information, he was and/or still is a Mormon missionary. I find it noteworthy that when he was describing his present employment, that he left the city and state off of his explanation, but upon his other employment entries, the location is specifically listed.

    The family picture taken with the king is odd to me. Although the family appears to be looking at a camera straight ahead, it is noteworthy why that picture was not used, as opposed to the picture being taken from the side that eliminates the face and upper body of Mr. Parker. I also find it odd that he is holding the little girl who is not a toddler, but could easily stand by herself. I find it odd that the other woman at the end, perhaps a friend, seems to be holding up a toddler with her right hand only, which would be very difficult. Her left hand is on the child’s knee wherein she is not grasping her body.


  12. Again, I say–look at the area around the bridge of the nose. It is much more indented in Robby #1. That is very characteristic of him. This is not so of the other guy. Also, the other guy’s nose also doesn’t seem to protrude as much (it is more flattened) and the tip is rounder than Robby #1’s. The other stuff is up for grabs imo, but I think they “new” Robby has a smaller mouth. Also, I haven’t seen the mouth upturn like it does in the “new” Robby in any of Robby #1’s videos. He has a wider mouth and tends to a crooked smile.
    I don’t believe we’ve been told the truth about anything. However, I think these are two different people.


  13. The noses of both pictures are very similar. Remember, when you smile, that also changes the nostrils a bit. But the bone structure is right there!


  14. I also forgot to mention that the shape of the ears outside and inside are the same as well. I’ll eat your hat if they’re not! Good grief!


    • These men may share same ‘gene pool’; and name. . .but their ears are NOT the same; nor their foreheads; nor hairline; if you want to get ‘precise’..
      Close, very close. . .but no cigar. That said; the grief-stricken. . .appear more like ‘actors’ than not. But then. . .who knows; tragedies push people into ‘denial’. . and cameras force people into places where they do not want to be. ‘Facial language’ here; nonetheless; does not look ‘good’/credible. .As well; plenty of MO’s to suspect Government intervention/per ‘foul play’. Just do not see, precisely; what role; what MO. . .yet.


  15. I’m troubled by the “insatiable desire to create order out of chaos” line and the “Six Sigma”… “methods used”…”creates a special infrastructure of people within the organization”… “who are experts in the methods” because it just makes me think of something very sinister. And we already know that the church of satan has their recruiting center there in Newtown!


  16. I just placed my index finger on the bridge of my nose between my eyebrows and felt the indentation. Then I smiled big and it pulled the skin tighter in that area. That right there would account for the apparent difference in the nose bridge between the non-smiling pic and the smiling pic. I also see the same hairline, just shorter hair. I believe it to be the same guy.


  17. what I am talking about is the area in between the eyes. That actually doesn’t change, smiling or not. I don’t know what that is called, but Robby #2 doesn’t have that. Bone structure is the surest measure of identity, and the other guy seems to have a higher forehead.


  18. use photoshop to place one hairline over the other and they are an identical match.



    earlobes look different to me. attached on rob1 not attached on rob 2


  20. You’re all idiots. OnSite Neonatal Partners operates their main office out of New Jersey and contracts Neonatal-Perinatal providers to different hospital locations around the country. Every hospital they have contracts with lists the location of the NICU provider as Voorhees, NJ. You’re all crazy!


  21. YouGottaBeKiddingMe

    lol…read the summary on the Robby Parker linkedin page:

    “Self motivated quality assurance engineer and production manager with an insatiable desire to create order out of chaos.”


  22. So you all believe this horseshit???


  23. So you mike, have nothing better to do than believe all these faceless lies??? And yes, i have already read that, thanks.


    • I don’t necessarily believe, however I do believe in facts and evidence, all of which lead to SH being a hoax.


      • There is so much evidence of it being a hoax. And they’re all such big pieces of the puzzle that they could all be called “the smoking gun.” But I believe the biggest evidence is that the school had been shut down for 5 years. This was proven with the wayback machine, showing no internet activity. But also there would have been no bills of any kind being paid, except maybe an occasional lawn mowing. ALL the townspeople would know about the closed school, so that boggles my mind. They are making a lot of money and/or some are disappearing.


  24. Pingback: Is Sandy Hook’s Robbie Parker who he says he is? | necltr

  25. The unknown woman holding the youngest Parker daughter is the family’s attorney and also an aunt.


  26. If they are identical twins, surely no parents would call one Robbie and the other Robby, or both babes Robert.


  27. I am related to Sandy Hook Robbie Parker (AKA Robbie#1). I am ashamed for even reading this blog entry, as well as responding to it. The better choice would have been to take the high road, as the rest of the family has obviously done, but I’m just so mad that one of the most sincere, most without-guile men I know is being slandered because of how a bunch of strangers feel he should have behaved in the moments or days after his daughter’s brutal murder. I don’t wish for any of you to experience the grief he has born, but imagine having cameras rolling through each dark and horrific moment. I am likely accurate when I say that none of you has experienced what he has (and understand that it was WAY more than even the crippling reality of a daughter’s murder (what could possibly be more than that?)–when you include the twisted reality-TV-watching society we have, as well as the boundary-pushing media frenzy, political agendas, etc.). It was bizarre.

    That being said, I will not be returning to this site (I don’t want to help it’s search-engine-optimization any further), so don’t bother commenting to me in a way that you’re hoping for a reply. Continuing . . .

    I know him personally (face to face, on a regular basis). We hug, we talk, we’ve babysat each others’ kids (including Emilie). Yes. An actual relative. There are a lot of us. Here are my comments:

    1) NO, that Robby#2 isn’t him. And even as a non-related observer, it’s embarrassing to me that any of you is trying to make a case that those 2 images are the same guy–the fact that you’re arguing this cuts your credibility immediately. While there may be an interesting conversation to be had about Robby#2’s CSSBB affiliation, they aren’t the same guy. So the rest of the blog entry doesn’t have anything to do with Sandy Hook.

    2) I’ll agree the video, where he politely smiles (not laughs) before he asks the multiple media groups if he should start looks weird, and our family (including Robbie & Alissa) were very nervous as to how that was misinterpreted. BUT I would like to assure you that there is a VERY reasonable (and simple) explanation for it (which I’m not sharing with a bunch of strangers who clearly seem to be looking to skew truth into lies); anyone I’ve told the full story to is completely satisfied and no longer questions it.
    Additionally–and most importantly–PLEASE recognize that calling the father of a murdered child an actor is cruel at the very. most. deeply. personal. level. It is because of attacks like yours that Alissa & Robbie don’t watch any media at all. The only real reason I’ve chosen to comment on this is that by reading your comments, it sounds like some of you are reasonable people seeking truth, not blind conspiracy-hunters; so it’s you I hope to persuade. Please leave this family alone. Please stop supporting through your clicks (like I just did, unfortunately) sites that attack Robbie and Alissa.

    Liked by 1 person

    • RPrelative,

      After your string of criticisms and insults, you ended up writing: “BUT I would like to assure you that there is a VERY reasonable (and simple) explanation for it (which I’m not sharing

      Well, thanks a lot for nothing.


    • If you’re related to aka Robbie Parker, prove it. I don’t buy a word you’re saying.


    • There is proof that the school was closed since 2008. That is the only smoking gun needed.


    • I’m sorry but the kind of comment that goes along the lines, “I was at the funeral but won’t give my name, I knew one of the children but won’t say which one, I know the parents but have promised not to speak about them.” rings very hollow in the face of such huge evidence that this event was entirely staged, or at least manipulated, to ease the way for gun control.


  28. How absurd that people will lie because they *WANT* to believe something. Those pictures are of two different men and it’s appalling that the liars who posted them side by side would GO THAT FAR. *Every* specific characteristic on the men is recognizably different. Yes, the men look similar, but careful analysis to each detail of their faces shows differences.

    This goes on a lot on the Internet and I learned a long time ago, when people put up two pictures and claim they are the same person to look at the ears first, because often the ears show significant differences and so it is true here. There are numerous differences in the ears alone in size, shape and structure. Even the lobes are *very* different though we don’t get clear shots on the left guy. Yet we do get pics of both sides, so even with the fuzziness of the picture, it doesn’t obscure the attached ear lobes of the guy on the left enough to not make a definitive judgement that they are attached and slope to the jaw. If we watch the video and see his left ear, the attachment is even more significantly obvious, while the other guy’s earlobes are “free.” Though they’re not strongly so, they are so *more than enough* so that they alone provide conclusive evidence that this is not the same man and so it is with every other close examination, even the shape and slope of the forehead, the smile, the crows feet, the eyebrows, the chin, everything is different,

    This is appallingly dishonest. The time setting up the comparison was more than enough time to say, “What are we doing? This isn’t the same guy!”


    • Gary Sellars,

      Notice the title of this post ends with a question mark?

      But you, however, are 100% sure and more, condemning with sneering insults and accusations of “liars” and “This is appallingly dishonest.” Why would a dishonest liar put the pics side by side and invite readers to compare them?

      You are appallingly rude and condescending. There is simply no need to state your disagreement by stooping to insults.


  29. Dr, Eowyn, I suspect the writer you address may have the problem he thinks others have, a habit of lying. In his case, I suggest the possibility of actually believing by perhaps unkowiingly lying to himself. Much of humanity has that problem, so the great efforts used to apply your skills at revealing truth are very much appreciated by those of us with at least partial soundness of reason.


  30. They look quite similar, almost like they’re related, but they do not look like the same man. If you look carefully at the widows peak you’ll see #1 is wider at the top corners, while #2 is much more narrow.


  31. Have you attempted to contact either Robbie/Robby Parker? Do you know if either/both Rob Parkers continue to live in CT and/or UT and if either or both continue to work for SpotterRF and/or as a physician’s assistant?


  32. They have different earlobes


  33. During his “emotional” CNN interview (scene), Mr. Parker stated that he’s 30 years old. The article from the AP said he was 32. Just another sloppy mistake by these morons


  34. Well, I feel rather out of touch not to have seen this till now. Quite a striking discovery. I noted the “order out of chaos” comment in #2’s LinkedIn profile. Very telling. And I see that he’s still using his #2 photo on that page. Thanks for posting!


  35. I believe Robbie is a fake and fraud, but the two photos are not of the same person. I really want this guy exposed along with everyone else involved especially Gene Rosen, Wayne Carver, Daniel Malloy and Monte Frank. Toss them all in jail and thrown away the key.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. Reblogged this on necltr and commented:
    Who knows what lurks… The Shadow Masters know.


  37. Sorry but it doesn’t look the same person to me as the ears are different. Especially the top photo. BUT after seeing the video of him laughing and then trying to compose himself to get into the role of a grieving father, I will never believe this phony just had a child murdered. (Unless he’s a psychopath as they pretty much have no grief emotions). Without doubt he’s a fake. Here’s another link of what’s really going on in the world. Please try and watch all of it. Best 3 hours you’ll spend and definitely worth it.


  38. Thaddeus Ramotowski

    No, I’m sorry, I completely disagree. As much as I love this site, as regularly as I frequent it and as much as I appreciate the religious/conservative aspect, I do not agree. Pic #1 shows bottom ear lobes going on a downward slant. Pic #2 shows bottom ear lobes going on an upward slant. The point of his hairline that protrudes outward above his sideburns is less noticeable in Pic #2, but if that is possibly due to aging, then why is his front left tooth larger than in Pic #1 (and I’m sure it’s not due to a dental crown of some sort, as it’s severely misshapen)?

    Liked by 1 person

  39. Thaddeus Ramotowski

    I meant to include in my previous post that I COMPLETELY agree that Sandy Hook was a false flag. I just do not agree with these being the pictures of the same man.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s