Article cited by Limbaugh on Syrian chemical attack being a U.S. false flag

Yesterday, conservative talk radio titan Rush Limbaugh told his millions of listeners that he changed his mind about the Syrian chemical attack because of an article by Yossef Bodansky, former director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, which claims that the Obama administration has (a) foreknowledge of the August 21 chemical weapons attack on Damascus; and (b) plans to exploit the attack for a U.S.-led military “intervention” to topple the Assad regime.  (see Trail Dust’s post on this, here).

Bodansky makes two points that are especially compelling:

  1. A week before the Aug. 21 chemical attack, at meetings in Turkey (the Turkish government is hostile to Syria’s Assad regime), Syrian jihadist rebels were told to prepare — and were supplied with a new influx of Western-supplied weapons — for a major game-changing event in the two-year-long Syrian civil war. That major “war-changing development” would be a dramatic event that would provoke a U.S.-led military intervention, beginning with the U.S. bombing of Syria, which the rebels were told will enable them to topple the Assad regime. U.S. intelligence agents were present in those meetings.
  2. There are Syrian leaders, unaffiliated with the jihadist rebels but also enemies of the Assad regime, who believe the Assad regime did not perpetrate the Aug. 21 chemical attack although they have every reason to suspect the regime.

Here’s Bodansky’s article in its entirety.

No War

Mounting evidence raises questions about Syrian chemical weapon attack

Yossef Bodansky, Senior Editor, GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs

August 28th, 2013 | Posted by

There is a growing volume of new evidence from numerous sources in the Middle East — mostly affiliated with the Syrian opposition and its sponsors and supporters — which makes a very strong case, based on solid circumstantial evidence, that the Aug. 21 chemical strike in the Damascus suburbs was indeed a premeditated provocation by the Syrian opposition.

The extent of U.S. foreknowledge of this provocation needs further investigation because available data puts the “horror” of the Barack Obama White House in a different and disturbing light.

On Aug. 13-14, Western-sponsored opposition forces in Turkey started advance preparations for a major and irregular military surge. Initial meetings between senior opposition military commanders and representatives of Qatari, Turkish, and U.S. Intelligence [“Mukhabarat Amriki”] took place at the converted Turkish military garrison in Antakya, Hatay Province, used as the command center and headquarters of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and their foreign sponsors. Very senior opposition commanders who had arrived from Istanbul briefed the regional commanders of an imminent escalation in the fighting due to “a war-changing development” which would, in turn, lead to a U.S.-led bombing of Syria.

The opposition forces had to quickly prepare their forces for exploiting the U.S.-led bombing in order to march on Damascus and topple the Bashar al-Assad government, the senior commanders explained. The Qatari and Turkish intelligence officials assured the Syrian regional commanders that they would be provided with plenty of weapons for the coming offensive.

Indeed, unprecedented weapons distribution started in all opposition camps in Hatay Province on Aug. 21-23. In the Reyhanli area alone, opposition forces received well in excess of 400 tons of weapons, mainly anti-aircraft weaponry from shoulder-fired missiles to ammunition for light-guns and machine guns. The weapons were distributed from storehouses controlled by Qatari and Turkish Intelligence under the tight supervision of U.S. Intelligence.

These weapons were loaded on more than 20 trailer-trucks which crossed into northern Syria and distributed the weapons to several depots. Followup weapon shipments, also several hundred tons, took place over the weekend of Aug. 24-25, and included mainly sophisticated anti-tank guided missiles and rockets. Opposition officials in Hatay said that these weapon shipments were “the biggest” they had received “since the beginning of the turmoil more than two years ago”. The deliveries from Hatay went to all the rebel forces operating in the Idlibto-Aleppo area, including the Al Qaida affiliated jihadists (who constitute the largest rebel forces in the area).

Several senior officials from both the Syrian opposition and sponsoring Arab states stressed that these weapon deliveries were specifically in anticipation for exploiting the impact of imminent bombing of Syria by the U.S. and the Western allies. The latest strategy formulation and coordination meetings took place on Aug. 26. The political coordination meeting took place in Istanbul and was attended by U.S. Amb. Robert Ford.

More important were the military and operational coordination meetings at the Antakya garrison. Senior Turkish, Qatari, and U.S. Intelligence officials attended in addition to the Syrian senior (opposition) commanders. The Syrians were informed that bombing would start in a few days. “The opposition was told in clear terms that action to deter further use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime could come as early as in the next few days,” a Syrian participant in the meeting said. Another Syrian participant said that he was convinced U.S. bombing was scheduled to begin on Thursday, Aug. 29. Several participants — both Syrian and Arab — stressed that the assurances of forthcoming bombing were most explicit even as formally Obama is still undecided.

The descriptions of these meetings raise the question of the extent of foreknowledge of U.S. intelligence, and therefore, the Obama White House. All the sources consulted — both Syrian and Arab — stressed that officials of the “Mukhabarat Amriki” actively participated in the meetings and briefings in Turkey. Therefore, at the very least, they should have known that the opposition leaders were anticipating “a war-changing development”: that is, a dramatic event which would provoke a U.S.-led military intervention.

The mere fact that weapon storage sites under the tight supervision of U.S. intelligence were opened up and about a thousand tons of high-quality weapons were distributed to the opposition indicates that U.S. intelligence anticipated such a provocation and the opportunity for the Syrian opposition to exploit the impact of the ensuing U.S. and allied bombing. Hence, even if the Obama White House did not know in advance of the chemical provocation, they should have concluded, or at the very least suspected, that the chemical attack was most likely the “war-changing development” anticipated by the opposition leaders as provocation of U.S.-led bombing. Under such circumstances, the Obama White House should have refrained from rushing head-on to accuse Assad’s Damascus and threaten retaliation, thus making the Obama White House at the very least complicit after the act.

Meanwhile, additional data from Damascus about the actual chemical attack increases the doubts about Washington’s version of events. Immediately after the attack, three hospitals of Doctors Without Borders (MSF: médecins sans frontières) in the greater Damascus area treated more than 3,600 Syrians affected by the chemical attack, and 355 of them died. MSF performed tests on the vast majority of those treated.

MSF director of operations Bart Janssens summed up the findings: “MSF can neither scientifically confirm the cause of these symptoms nor establish who is responsible for the attack. However, the reported symptoms of the patients, in addition to the epidemiological pattern of the events — characterized by the massive influx of patients in a short period of time, the origin of the patients, and the contamination of medical and first aid workers — strongly indicate mass exposure to a neurotoxic agent.” Simply put, even after testing some 3,600 patients, MSF failed to confirm that sarin was the cause of the injuries. According to MSF, the cause could have been nerve agents like sarin, concentrated riot control gas, or even high-concentration pesticides. Moreover, opposition reports that there was distinct stench during the attack suggest that it could have come from the “kitchen sarin” used by jihadist groups (as distinct from the odorless military-type sarin) or improvised agents like pesticides.

Some of the evidence touted by the Obama White House is questionable at best.

A small incident in Beirut raises big questions. A day after the chemical attack, Lebanese fixers working for the “Mukhabarat Amriki” succeeded to convince a Syrian male who claimed to have been injured in the chemical attack to seek medical aid in Beirut in return for a hefty sum that would effectively settle him for life. The man was put into an ambulance and transferred overnight to the Farhat Hospital in Jib Janine, Beirut. The Obama White House immediately leaked friendly media that “the Lebanese Red Cross announced that test results found traces of sarin gas in his blood.” However, this was news to Lebanese intelligence and Red Cross officials. According to senior intelligence officials, “Red Cross Operations Director George Kettaneh told [them] that the injured Syrian fled the hospital before doctors were able to test for traces of toxic gas in his blood.” Apparently, the patient declared that he had recovered from his nausea and no longer needed medical treatment. The Lebanese security forces are still searching for the Syrian patient and his honorarium.

On Aug. 24, Syrian Commando forces acted on intelligence about the possible perpetrators of the chemical attack and raided a cluster of rebel tunnels in the Damascus suburb of Jobar. Canisters of toxic material were hit in the fierce fire-fight as several Syrian soldiers suffered from suffocation and “some of the injured are in a critical condition”.

The Commando eventually seized an opposition warehouse containing barrels full of chemicals required for mixing “kitchen sarin”, laboratory equipment, as well as a large number of protective masks. The Syrian Commando also captured several improvised explosive devices, RPG rounds, and mortar shells. The same day, at least four HizbAllah fighters operating in Damascus near Ghouta were hit by chemical agents at the very same time the Syrian Commando unit was hit while searching a group of rebel tunnels in Jobar.

Both the Syrian and the HizbAllah forces were acting on intelligence information about the real perpetrators of the chemical attack. Damascus told Moscow the Syrian troops were hit by some form of a nerve agent and sent samples (blood, tissues, and soil) and captured equipment to Russia.

Several Syrian leaders, many of whom are not Bashar al-Assad supporters and are even his sworn enemies, are now convinced that the Syrian opposition is responsible for the Aug. 21, chemical attack in the Damascus area in order to provoke the U.S. and the allies into bombing Assad’s Syria. Most explicit and eloquent is Saleh Muslim, the head of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD) which has been fighting the Syrian Government.

Saleh Muslim doubts Assad would have used chemical weapons when he was winning the civil war.

“The regime in Syria … has chemical weapons, but they wouldn’t use them around Damascus, five km from the [UN] committee which is investigating chemical weapons. Of course they are not so stupid as to do so,” Muslim told Reuters on Aug. 27. He believes the attack was “aimed at framing Assad and provoking an international reaction”. Muslim is convinced that “some other sides who want to blame the Syrian regime, who want to show them as guilty and then see action” is responsible for the chemical attack. The U.S. was exploiting the attack to further its own anti-Assad policies and should the UN inspectors find evidence that the rebels were behind the attack, then “everybody would forget it”, Muslim shrugged. “Who is the side who would be punished? Are they are going to punish the Emir of Qatar or the King of Saudi Arabia, or Mr Erdogan of Turkey?”

And there remain the questions: Given the extent of the involvement of the “Mukhabarat Amriki” in opposition activities, how is it that U.S. intelligence did not know in advance about the opposition’s planned use of chemical weapons in Damascus?

And if they did know and warned the Obama White House, why then the sanctimonious rush to blame the Assad Administration? Moreover, how can the Obama Administration continue to support and seek to empower the opposition which had just intentionally killed some 1,300 innocent civilians in order to provoke a U.S. military intervention?

who are the Syrian rebels

Today, the U.S. Senate will vote on whether to authorize Obama’s bombing of Syria. Call your Senators and tell them to vote No!!!!!!!!!

See also:



20 responses to “Article cited by Limbaugh on Syrian chemical attack being a U.S. false flag

  1. During World War II, in order to placate our Soviet ‘allies’ the USA and Britain, blamed the massacre of 22,000 Polish Army officers against the Nazis. Though the massacre had taken place in an area previously under Soviet control and the Soviets had been allies of the Nazis, the Soviets were exonerated for political reasons.

    Fast forward to 2013. Our bumbling senators held choreographed hearings, designed to impress the unknowing public, on the chemical attack in Syria wherein Secs Kerry, Hagel and Gen. Dempsey gave testimony. The questions posed by our august senators focused on whether an strike should be made on Syrian government forces, the extent of same, if it would be purposeful, would congress be consulted, etc. However, no point seemed to be raised regarding the plausibility of the attack having been orchestrated by the Syrian Muslim terrorist rebels (supported by the Saudis) despite the increasing amount of information/evidence confirming same. The hearings appear to have been designed to throw the American people off track. Our illustrious shepherds continue to feel that they are able to dupe their respective flocks.

    Has 1943 returned and are we not now basking in the Shades of Katyn Forest.?

    John Molloy
    National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition


  2. Does anybody really believe Obama will make a strike on any Muslim country?


  3. Thank you Dr. Eowyn, for posting the story that moved Rush Limbaugh enough to go out on a limb. We are in perilous times. This article calls into doubt the entire campaign being waged by the White House.

    Just think of who is calling for war right now. It is Obama and his thugs, the Left and their minions, false conservatives like Bill O’Reilly, and news networks greedy for the ratings bonanza of a war.

    Then there is the issue of our own corrupt society. When I saw Fox and Friends yesterday, announcing with giddy excitement the names of the actor and actress who would play the lead characters in 50 Shades of Gray, it became clear to me that we have the government we deserve. In this case, the Antichrist (or an accurate preview of him).


  4. Thank you Dr. Eowyn. I have contacted both of my OK Senators offices. Here is a link to another website that has contact information for Senators if anyone needs it.


  5. Dr. Eowyn, please put this post back at the top of your blog. It’s so much more important that Wiener. I told my Senators offices to go to the front page of Fellowship of Minds blog. Now I’m afraid they won’t see it way down here. Unless, have you received a threat?


  6. Assad, like Mubarak and Col. Daffy, refuses to participate in wiping Israel off the face of the Earth.

    Therefore, he has to go, too.

    That is really all this is about.



  7. If Barack Obama told a select few congressmen that CIA trained Al Quada militants had been despatched to Turkey last week for deployment in Syria how can John Kerry say that the Syrian Opposition is no affiliated with Al Qaeda. Silly me, I forget that certain Arabs have promised to pay all US expenses incurred in this “Strike”.
    When is a strike not a strike? When it’s Thermonuclear World War Three.


  8. Have we entered the twilight zone? Everywhere I turn to people are crying out against this strike. Don’t our congressmen and women have internet access? Who is blackmailing them or what have they been bribed with to make them act this way? It has to be heavy duty bribery or blackmailery or are they just pretending to be going along with the strike because they are getting ready to get out of Dodge and zoom off to penthouses in Dubai.


  9. Reblogged this on PUMABydesign001's Blog and commented:
    There are truly some evil men ruling this country. We, as Americans, Christians, Children of God, had better speak up and take a stand. Nothing less will do. To be remain silent is to be complicit.


  10. Dr, Eowyn, Here is another MUST READ article on this. It shows just how long this has been given the read light via a leaked British defense contractor email. Also, why did Obama draw the red line when he did? Was is the signal? Was the reporters question a plant just like the IRS scandal release? Real evil going on here!


  11. Pingback: What kind of president would throw in the world’s lot with evil al-Qaeda?BLOGGING DAWG STYLE | BLOGGING DAWG STYLE

  12. Voltaire has just published an article regarding a US official and his wife discussing the promotional video of the gassed victims as though it had been planned and executed by him or his colleagues and the thought was haunting his wife. The report includes the photo from 2003 that is featured above………..this is an opportunity for US citizens to unite against our common adversary and his supporters in the Adminstration and our Congress. Stand up stand up for Jesus Soldiers of the Cross………


  13. Pingback: Lawyers, Guns and Money: How Obama is Arming Al Qaeda in Syria | The Firewall

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s