Chicago police want raise despite cuts to service


On February 3rd, I reported how the Chicago Police are no longer dispatching cops for certain crimes, like burglaries and car thefts in which the offender is no longer at the scene and no one is in immediate danger. With that in mind, the Police Union is asking for a 12% raise.

Chicago police union defends request for 12 percent raises over two years

Chicago Tribune: City Hall has enough money to give Chicago police officers 12 percent raises over two years and still hire more cops to bolster the size of the force, the head of the city’s Fraternal Order of Police said Thursday in defending the union’s contract proposal.

Union president Michael Shields said it’s simply a matter of Mayor Rahm Emanuel making public safety a priority. In addition to 6 percent yearly raises, the union wants $3,000 yearly “cost of living in Chicago” stipends for police to help defray the expense of the requirement that they live within city limits.

The FOP proposal is an early contract offer in negotiations that could drag on for some time before eventually going to an independent arbitrator for a ruling, as was the case with the last police contract in 2010. The offer is being distributed to police officers this week by union representatives.

Asked whether the union proposal is realistic, the mayor said Thursday he doesn’t want to negotiate in public. “In whatever conversation I’ve had, or negotiations, I represent the taxpayers and what they can afford. That’s my perspective,” Emanuel said at a news conference to announce the city will invest more money in programs designed to keep at-risk youth out of trouble.

Ald. Patrick O’Connor, who is Emanuel’s City Council floor leader, noted the city’s financial struggles. “Anybody that’s been observing city government for the last several years knows we do not have a lot of money for the essentials, never mind raises and increases and benefits to a group that basically already has one of the best deals of all the unionized workers in the city of Chicago,” said O’Connor, 40th. “But I can understand where they would want to carve out this territory, because the strategy must be, ask for significantly more than they think they’re going to get, and maybe it will level off at an area that’s acceptable to them.”

But Shields, who has been arguing the city must hire additional police to fight the scourge of violence in Chicago, said meeting the union’s salary demands still would leave Emanuel with sufficient revenue to do so. “The money’s there when they want to build something, when they want to put in bike lanes,” Shields said. “The mayor just has to decide if this is a commitment he wants to make.”

Shields also said the union’s salary request reflects the fact then-Mayor Richard Daley offered rank-and-file police raises totaling 16 percent over five years  during the last contract negotiations before pulling that package off the table. The arbitrator instead awarded the union a 10 percent raise. “We take that into account” in asking for 12 percent this time, Shields said.

But O’Connor said the current negotiations shouldn’t be influenced by an earlier offer the police union didn’t accept. “To somehow make it ‘We’re still owed the money because at one time it was on the table?’ That’s not how negotiations work. It’s certainly not how contracts work,” he said.

I almost feel sorry for the people of Chicago. Less response to 911 calls and having a murder rate far worse than during Al Capone ‘gangland’ days. Almost as they keep electing democrats that do nothing for them. Elections have consequences.



6 responses to “Chicago police want raise despite cuts to service

  1. Public-service unions… there’s a reason even FDR was against them.


  2. Unions ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,duh !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  3. a 12 percent raise for doing what? harrassing the normal, working people while ignoring the drug dealer doing open air drug transactions or the 20 guys hanging on the corner, not putting enough police officers on the street to deter criminals, continued police brutality, killing unarmed citizens. That is the Chicago way people; F—-! You pay me


    • That’s because ‘normal, working people’ aren’t likely to pull out a gun and shoot them.

      After all, real law enforcement is hard, and not a little dangerous.



  4. A twelve per cent raise and they aren’t required to protect the folks that pay their salaries? WTF? Give me a break. If the cops aren’t there to protect us then we need to get rid of them and use vigilante justice or empower the sheriff’s departments to provide protection for the citizens of the municipalities.


  5. Typical government goonion pukes.

    They want more money for less work.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s