This is how arrogant that POS in the White House is.
His lawyer, Alexandra Hill, effectively has admitted that the image of his purported birth certificate that Obama revealed to America in a press conference last year is a forgery. But none of that matters or affects his constitutional eligibility to be President.
Dan Crosby writes for The Daily Pen, April 12, 2012, that a suit was brought by (Retired) Commander Charles Kerchner in a New Jersey court challenging Obama’s right to have his name on the November ballot, due to a lack of authenticated eligibility of his “natural born citizen” status.
Obama’s attorney Alexandra Hill admitted that there is no evidence that the birth certificate the White House put online is authentic and that it likely was “manufactured.” Hill then proclaimed the birth certificate cannot be used as evidence to confirm Obama’s lack of natural born citizenship status and the issue therefore is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot.”
Now, that’s in-your-face hutzpah.
Adding insult upon injury, Hill went on to contort reasoning further by implying that Obama needs only invoke his political popularity, not legal qualifications, in order to be a candidate.
This photo must have been taken when Hill was 15 years younger and 30 lbs lighter. LOL
Hill, of Genova, Burn & Giantomasi Attorneys in Newark, then made a motion to dismiss the ballot challenge arguing that Obama’s lack of natural-born citizenship status was not relevant to being placed on the New Jersey presidential ballot because no law exists in New Jersey which says that a candidate’s appearance on the ballot must be supported by evidence of natural born citizenship status. Only the U.S. constitution restricts eligibility to hold the office of president to natural born citizens.
New Jersey Administrative Law Judge Jeff S. Masin denied the motion to dismiss and the case proceeded to trial.
At the hearing, attorney for the plaintiffs, Mario Apuzzo, correctly argued that Obama, under the Constitution, has to be a “natural born Citizen” and that he has not met his burden of showing that he is eligible to be on the New Jersey primary ballot by showing that he is indeed a “natural born Citizen.” He argued that Obama has shown no authenticate evidence to the New Jersey Secretary of State demonstrating who he is and that he was born in the United States. Apuzzo also argued that as a matter of law, Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” because he was born to a father who was not a U.S. citizen.
Despite Hill’s admission, the New Jersey court ruled in favor of Obama.
The Daily Pen’s editor Penbrook Johannson explains:
“Sadly, regardless of her moral deficiency, Hill is legally justified. Obama’s eligibility is a separate matter than the charges of forgery and fraud. Of course, we have evidence that he is not eligible. But, evidence of forgery by as yet unidentified counterfeiters working on behalf of Obama is not what legally excludes Obama from appearing on a ballot, by itself, until some authority is willing to consider this as evidence of forgery on its merit as an indication of actual ineligibility in a court of legal authority. Until some court of competent jurisdiction is willing to hear evidence of forgery and fraud, you can’t legally punish a political candidate for that crime which has not been proven that they committed. However, since Obama is not eligible because of a lack of authenticated evidence to the contrary, he could be held off the ballot for that reason.
“He does not exist as a president except in the imagination of those who blindly support him. Whereas he is politically desired by a transient consensus, his legality is unresolved until a responsible court makes a determination. This is the essence of our crisis. Our nation exists in a state of non-authorized identity. Obama is just some guy calling himself a president and living in the White House without the confirmative authority to do so.”
To conclude, despite mounting evidence that he is a usurper, until a court with jurisdiction considers this case, Obama’s eligibility status remains in limbo. What a sorry day for America.
And of course, none of this is being reported by the useless spineless Establishment Media.
N.J. Administrative Law Judge Jeff Masin’s phone number: (609) 689-4008
Here’s the video of the court hearing (h/t ObamaReleaseYourRecords):
UPDATE (April 18):
In response to critics who insist that Alexandra Hill did not say the birth certificate that Obama posted online is a forgery, this is what Pennbroke One of the Daily Pen wrote:
“The fact that Ms. Hill, in representing Obama, admitted that such a form of this record cannot be used to prove these claims by Obama, she is admitting that the image is not a truthful representation of those claims. Therefore, it must be a false representation of those claims otherwise, why did Obama choose to publish this record if not to provide proof of his eligibility? Website decoration?
She specifically agreed that the plaintiffs had “great arguments” toward showing forgery had been committed, but that it was not relevant in their objections to Obama’s appearance on the ballot.
Ms. Hill received her J.D. at Georgetown and is widely steeped in matters of document fraud and forgery. Despite her youth, we are confident she understands that if an image of a document which was intended by the highest levels of our government to represent an official, legal record of identification cannot be relied upon to provide evidentiary proof in a court of law, then the only available consideration toward defining the veracity of that record’s authenticity is that the image of it is not an accurate representation of the person’s identity. Therefore, it is a forgery.
However, combining this fact with the conclusion that a constitutionally empowered law enforcement agency [AZ Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Posse investigation] has determined through a criminal investigation that this image, as well as the image of Obama’s Selective Service registration, are fabrications which were publicly displayed on an official government website, funded by taxpayers, for the intended purpose of deception, not corroboration or verification, of Obama’s true identity, demonstrates nothing less than Hill’s understanding of the fullest legal definition and awareness of forgery with regard to this image.
There is no other reason for Hill to discount its purpose in the matter of Obama’s eligibility to appear on any ballot. Unless, she believes it was posted for website decoration or satire.”