1995 Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh was a Muslim sympathizer

Rate this post

mcveigh_nichols
The popular image of 1995 Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh is that of a twisted “patriot” out to avenge government actions at Waco and Ruby Ridge. This is what Wikipedia says about McVeigh:

McVeigh, a Persian Gulf War veteran, sought revenge against the federal government for its handling of the Waco Siege, which ended in the deaths of 76 people exactly two years before the bombing, as well as for the Ruby Ridge incident in 1992. McVeigh hoped to inspire a revolt against what he considered to be a tyrannical federal government.

From the beginning, the media had portrayed McVeigh and co-conspirator Terry Nichols as extremist, “right-wing,” Christian nut-cases. Just recently, on ABC’s The View on November 17, co-host Joy Behar called Americans unChristian for objecting to Obama’s program of bringing unvetted Muslim “refugees” to the United States. Behar then implied that Syrian Christian refugees are dangerous because “Timothy McVeigh was a Christian.” (See “Whoopi Goldberg, the woman who named herself after farting, says Christians are just as dangerous as Muslims“)

Joy Behar

Joy Behar


But The Federalist points out that McVeigh wasn’t a Christian — he identified himself as an agnostic. Though raised as a Roman Catholic, McVeigh stated in his 2002 biography American Terrorist that he did not believe in a hell and that science was his religion. In June 2001, a day before the execution, McVeigh wrote a letter to the Buffalo News identifying himself as agnostic.
More than that, McVeigh was a Muslim sympathizer.
In her bestseller, The Third Terrorist, investigative journalist Jayna Davis presents the evidence showing that Timothy McVeigh was a front man for Middle Eastern terrorists, and that a third co-conspirator was an Iraqi — the mysterious “John Doe” who was never found. Davis says the evidence was ignored and dismissed because the Clinton Administration didn’t want to go to war with Iraq, the likely culprit, and wanted to blame the attack on domestic right-wingers for political reasons.  
Roger Aronoff of Accuracy in Media writes:

Davis makes a convincing case that in fact McVeigh “was a handpicked dupe, set up to take the fall in order to save his Islamic collaborators from prosecution.” She documents that he had expressed a desire to be a mercenary for Middle Eastern terrorists, and that the trail of evidence that both he and his accomplice Terry Nichols left behind points in the direction of an Arab/Muslim connection to the attack.

In her book, Davis details sworn affidavits from very credible witnesses who link McVeigh and Nichols to former Iraqi soldiers in the U.S. who were anti-American infiltrators wanting revenge on America’s Middle East policy. For that, Davis said she was called a racist:

“I’m an NBC affiliated reporter, I was from the mainstream media, but I was branded a racist, and politically incorrect, because I was pursuing legitimate leads and evidence that led to foreign involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing,” she said. “So by virtue of securing his [1996] White House bid by blaming right-wing rhetoric for inciting Timothy McVeigh, Bill Clinton was able to seal the case. That was it. It was domestic, home-grown terrorism. And now, fifteen years later, he comes out with the temerity and absolute audacity to try to compare these Tea Party conservatives with [McVeigh] a bloodthirsty terrorist. I mean, nothing could be further from the truth. “

In a 1,200-word essay dated March 1998, from the federal maximum-security prison at Florence, Colorado, McVeigh claimed that the Oklahoma City bombing was “morally equivalent” to U.S. military actions against Iraq and other foreign countries. The essay marked the first time that McVeigh publicly discussed the Oklahoma City bombing. He wrote:

The administration has said that Iraq has no right to stockpile chemical or biological weapons (“weapons of mass destruction”) — mainly because they have used them in the past.
Well, if that’s the standard by which these matters are decided, then the U.S. is the nation that set the precedent. The U.S. has stockpiled these same weapons (and more) for over 40 years….
Remember Dresden? How about Hanoi? Tripoli? Baghdad? What about the big ones — Hiroshima and Nagasaki? (At these two locations, the U.S. killed at least 150,000 non-combatants — mostly women and children — in the blink of an eye. Thousands more took hours, days, weeks or months to die).
If Saddam is such a demon, and people are calling for war crimes charges and trials against him and his nation, why do we not hear the same cry for blood directed at those responsible for even greater amounts of “mass destruction” — like those responsible and involved in dropping bombs on the cities mentioned above?
The truth is, the U.S. has set the standard when it comes to the stockpiling and use of weapons of mass destruction.

Four years after his conviction, McVeigh was executed by lethal injection on June 11, 2001.
Jayna Davis’s book has received the endorsement of, among other authorities:

  • Former CIA director Jim Woolsey.
  • David Schippers, former congressional investigator and a seasoned prosecutor responsible for prosecuting the impeachment trial of Bill Clinton.
  • Larry Johnson, a former deputy director of the State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism. According to the Wall Street Journal, Johnson said, “Looking at the Jayna Davis material, what’s clear is that more than Tim McVeigh and Terry Nichols were involved. Without a doubt, there’s a Middle Eastern tie to the Oklahoma City bombing.”

This is what Jayna Davis said about the official and media version of the Oklahoma City bombing:

“Here’s where I think it, it lies: It’s going to have to be the peasants with the pitchforks. These people are going to have to rise up, just like the Tea Party movement is angry about Washington policies that affect their pocketbooks and the future of their children and the national deficit. They’re going to have to rise up and demand that this record is corrected.”

Otherwise, the liberal left will continue to use their version of Oklahoma City to smear anybody critical of their control of the federal government. Davis said:

“They’re going to continue to label anybody who carries a placard or raises a voice of dissent in a peaceful protest as a ‘Tim McVeigh wannabe.’  And until The Third Terrorist, and this evidence embodied in my book, is actually proven, prosecuted, and validated in a courtroom setting, the label of ‘Tim McVeigh wannabe’ is going to continue to be attached to God-fearing Americans who dare to step forward and question and hold to account their elected officials.
My belief is, the best way to get this into a courtroom, and to finally seek justice for the slain of April 19th, 1995, is to pressure the District Attorney of Oklahoma County, who single-handedly holds the legal power to go out and arrest these Arab suspects and put them on trial. He does not need the permission of the federal government. He can act single-handedly, either put it before a grand jury and issue an indictment, or he can just issue arrest warrants based on the evidence and talk to the witnesses.”

According to the Wall Street Journal, the court did not grant McVeigh’s attorney Stephen Jones’s request to comb through U.S. intelligence files in search of an Iraq connection to the Oklahoma City bombing. For his part, when he sentenced McVeigh to death, U.S. District Judge Richard Matsch said, “It would be disappointing to me if the law enforcement agencies of the United States government have quit looking for answers.”
AIM’s Roger Aronoff asked readers to phone Oklahoma County District Attorney David Prater at (405) 713-1600 or here, and ask respectfully that he act on the evidence presented by Jayna Davis.
That was in April 2010, more than 5 years ago.
H/t John Molloy
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “1995 Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh was a Muslim sympathizer

  1. “The Third Terrorist” by Jayna Davis is a well researched book which shows that, without doubt, there were a number of foreign individuals, probably all Iraqis, involved in the Oklahoma bombing. Anyone who has not read this book has missed almost all of the true facts about the Oklahoma City bombing. It had nothing to do with Waco or Ruby Ridge. Most likely the bombing was instigated and supported by Saddam Hussein. This book is a must read.

     
  2. I wouldn’t be surprised if oklahoma city bombing was another contrived event by the government to push an agenda on the american sheeple.

     
  3. Joy Behar needs to have a whole family of radical Syrians housed in her own home . . . then I want to know how great a deal she thinks that would be. The problem here is the “cream at the top” have no problem pushing the problems off on the rest of the 99%. I for one have always felt that the bombing in Oklahoma City was more than what the appearances would indicate. But just like pinning Sandy Hook on the poor unfortunate Adam Lanza . . . Tim McVeigh was the unfortunate soul that got labeled for doing the Oklahoma bombing. I honestly don’t think we have a full and honest reporting of either of these tragedies; in both instances these were men who were marginalized–very easy targets to pin the wrap on. My mind wonders about these scenarios, and the only way I get any comfort is . . . in Eternity no one who has been “found guilty”of murderous crimes they did not commit will beheld accountable–they will be entitled to whatever glory they have earned. God cannot and will not rob them of their place in Heaven do to the machinations of evil men. And for her part, I think Ms Behar will have a lot of “splaining” to do on the other side.

     
  4. You have got to be kidding. McVeigh was a patsy who wouldn’t go along with the plan. There are dozens of witnesses to what really happened at the Murrah building. Several of them died in very questionable circumstances. Ever wonder why mcVeigh was executed so quickly???

     
  5. There are very fishy things about the conviction of McVeigh, and they point to a false flag by our own government (again). Most important, it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL to try a crime in a court outside the state where the crime was committed. U.S. Constitution, Article VI. So both sides wanted to get this case before Judge Matsch, who is ex-Army (likely Army intelligence); but when a court lacks jurisdiction the parties cannot create it by stipulation. It means everything done in the court is a nullity.
    So everyone involved knew the trial was a farce. And it is possible McVeigh was not actually executed. There was a report from one witness that he was still breathing when he was pronounced dead.

     
  6. Good info, and I remember McVeigh’s statement on the weapons of mass destruction.
    I am not discounting the possibility of Middle Eastern involvement, but I wouldn’t give Bill Clinton the credit for being able to pull that off.
    Again, at the risk of going out on a limb here, I would really like to see the entire criminal history of George H.W. Bush brought to light. He has behaved like a silent partner in clandestine matters from the get-go. After all, WHY would the Oklahoma City terror event require a Middle Eastern partner? And so what if McVeigh, agnostic Muslim sympathizer that he was, vents his spleen and writes a book? It just seems to me that an invisible partner would have to facilitate these connections.
    At any rate, McVeigh is dead and Bush-41 still lives.

     
  7. Jayna Davis’ so-called ‘well researched book’ only adds fuel to the fire of disinformation about the ‘bombing’ of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on 19th April 1995. All evidence at the time indicated that it was a false flag operation. It would have been ‘physically impossible’ for a truck bomb in the street to create so much damage to the building. The destructive impact could only have occurred by a bomb being place within the building. Further, there was another undetonated bomb found on the building.

     
  8. Well, I am going to have to disagree on the Clintons not wanting to go into Iraq. They screamed for the 8 years they were in office about the need to go into Iraq along with Pelosi, Biden and others and there are plenty of videos to prove that.

     
  9. To anyone who is interested , watch the movie A Noble Lie .
    There is no way a truck bomb caused that so called devastation . That building was sacrificed . That building came down like a knife cut through it .
    Watch the remnants of the building . Precise explosives placed perfectly . This was a false flag . Pure and simple .

     
  10. A good primer is a book called The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror. Start there. Published around 1998, it connects the dots very well. McVeigh was definitely a patsy, probably CIA/MKUltra, and very possibly still alive.

     
  11. Pingback: 1995 Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh was a Muslim sympathizer |

  12. Sheikh Jahanghir

    Fuck you stupid constipated conservative! I hope you Islamophobic infidels burn in hell!!! ALLAHU AKBAR!!!

     
    • Gosh, by your lovely behavior on this blog you sure show us that Islam is a religion of peace, didn’t you?

       
      • I happened to stumble into this from a recent post. A couple of things to note:
        • It appears that Sheikh Jahanghir (complete with the less-common transliteration of that last name) was a student in biochem studies at University of Kashmir in 2012. An interesting focus considering the WMD nature of some of the comments.
        • The Bush-Clinton-Bush counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke noted that McVeigh’s partner Terry Nichols seems to have studied bomb-making in the Philippines under al Qaeda’s Ramzi Yousef (page 145 of Against All Enemies).
        • It was Clarke on his own authority, not Bush, that put the bin Ladin family on a plane home after the 9/11 attacks.
        ===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle

         
    • Truth hurts too much that another monster supports Islam? Good.

       
  13. a must see: ‘A NOBLE LIE’

     
  14. Pingback: Neutral Perspective: Iraq War was justified or not? | Goodnewseverybodycom's Weblog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *