1961 law aims for elimination of U.S. military and all civilian arms

Rate this post

If you think the New World Order and a global government are relatively recent ideas that began with Bush the Elder, George H. W. Bush, think again.
Those ideas can be traced back at least to the Kennedy Administration, but under a different terminology — the Arms Control and Disarmament Act of 1961, which began as H.R. 9118. The bill was passed by both houses of Congress and, on September 26, 1961, was signed into law, becoming 22 U.S.C. § 2551.
This is how radical the Arms Control and Disarmament Act is. (Click here for the Act in PDF.)
On page 1, the Act declares that “An ultimate goal of the United States is a world which is free from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of armaments; in which the use of force has been subordinated to the rule of law….”
The purpose of the Act is “to provide impetus toward this goal by creating a new agency of peace to deal with the problem of reduction and control of armaments looking toward ultimate world disarmament.”
Here’s a screen shot I took from the Act:
Arms Control and Disarmament Act
The job of this new federal “agency of peace” is “to provide the essential scientific, economic, political, military, psychological and technological information upon which realistic arms control and disarmament policy must be based.”
The Act defines “arms control” and “disarmament” as “the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments of all kinds under international agreement including the necessary steps taken under such an agreement to establish an effective system of international control, or to create and strengthen international organizations for the maintenance of peace.”
Translated into simpler English, the Arms Control and Disarmament Act aims at none other than the elimination of the U.S. military and of all civilian firearms (“armaments of all kinds”) — all to be placed under an international body (“system of international control”).
The “agency of peace” turned out to be the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA), an independent agency of the United States government — an agency established through a separate statute passed by Congress, which exists outside of the federal executive departments (those headed by a Cabinet secretary), and which while constitutionally part of the executive branch, is independent of presidential control, usually because the president’s power to dismiss the agency head or a member is limited.
In 1997, the Clinton administration integrated the ACDA with the State Department. The ACDA’s executive is Obama appointee Under Secretary Rose Gottemoeller. She communicates with the president (Obama) through the secretary of state (John Kerry).
The ACDA’s current programs appear to be international in focus:

  • Stopping Nuclear Testing
  • Banning Chemical Weapons
  • Reducing Strategic Nuclear Arms
  • Keeping Nuclear Weapons out of the hands of rogue states
  • Preventing the use of disease as a weapon of war

Since its passage into law, the Arms Control and Disarmament Act has been amended 9 times, the most recent amendment was in 1989 in the George H. W. Bush administration.

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “1961 law aims for elimination of U.S. military and all civilian arms

  1. In all practicality, I rather doubt that total disarmament is either possible or in our best interest . . . . . until The Lord comes to reign here upon the earth, and we are all subject to His government. I do wish that this change would come about swiftly.

    • Dear Auntie:
      Few people have read Thomas Berger’s novel ‘Little Big Man’ which was made into a fine movie adaptation starring Dustin Hoffman, but I did –twice!– and was sad that it wasn’t longer than its 600+ pages.
      The irascible main character –one can hardly call him a hero– is Jack Crabb, at 126 yrs age relating his life to his erstwhile biographer, who is a foolish Liberal-Progressive fop.
      In one of many great scenes, that writer recoils from Jack’s acerbic recollections, and tells him that his recitation of horrors committed by the US against the natives is surely in our past, and the future will see the lion lay down with the lamb.
      To which Jack draws a long look on the soft face of this media whore and replies: “That’s a mighty fine sentiment, boy-o, as long as you remember to switch out the lambs from time to time.”
      It is one of those literary moments that is so full of true truths, to give Donald Rumsfool [sic] his due, that one easily recalls it almost verbatim. Thanks for prodding my memory!

    • You’re right, Auntie Lulu, “total disarmament” is not possible. But nearly total control, of some sort or another, is. Jesus Himself said, “Let he who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one.”
      We have been living through a conspiracy—whose goal is the LUCIFERIAN EXTINCTION OF MANKIND—publicly exposed, I believe, with Pope Leo’s vision, after which he composed the Prayer to St. Michael the Archangel—that is, in the words of Churchill, “so huge and so vast, the average person cannot believe it exists.”
      Yes, Churchill was right—but only insofar as he wished to reveal. We have been living under a conspiracy that has survived a number of generations, a conspiracy that could only have been nurtured and prolonged by generations of Ruling Elites by the Power of the Devil!
      The real war is between Jesus Christ and Satan. Jesus has already WON. Satan is battling for time. He knows he will lose—he is in DENIAL! In the meantime, this tortuous road has been laid out for OUR benefit: We have this time to choose WHICH MASTER we shall serve for eternity. THAT is why this drags on and on and on!
      I do not believe Jesus will come to Reign upon this Earth: He will come again to Judge the Living and the Dead. FINIS. And then, HE WILL SET THE ENTIRE WORLD ON FIRE IN HIS RIGHTEOUS MIGHT.

  2. I’ve heard of this law before—about six years ago, if my memory serves me correctly. I cannot understand why President Kennedy (whom I believe was a good President) signed the bill.
    But on the face of it, the law is dishonest: What is the relationship between private firearms ownership and nuclear testing, or biological warfare? What is the relationship between private firearms ownership and the military-industrial complex? Clearly, there is none: The individual or the “militia” identified in the Second Amendment has nothing to do with what Eisenhower (correctly) identified as the “military-industrial complex.”
    On the face of it, this law looks to me as if it was lobbied heavily for by foreign powers (in all likelihood by the British government). WHY? I look at the creation of the CIA by Truman (who also created the NSA by Executive Order) as a pivotal event in our History, which has hamstrung and directed our foreign policy ever since. The reason why I say this is the following: I have read that the founding Charter of the CIA specifically states that its purpose is NOT to protect U.S. Sovereignty, but “to protect the interests of the British Crown.” (I have searched for over two years online for any copy of the founding Charter I could find; I have found none).
    I have also read or heard that the UN has a similar protocol or policy.
    Long story short: I see another branch of the WICKED eugenics tree blooming here. This law links the individual to the collective in linking the individual gun-owner with things he has no control over whatsoever, as if the blame for the military-industrial complex rests upon him. And I see Aldous Huxley’s prediction of mass control of every individual coming true: He stated the goal, and Zbigniew Brzynski, in his advocacy of TECHNOCRACY, the technological control of every individual’s movements, is now upon us.
    Again: I cannot understand why Kennedy signed this bill into law. But I see the British Empire as being behind it, as they are the party that stands most to benefit from it. If anyone finds this far-fetched, the British Empire is now referred to as “the Trans-Atlantic Alliance,” the “special relationship” crowed about so much by war criminal and assassin Tony Blair.
    Again: Lyndon Larouche calls our system a “Zeusian system.” I call it for it really is, in real and not mythological terms: It is an ANTI-CHRIST system.

  3. Stephen, of all your many fine postings/comments, for me this is your All-time Best, as it has so many truths, and connects so many evil points of darkness!

  4. Steven — great comments.
    Auntie LuLu — AMEN!
    Just one question — “On page 1, the Act declares……… in which the use of force has been subordinated to the rule of law….” — has any one told the muslime/islime/terrorist about abandoning force and submitting themselves to the rule of law? Didn’t think so! Their rule of law — Sharia Law — changes with the wind or maybe I should say how angry any one muslime male feels at any given time of day or night.

    • You’re right, MA in MO, and what is being set up here is a Clash of Civilizations. The British Empire and Rothschild SATANISTS are desperate to eradicate Christianity from the Face of the Earth. (We have Our Lord’s Word on it that it WILL NOT HAPPEN). I URGE one and all to read and study ALL of Henry Makow’s archives and even print them out while we still have the internet.

  5. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this interesting post. It is noble to seek world peace, but our current reality, and of course the past, reflects the need to defend the good and what is right against those entities and/or terrorists who would like to eliminate us from existing in this world. Self-defense is necessary.

    • Joan . . . I certainly agree with you on two points: 1) Dr Eowyn is to be thanked for the excellent posts she brings to us and 2) I agree that it is a noble effort to work towards “world peace,” and in that vein I believe that Teddy Roosevelt said it best, “Speak softly, but carry a big stick!” There is no doubt that we must practice “self defense,” because others’ who look at us with “our lands of gold” cannot help but desire to take them away from us. Greed is certainly a driving force among so many people. God Bless the U S A!

  6. Liberals do not comprehend what “Shall Not Be Infringed” means. Thomas Jefferson explained that concept so well that even a liberal SHOULD be able to understand: “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”
    ”…our founding fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the fears of governmental tyranny which gave rise to the Second Amendment will ever be a major danger to our nation [sic], the amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic civilian-military relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of this country. For that reason, I believe the Second Amendment will always be important.” -John F. Kennedy, April 19, 1960 (ostensibly before signing the Arms Control and Disarmament Act into law in 1961)
    I’ll put my trust in the tens of millions of gun owners in this country; the Second Amendment; and the 1902 Dick Act, which cannot be infringed or repealed.

  7. Excellent post and comments. Thank you all. I would be very interested in knowing what their take would be today with the current circumstances.
    I think world peace is impossible for the simple fact, there is a group that wants to cleanse the whole world of anyone that does not honor Islam.
    Take Islam out of the equation and I think world peace could be obtainable.
    Would those that wrote the law, think that the people and the states should not protect themselves?
    I would love to know the workings of the brains that thought this was achievable.

    • Dear Glenn47:
      If we take Islam out of the equation, there still won’t be world peace, ever. The 20th century was the bloodiest century in human history, but it wasn’t Islam or Muslims who did the killing. Nor would taking Islam out of the equation lead to peace within each country. We humans are a fallen creation, fomes peccati (tinder for sin). It is part of our DNA.

      • Wait a sec—you make the same mistake the Jews AND Dr. David Duke make: Some Jews believe that the virulence of antisemitism must be due to the blood or the DNA of the haters, and Dr. Duke says the same of the Jews.
        We are “tinder for sin,” but the fault is NOT in our DNA; Rather, it is in the WILL, and with that, the DNA suffers because the Law of Entropy insures sickness and death over time.
        Yes, the 20th Century was the bloodiest Century—so far. Regrettably, I think this Century will be worse in orders of magnitude. The majority of the damage has been fomented and encouraged by the Rothschild banking system and its greed.
        One of the untold stories of the 20th Century is the genocide, by foreign policy, of the government of England against the peoples of Africa. The death toll by wars, insurrections, diseases, poverty and starvation topped OVER ONE BILLION.
        NO OTHER FORCE in the History of Western Civilization has done more to promote racialistic policies than British government and its intelligensia. And they always come out smelling like a rose.

        • “you make the same mistake the Jews AND Dr. David Duke make”
          Really? I sure don’t appreciate that.
          Fomes peccati = Original Sin.
          How else could Original Sin be our first parents’ legacy to all humans other than transmitted through DNA?

          • Yes, but is Original Sin in the DNA? There is a cause and effect: “For the day you eat of that fruit, Ye shall surely die.” But the problem is in the will. The human soul animates or leads the body, not the other way around.
            Hagmann & Hagmann guest Paul McGuire said that, before the Fall, Adam & Eve had command over nature and the animals. With Original Sin, they lost that power.
            I am confused here: If the soul leads the body, like St. Thomas Aquinas seems to say it does (in so many words), then wouldn’t the problem be in the will?
            But if the problem is in the blood or the DNA, then wouldn’t the body be leading the soul? Aquinas argued that the soul of an animal dies with its body.
            Adam & Eve gave us a legacy, all right. Our intellects are darkened and our wills are weakened. Sorry to offend.

  8. A United Nations one world police force launched Sept 29.15 https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/launch-strong-cities-network-strengthen-community-resilience-against-violent-extremism
    Cities are joining as vital partners in an international effort to build social cohesion and resilience to violent extremism … when in fact violent extremism was deliberately created.
    Perpetual peace requires all modern states and governing bodies, including and especially the United Nations, to be completely disarmed.
    READ more at https://ourgreaterdestiny.wordpress.com/2015/10/28/this-deceit-is-a-gift-from-hell-earth-constitution-vs-facts-part-2/


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.