Tag Archives: World Net Daily

America, meet your future

The United States, like Brazil, has elected an openly Socialist president.

We can see our future in the streets of Brazil if we don’t stand up and resist this trend. In the 20th century, the Socialists committed enough worldwide genocide to make even the most radical muslim blush with inadequacy.

Today’s article in WND.com details horrifying breaking news that should send a warning to us all.

~TD

WND EXCLUSIVE

TROOPS BULLDOZE HOMES, LEAVE THOUSANDS HOMELESS

Soldiers wearing U.N. logos evict whole towns in land grab

By Alex Newman

Thousands of poor Brazilian families are living in wretched conditions at make-shift refugee camps after being evicted from their homes at gunpoint by federal forces, some of whom were sporting United Nations logos, according to sources.

Towns literally have been wiped off the map, and no compensation was offered to the victims. About 400,000 acres of land were expropriated in the latest operation.

Residents in the Siua-Missu area in the state of Mato Grosso battled heavily armed federal police and military forces for weeks using sticks, rocks, Molotov cocktails and other crude weapons.

In the end, however, the powerful national government forces were overwhelming.

Virtually all of the residents have now been displaced, living in squalor, packed into school gymnasiums in nearby towns. Others are living on charity under plastic tarps propped up with sticks with no clean water or sewage services.

Leaders of the feeble resistance, meanwhile, are being hunted down by authorities for punishment. 

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/troops-bulldoze-homes-leave-thousands-homeless/#Qm9JL4PpU2C7D764.99

Communist Party USA Endorses Obama & Democrats for 2012

Aaron Klein of WorldNetDaily reports, August 3, 2011, that the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) is endorsing Barack Obama for the 2012 election.

In an article last week at People’s Weekly World, the official newspaper of the CPUSA, despite being disappointed with “some aspects” of the Obama administration’s domestic and foreign policy, Sam Webb, chairman of the Communist Party USA, threw his support behind Obama’s re-election bid.

CPUSA Chairman Sam Webb

Webb said that for communists there are major differences between Democrats and Republicans. He urged his supporters to continue to back the Democrats, explaining: “Neither party is anti-capitalist, but they aren’t identical either. Differences exist at the levels of policy and social composition. And despite the many frustrations of the past two years, the election of Barack Obama was historic and gave space to struggle for a people’s agenda.”

CPUSA Executive Vice Chair Jarvis Tyner

Now that the news of CPUSA’s endorsement of Obama is out, the party likely will do a repeat of what it did in 2008.

CPUSA posted an article on its official website on Dec. 30, 2007, stating that “Our Party actively supported Obama during the primary election.” But when WND reported the news in November 2008, CPUSA scrubbed its website of references that it “actively supported” Obama’s candidacy.

So I went on CPUSA’s website to verify WND’s information.

I found a report, “Fighting For Our Future,” which Chairman Webb gave at a meeting of the National Committee of the Communist Party on June 26, 2011. Webb said:

“Socialism isn’t yet embraced by large sections of the American people…. In these circumstances, the role of the left is to step up our efforts to energize, broaden, deepen, and, above all, unite the movement against the draconian plans of the Republican right…. Nothing is more important than the ideological and political strengthening of this movement….

It is obvious that there is a growing feeling of frustration and even anger among supporters of the Democratic Party with its performance over the past two years…. I am also disappointed with some aspects of the Obama administration’s domestic and foreign policy. But I don’t forget that this administration governs in a very hostile political environment in which the right is laboring overtime to wreck its initiatives at every step of the way….

But the main question from a strategic point of view is this: Does it make any difference, from the standpoint of the class and democratic struggles, which party gains political ascendency?

In our view, the differences between the two parties of capitalism are of consequence…. Neither party is anti-capitalist, but they aren’t identical either. Differences exist at the levels of policy and social composition. Despite the many frustrations of the past two years, the election of Barack Obama was historic and gave space to struggle for a people’s agenda….

The 2012 elections have begun…. No other struggle now or in the foreseeable future has the same possibility to effect a change in the political balance of forces in a progressive direction…. While millions understandably feel dissatisfied with the Democratic Party…it is the only viable alternative to the Republican Party at this moment.”

Joelle Fishman

I also found on the CPUSA website this article, “2010 Election Results: Time to Organize,” by Joelle Fishman, Chair of the Connecticut Communist Party USA :

Obama’s most important statement during his national tour was, ’2008 wasn’t just about electing a President, it was about building a movement.’ ….

Our Party was in the thick of the battle of 2010. We contributed and we learned a lot. We have found an openness to our ideas and our participation. We have deepened our relationships with other organizations and activists.

We have brought new members into our Party even during the campaign…. Therefore, we should be optimistic and confident about growing more in the months ahead. However, this does not happen spontaneously, there must be a plan….”

It’s official:

A vote for Obama in 2012 is a vote for the Communist Party USA.

See also my post of May 17, 2010, “Communist Party USA Sues Dems for Theft of Party Platform.”

H/t beloved fellow Tina.

~Eowyn

State of Arizona Investigating City of Quartzsite

While matters are deteriorating in the United States, there is still an institutionalized political framework and procedure, wherein no government unit can simply turn tyrannical and be unaccountable.

The City Council of Quartzsite, Arizona, are finding that out.

On June 28, 2011, the Quartzsite City Council had a nonviolent citizen (Jennifer Jones) forcibly removed from a public meeting. When news about that went national, instead of amending its ways, the city council became enraged and declared a state of emergency, closing all its meetings to the public, shunted to the side the city’s elected mayor, and put the police chief in charge.

Joe Kovacs of WorldNetDaily reports, July 20, 2011, that the state of Arizona is now investigating allegations of massive corruption among government officials in Quartzsite.

WND contacted the office of Gov. Jan Brewer to see what, if anything, it was doing about the ongoing situation, and received a brief response from Tasya Peterson, the deputy press secretary:

“Mayor Foster of Quartzsite visited with the governor’s Office of Constituent Services about this matter. One of the roles of Constituent Services is to help guide individuals to the proper place for assistance. In this instance, based upon the mayor’s allegations, Constituent Services suggested that he address his concerns with the attorney general’s office and AZPOST [Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training Board]. Constituent Services understands that this did occur and these offices will decide if and how to proceed.”

A spokeswoman for Attorney General Tom Horne confirmed that the case “is under investigation.”

Quartzsite’s stalwart Mayor Ed Foster also confirms that “the investigation is now underway,” and that state legislators and state police are als0 now involved.

But Foster, the elected head of Quartzsite, also says that he’s no longer getting paid as mayor, “That’s not a big deal, but it’s in the town code that I get a stipend of $400. If they made a decision to withdraw my stipend, they have to do it in public, so just the decision to do it in private is another violation of the open-meeting law. It’s just idiocy.”

Foster has been at war with his own council and Police Chief Jeff Gilbert whom he has called corrupt and “a Nazi.” The mayor believes potentially millions of dollars of taxpayer money is being illegally funneled through secret checks to unnamed councilmembers.

He also asserts that the majority of officers on the town’s small police force are in the process of being let go merely because they don’t support the actions of Chief Gilbert. The town has placed nine officers on “paid, administrative leave until such time that you are told otherwise or until your employment is terminated,” according to a letter it delivered to the officers today. The officers, in turn, are filing a formal complaint about this to the U.S. attorney’s office.

Read the rest of the WND article here.

H/t beloved fellow Tina!

~Eowyn

White House Targets Corsi Book on Obama Birth Certificate

If we speak the truth and have truth on our side, we fear no evil.

If Obama is so confident that the matter of his birth eligibility has been settled by his releasing his long-form birth certificate last month, why is the White House in full attack mode against a little book that came out just today? The book is Dr. Jerome Corsi’s Where’s the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President.

Further, if Corsi’s book indeed is, as Esquire magazine editor calls it, “a piece of shit,” why is the 79-year-old Esquire magazine acting as Obama’s puppet by publishing a fraudulent piece today claiming that World Net Daily pulled all copies of Corsi’s book?

From the WorldNetDaily article, “White House panic: Corsi book targeted,” May 18, 2011:

Why is the White House in full defense mode against a book by a small publisher contending Barack Obama is not legally eligible to be president?

Today, the Obama re-election campaign launched an all-out attack on a brand new book critical of Obama, “Where’s the Birth Certificate,” by bestselling author Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., calling it delusional, laughable and a “joke.”

…Today’s attack by the Obama machine on Corsi’s latest and most controversial book was introduced as an offering to sell Obama supporters a T-shirt or coffee mug with an image of the Obama “Certificate of Live Birth” released several weeks ago as well as a portrait of Obama, stamped “Made in America.” [See FOTM's post on this here.]

…So, why the Obama organization’s attack against this particular book, when there are so many other hot-selling books that are also very critical of Obama?

“If what Barack Obama released is really a valid birth certificate that answers all the questions about this controversy, why is the Obama campaign in attack mode on Jerome Corsi’s bestselling book?” asks Joseph Farah, CEO of WND.com and WND Books, publisher of “Where’s the Birth Certificate?”

“Because he fears it is his undoing. Do you really think the $1 billion Obama campaign cares about selling a few coffee mugs? Give me a break. This is an effort to derail media attention from a successful book and media tour that is focusing renewed attention on his ineligibility for office.”

Just an hour earlier, Esquire, the Hearst Corporation-owned 79-year-old national magazine, published a fabricated report attacking the Corsi book.

Esquire, which endorsed Obama for president in 2008, claimed falsely in the story that “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” was being “pulled from [bookstore] shelves,” was being disavowed by the publisher who was offering refunds to customers, and that all copies were being destroyed.

The magazine later claimed it had “committed satire” but not until after a number of major news organizations apparently accepted the report as genuine and contacted WND Books for reaction.

At the Political Punch blog on the ABC News website, Jake Tapper reported that Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt characterized the new effort as a “mobile version” of Obama’s 2008 online “fight the smears” effort, which attempted to mute criticisms about his candidacy.

Read the rest of the WND article HERE.

H/t beloved fellows May & Tina.

~Eowyn & Steve

Obama Eligibility Issue Gathering Steam

Thank you, Joseph Farah and World Net Daily, for your tireless efforts to inform Americans on this important issue! History will remember you.

~Eowyn

We’re making progress on birth certificate

By Joseph Farah – WorldNetDaily - January 6, 2011

Have you noticed how much better informed the major news media have become about the missing birth certificate since Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie entered the picture?

It wasn’t that long ago that most of the TV talking heads and alleged news reporters were telling the American people that Barack Obama had released his birth certificate. They seemed incapable of comprehending the difference between the digital short-form certification of live birth offered up by the Obama campaign in 2008 and a standard, long-form birth certificate we’re all familiar with.

How many of you recall Bill O’Reilly and Chris Matthews waiving copies of the certification of live birth in front of the camera, telling the American people they had the actual birth certificate?

How many times do you recall them viciously attacking those who persisted in demanding the absolute minimal documentation needed to ensure Obama was indeed constitutionally eligible to serve as president – without ever giving any of those conscientious, principled, rational advocates of the rule of law and openness in government the opportunity to answer their ad hominem insults?

On the edge of a constitutional crisis … learn the facts in WND’s comprehensive “Obama Eligibility Primer”

How many times have you heard them characterize “birthers” as a fringe group of crackpots and conspiracy nuts?

Now, all of a sudden, as polls continue to show Americans increasingly skeptical about Obama’s birth narrative despite the media’s stonewalling and obfuscating, along comes the new socialist governor of Hawaii who admits the possibility that the release of some actual evidence might indeed quell what is turning into widespread public distrust of both the government and what Rush Limbaugh astutely calls “the state-sponsored media.”

He says he would like to release the birth certificate – though I doubt he ever will.

But that leaves O’Reilly, Matthews and the rest of the Big Media in a dilemma. After all, they have been pretending for years that the birth certificate has already been released.

It didn’t take Matthews long to do a 180.

Hey, if the Democratic governor of Hawaii wants the birth certificate released, then he’s for it, too. He even bullied two certifiably leftist pundits on his panel to capitulate to his demand as well.

O’Reilly is sure to follow suit if he hasn’t already.

Looks like the birth certificate issue is reaching critical mass.

These media types are now using Abercrombie as a way to extricate themselves from all their foolishness and irresponsibility on this story from the beginning.

The truth is Obama should never have been able to assume office without establishing his constitutional eligibility. The system failed the American people and the rule of law. The media “watchdogs” weren’t just AWOL. They were attacking those actually serving as vigilant citizen watchdogs of the Constitution and the people’s business.

I expect politicians to act like politicians. I expect them to protect their secrets as best they can. I expect them to get away with anything they can get away with.

But, as someone who has spent 30 years in the news business, I have never been more ashamed of my industry than I have been over the last two years in their mindless and shameless demagoguery over Obama’s eligibility problem.

If they had been paid shills for Obama they could not have been more reckless and mean-spirited and less truthful and honest.

That goes for Bill O’Reilly and Chris Matthews and the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post and the Associated Press – and literally thousands of other news agencies and so-called “journalists.” They missed one of the biggest stories in American history and set about covering up their own incompetence.

Anyway, that’s beginning to change.

They now admit what was obvious to the vast majority of Americans for some time – that Obama has indeed been concealing his birth certificate. They admit he should be able to defuse this whole controversy with one phone call. They admit they are puzzled as to why he won’t do that.

Guess what, fellas – that’s just what those you have been vilifying have been saying for the last two years. That’s all they’ve been saying. And, a few of us in the media, most of them right here at this news agency, have actually been gathering evidence that thoroughly and unequivocally undermines Obama’s official birth narrative.

Quietly, and without fanfare, the WND team kept this story alive – just as I promised I would. Still, none of these media elitists has bothered to scratch beneath the surface of this story to comprehend the magnitude of deceit that went into Obama’s elevation to what may well be an illegitimate presidency.

I tell you, it’s not just Obama who is going to pay a price in history for this scandal. All those who aided and abetted him in the media are going down, too.

Now that this story shows no signs of going away, I think they’re beginning to realize what they missed.

Notice to Boehner: We Birthers Will Never Give Up

 

We Obama truth-seekers, whom the MSM deride as “birthers,” are patriots who love and respect the Constitution because it is not just our founding document but the highest law of the land. We fully know how thin and fragile the veneer of civilization is which alone separates us from the maw of chaos and the abyss. It is the rule of law — not of man — that holds civil order and civilization itself together.

To that end, we Obama truth-seekers hold sacred the Constitution’s stipulation of the necessary qualifications for the office of the presidency. Article II, Section 1 says: 

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

But the person variously named Barack Barry Hussein Steven Dunham Soetoro Obama has not produced the necessary documentation certifying he is a Natural Born Citizen (NBC). Even leaving aside the matter of his birth place, the very fact that when Obama was born in 1961, his biological father, Barack Obama Sr., was not a U.S. citizen but a British citizen (Kenya being a British colony at the time), would disqualify him. For there is a clear, concise definition of the term “Natural Born Citizen” in Vattel’s Law of Nations which was the principal legal reference book used by the Founding Fathers in writing the Constitution (h/t fellow Free Speech!):

“The natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens…it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

From the beginning — the 2008 presidential year — World Net Daily has waged a tireless battle to inform us about the eligibility issue and sponsoring public campaigns of awareness, including billboards. In that battle, World Net Daily was almost all alone. The liberal MSM ignored, suppressed and mocked us. Even more reprehensible are the news media that are supposed to be “on our side” – FoxNews and its talking heads Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck (who called birthers “dumb”) – who also ignored and dismissed us.

Finally, the eligibility question is getting steam despite the concerted media mockery and suppression. Recently, Jeff Kuhner of the Washington Times said that people around the White House, Democratic circles, and the liberal media – including senior top editors — all know there’s something there about Obama’s birth eligibility but are afraid to pursue the matter. Yesterday, a very brave woman single-handedly brought the eligibility question to the attention of the American people when she interrupted the House reading of the Constitution by yelling “Except Obama!” at precisely the point when Rep. Frank Perone was reading Article II, Section I that presidents must be naturally born U.S. citizens in order to be eligible for that office.

The woman, Theresa Cao, 48, was removed from the House by Capitol police, arrested and charged with unlawful conduct and disrupting Congress. She is now released from police custody.

Thank you, Theresa! Chroniclers of our time will record your courage and the name Theresa Cao will forever be remembered.

What a contrast this brave woman is from the spineless newly elected House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio). The Hill reports that in an interview on NBC Nightly News yesterday after “the incident,” Boehner reacted to the outburst and said he believed Obama is a U.S. citizen:

“The state of Hawaii has said that President Obama was born there. That’s good enough for me.”

Boehner is covering his and his fellow political class’s asses. None other than the Congressional Research Office has admitted that Congress failed to vett Obama’s presidential candidacy because no law requires them to do so, conveniently forgetting that the Constitution itself is the highest law of the land. (See also “Obama Eligibility Is Now a Conspiracy“)

Shame on you, Congressman Boehner! It may be “good enough” for you, but it sure ain’t “good enough” for us, the American people!

You keep up your pusillanimous spinelessness and We the People will get rid of you, too.

Count on it.

~Eowyn