Tag Archives: STD

Medical consequences of homosexual sexual behaviors

Gay Pride Parade, Miami Beach, 2013A scene from the Gay Pride Parade in Miami Beach, FL, April 14, 2013 (Source).

Most of this post was first published two years ago as “What They’ll Never Tell You in ‘Homosexual Education’.” I’m re-publishing it, given:

  • Last week’s momentous Supreme Court decision against the federal DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) law, which opens the floodgates to homosexual marriage across the United States. (See “Supreme Court rules for homosexual marriage,” June 26, 2013.)
  • The myth we’re being told that “gay” marriage is all about “love.” In fact, as lesbian activist Masha Gessen openly admitted what supporters of traditional marriage have long suspected, the push for gay marriage is about diminishing and eventually destroying the institution of marriage and redefining the traditional family. (See her on video, here.)

A word of warning:

When I first found out the information I’m about to relay to you, I was shocked and sick to my stomach. I kept the post in draft form for months, unable to bring myself to complete it. The great Scottish philosopher David Hume defined “evil” without resorting to theology: Evil is what causes harm or injury to oneself or to another. By that definition, the homosexual behaviors described below are evil.

Are you ready?

Take a deep breath. Here we go….

In his article, “The Health Risks of Gay Sex,” medical doctor John R. Diggs, Jr. writes that “The current media portrayal of gay and lesbian relationships is that they are as healthy, stable and loving as heterosexual marriages — or even more so. Medical associations are promoting somewhat similar messages.” But that portrayal is not consistent with facts.

Dr. Diggs warns that the consequences of homosexual sexual activity are distinct from the consequences of heterosexual activity. Just as it is his duty as a physician to recommend behaviors that are beneficial to our health and wellbeing, likewise it is his duty to inform patients of the health risks of gay sex — “Sexual relationships between members of the same sex expose gays, lesbians and bisexuals to extreme risks of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs), physical injuries, mental disorders and even a shortened life span.”

There are at least 5 major areas of differences between gay and heterosexual relationships, each with specific medical consequences. Those differences include:

  1. Levels of promiscuity
  2. Physical health
  3. Mental health
  4. Life span
  5. Definition of “monogamy”

1. Promiscuity

The “extreme” health risks of homosexual sex are a direct consequence of sexual promiscuity. Simply put, homosexuals are more promiscuous than heterosexuals. Prior to the AIDS epidemic, a 1978 study found that:

  • 75% of white gay males (3 of every 4) claimed to have had more than 100 lifetime male sex partners;
  • 15% claimed 100-249 sex partners;
  • 17% claimed 250-499;
  • 15% claimed 500- 999;
  • 28% (that’s more than 1 of every 5 white gay men!) claimed more than 1,000 lifetime male sex partners.

Levels of promiscuity subsequently declined but, with the advent of AIDS drugs, they are again approaching those of the 1970s. From 1994 to 1997, the percentage of homosexual men reporting multiple partners and unprotected anal sex rose from 23.6% to 33.3%, with the largest increase among men under 25. The medical consequence of this promiscuity is that gays have a greatly increased likelihood of contracting HIV/AIDS, syphilis and other STDs.

While similarly high rates of promiscuity have not been documented among lesbians, an Australian study did find lesbians to be more promiscuous than straight women:

  • 93% of lesbians reported having had sex with men. Other studies similarly show that 75-90% of women who have sex with women have also had sex with men.
  • Lesbians were 4.5 times more likely than heterosexual women (9% of lesbians vs. 2% of heterosexual women) to have had more than 50 lifetime male sex partners.
  • In addition to diseases that may be transmitted during lesbian sex, a study at an Australian STD clinic found that lesbians were 3 to 4 times more likely than heterosexual women to have sex with men who were high-risk for HIV.

It goes without saying that any degree of sexual promiscuity carries the risk of contracting STDs.

2. Physical Health

Excessive sexual promiscuity and certain common sexual practices among gay men result in epidemics like AIDS and serious medical consequences, some of which are virtually unknown among heterosexuals. A British researcher summarizes the danger as follows:

“penile-anal, mouth-penile, and hand-anal sexual contact is usual for both [male homosexual] partners, and mouth-anal contact is not infrequent…. Mouth-anal contact is the reason for the relatively high incidence of diseases caused by bowel pathogens in male homosexuals. Trauma may encourage the entry of micro-organisms and thus lead to primary syphilitic lesions occurring in the anogenital area…. In addition to sodomy, trauma may be caused by foreign bodies, including stimulators of various kinds, penile adornments, and prostheses.”

a. Anal intercourse:

Beginning in the “gay” culture, anal sex has now been “popularized” among heterosexuals via systematic propaganda of pornography.

But the simple truth is this: The human body was not designed to accommodate anal intercourse.

The rectum is significantly different from the vagina with regard to suitability for penetration by a penis. The vagina has natural lubricants and is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-layer stratified squamous epithelium that allows it to endure friction without damage and to resist the immunological actions caused by semen and sperm. In contrast, the anus is a delicate mechanism of small muscles that comprise an “exit-only” passage. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the sphincter loses its tone and its ability to maintain a tight seal. Consequently, anal intercourse leads to leakage of fecal material that can easily become chronic. Moreover, the intestine has only a single layer of cells separating it from blood. Therefore, any organisms that are introduced into the rectum have a much easier time establishing a foothold for infection than they would in a vagina. The single layer tissue cannot withstand the friction associated with penile penetration, resulting in traumas that expose both participants to blood, organisms in feces, and a mixing of bodily fluids.

Furthermore, ejaculate has components that are immunosuppressive, designed to allow the sperm to evade the immune defenses of the female. The fragility of the anus and rectum, along with the immunosuppressive effect of ejaculate, make anal-genital intercourse a most efficient manner of transmitting HIV and other infections. Below is a list of diseases found with extraordinary frequency among male homosexual practitioners as a result of anal intercourse. Sexual transmission of some of these diseases is so rare in the exclusively heterosexual population as to be virtually unknown. Lesbians are also at higher risk for these STDs:

  • Anal cancer
  • Chlamydia trachomatis
  • Cryptosporidium
  • Giardia lamblia
  • Herpes simplex virus
  • Human immunodeficiency virus
  • Human papilloma virus
  • Isospora belli
  • Microsporidia
  • Gonorrhea
  • Viral hepatitis types B & C
  • Syphilis: gay men contracted syphilis at 3 to 4 times the rate of heterosexuals.
  • HIV/AIDS: A study based upon statistics from 1986 through 1990 estimated that 20-year-old gay men had a 50% chance of becoming HIV positive by age 55. As of June 2001, nearly 64% of men with AIDS were men who have had sex with men.

b. Oral-anal contact (aka “rimming”):

It is because of “rimming” that intestinal parasites ordinarily found in the tropics are encountered in the bodies of American gay men. An extremely high rate of parasitic and other intestinal infections is documented among male homosexual practitioners because of oral-anal contact. There are so many infections that a syndrome called “the Gay Bowel” is described in the medical literature. Gay bowel syndrome includes such diseases as Hepatitis A, Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica,Epstein-Barr virus,Neisseria meningitides,Shigellosis, Salmonellosis, Pediculosis, scabies, Campylobacter, and typhoid.

c. Human Waste

Some gay men engage in coprophilia, which means sexual contact with (including ingesting) highly infectious fecal wastes. This practice exposes the participants to all of the risks of anal-oral contact and many of the risks of analgenital contact.

d. Fisting

“Fisting” refers to the insertion of a hand or forearm into the rectum, and is far more damaging than anal intercourse. Tears can occur, along with incompetence of the anal sphincter. The result can include infections, inflammation and, consequently, enhanced susceptibility to future STDs. 22% of homosexuals (nearly 1 of every 4) in one survey admitted to having participated in this practice.

Al Pacino and director William Friedkin got a lot of flak from “gay rights” activists for showing the truth in the 1980 movie Cruising, about an undercover cop investigating a serial killer who targets gay men, especially those involved in the S&M “culture.” The YouTube video below is an excerpt from the movie, showing scenes from a gay bar. Beginning at the 0:40 mark, you’ll see a man smearing talcum powder on his right fist and wrist, followed by another man being fisted. If this isn’t evil, I truly don’t know what is.

e. Sadism

Sadism is the sexualization of pain and cruelty, named for the 18th Century novelist, the Marquis de Sade. The medical consequences of such activities range from mild to fatal, depending upon the nature of the injuries inflicted. As many as 37% of homosexuals (more than 1 of every 3) have practiced some form of sadism.

3. Mental Health

Multiple studies have identified high rates of psychiatric illness, including depression, drug abuse and suicide attempts, among selfprofessed gays and lesbians. Gay activists argue that mental illness is induced by other people’s homophobia and intolerance.

But that argument is undermined by an extensive study in the Netherlands — a country of legalized same-sex marriages where GLBTs are widely accepted.The Dutch study, published in the Archives of General Psychiatry, found a high rate of psychiatric disease associated with same-sex sex. Gay men were much more likely to experience major depression, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia and obsessive compulsive disorder. Lesbians were more often diagnosed with major depression, social phobia or alcohol dependence. The researchers found “that homosexuality is not only associated with mental health problems during adolescence and early adulthood…but also in later life.”

Depression and drug abuse, in turn, can lead to reckless sexual behavior, even among those who understand the deadly risks, such as older professional gay men.

4. Life Span

The only epidemiological study (from Vancouver, Canada) to date on the life span of gay men concluded that gay and bisexual men lose up to 20 years of life expectancy. Compare that to cigarette smokers, who lose on average about 13.5 years of life expectancy. The Canadian study concluded that the probability of a 20-year-old gay or bisexual man living to 65 years was only 32%, compared to 78% for men in general.

5. Monogamy

Monogamy means long-term sexual fidelity. The most extensive survey of sex in America found that a vast majority of heterosexual committed couples are faithful: 94% of married people and 75% of cohabiting people had only one partner in the prior year.But long-term sexual fidelity is rare among GLB (gay, lesbian, bisexual) couples, particularly among gay males. Even during the coupling period, many gay men do not expect monogamy. One study reported that 66% of gay couples reported sex outside the relationship within the first year, and nearly 90% if the relationship lasted 5 years.

The average gay or lesbian relationship is also short lived. In one study, only 15% of gay men and 17.3% of lesbians had relationships that lasted more than 3 years. In other words, whatever data we have show very little long-term monogamy in GLB relationships, which then raises the question of why homosexuals are so insistent on their “unions” being legalized as marriages.

To read Dr. Diggs’ article in detail, go here. Another good article is Dr. Paul Cameron’s “Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do.”

~Eowyn

Gonorrhea is now antibiotic resistant

I’ve had this post in draft since August of last year. At the time, the post’s provisional title was “Gonorrhea becoming antibiotic resistant.”

Fast forward five months to now.

Newsflash! It is no longer a hypothetical future scenario. Gonorrhea has become antibiotic resistant.

Neisseria gonorrhoeae is the bacteria that causes the sexually transmitted disease gonorrhea - scientists in North America noted in a study released on January 8th that they have detected the first incurable strain of the diseaseJames Nye reports for The Daily Mail, Jan. 8, 2013, that what U.S. public health officials long feared is now true: The first cases of antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea have been found in North America.A study released by the Journal of the American Medical Association announced it had found nine patients with a strain of the sexually transmitted disease immune to the last remaining effective oral antibiotic.

This confirms the fears of both the Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization who warned last year that untreatable gonorrhea, the world’s second most common sexually transmitted disease (STD), would soon become a reality. “These are the clinical cases we’ve been waiting for,” said study leader Vanessa Allen of Public Health Ontario.

Researchers observed that 6.7% of patients with gonorrhea at one Toronto clinic still had the disease after a round of cephalosporins, which is the last antibiotic which doctors are able to use to cure the disease. Out of 133 gonorrhea-afflicted patients who returned for a follow up visit, nine remained positive with the disease, which is roughly one in 15 people.

Adding to the growing fears of health officials in the U.S., Robert Kirkcaldy of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) writes in an editorial that the disease is becoming a threatening disease: “Cephalosporin treatment failures have now been documented in North America. Although this milestone was expected, its arrival is deeply troubling.”

Gonorrhea infects near to 700,000 Americans each year – producing symptoms such as painful urination, abdominal pain, genital discharge, itching and infertility in women. Women who contract both HIV and gonorrhea are more likely to pass HIV onto their children than women with only HIV.

Just one year ago, Gail Bolan, director of the CDC’s sexually transmitted disease prevention program, had said that the “threat of untreatable gonorrhea is emerging rapidly.” At that time, only 1.7% of test cultures of the disease were considered immune in laboratory environments. Vanessa Allen said it proves how fast antibiotic resistance is evolving in disease and that “the problem appears worse than we originally thought.”

Although the nine patients in Canada eventually were cured with the injectable antibiotic known as ceftriaxone, Allen worries that the gonorrhea bacteria will soon develop resistance to ceftriaxone as well: “The next threat is when, not if, the same thing happens with ceftriaxone. And then what?”

To cope, the CDC recommends clinicians no longer prescribe a single antibiotic treatment for gonorrhea. Instead, doctors are advised to give patients an injection of ceftriaxone as well as a week-long course of oral azithromycin or doxycycline.

Meanwhile, the University of Toronto Student Union is merrily planning a sex orgy, oops, “an epic student sex club adventure” for next week, in the name of advancing the students’ “sex education.”

Sodom and Gomorrah, here we come! Whee!!!

~Eowyn

Why Are Our Babies Getting Hepatitis-B Vaccination?

Hepatitis B is an infectious illness caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV) which infects the liver. The disease has caused epidemics in parts of Asia and Africa, and is endemic in China. About a quarter of the world’s population, more than 2 billion people, have been infected with the hepatitis-B virus. This includes 350 million chronic carriers of the virus.

Perinatal infection is a major route of infection in endemic (mainly poor developing) countries, not the United States. Unless infected by the birth mother, however, hepatitis B is rarely found in children. While viral DNA has been detected in the saliva, tears, and urine of chronic carriers, transmission of hepatitis B virus results from exposure to infectious blood or body fluids such as semen and vaginal fluids. Hepatitis B viruses cannot be spread by casual contact, such as holding hands, sharing eating utensils or drinking glasses, breast-feeding, kissing, hugging, coughing, or sneezing. [Source: Wikipedia]

In other words, in the United States, hepatitis B is a sexually-transmitted disease.

Given that, why is our government mandating all healthy babies be vaccinated against hepatitis-B, a sexually-transmitted disease?

Dr. Judith A. Reisman writes that in 1991, without public voteanonymous health bureaucrats in the Center for Disease Control initiated ‘aids to prevent [hepatitis B] venereal disease’ for all American newborns. By 1994 most states silently implemented hepatitis B vaccinations for neonates, often within 12 hours of birth born to uninfected mothers. By April 1998, 35 USA states reported that they had ‘hepB childhood vaccination mandates’ with the CDC declaring that 80% plus of American infants and children, ages 19-35 months had received hepatitis B shots.

There is no evidence to suggest that the parents of these children were told that a) hepatitis B is a sexually transmitted diseaseresulting from promiscuous homo/heterosexual conduct as well as commonly sex-related IV drug use or b) that such universal vaccinations are experimental.

Dr. Reisman then quotes from an article in the July 31, 1998 Science magazine, on hepatitis B vaccine being suspected for triggering multiple sclerosis-like symptoms:

“Critics blame the widely used vaccine for many ills….Concern about the vaccine appeared early in France….[with] data on more than 600 cases of illnesses, many with MS-like symptoms in people who had received the hepatitis B vaccine. In addition, patient advocacy groups in Britain and Canada have studied more than 100 cases each, as has ….Bonnie Dunbar, a molecular biologist at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston…..[who] is motivated by personal experience: Her brother developed immune problems that she believes were triggered by the hepatitis B shots he had to get when he became a health care worker. Dunbar says that when she began investigating, she found that other medical colleagues had experienced or knew about such reactions. One nurse, for example, attributed a dozen cases of MS to vaccination….A grant application [she and another "hepatitis virus expert"] submitted to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has been turned down twice….”

Dr. Reisman then points out that pedophile organizations (groups that work to legalize adult-child sex) have long campaigned for “A Child’s Sexual Bill of Rights” to legalize sex “with a parent, sibling or other responsible adult or child” and that such sex be “protected and aided….with contraceptives and aids to prevent venereal disease.”

Instead of aggressively arresting and imprisoning child sex criminals, is the government’s hepatitis B vaccination program making children physically “safe” for pedophiles? Are pro-pedophile pediatric authorities (e.g., Johns Hopkins’ Dr. John Money, who in a Journal of Paedophilia interview, demanded an end to age of consent laws, adult-child sex at all ages, and pushing for pedophile rights) behind the perilous universal vaccinations of infants and children for “hep B” and other sexually transmitted diseases?

In their widely popular second edition of Nutritional Healing, Balach and Balach (1997) reported that roughly “85 percent of gay men are infected with hepatitis B.

With no recorded cases of hepatitis B among chaste infants and children of commonly healthy mothers, the question must be asked as to why most states now mandate or coerce parents into vaccinating their infants and children with a serum created largely for prostitutes and promiscuous male homosexuals — and a vaccine the side effects of which are largely unknown.

Although increased rates of MS, asthma, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, Attention Deficit Disorders and other afflictions have been implicated in hepatitis B vaccinations, its gross and subtle effects on injected children will not be known for many, many decades–if ever. Still, millions of infants are being injected, allegedly for their own good, with a sexual prophylactic, toxic in its natural form. Who are these injections designed to protect?

Read about the Child Sexual Bill of Rights, here.

Read about Massachusetts schools giving condoms to first grade schoolchildren, here.

~Eowyn