Tag Archives: one world government

Frontrunner to succeed Pope Benedict 16th had called for a World Political Authority

News came this morning that Pope Benedict 16th is resigning.

Nine names are said to be papabili (potential popes), frontrunners to succeed Benedict 16th. Among them is an ominous name — Peter Turkson of Ghana, Africa.

It is not just that his name “Peter” is evocative of St. Malachy’s (1094-1148) prophesy that the last pope would be one “Peter the Roman,” Peter Turkson was the person who, in 2011, had called for a “supranational world political Authority,” i.e., a one-world government.

I am therefore re-publishing this post, originally titled “About the Vatican’s Call for a World Political Authority,” which I had first published on October 26, 2011.

~Eowyn (Feb. 11, 2013)

Two days ago, on October 24, 2011, the Vatican issued a curious document calling for the creation of a “supranational global political Authority” and a central world bank to manage and cure the ills of the world’s economies.

The proposal, Note on the reform of the international financial and monetary systems in the context of global public authority” (henceforth, “The Note”), was not authored by the Pope but by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (PCJP). Nevertheless, the PCJP is a part of the Roman Curia or the Holy See, the leaders of the PCJP are appointed by the Pope, and The Note liberally references and quotes past and present popes. Given all this, one can only conclude that The Note has Pope Benedict XVI‘s approval.

To read a translation of The Note, click here.

The Note begins by declaring:

“The economic and financial crisis which the world is going through calls everyone, individuals and peoples, to examine in depth the principles and the cultural and moral values at the basis of social coexistence. [...] as Benedict XVI teaches, the crisis ‘obliges us to re-plan our journey, to set ourselves new rules and to discover new forms of commitment, to build on positive experiences and to reject negative ones. The crisis thus becomes an opportunity for discernment, in which to shape a new vision for the future. In this spirit, with confidence rather than resignation, it is appropriate to address the difficulties of the present time.’”

The author(s) of the Note attributes the global economic crisis to mainly two factors:

  • Economic liberalism, i.e., the free market;
  • Problems of personal and national ethics — of greed and unbridled “materialism.”

All of which, The Note maintains, has led to great inequalities, between/among nations and peoples, and a seemingly intractable global economic crisis.

The Note’s proposed remedy is contained in Section 3, titled “An Authority over Globalization.”

The Section begins by referring to Pope John XXIII’s teaching, in what The Note calls “the prophetic” Encyclical Pacem in Terris of 1963. In the encyclical, John XXIII observed that the world was heading towards ever greater unification, that a correspondence was lacking in the human community between the political organization “on a world level and the objective needs of the universal common good,” and expressed the hope that one day “a true world political authority” would be created.

The Note then urged that John XXIII’s teaching be implemented today “in view of the unification of the world engendered by…globalization, and of the importance of guaranteeing…a free, stable world economic and financial system.” Moreover, The Note insists, the present Pope Benedict XVI himself had “expressed the need to create a world political authority,” given the ever longer ” agenda of questions” that must “be dealt with globally” — questions of “peace and security; disarmament and arms control; promotion and protection of fundamental human rights; management of the economy and development policies; management of the migratory flows and food security, and protection of the environment.”

The Note then asserts that the answers to all these questions in an “increasingly interconnected and interdependent” world “are not just sectorial and isolated, but systematic and integrated,” and should be “geared to the universal common good.” To do otherwise is to consign ourselves to a world characterized not by “the common good” but dominated by only “the strongest nations.”

The Note then proposes that a “supranational world political Authority” be “set up gradually” to deal with all these problems. The Note recognizes that such a world political Authority (WPA) “cannot be imposed by force, coercion or violence, but should be the outcome of a free and shared agreement” and “a sincere dialogue”. Such an agreement can only come “from a process of progressive maturation of consciences and freedoms as well as the awareness of growing responsibilities.”

The Note then goes on to say that the WPA must recognize and respect the differences of the world’s many disparate cultures and civilizations. This WPA would be “subsidiary” to the world’s many governments: “Governments should not serve the world Authority unconditionally. Instead, it is the world Authority that should put itself at the service of the various member countries.”

Such a WPA would:

  • Make decisions “with a view to the global common good, which transcends national goods.” [Who decides what "the global common good" is?]
  • Create “the socio-economic, political and legal conditions” essential for “efficient and efficacious” markets that “are not over-protected by paternalistic national policies.” [Excuse me, but didn't The Note just say that it was "economic liberalism" (i.e., the free market) that had caused global inequities and the global economic crisis, in the first place?]
  • At the same time, those “efficient and efficacious” markets must be well-financed, instead of being “weakened by systematic deficits in public finances and of the gross national products.” ["well-financed" by whom?]
  • At the same time as the WPA ensures there be “free and stable markets,” there would also be “a fair distribution of world wealth.” [No contradiction there!]

The Note then proposes it is “logical” that the creation of such a GPA should “proceed with the United Nations as its reference.”

To that, I can only ask: “And how well is that working?”

So the Vatican is proposing that we should begin the process toward creating this global welfare state of a World Political Authority by using the UN as our “reference” — whatever that means.

Is this the same United Nations, whose IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) — the world’s chief “climate change” institution — again and again has been caught issuing unsubstantiated and downright fraudulent claims about global warming? The same United Nations that is overrun with New Age occult mumbo-jumbo? (See my 4-part series on the UN here)

God help us.

So what is this Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (PCJP) that issued The Note?

Wikipedia says the PCJP, founded in 1967 as part of the reforms of the Second Vatican Council, is dedicated to “action-oriented studies” for the international promotion of justice, peace, and human rights from the perspective of the Roman Catholic Church. The Council’s objectives and mandate are the promotion of “justice and peace in the world, in the light of the Gospel and of the social teaching of the Church.”

The PCJP’s president is 63-year-old native of Ghana, Cardinal Peter Kodwo Appiah Turkson, who was appointed by none other than Pope Benedict XVI himself in 2009.

Cardinal Peter Turkson

Turkson also is a member of other important institutions in the Vatican: the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, the Pontifical Commission for the Cultural Heritage of the Church and the Pontifical Committee for International Eucharistic Congresses.

Turkson’s most recent appointment may be the most important. On 16 October 2010 Pope Benedict appointed him as a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith — the same institution that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger had headed, before he was chosen to succeed Pope John Paul II, and so became Benedict XVI.

Clearly, Peter Turkson is being groomed for high office. Indeed, Wikipedia’s entry on him says that “Peter Turkson is considered papabile,” which means a cardinal of whom it is thought likely or possible that he will be elected pope. A literal English translation would be “popeable” or “one who might become pope”.

Wikipedia also identifies Peter Turkson him as being the source of The Note:

“In response to the global economic crisis started in 2008, Cardinal Turkson together with bishop Mario Toso elaborated a proposal to reform the International Financial System by creating a Global Public Authority and a Global Bank that consider the interest of all developing countries. The document of 40 pages was officially presented in October 2011….”

If The Note sounds familiar to some, that is not surprising. It is merely that neo-Marxist Liberation Theology in a new and global garb — the same liberation theology repudiated by the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1984 and 1986.

In a speech, “Protecting Human Life and Dignity: Promoting a Just Economy,” which Turkson delivered at the Social Ministry Gathering in Washington, D.C., February 13-16, 2011, the cardinal said the following:

The first step is surely to face the difficulties of the present time, not with ready-made answers or simplistic (/simplifying) ideologies, but with a realistic attitude and with discernment. [...] In order to confront the problems of our world we must first study them, we must learn to SEE them clearly and recognize what constitutes injustice at every level. ‘Seeing’ demands more than a glance based on presumptions of ideology or prejudice (even political affiliation: Republican or Democrat). Rather, using the available scientific tools, we must conduct a rigorous analysis of social conditions, their causes and interconnections, their effects, especially on the poor and marginalized, and the contemporary experiences of the People of God who struggle. Beside an empirical analysis, we make use of biblical insight, the tradition of our Church’s social teaching, theological reflection to ‘judge’ the situation described. And out of this effort – which sometimes entails solitary research but which often is a collaborative task – emerges a way forward and proposals of what to do and how to ‘act’.”

I humbly suggest that the good Cardinal Peter Turkson should take his own admonishments to heart and refrain from prescribing to the world the “simplistic/simplifying ideology” and “presumptions” of Marxism.

I will now end this post with this last little nugget:

St. Malachy (1094-1148), the first Irish saint in the Catholic Church, prophesied that the last pope would be one “Peter the Roman”:

“In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church there will reign Petrus Romanus, who will feed his flock amid many tribulations; after which the seven-hilled city will be destroyed and the dreadful Judge will judge the people. The End.” 

UPDATE (Nov. 21, 2011):

10 days after The Note was issued, the Vatican’s Secretariat of State convened a special meeting in which the Roman Catholic Church’s Secretary of the State Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone effectively denounced The Note. For details, go to my post.

~Eowyn

Secret plan by Eurocrats to abolish Britain

I want to ask you a hypothetical question. Please take seriously the question and use your intelligence to answer the question.

Let’s say you want to create a one-world government. How would you go about doing that?

My answer is that it would make sense to do the following:

1. Gather like-minded people to formulate a plan. The planners should include the political-economic-cultural elites from the world’s most powerful countries for the simple reason that those are the people who, being powerful, can either (a) thwart the plan; or (b) help see the plan’s implementation to fruition.

2. It is always better, from cost-benefit calculation, that instead of using force to coerce, that the people of the world willingly embrace one-world government.

3. To do that, they would need be persuaded, brainwashed, indoctrinated, and frightened into not just acquiescing but wanting a one-world government.

4. The tools of persuasion should include the notion that humanity is confronted with problems of such a scale and scope (Global Warming! Climate Change! Over-population! Global Financial Crisis! Imminent Economic Collapse!) that only a unified coordinated response by all humanity will do. That means the world’s many countries and governments will have to join together and become one.

5. Obviously, a one-world government can’t be created overnight. Logically, a stepping stone toward that eventuality should be the amalgamation of separate countries and governments into regional entities, such as an European Union (EU) and a North American Union.

Well, surprise, surprise! We do have such a group of like-minded elites! And the group did formulate a plan!

It’s called the Club of Rome (see Sagebrush’s post, “Super Nation#5: Eurasia“). Here’s the Club’s current map of the 10 Super Nations that should/will be formed from the current 207 sovereign states or countries in the world:

It is that context that makes the following news alarming.

Macer Hall reports for Express.co.uk, May 4, 2012, that a group of senior Eurocrats are secretly plotting to replace current President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy with a super-powerful EU president who will move to abolish ­Britain as a sovereign state. In effect, Britain will be ruled from Brussels, not London.

Express.co.uk is not some crackpot supermarket tabloid, but the home site of the Daily and Sunday Express — well-established and reputable UK newspapers. Express’ source for this plan is Lord David Stoddart, an independent Labour politician in the UK, unaffiliated with the Labour Party.


European Council President Herman Van Rompuy at an EU summit

Here are excerpts from Macer Hall’s article:

Senior Eurocrats are secretly plotting to create a super-powerful EU president to realise their dream of abolishing ­Britain, we can reveal.

A covert group of EU foreign ministers has drawn up plans for merging the jobs currently done by Herman Van Rompuy, president of the European Council, and Jose Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission.

The new bureaucrat, who would not be directly elected by voters, is set to get sweeping control over the entire EU and force member countries into ever-greater political and economic union.

Tellingly, the UK has been excluded from the confidential discussions within the shady “Berlin Group” of Europhile politicians, spearheaded by German foreign minister Guido Westerwelle.

Opponents fear the plan could create a modern-day equivalent of the European emperor envisaged by Napoleon Bonaparte or a return to the Holy Roman Empire of Charlemagne that dominated Europe in the Dark Ages.

They are concerned that David Cameron’s coalition Government is doing nothing to prevent the sinister plot. The secret talks were uncovered by Independent Labour peer Lord Stoddart of Swindon. “This is a plot by people who want to abolish nation states and create a United States of Europe,” he said. “The whole thing is barmy. These people are determined to achieve their final objective.”

Tory backbench MP Douglas Carswell said: “It doesn’t matter how you arrange the offices of these technocrats, they are useless at arranging our lives for us and they are not elected so they have no legitimacy. “My worry is that the president will end up having the charisma of Van Rompuy and the economic management skills of Barroso.”

Euro-MP Paul Nuttall, of the UK Independence Party, said: “This is a truly ridiculous idea that must never be allowed to happen. It sounds as if they are trying to go back to the days of the Holy Roman Emperor.”

[...] Supporters of the move believe that the rival presidencies are undermining the EU’s ability to speak with a single voice. They argue that merging the two jobs will create a powerful European leader who is capable of pursuing the federalist dream of a united Europe which has been severely shaken by the eurozone crisis.

Lord Stoddart confirmed the existence of the plot thanks to a parliamentary written answer in the House of Lords. He asked Foreign Office ministers to reveal what they knew about the merger talks.

In response to his inquiry, Tory Foreign Office minister Lord Howell of Guildford said: “We are aware of one group of EU foreign ministers meeting on an informal basis to discuss a variety of issues related to the future governance of the EU. While the UK is not part of that group, we understand that one idea under discussion is a merger of the positions of president of the European Council and president of the European Commission.”

[...] Lord Stoddart said: “These sorts of informal discussions within the EU have a habit of rapidly being transferred into formal proposals. Since the [British] Government is not party to these discussions, its reservations are academic. Such a merger would represent a massive shift of power into the hands of a single, unelected bureaucrat. The Government should be taking this far more seriously and voicing its objections very strongly. The holder of this new office would be both Europe’s political and administrative leader, giving them far more powers than those given to the US president.

~Eowyn

CFR – How To End Terrorism – Get Rid Of Cash

Watch CFR member and CNBC anchor -  Erin Burnett’s giddy excitement over the wonderful possibilities (including biometric Id) of getting rid of cash globally.  It’s the only way to stop terrorists, you know.  After all – those silly Syrians don’t want a CFR controlled central bank.  Never mind about the Biblical mandate to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ over the whole world.   It’s more important to bring the turbulent  Muslim nations into “compliance.”   Then we will all live together peacefully in utopian sustainable cities. Doesn’t that sound nice?  No money, no cars, no religion . . .

Did you know the CFR has their very own youtube channel?  Everything you ever wanted to know – except the truth about what they really are.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

“There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international…network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies…but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”
+++
Even talk show host Rush Limbaugh, an outspoken critic of anyone claiming a push for global government, said on his February 7, 1995 program:”You see, if you amount to anything in Washington these days, it is because you have been plucked or handpicked from an Ivy League school — Harvard,Yale, Kennedy School of Government — you’ve shown an aptitude to be a good Ivy League type, and so you’re plucked so-to-speak, and you are assigned success. You are assigned a certain role in government somewhere, and then your success is monitored and tracked, and you go where the pluckers and the handpickers can put you.”
+++
On May 4, 1993, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) president Leslie Gelb said on
The Charlie Rose Show
that:”…you [Charlie Rose] had me on [before] to talk about the New World Order! I talk about it all the time. It’s one world now. The Council [CFR] can find,nurture, and begin to put people in the kinds of jobs this country needs. And that’s going to be one of the major enterprises of the Council under me.”
+++
Previous CFR chairman, John J. McCloy (1953-70), actually said they have been doing this since the 1940s (and before). The thrust towards global government can be well-documented but at the end of the twentieth century it does not look like a traditional conspiracy in the usual sense of a secret cabal of evil men meeting clandestinely behind closed doors. Rather, it is a “networking” of like-minded individuals in high places to achieve a common goal, as described in Marilyn Ferguson’s 1980insider classic,
The Aquarian Conspiracy

[Dennis Cuddy]  History of the CFR

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 36And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.

 37Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.

 38But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.

Daniel 11: 36-38

sage

Tupac “rises” from the dead and Project Blue Beam

Have you heard of Project Blue Beam?

In 1994, Serge Monast, a Canadian investigative journalist, claimed that he had received information about a secret project of NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) and the United Nations to manipulate public opinion in order to put in place a one-world government and religion, with the Antichrist at its head.

According to Monast, this Project Blue Beam (PBB) has four steps.

The first step is to engineer artificially-created earthquakes at certain precise locations on Earth, which will lead to supposedly new archaeological discoveries that will discredit all religions, especially Christianity.

The second step is a gigantic “space show” — a laser projection from satellites of three-dimensional optical holograms and sounds, to different parts of the world. Each geographical region of the world will receive a different “god” image according to that area’s predominant religion. This new “god” — the new messiah Maitreya — will speak in all languages. He will be the “god” of a one-world New Age religion.

Monast is dismissed as a conspiracy-theorist crackpot. Whether Project Blue Beam is real or a product of Monast’s fevered imagination, it is sobering to know that the technology for Step Two’s gigantic space show is within reach, judging by what happened at the recent 3-day Coachella Music Festival in Indio, California.

Here’s TMZ’s account:

Tupac came back to life this weekend … as a hologram … and it was frickin’ AMAZING!!!.

Pac was resurrected for the Coachella music festival in California … and “performed” a couple of his greatest hits … including “2 of Amerikaz Most Wanted” with Snoop Dogg.

We’re told the crowd went INSANE … especially when 2pac first appeared to the crowd … rising up from the ground until he was standing on the stage.

The movements were remarkably lifelike … grabbing his crotch and pointing his mic to the crowd like the good ole days.

At the end of his performance, a light shines on Pac … and he dissipates into thin air.

Pretty insane … especially for the “partiers” in the crowd … who didn’t realize it was a hologram.

Tupac Shakur was a best-selling American rapper who was involved with the Black Panthers and feuded with East-coast rappers and music producers. On September 7, 1996, Shakur was shot four times in Las Vegas, Nevada, and died six days later. His death raised him to near-idol status.

Now see Tupac “rising from the dead” for yourself (WARNING: many F-words):

Here’s another mind-bending holographic light show:

As for Serge Monast, his early and sudden death has added to his credibility. From Wikipedia:

By 1995 and 1996, Monast said he was being hunted by the police and authorities for involvement in “networks of prohibited information.” He had homeschooled his two children, who were then taken away and made wards of the state in September 1996 so that they would receive a public education. He died of a heart attack in his home in December 1996, at age 51, the day after being arrested and spending a night in jail. His followers claim his death was suspicious, suggesting he was assassinated by “psychotronic weapons” to keep from continuing his investigations.

~Eowyn

Obama’s Science Czar Wants Global Police to Enforce Depopulation

Margaret Sanger, eugenicist and abortion-advocate

The Eugenics Movement – the “science” that advocates certain practices to improve the genetic composition of the human population — was widely popular in the early decades of the 20th century.

In the United States, the chief proponent of eugenics was the American Eugenics Society, established in 1922. One of its members was Margaret Sanger, an avowed socialist and the founder of the abortion-mill Planned Parenthood.

By the late 20th century, eugenics had fallen into disfavor, having become associated with Nazi eugenics — Hitler’s racially-based social policies that aimed at preserving and improving the purity of the Aryan race through the sterilization and extermination of those identified as “life unworthy of life, including but not limited to the criminal, degenerate, dissident, feeble-minded, homosexual, idle, insane and the weak.

But eugenics didn’t really go away. Its proponents merely went underground, taking on other guises.

They walk among us today as the Rockefellers, the UN’s Agenda 21, the enigmatic Georgia Guidestones, and Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren.

In a 1977 textbook, Holdren advocated the formation of a one-world government that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures to depopulate the world.

Judge Obama by the company he keeps.

~Eowyn

Obama walks with John Holdren, Director of the Wnite House's Office of Science and Technology Policy

The Elite’s Plan for Global Extermination Exposed by Dr. Webster Tarpley

Infowars.com – June 19, 2011

Historian and author Webster Tarpley exposes how White House science czar John P. Holdren, who infamously co-wrote a 1977 textbook in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children, is a Malthusian fanatic in the tradition of the arcane anti-human ideology that originated amongst British aristocracy in the 19th century.

Holdren calls himself a “neo-Malthusian” in his own book, and as Tarpley explains, is a historical pessimist who has rejected the idea that America and humanity as a whole can progress through ingenuity, industry and economic growth. Instead, Holdren sees humankind as a cancer upon the earth. Holdren wants to set up a “Science Court,” where potential developments could be blocked by government decree if they don’t conform to the planned society necessary under Holdren’s “planetary regime”. He also seeks to institute “de-development” worldwide to prevent the third world from ever lifting itself out of poverty and roll things back to “pre-industrial civilization” where average life spans would not be much more than 30 years.

Holdren’s co-author, Paul Ehrlich, is a discredited crank who wrote books in the 70′s claiming that England would not exist as a land mass by the year 2000 because of climate change. As Tarpley explains, Ehrlich’s warning of a “population bomb” has proven incorrect, with population in Europe, Japan and the United States falling when immigration is removed from the equation.

Go HERE to watch the interview.

H/t beloved fellow Joseph.