Tag Archives: jihad

US helps in fight between Christians and Muslims in Africa. Read between the lines.

HAGEL ORDERS AIRLIFT FOR CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC

BY LOLITA C. BALDOR – ASSOCIATED PRESS

DOHA, Qatar (AP) — Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has ordered the U.S. military to transport troops from Burundi into the Central African Republic to help quell the latest upsurge in violence there.

Hagel approved the order after speaking with French Minister of Defense Jean-Yves Le Drian Monday night from Afghanistan where he was visiting troops. Le Drian asked the U.S. to help get African troops quickly into the country to prevent the violence there from spreading, said Pentagon spokesman Carl Woog.

There are more than 1,000 French troops in the Central African Republic, where more than 400 people were killed in two days of violence last week between Christians and Muslims. Christian armed fighters oppose the Muslim ex-rebels now in charge of the former French colony… 

Story continues at: Associated Press

Notice the clever wording about who’s fighting who? Armed Christians fighting Muslim “ex-rebels now in charge“?

Hmmm… what might this tortured syntax tell us about who we’re actually supporting? Associated Press seems to be trying to avoid telling us that once again, American military assets are supporting jihadists in the removal of those pesky Christians. Also, they most certainly don’t want to tell us that the jihadists are doing so by the usual methods, like beheading children. In honor of AP’s double-talk, I’m posting Shrek’s Pinocchio at his lying best. ~ TD

Here’s the nature of islam in Indonesia, where Barack Obama went to school.

This article was posted on AtlasShrugs.com

Barack Obama as a child in Indonesia

Barack Obama as a child in Indonesia

ISLAMIC JIHAD IN INDONESIA

jihad_001The price for being a Christian…. in Indonesia…and soon to be  Malaysia (allegedly reported in the local daily news yesterday and today.)

Death for abandoning (lapsing) Muslims and for Christians who preach in Malay.

Indonesia. An Islamic democracy. Is Islam compatible with democracy? These pictures were forwarded to me from a friend who knows a Christian in Indonesia……I cannot reveal too much or I will jeopardize the lives of those that smuggled these pics out. I am running them beneath the fold as they are too graphic to run on the main page. I am running them so the world will know and see that Indonesians are NOT the friend of anyone who is not Muslim.

To read the whole article on AtlasShrugs.com, go here: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2006/11/islamic_jihad_i.html

Please also check out: Irish respond to muslim invasion

UPDATE November 20: These pictures are from the late nineties early zeros. There is more background  on them here. They are horrible proof of the torture and oppression Christians suffer at the hands of Muslims in Indonesia. Whether it was yesterday or six years ago, the brutality, the horror is the same. It is happening as we speak. This latest beheading in Indonesia was just  last week here. So while these pictures are from a few years ago, the practice continues apace.

Beheaded girls were Ramadan ‘trophies’ The Australian
November 9 2006

THREE Christian high school girls were beheaded as a Ramadan “trophy” by Indonesian militants who conceived the idea after a visit to Philippines jihadists, a court heard yesterday.

The girls’ severed heads were dumped in plastic bags in their village in Indonesia’s strife-torn Central Sulawesi province, along with a handwritten note threatening more such attacks.

The note read: “Wanted: 100 more Christian heads, teenaged or adult, male or female; blood shall be answered with blood, soul with soul, head with head.”

And it continues, just this past September, Indonesian Catholics were put to death by firing squad amid doubts of guilt.

And last September , three Christian girls were beheaded walking home from school here (warning GRAPHIC PICTURES.) September 2005

A terrible crime has been committed in Poso, in Central Sulawasi, Indonesia, which for several years has seen sectarian violence against the Christian minority. Thugs have beheaded 3 Christian 16 year old girls walking back from school. This Voice of America report tells how the anti-Christian violence has attracted Islamic militants to Sulawasi. GRAPHIC PICTURES WARNING  

More here. So what follows are photos from the late 1990s before the US went into Afghanistan and Iraq. Here we have Christian girls beheaded in Indonesia late last year. And here we have more Christian girls beheaded last week with the promise of more. It’s the jihad.

The girls’ severed heads were dumped in plastic bags in their village in Indonesia’s strife-torn Central Sulawesi province, along with a handwritten note threatening more such attacks.

The note read: “Wanted: 100 more Christian heads, teenaged or adult, male or female; blood shall be answered with blood, soul with soul, head with head.” More here

These pictures depict the cruel, oppressive existence that non Muslims live under in Islamic countries. No matter how the left twists and squirms to rationalize, this is the ugly truth. And the barbarism continues before the US intervened and after.

There are graphic pictures should you click on the link on the bottom of this post (the link that says “click to continue”), consider yourself warned.

****THESE ARE GRAPHIC ********VIOLENT PICTURES. ****

*******WARNING WARNING WARNING**********

******* BEHEADINGS**** VIOLENT PICS******GRAPHIC*******

 

jihad_010 jihad_009 jihad_008 jihad_007 jihad_006 jihad_005 jihad_004 jihad_003

Irish respond to muslim invasion

A violent letter has been sent to the mosques and schools of Ireland. We at FOTM do not support violence, but are aware of muslim intimidations against all free people. Some Irish have decided to turn the tide of the muslim invasion, and betrayed by their elected leaders, have issued a stark warning.

The Irish Resistance

The Irish Resistance

Irish Citizens Stand Against Muslim Invasion

Posted by:  Posted date: November 27, 2013 
irish-islam-letter

Many Muslims in Ireland are shocked by a letter posted to schools and mosques declaring a war against them. They should be shocked that it has taken as long as it has for people across the world to start standing up against their campaign of intimidation.

Gutless politicians don’t stand with the people anymore. In seemingly every country across the globe, the political positions are occupied by self-serving, pandering wimps. This letter is clearly born out of a frustration with a lack of positive action on the part of government officials and a willingness of the Irish to defend their nation by taking matters into their own hands. After all, the people are the ones who are chiefly affected, not the bureaucrats.

The anonymous letter has made the rounds of Muslim schools and mosques in Dublin.

While the Muslim groups have and will try to negatively label it otherwise, it is a call to arms for the Irish citizens to recognize the impact of the invasion and the deliberate efforts to supplant the Irish people, their culture, and their traditions with Islam and Sharia law.

The language of the letter is described as intimidating and extremely violent. The obvious neglect to mention the Islamic violence is so outlandish that it is barely deserving of a comment.

A rapid, demanding and threatening spread across the world towards their caliphate is a much publicized goal of Islam. Yet the non-Muslim citizens of the world still continue to ignore the truths that the Islamists themselves acknowledge.

To read the rest of this article in its natural habitat, go to the following link: http://freepatriot.org/2013/11/27/irish-citizens-stand-muslim-invasion/

Again, FOTM does not promote violence. This is an article about one response in Ireland to the muslim invasion of their Christian nation. Jesus died for all who will turn to Him, including muslims. He wants to save them as much as He wants to save us. The letter spoken of here is poorly worded, violent, and reminiscent of the long conflict between Catholics and Protestants in that country. But people in this tiny island nation are feeling their backs to the wall, and recognize the mortal threat they are facing from jihadists moving into their country, demanding Christian statues be removed nation wide. 

So I put out a question.
How should the Irish respond? ~TD

 Update: In answer to a muslim commenter , yn, from Indonesia, I found materials that need their own post. YN asserted that islam doesn’t force anyone to convert. The link below contains information about Indonesian muslims.

Here’s the nature of islam in Indonesia, where Barack Obama went to school

 Update: As the debate continues on whether we should be more soft and understanding toward the muslims, Obama’s secret jihadists continue their hideous murder spree in Syria.

Prayer needed: Muslim jihadists attack, loot, kill Christians in Syria

U.S. imam: Muslims can take the property of Christians and Jews

Dr. Eowyn:

What this imam preaches about Muslims having the right to take the property (and life) of Christians is consistent with I’ve read in their Koran. This imam is not some looney-tune in the Middle East. He teaches religious studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee! God help us.
.
~Dr. Eowyn

Originally posted on Consortium of Defense Analysts:

Yasir Qadhi

Yasir Qadhi (aka Abu Ammaar Yasir Kazi) is an American imam and college professor who is described by a 2011 New York Times Magazine essay as “one of the most influential conservative clerics in American Islam.”

Born in Houston, Texas, to Pakistani parents, Qadhi spent his formative years in Saudi Arabia, having graduated from high school in Jeddah, after which he returned to the United States to pursue a B. Sc. in chemical engineering from the University of Houston, followed by a doctoral degree in theology at Yale University. Qadhi is presently a faculty member in the Religious Studies Department of Rhodes College, in Memphis, Tennessee.

Qadhi gives regular sermons and lectures, and also appears on a number of Islamic satellite channels in the U.S., U.K., Egypt, and India.

In his sermon/lecture in the YouTube audio below, Qadhi begins by calling Christians “shirk” for being “polythesists” who believe in the Triune God (three persons in one…

View original 1,192 more words

Genocide

Just when I need to focus on my work, here comes a muslim, murdering people to please his god. ~TD

WND EXCLUSIVE

MUSLIM ACCUSED OF BEHEADING 2 CHRISTIANS IN U.S.

persecution of faithful no longer reserved for Islamic nations

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/muslim-accused-of-beheading-2-christians-in-u-s/#IIDU7o9hc8LGwK1E.99

by BOB UNRUH

Authorities in New Jersey allege a Muslim man beheaded two Coptic Christians, burying their bodies and heads and hands in separate graves near Philadelphia, bringing the horror of the persecution of Christians in Islamic nations to the United States.

According to New York’s WABC-TV, the Muslim was identified as Yusuf Ibrahim, 28. He was taken into custody after the bodies were found.

The report said investigators alleged Ibrahim killed the victims then severed their heads and hands, and buried the remains in the back yard of a home in Buena Vista, N.J.

The report said the victims were from the Coptic Christian community in the area. One of the victims had come from Egypt not many years ago.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/muslim-accused-of-beheading-2-christians-in-u-s/#IIDU7o9hc8LGwK1E.99

11 Days After Benghazi, Jihad Was Proclaimed on the Streets of New York

Hate and Intolerance for America was on parade September 23, 2012, at the NYC Muslim Day Parade.

One of the more disturbing parts of the Muslim Day Parade was the proud display of the Islamic Black Flag of Jihad visible throughout the event. The Black Flag of Jihad was hoisted above our overrun embassies in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, etc… The Jihadist’s pulled down and burned the American flag and replaced it with the Islamic Black Flag of Jihad as a symbol of dominance and military victory.

The hatred and intolerance for the United States of America, the Islamic Black Flag of Jihad represents, sent a clear and chilling signal to all supporters of America in attendance. I wish there were some Muslims at the parade who were equally offended, If there were they did not make their voices heard.

The President of the Muslim Day Parade, Dr. Shafi Bezar, saw these black flags of Jihad on display and did nothing to stop this offensive display of intolerance. Dr. Bezar owes the City of New York an apology and an explanation.

NY State Democratic Senator Tony Avella was so offended by the speeches coming off the main stage he left in disgust before he even had a chance to speak. We congratulate and support Senator Tony Avella’s standing up for American ideals and values.

The NYC Muslim Parade Committee have their 1st Amendment rights to spew their anti American political agenda. However, we at The United West have an obligation to expose this type of hateful pro Islamist political agenda.

We call on Mayor Michael Bloomberg to condemn the hate and intolerance shown for America at this years Muslim Day Parade. We demand Dr. Shafi Bezar, the parade planners, and staff attend a mandatory sensitivity training class and sign a letter of apology to the people of New York.

God Bless America and God Bless Our Troops

One Team One Fight

The United West 

  http://theunitedwest.org/

H/T  Kelleigh

Sodomy widens your anus for Jihad!

You just can’t make this stuff up.

A Muslim cleric (of the Shiite sect) is captured on video, saying that a special Wahhabi¹ fatwa² sanctions sodomy as a method of jihad³ because it widens a man’s anus, thereby making the cavity capacious enough for the insertion of explosive capsules!

[Notes:
1. The Wahhabi is an extremist Muslim school-of-thought, based in Saudi Arabia, which claims Osama bin Laden as one of its acolytes.
2. A fatwa is a juristic ruling concerning Islamic law issued by an Islamic scholar, of whom there are droves, with the force of law.
3. Jihad is Islam's holy war against infidels.]

Here’s the video of London-based Shiite cleric Abdallah Al-Khilaf making the incredible pronouncement on Fadak TV, posted to YouTube on June 16, 2012:

Here’s a transcript of what the cleric said, provided by MEMRI:

Abdallah Al-Khilaf: First, we’d like to show you a fatwa, which appeared on the Lions of Sunna Internet forum. One Wahhabi wrote: “Dear Sheik, may Allah grant you martyrdom and black-eyed virgins in Paradise, I wanted to commit a martyrdom operation. I turned to Sheik Abu Dimaa Al-Qassab, who told me that they had invented a new and unprecedented form of martyrdom operations – explosive capsules are inserted into your anus. In order to train for this method of Jihad, you must consent to being sodomized for a period of time, so that your anus becomes wider, making room for the explosives. My question is whether I am permitted to allow one of the mujahideen access to my anus, if my intentions are honorable, and the purpose is to train for Jihad by widening my anus.”

The sheik praised Allah and said: “In principle, sodomy is forbidden. However, Jihad is more important. It is the pinnacle of Islam. If sodomy is the only way to reach this pinnacle of Islam, then there is no harm in it. The rule is that necessity makes the forbidden permissible. Something that is required in order to perform a duty becomes a duty in and of itself. No duty takes precedence over Jihad. Therefore, you must be sodomized… After you have been sodomized, you must ask Allah for forgiveness. Know, my son, that Allah resurrects the mujahideen on Judgment Day on the basis of their intentions. Allah willing, your intention is to support Islam. May Allah include you among those who heed His call.”

This is the fatwa that led a man a while ago to carry out a bombing attack against then Interior Minister Naif bin Abd Al-Aziz [sic]….”

PatriotActionNetwork. says the cleric now says it’s all a lie concocted by Israeli Jews even though we have the loony cleric on video!

Thanks to FOTM’s BritCapitalist and our inimitable Terry for bringing this stunning video to our attention!

~Eowyn

Jihad Jimmy Slams Obama for the One Thing He is Doing Right

The one bright spot in what otherwise has been the most dismal, not to mention dangerous presidency in American history has been Obama’s willingness to continue to arrange meetings between 7th Century, bass-ackward illiterate camel-washers, and Allah.

I have to admit, even if half-grudgingly, this is the one thing Obama has gotten right – regardless of his motives.

Now along comes Jimmy Carter, the 39th POTUS, and the person I hold responsible for rekindling the 14 century-long Jihad that had pretty much laid dormant since WWI.

Apparently, Jimmy Earl is most displeased with Obama’s use of drones to dispatch the Jihadists to Hell:

Via  independent.co.uk:

Carter attacks Obama over assassinations and drone attacks

David Usborne  Wednesday 27 June 2012

Former president Jimmy Carter has blasted the United States for anti-terror strategies such as targeting individuals for assassination and using unmanned drones to bomb suspected targets, saying they directly flout the basic tenets of universal human rights and foment anti-US sentiment.

In an article written for the New York Times headlined “A Cruel and Unusual Record”, Mr Carter, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for his work trying to resolve conflicts around the globe, suggested that the US is in violation of 10 of the 30 articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is a rare attack by a former commander-in-chief on a sitting President – especially of the same party.

While Mr Carter does not name President Obama, there is little disguising that he is the principle target of his stinging words. Recent weeks have seen a slew of media reports detailing how Mr Obama has grown increasingly dependent on drones to take out suspected terror cells and describing how he has the final word to approve names on a “hit-list” of most-wanted terror suspects overseas for assassination. “Revelations that top officials are targeting people to be assassinated, including American citizens, are only the most recent, disturbing proof of how far our nation’s violation of human rights has extended,” Mr Carter wrote, concluding that the US is “abandoning its role as the global champion of human rights”.

In the past, Mr Carter, 87, has meted out similar criticisms, most notably George W Bush. This latest assault is embarrassing for Mr Obama as it will serve as a reminder that he specifically pledged to adjust America’s posture in the war on terror. He began by banning interrogation techniques he considered to be torture, such as water-boarding, and by closing down Guantanamo Bay. On the latter, of course, he has failed to deliver.

It is poignant, moreover, that both men are Peace Prize winners. Critics believe Mr Obama has proved himself unworthy of the honour which he received soon after taking office. His supporters believe however that he has pre-empted criticism of his foreign policy performance. Under his watch, Osama bin Laden has been killed and much of the top echelons of al-Qa’ida have been gutted.

-End 

James Earl Carter was defeated in one of the most lopsided presidential elections in the history of elections.

Thirty-two years hence, I still do not think he gets it.

-Dave

(h/t: Drudge)

How to solve the problem of Islam

Answer: Get every Muslim to be a suicide bomb instructor!

H/t Joseph

~Eowyn

Was Islam’s founder Muhammad a real man or an invention?

Robert Spencer is an authority on Islam and the author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. He is also the director of Jihad Watch.

In his new book Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins, Spencer asks if Muhammad was a real man or a later invention by those who had fashioned an Arab empire via wars and conquer.

Writing in American Thinker, April 23, 2012, Spencer makes a case for Muhammad being more fictive than real:

Why would it matter if Muhammad never existed?  Certainly the accepted story of Islam’s origins is taken for granted as historically accurate; while many don’t accept Muhammad’s claim to have been a prophet, few doubt that there was a man named Muhammad who in the early seventh century began to claim that he was receiving messages from Allah through the angel Gabriel. [...]

Yet the numerous indications that the standard account of Muhammad’s life is more legend than fact actually have considerable implications for the contemporary political scene. These are just a few of the weaknesses in the traditional account of Muhammad’s life and the early days of Islam:

  • No record of Muhammad’s reported death in 632 appears until more than a century after that date.
  • The early accounts written by the people the Arabs conquered never mention Islam, Muhammad, or the Qur’an.  They call the conquerors “Ishmaelites,” “Saracens,” “Muhajirun,” and “Hagarians,” but never “Muslims.”
  • The Arab conquerors, in their coins and inscriptions, don’t mention Islam or the Qur’an for the first six decades of their conquests.  Mentions of “Muhammad” are non-specific and on at least two occasions are accompanied by a cross.  The word can be used not only as a proper name, but also as an honorific.
  • The Qur’an, even by the canonical Muslim account, was not distributed in its present form until the 650s.  Casting into serious doubt that standard account is the fact that neither the Arabians nor the Christians and Jews in the region mention its existence until the early eighth century.
  • We don’t begin to hear about Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, and about Islam itself until the 690s, during the reign of the caliph Abd al-Malik.  Coins and inscriptions reflecting Islamic beliefs begin to appear at this time also.
  • In the middle of the eighth century, the Abbasid dynasty supplanted the Umayyad line of Abd al-Malik.  In the Abbasid period, biographical material about Muhammad began to proliferate.  The first complete biography of the prophet of Islam finally appeared during this era-at least 125 years after the traditional date of his death.

The lack of confirming detail in the historical record, the late development of biographical material about the Islamic prophet, the atmosphere of political and religious factionalism in which that material developed, and much more, suggest that the Muhammad of Islamic tradition did not exist, or if he did, he was substantially different from how that tradition portrays him.

How to make sense of all this?  If the Arab forces that conquered so much territory beginning in the 630s were not energized by the teachings of a new prophet and the divine word he delivered, how did the Islamic character of their empire arise at all?  If Muhammad did not exist, why was it ever considered necessary to invent him?

Every empire of the day had a civic religion.  The Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire was Christian.  Its rival Persia, meanwhile, was Zoroastrian.  The Arab Empire quickly controlled and needed to unify huge expanses of territory where different religions predominated.  The empire was growing quickly, soon rivaling the Byzantine and Persian Empires in size and power.  But at first, it did not have a compelling political theology to compete with those it supplanted and to solidify its conquests.  It needed a common religion — a political theology that would provide the foundation for the empire’s unity and secure allegiance to the state.

Toward the end of the seventh century and the beginning of the eighth, the leaders of the Muslim world began to speak specifically about Islam, its prophet, and eventually its book.  Stories about Muhammad began to circulate.  A warrior-prophet would justify the new empire’s aggressive expansionism.  To give those conquests a theological justification — as Muhammad’s teachings and example do — would place them beyond criticism.
This is why Islam developed as such a profoundly political religion.  Islam is a political faith: the divine kingdom is very much of this world, with God’s wrath and judgment to be expected not only in the next life, but also in this one, to be delivered by believers.  Allah says in the Qur’an: “As for those disbelieving infidels, I will punish them with a terrible agony in this world and the next. They have no one to help or save them” (3:56).  Allah also exhorts Muslims to wage war against those infidels, apostates, and polytheists (2:191, 4:89, 9:5, 9:29).

There is compelling reason to conclude that Muhammad, the messenger of Allah came into existence only after the Arab Empire was firmly entrenched and casting about for a political theology to anchor and unify it.  Muhammad and the Qur’an cemented the power of the Umayyad caliphate and then that of the Abbasid caliphate.

This is not just academic speculation.  The non-Muslim world can be aided significantly in its understanding of the global jihad threat — an understanding that has been notably lacking even at the highest levels since September 11, 2001 — by a careful, unbiased examination of the origins of Islam.  There is a great deal of debate today in the United States and Western Europe about the nature of Islamic law; anti-sharia measures have been proposed in at least twenty states, and one state — Oklahoma — voted to ban sharia in November 2010, although that law was quickly overturned as an infringement upon Muslims’ religious freedom.  Others have been successfully resisted on the same grounds.

If it is understood that the political aspect of Islam preceded the religious aspect, that might change.  But that will happen only if a sufficient number of people are willing to go wherever the truth my take them.

~Eowyn