Boston Bombing. The Case Of The Missing Pinky.

Ok troops so they run this race today, and all is well. Nothing goes BOOM!. Now let’s go back to last year and let us follow up on Dr. Eowyn’s post of this morning HERE. 

She mentions that bombing victim Jeff Bauman ( Wheelchair dude) looks so much like former U.S. Army officer Lt. Nick Vogt who lost his legs in the Afghan war. B1

(So let’s see if we can sort this out. I poked around and found this great page where this guy has done some amazing work,)

OK I’ll be referring to 2 Jeff Bauman’s.

1. The “Jeff Bauman” in those famous news photos at the scene of the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing with his bloody legs reduced to stumps, supposedly “blown off” by the bomb explosion. Let’s call him Marathon Jeff.
2. The “Jeff Bauman” supposedly “in recovery” in the hospital, and the recipient of charity donations. Let’s call him Donation Jeff.

(My comments are in purple Rest is taken from site)

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/bostonbombingdidyouthink20apr13.shtml

—————————————————————————————————

[Note from Ken Adachi: I cropped the head of the Army amputee shown above. Is "Jeff Bauman" the same individual seen in each head crop photo shown? Note the matching ascending hairline on the right side of the face between Lt. Nick Vogt and the Boston Marathon wheelchair guy

Lt. Nick Vogt

Lt. Nick Vogt

Jeff Bauman in hospital

Jeff Bauman in hospital

  Jeff Bauman in wheel chair 1

Jeff Bauman in wheel chair 1

 Lt. Nick Vogt, "Wounded Warrior"

Lt. Nick Vogt, “Wounded Warrior”

OK, now go to link , and there are like 5 other groups of side by sides. Ear, hair, mustache, etc.      Just too many to post here. And they do a very good job with explanations. Not being lazy, it’s just that I can’t get the pic’s to lay side by side for good comparison.   Don’t forget to come back.  LOL Or scroll down for the “Home Run” shot first.

   http://educate-yourself.org/cn/bostonbombingdidyouthink20apr13.shtml

Smoking Gun!!

(Now this is new to me and a home run)

 The Missing Left Hand Pinky Finger of the April 15 “Jeff Bauman” (and Lt. Nick Vogt) versus the Left Hand of “Donations Jeff Bauman”

The most damning evidence proving that the Boston Marathon “Jeff Bauman” and the “Donations Jeff Bauman” are two different people is the absence of the left hand pinky finger discovered in one video frame capture posted at http://imgur.com/a/9MPLT/noscript and identified as “V7px8wa.” On April 27, 2013, I posted an enlarged photo of this incriminatinmg video frame capture as well as cropped enlargements of the left hand of Boston Marathon “Jeff Bauman”
Breakthrough Photo Enlargement: … (April 27, 2013)

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/breakthroughphotobaumanvogtriddle27apr13.shtml

You can see the original video frame capture at the above link, but I’ll reproduce the enlarged left hand crop here, along with photos of Lt. Nick Vogt’s missing left hand pinky finger, and the very much intact left hand fingers of our valiant hero/bombing survivor ‘Donations Jeff.’

No Pinky.

No Pinky.

OK, wanna see that up close?

OK, wanna see that up close?

We got a pinky

We got a pinky

Umm, anyone see my pinky?

Umm, anyone see my pinky?

“Jeff Bauman” is shown positioned on the ground in front of a black woman who is wearing a white T-shirt under her red coat. You can see “Jeff’s” left hand is clearly missing his pinky finger (seen against the white background of the woman’s T-shirt). Coincidentially, Army Lt. Nick Vogt, who bears a remarkable and uncannmy resemblence to the “Jeff Bauman” seen here, also has a missing pinky finger from his left hand.

Since the “Jeff Bauman” photographed in the hospital and shown in many photographs on the Jeff Bauman Donation web site, is seen to possess all of the fingers on his left hand, I think we can safely conclude that the guy seen in these photos of the April 15, 2013 Boston Marathon bombing scene, is not the same guy who has already collected over $724 thousand dollars in donations and postures himself as being the person seen in these photos.

Hey! They magically reattached my pinky. Wink wink, nudge nudge.

Hey! They magically reattached my pinky. Wink wink, nudge nudge.

~Steve~                              More to come..

H/T

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/breakthroughphotobaumanvogtriddle27apr13.shtml

 

Bundy’s beef with BLM is about Federal vs. State ownership of land in Nevada

Battle of BunkervilleCliven Bundy’s son, Ammon, at the standoff against the BLM — the Battle of Bunkerville.

In his long-standing dispute with the federal government over grazing fees, Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy consistently invokes states’ rights as his principle. From Bundy’s blog of April 21, 2012, stating his position:

the State of Nevada owns the lands pursuant to their NRS 321.596 et al statutes (Nevada Public Lands Ownership Act) enacted by Nevada back in the late 1970′s. All the western public lands states adopted this law back when it was called the “Sagebrush Rebellion”. The main component of this law (Public Lands Ownership) has yet to be adjudicated by the courts or by the US Supreme Court. This matter came to the forefront once in the court process and the then Nevada Attorney General filed away this issue by stipulating that the feds owned the public lands in Nevada. The court basically said it had no other choice but to rule in favor of the Feds. (US vs. Nye County). Bundy is following Nevada Law and holds that the 18 year old adverse decision against him that the BLM et al is using does not apply to him because he is not grazing on federal property. The State of Nevada has an obligation to enforce its own law on this matter. Therefore Bundy is not in contempt of any court order since he is not operating on federal property.

Bundy paid grazing fees to the rightful Landlord (Clark County-NV) back in the ’90′s and then they returned that payment to Bundy. […] Bundy still has the county check and he never intended to steal anything and stands ready to pay the rightful Landlord today just like he did back in the ’90′s.

The federal government claims ownership of as much as 80% of the land in the State of Nevada. How did that happen?

Martin Armstrong explains on his global financial markets forecasting site, Armstrong Economics, April 19, 2014:

The current land conflict in Nevada extends back to this event in 1864 and how the territory of Nevada became a state in order to push through a political agenda to create a majority vote. [...]

The “law” at the time in 1864 required that for a territory to become a state, the population had to be at least 60,000. At that time, Nevada had only about 40,000 people. So why was Nevada rushed into statehood in violation of the law of the day? When the 1864 Presidential election approached, there were special interests who were seeking to manipulate the elections to ensure Lincoln would win reelection. They needed another Republican congressional delegation that could provide additional votes for the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery. [...] Nevada’s entry would secure both the election [of Lincoln] and the three-fourths majority needed for the Thirteenth Amendment enactment.

The votes at the end of the day demonstrate that they never needed Nevada. Nonetheless, within the provisions of the Statehood Act of March 21, 1864 that brought Nevada into the voting fold, we see the source of the problem today. This Statehood Act retained the ownership of the land as a territory for the federal government. In return for the Statehood that was really against the law, the new state surrendered any right, title, or claim to the unappropriated public lands lying within Nevada. Moreover, this cannot be altered without the consent of the Feds. [...]

Republican Ronald Reagan had argued for the turnover of the control of such lands to the state and local authorities back in 1980. Clearly, the surrender of all claims to any land for statehood was illegal under the Constitution. This is no different from Russia seizing Crimea. The Supreme Court actually addressed this issue in Pollard’s Lessee v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 212 (1845) when Alabama became a state in 1845.[...]

The Pollard decision expressed a statement of constitutional law in dictum making it very clear that the Feds have no claim over the lands in Nevada. The Supreme Court states:

“The United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in and to the territory of which Alabama, or any of the new States, were formed, except for temporary purposes, and to execute the trusts created by the acts of the Virginia and Georgia legislatures, and the deeds of cession executed by them to the United States, and the trust created by the treaty of the 30th April, 1803, with the French Republic ceding Louisiana.”

So in other words, once a territory becomes a state, the Fed must surrender all claims to the land as if it were still just a possession or territory.

Sorry, but to all the left-wing commentators who call Bundy a tax-cheat and an outlaw, be careful of what you speak for the Supreme Court has made it clear in 1845 that the Constitution forbids the federal rangers to be out there to begin with for the Feds could not retain ownership of the territory and simultaneously grant state sovereignty. At the very minimum, it became state land – not federal.

~Eowyn

When Obama is your co-pilot . . .

A picture is worth a thousand words. LOL

Obamabot

H/t FOTM’s Miss May

~Eowyn

Did you know there are AMPUTEE crisis actors?

I woke up this morning to wall-to-wall TV news on today’s Boston Marathon and last year’s bombings.

That reminded me of something I had meant to post about last year:

Amputee Crisis Actors

Yes, Virginia. Not only are professional “crisis actors” used in government drills and mass trauma events, some of them are actual amputees!

There’s an outfit called Amputees in Action, which describes itself as:

“a unique agency, working independently to provide the UK’s largest directory of trained professional amputee actors for the film and screen industries and for emergency and military services training simulations, both home and abroad.

Our personnel use their personal trauma experiences to enable graphic realism that is second to none, and our team of special effects (SFX) make-up, moulage and prosthetic artists use cutting edge technology to enhance and extend the appearance and function of limb-loss scenarios.”

On its “Emergency Services” page, Amputees in Action (AIA) says:

Most of our personnel have lost limbs as a direct result of a trauma incident, and are able to bring their experiences to your simulation with unique insight and acting in the field, remaining in character throughout. [...] Our SFX experts enhance the  amputee experience, replicating injuries beyond leg and arm injuries. We also recreate traumas like head and facial wounds, eviscerated abdomens and groin wounds.

Here are some images of AIA’s amputee crisis actors:

Amputees in Action1Amputees in Action2Amputees in Action3Boston Bombing

Oops. The 4th picture (above) was of Boston Marathon Bombing victim Jeff Bauman, not an amputee crisis actor.

Wait.

Why does Jeff Bauman look so much like former U.S. Army officer Lt. Nick Vogt who lost his legs in the Afghan war?

Lt.-Nick-VogtH/t my bud Mark S. McGrew

For the posts FOTM has published on the Boston Marathon Bombings, go here.

See also:

~Eowyn

Painting the Resurrection

The Resurrection by Ron DiCianniFrom “The Resurrection” wall mural, by Ron DiCianni

Ron DiCianni is a Christian artist who dedicates his talents solely to the task of proclaiming the good news of the Gospel. His artwork has won him national recognition with  ABC, NBC, the  Smithsonian, and McDonalds, leading to a commission as official artist of the U.S. Olympic Committee for the Moscow  Olympic Games.

Ron DiCianniRon DiCianni

Given his accomplishments, one would think that DiCianni would merit an entry in Wikipedia. Not so.

Here’s a video of DiCianni describing and explaining his wall mural depicting our Lord’s resurrection from the dead.

H/t FOTM’s swampygirl

~Eowyn

Shameless ‘model’ who vowed to have an abortion so she could appear on Big Brother reveals the bump of the child who will never be born due to her quest for fame

sicko

DailyMail: An aspiring glamour model who said she wanted an abortion so she could appear on Big Brother has revealed her growing baby bump.

Jose Cunningham, 24, sparked outrage when she had a breast enlargement operation on the NSH. She is now four months pregnant after falling into a life of prostitution.

The aspiring model said she planned to abort the child to further her television career, adding: “This time next year I won’t have a baby. I’ll be famous instead.

Ms. Cunningham, from Leeds, said she had been on the shortlist to appear on Big Brother – but was reluctant to proceed because of her pregnancy.

She told the Sunday Mirror: “An abortion will further my career. This time next year I won’t have a baby.” Instead I’ll be famous, driving a bright pink Range Rover and buying a big house. Nothing will get in my way.”

She added: “I want to be famous for being me – Jose Cunningham, a glamour model in my own right. If I want to do that I need to put my career first.”

Ms. Cunningham has now posed in a series of photographs showing off her growing baby bump.

Ms. Cunningham posted a confusing message on Twitter to those criticizing her – which hinted she may be getting more surgery on the NHS. It read: “Thanks for strengthening my case for more cosmetic surgery on NHS! Proof that a certain feature affects my life.” 

Furthermore, as mothers-to-be are entitled to free dental care, Ms. Cunningham is said to be applying to receive a variety of procedures on the NHS. The shameless model is reportedly set to have root canal surgery, a dental implant, a filling, and her wisdom teeth removed.

Ms. Cunningham said she was pleased the NHS would be footing the bill for her dentistry. “I didn’t get pregnant to have my teeth sorted, but it’s a massive bonus,” she told The Sun.

“I’m sure people will be annoyed that I’m accepting this freebie but I couldn’t care less.” She said that she was annoyed the free dental care would only cover a silver filling, but added: “I guess beggars can’t be choosers”.

Ms. Cunningham revealed she was pregnant last month – posting an image of her baby’s scan to her followers on Twitter.

The unmarried mother of two, who says she is no longer working as an escort, does not know who the father of her unborn child is. She says he could either be a surgeon who paid her for a night of passion or a friend she has casual sex with.

Miss Cunningham hit the headlines last year when she underwent cosmetic surgery to increase her bust from 32A to a 36DD at St James’s Hospital in Leeds.

sicko1

The operation caused outrage, heightened further by the same NHS trust refusing to fund surgery that would enable a two-year-old girl with a form of cerebral palsy to walk.

Miss Cunningham has vowed to work to pay back the £4,800 cost of her operation, but has said that the £1,000 she had set aside to reimburse the Health Service has now been spent on clothes for her new baby.

Last month she told how she had turned to escort work at the suggestion of a friend and had slept with her fourth client, an unmarried surgeon in his mid-30s.

‘I’m ashamed to say I don’t know who the father is,’ Miss Cunningham told Closer magazine. ‘I’ve only slept with one client, but I’ve also been having casual sex with a friend.’

She was still seeing two clients a week until discovering that she was expecting a baby, and has since worked on adult phone lines. 

Miss Cunningham has a congenital medical condition which means she has no breast tissue.

She says she was bullied about her flat chest from the age of 14. Recently she decided she wants her breast implants removed – again paid for by the NHS.

I. have. NO. WORDS. All we can do is pray for this baby:

Josie-Cunningham-pregnancy-scan-3434068

DCG

Monday Morning Quickie!

HOW CATHOLICS KNOW THEY’RE DRIVING TOO FAST .

1 (1)

~Steve~                                              H/T   Hujonwi