Category Archives: New World Order

Former intelligence officer Robert Steele: Every single terrorist incident in U.S. was a false flag

James Madison quote

A false flag, as the term is used in contemporary parlance, is a traumatic public event of mass casualties which bears the marks of falsity, in part or in whole, as the public have been told by government and media. The objective of false flags is always to rally the public in an outburst of sympathy and support for the government and its agenda, e.g., gun control, opposition to an identified enemy, etc.

Robert David Steele, 62, is a former CIA clandestine services case officer and a 20-year Marine Corps Infantry Intelligence officer. A candidate for the Reform Party’s presidential nomination in 2012, Steele is known for his promotion of open source intelligence (OSINT). In the intelligence community, OSINT refers to overt, publicly available sources (as opposed to covert or clandestine sources), and is not related to open-source software or public intelligence. Here’s his website: www.robertdavidsteele.com.

Robert David Steele

The Keiser Report is a financial news and analysis show hosted by Max Keiser on RT UK and the RT network. On the show’s episode 731 on March 13, 2015, Steele made a startling assertion that most terrorists are false flag terrorists created by the world’s intelligence services, and that every single terrorist incident in the U.S. has been a false flag. The interview with Steele begins at the 12:23 mark of the video:

Here’s a transcript of the interview beginning at the 15:08 mark:

Keiser: “There are several terror events in Europe by Europeans recently. Now, each one of the bad guys is already known to security services, a good example being here in the UK, they had somebody who was on MI5 radar, he went off to join ISIS and he became Jihadi John. So your thoughts: Is this because we have too much data or too many people on the terror watch list, or there’s not enough real intelligence? What’s going on here?”

Steele: “Well, Max, this may be too much for you guys, but let me give you the bottom line as I see it…. Most terrorists are false flag terrorists…created by our own security services. Now I have no direct access in England, but I will tell you that here in the United States, every single terrorist incident we have had has been a false flag or has been an informant pushed on by the FBI. In fact, we now have citizens taking out restraining orders against FBI informants that are trying to incite terrorism. We’ve become a lunatic asylum. As far as Jihadi John, the best guess that I can give you is that this is funded by Saudi Arabia, trained by CIA. This destruction of ancient artifacts and so on, that’s a covert action influence operation; that’s not something they would normally do. This is, in one word, largely theater.

Note: In an October 2014 interview with Alex Jones of Infowars, Steel specifically identified Sandy Hook and Boston Bombing as false flags.

Keiser then asks if a solution to all this “skullduggery” is open source, i.e., taking all the data and make it public, and mentions Edward Snowden and Julian Assange as examples. Steele replies that Assange “has” (i.e., takes) “no sides.” At the 17:47 mark, Steele said:

“[Edward] Snowden is a good thing, but right now all indications are that he’s a CIA op that was authorized by Obama to take Assange (?) down a notch, and the reason the State Department canceled his [Snowden’s] passport while he was en route to Russia was precisely to throw him in front of the Russians as a dangle.”

Steele is the founder and publisher of Public Intelligence Blog. An advocate of open source and the New Alternative Media of citizen bloggers, Steele once said:

“You are the Paul Reveres and Patrick Henrys of our generation. Bottom-up horizontal-connection is key. Sharing at all levels, not top down control. Public intelligence and influence is about to take off. We’re about to bury rule by secrecy. Civil affairs is the focal point….

If you bloggers self-organize and attach yourselves like leeches to specific issues, corporations, organization, challenges, whatever, you will be the intelligence minutemen of this century. The power is in your hands.

There aren’t enough guns to kill us all, and Halliburton can’t build jails fast enough to keep us down…. I think we’re at a turning point. We’re at the very beginning of a historic tidal shift in power, restoring the Constitution.”

So, be not afraid! Take heart! Stand firm!

~Éowyn

Environmental hypocrite Leonardo DiCaprio’s superyacht has huge carbon footprint

That preachy, sanctimonious environmentalist is at it again, oblivious to the irony of him vacationing on a gas-guzzling, CO2 spewing, 450 ft. superyacht, anchored off the Mediterranean coast of France for the annual debauchery known as the Cannes Film Festival.

Here’s Leonardo DiCaprio is his off-camera scruffy Howard Hughes mode:

Leonardo DiCaprio on board superyacht Cannes 2015

Heather Waugh reports for the Daily Mail, May 21, 2014, that the superyacht Rising Sun was custom built in 2004 by Lurssen Yachts and owned by David Geffen, the openly homosexual co-founder of Dreamworks Studio (with director Steven Spielberg), whom former Hollywood powerhouse Michael Ovitz calls the leader of Hollywood’s Gay Mafia. (See “The Gay Mafia and America’s aggressive homosexual agenda“)

The superyacht reportedly cost $200 million to build and is the 11th largest yacht in the world. It offers accommodation for up to 16 guests, a cinema, a wine cellar and is capable of carrying up to 45 crew members on board. It also boasts a basketball court which can be transformed into a helipad if necessary.

Superyacht Rising Sun

Superyacht Rising Sun

So how much of a carbon footprint does Rising Sun make?

In 2014, Leo borrowed another super yacht, the 482-ft. Topaz, to watch the World Cup in Brazil and party in style.

According to Monalisa Gangopadhyay of Liberty Voice, the $680 million Topaz is the 5th largest super yacht in the world, and belongs to billionaire Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates. The super yacht is replete with luxurious features that include a top deck jacuzzi, opulent staterooms, a swimming pool, gym, movie theater, a large conference room, and two helipads.

Gangopadhyay notes:

But all these luxuries come at an environmental cost. A super yacht like the Topaz [and Rising Sun] can burn thousands of liters of marine diesel every hour as it cuts an impressive swatch through the ocean waters, leaving behind trails of smoke and tones of carbon dioxide. Additionally, such crafts can use up to 1000 liters a day or more just for its air-conditioning and electrical systems, according to Yacht Carbon Offset, a company that provides carbon offsetting for its seafaring clients.

This is the same Leonardo DiCaprio whom another hypocrite, tax-dodger Secretary of State John Kerry, had invited to talk about conservation at the State Department’s Our Ocean conference on June 17, 2014.

Kerry, who at age 70 went under the knife for major cosmetic surgery, and flicks his tongue like a snake, lauded DiCaprio for having demonstrated continued dedication towards protecting the world’s oceans.

do as i say

See also “Leonardo DiCaprio, Environmental Hypocrite.”

~Éowyn

List of persons/groups paid by Soros to protest in Ferguson & Selma

Only in America can one be a political revolutionary and get paid for it!

Only in America are political protesters/rioters/looters not only paid for their “services,” they are reimbursed for their food, transportation, cell phones, art supplies to make up posters and signs, traffic fines (running red light), and other expenses.

Only in America are staff members of non-profit political groups — all Marxist — reimbursed for their salaries for taking time away from their jobs to protest/riot/loot.

Isn’t America just grand?

Nickarama reports for Weasel Zippers, May 19, 2015, that we now have evidence that two groups funded by George Soros, MORE and OBS, advertised money for people willing to travel to protest in Ferguson. The groups are:

  1. Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment (MORE)
  2. Organization for Black Struggle (OBS)

The evidence that Soros-backed groups pay people to protest consists of two:

1. A tweet:

Note: @organizemo is the twitter account of MORE

 Ferguson tweet2. A list of names and organizations to whom M.O.R.E. paid money:

On May 14, 2015, protesters protested that they hadn’t received their checks from MORE (read about it here). So MORE distributed a list detailing who was paid to protest in Ferguson, Missouri and Selma, Alabama.

Here are 3 photos of the list, followed by my painstaking reconstruction of the list in a more legible format.

↓ Click photos to enlarge ↓

Ferguson list1Ferguson list2Ferguson list3

Here’s my reconstruction of the list in the photos in a more legible format. Note that:

  • Ferguson October = Ferguson protests in October 2014
  • Selma = Protests in Selma, Alabama
  • Jobs With Justice is a non-profit organization for “workers’ rights” based in Washington, D.C.
  • World Community Center is a non-profit “for peace” group in St. Louis, also called Nation Builder.
  • Black Souljaz is a social network group.
  • National Domestic Workers Alliance is a non-profit for domestic workers’ (mainly women) rights.
  • Action Council is a non-profit “to address the reduction in government funding for health and human services for low-income and vulnerable people.”
  • People’s Institute is a non-profit “on understanding what racism is.”
  • Latinos en Axion is “a community leaders group.”
  • I can’t find what these groups are: NVDA, MAU, Freedom Fighters, MASK.
Date Person/Group Amount Purpose
8/18/2014 Darien Wigfall $100 Ferguson October art supplies
9/15/2014 Wisdom Works $239 Ferguson October website
10/6/2014 Adam Jones $2,711.50 Ferguson October tshirts
10/6/2014 Derek Laney $1,000 Ferguson October art supplies
10/9/2014 John Chasnoff $225 Ferguson October permits
10/9/2014 John Chasnoff $1,242 Ferguson October permits
10/6/2014 Production Support Services $2,193.25 Ferguson October march tech
10/9/2014 Juliette Jacobs $200 Ferguson October walkie talkies
10/7/2014 Adam Jones $671.50 Ferguson October tshirts
10/10/2014 Hi-Tech Copy $890.63 Ferguson October copies
10/11/2014 Fed Ex $433.83 Ferguson October banner
10/9/2014 Jobs With Justice $2,702.68 Ferguson October van rentals
10/14/2014 St. Louis A/V Company $911.42 Ferguson October a/v
9/18/2014 World Community Center $500 Movement space usage
10/22/2014 Karl Kumodzi $200 Ferguson October gas cards
10/18/2014 Public Policy & Education Fund of NY $2,856 Staff salary reimbursement
10/1/2014 MO Dept of Revenue $66.15 fines for CN1 bank account
11/3/2014 CWA Local 6355 $1,005.19 Ferguson October (vans)
11/5/2014 Shona Clarkson $184.24 Ferguson October (megaphones)
11/18/2014 Jeff Ordower $10,717 Ferguson October reimbursements
11/18/2014 Kathy Peterson $1,914.69 Ferguson October supplies
11/18/2014 Tia Byrd $52.33 Ferguson October copies
11/20/2014 Harry Alper $119.53 Ferguson October supplies
11/21/2014 Damon Davis $300 Art supplies
11/24/2014 Kayla Reed $2,000 Youth stipends, food, etc.
11/24/2014 Julia Ho $31.07 NVDA training food
11/28/2014 Jeff Ordower $10,000 Ferguson October reimbursements
11/28/2014 Tia Byrd $82.90 NVDA training supplies
12/3/2014 Emily Bland $132 Ferguson October parking
12/5/2014 Maurice Weeks $224.88 Ferguson October supplies
12/5/2014 Ashley Yates on behalf of MAU $3,129 Online donations for MAU
12/9/2014 Harry Alper $169.50 Supplies for non-indictment
12/9/2014 Damon Davis $200 Art supplies
12/10/2014 Jeffery Hill on behalf of Black Souljaz $500 Online donations
12/10/2014 Maryam Adrangi $173.63 Ferguson October art supplies
12/10/2014 Public Policy Education Fund for NY $6,882.44 staff salary reimbursement
12/12/2014 Brandon Sneed (formerly of Tribe X) $500 Online donations
12/12/2014 Arielle Klagsbrun $203.53 NVDA training supplies
12/12/2014 Beverly Jones $114.63 Supplies for non-indictment
12/15/2014 Michael Bowersox $444.39 Non-indictment food
12/15/2014 National Domestic Workers Alliance $1,099.13 Cell phones for Ferguson October
12/15/2014 Harry Shelton $70 Gas for Ferguson October
12/15/2014 Charles Murphy $170 Video services for Ferguson October
12/15/2014 Brittany Ferrell $3,544 Online donations for MAU
12/17/2014 Jeanina Jenkins $600 Freedom Fighters donations
12/17/2014 Autumn Osborn $250 Freedom Fighters donations
12/18/2014 MORE $52,815.48 Debt repayment for Ferguson October
12/18/2014 MO Jobs For Justice $30 Red light camera charges
12/18/2014 Brittany Ferrell on behalf of MAU $7,536 Online donations
12/18/2014 Julia Ho $230.75 NVDA training supplies
12/18/2014 Lisa Fithian $1,127.72 Visit expenses
12/18/2014 Beverly Jones $320.22 Supplies for non-indictment
12/18/2014 Jeff Ordower $905 Nationbuilder, canvassing reimbursement
12/18/2014 Derek Laney $25 NVDA training supplies
12/18/2014 Julia Ho $190.67 NVDA training supplies
12/18/2014 Arielle Klagsbrun $487.39 NVDA training supplies
12/18/2014 Cathy Daniels $300 Supplies for non-indictment
12/18/2014 Public Policy & Education Fund of NY $5,692.44 Staff salary reimbursement
12/12/2014 Shona Clarkson $361.15 Supplies for non-indictment
1/16/2015 Yvette Harris for MASK $53.15 Supplies for MASK
1/16/2015 Julia Ho $45 Action Council food
12/15/2014 Aaron Stables $459.95 Ferguson October bullhorns
1/15/2015 Jeff Ordower $6,708.53 Reimbursements for Ferguson October
2/3/2015 Brittany Ferrell on behalf of MAU $4,799.85 From CN1
2/3/2015 Hands Up United $3,000 Online donations for Hands Up
2/3/2015 Menta Jackson $350 ?
2/3/2015 Julia Ho $42 Action Council food
2/6/2015 Nabeeha Azeez $300 Selma Travel Expenses
2/6/2015 Ned Alexander $300 Selma Travel Expenses
2/6/2015 Emanuel Jones $300 Selma Travel Expenses
2/6/2015 Elizabeth Vega $642.89 Art build receipts august 9-feb 9
3/9/2015 Cathy Daniels $600 People’s Institute catering
3/9/2015 HJ Rodgers $1,000 Travel stipend
3/9/2015 Dasha Jones $300 Selma travel expenses
3/16/2014 Ashley Yates on behalf of MAU $2,032.14 Online donations for MAU
3/17/2015 Yvette Harris for MASK $2,000 DC trip
3/19/2015 Cathy Daniels $545 People’s Institute catering
3/20/2015 Tony Rice $145 People’s Institute catering
3/23/2015 Latinos en Axion $800 S Jefferson place
3/26/2015 Sana Rankin-Cole $200 People’s Institute catering
4/2/2015 Cathy Daniels $600 Reconciliation dinner
4/20/2015 Marcia Curtis $66.01 Activist supplies

Is paying people to protest and riot not a conspiracy?

And to think we are constantly being derided by the media for being “conspiracy theorist” tinfoil hatters.

See also:

H/t Barry Soetoro, Esq., for the tip on the protesters protesting not having received their money.

~Éowyn

Editor of The Economist explains meaning of 2015 cover illustration

Please read Dr. Eowyn’s article on the same subject: 
Rothschild-owned The Economist’s 2015 cover full of unsettling symbols

economist_magazine_jan2015The following is excerpted from a YourNewsWire.com article attempting to find some clarity on the very strange cover art. I did a search for the name of the illustrator of the cover art, and was very surprised to read there was no illustrator. The cover, they say, was created by a committee. This would explain the shameless borrowing of the Beatles album cover theme.

I have removed the theories expressed on VigilantCitizen.com, and show only the explanation given by The Economist’s editor. 

So here is The Economist’s explanation of the cover. ~TD 


Controversial Economist 2015 Cover Illustration Explained!

By Salli LaBelle Platt and Jacqui Deevoy

There’s been much controversy over the meaning of The Economist’s new year cover. YourNewsWire speaks to Editor Daniel Franklin about what those images actually mean…


BLACK & WHITE FACES

economist-2015-response

Daniel Franklin, Editor of The Economist says: “The black & white versus the colour faces was a decision based purely on the strength of the design. There is no differentiation with the people featured in colour or not – it’s merely a way of representing a bunch of relevant folk in order that this be a stronger front cover.”


TWO FACED GLOBE

two-faced-globe

Daniel Franklin says: “Represents the rise of Nationalism and how it may be a world of conflict with regard to agreements. Many nations involved, some places angry, unsettled, others less so. The two faces of the moon disagreeing with itself as depicted on different sides. The article it refers to is called ‘Nationalism is Back’ and can be found in the International Section.”


DRONE

drone

Daniel Franklin says: “The drone is relevant to the US Section, where there is an article on the Fed Aviation Society who are set to announce the rules this Autumn on the regulations on Drone use in America. (To be found in the US Section).”


ROCKET

rocketDaniel Franklin says: “’New Horizons’ space probe which will be flying by Pluto in 2015 (the article on this is on page 137 of the UK edition of the magazine). However, at the last minute, after the cover had gone to press, they decided to use an illustration for that story showing the distance New Horizons had travelled to Pluto, which is why you won’t find the picture inside the magazine.”


NUCLEAR MUSHROOM CLOUD

mushroom

Daniel Franklin says: “The mushroom cloud relates to the story on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty yearly review conference, set to take place in New York – article to be found in the ‘International’ Section.”


PIGGY BANK

piggy-bank

Daniel Franklin says: “The piggy bank flying from David Cameron’s chest
 relates to the article on how small banks should do well this year.”


SPIDERMAN

spiderman

Daniel Franklin says: “This iIllustration relates to the article on Hollywood 2015. ‘Lights, Camera, Fraction’, focusing on the downward spiral of wages and superhero movies being very popular whilst implying it’s less important as to who is behind the mask – i.e. a cheaper actor/actress would be used as opposed to the Celebrity A class. (Page 124, UK version).”


LEONARDO DA VINCI PAINTING

da-vinci

Daniel Franklin says: “The New Abu Dhabi LOUVRE Museum set to open this year. Apparently, the painting in the cover illustration may be one of the debut masterpieces loaned for the opening exhibition of this venue. (See feature in the Books & Arts section.)


ALICE IN WONDERLAND and THE CHESHIRE CAT

alice

cheshire

Daniel Franklin says: “It’s the 150th Anniversary of Alice in Wonderland. No particular reason for this part of the story to be depicted other than it is recognisable as such. The pile of dirt is actually a pile of sand and relates to the article on Abu Dhabi museum.” (See above.)


ARROWS WITH NUMBERS

arrows

Daniel Franklin says: “The arrows are taken from the graphic illustrating the story of China’s economy “The numbers to watch” and are Chinese ‘targets’. As it happens, the numbers on the graphic were adjusted in the fact-checking process after the cover went to press.”


CRICKET BALL

cricket

Daniel Franklin says: “We featured a white cricket ball because cricket world cup played with a white ball. There is the rugby world cup and the women’s football world cup all this year.”


GHOST with HOLIDAY BROCHURE

ghost

Daniel Franklin says: “This is all about predictive programming on your mobile/handheld devices. The phone could tell you when you are on holiday and support your lifestyle ~ helpful but at the same time arguably a little creepy, hence the ghoul image use.”


TURTLE

turtle

Daniel Franklin says: “Lonesome George” the famous turtle who died in 2012 is to be returned to the Galápagos Islands this year. The story on this appear in the ‘Events’ section. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lonesome_George


SUMO WRESTLER WITH A BIG BATTERY

sumo

Daniel Franklin says: “Japan’s biggest battery for storage has been produced – for excessive solar and wind power. (There’s an article on this in the ‘Asia’ section).”


PANDA IN SPEEDOS

panda

Daniel Franklin says: “Represents Chinese Politics – ever more muscle.”


PIED PIPER

piper2

Daniel Franklin says: “The illustration of the Pied Piper depicts the story where the rats are being eradicated from the Island of St Georgia. 20th Century Whalers set up bases on the Island and escaped rats caused chaos to it’s ecosystem. (‘Science’ section).”


BOY WITH TOY PLANE

boy

Daniel Franklin says: “This part of the illustration relates to the drone illustration with regards to the FSA. Both the little boy with the plane and the helicopter are from the illustration that accompanies the piece on drones (on page 60 of the magazine).”


PANIC GAME

panic

Daniel Franklin says: “Where might you find the financial crisis? EURO – FED RESERVE & CHINA. (Finance Section).”


BOY WITH NOODLES

boy-noodles

Daniel Franklin says: “There’s an article in the Chinese Section that reports on the growing fussiness of Chinese consumers. This image illustrates that article.”


ASIAN MASKED OFFICER

asian-masked-officer

Daniel Franklin says: “This illustrates an article on pollution that relates to the Paris, December meeting.


LANDROVER DEFENDER

land-rover

Daniel Franklin says: “This illustrates an article that reports on the ceasing of production with the LandRover Defender.”

– See whole article at: http://yournewswire.com/controversial-economist-2015-cover-illustration-explained/#sthash.hmSGoIhY.dpuf


There you have it, straight from the horse’s mouth. 

Now if you will excuse me, I have to talk to somebody who told me there’s a great bargain to be had on the purchase of a bridge in New York! 

Please read Dr. Eowyn’s article on the same subject:
Rothschild-owned The Economist’s 2015 cover full of unsettling symbols

Video of U.S. Marines apprehending civilians raises fear of martial law preparation

A DVIDS video, titled “Assault Support Tactics 3,” is causing a lot of buzz on the Internet, with some claiming the Marines were training to hunt down and arrest civilians in preparation for martial law. As an example, The GovtSlaves.Info Report calls the video “Shock Video: Children Used in FEMA Camp Roundup Drills.”

DVIDS is Defense Video & Image Distribution System, a website run by the United States Army. Here’s how DVIDS describes itself:

The Defense Video & Imagery Distribution System (DVIDS) is provided as a public service operated by Third Army/U.S. Army Central (ARCENT) on behalf of the Department of the Army in support of all branches of the U.S. military and its Coalition partners serving with U.S. Forces in the Central Command (CENTCOM) area of responsibility and throughout the world.

Third Army/ARCENT has a contract with Encompass Digital Media, Inc., in Atlanta, Georgia, to provide this service. Encompass Digital Media employs civilians to fulfill the contract as media representatives, video editors, web developers and satellite transmission technicians.

Information presented on or via DVIDS is considered public information and may be distributed or copied unless otherwise specified. Use of appropriate byline/photo/image credits is requested.

The DVIDS service is paid for by the US Department of Defense via the Department of the Army, Third Army/US Army Central (ARCENT).

The “Assault Support Tactics 3” video was taken on April 17, 2015, in Yuma, Arizona, by U.S. Marine journalist Sgt. Daniel Kujanpaa. This is how the video is described on DVIDS:

U.S. Marines from 1st Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division participate in assault support tactics 3 during Weapons and Tactics Instructor Course (WTI) 2-15 in Yuma, Ariz., April 18, 2015. WTI is a seven week event hosted by Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One (MAWTS-1) cadre. MAWTS-1 provides standardized tactical training and certification of unit instructor qualifications to support Marine Aviation Training and Readiness and assists in developing and employing aviation weapons and tactics.

Here is a version of the video, 02:27 minutes long, posted to YouTube, showing the Marines subduing men (crisis actors) dressed in civilian clothes, some with feigned injuries like the guy with a bloodied face at the 0:17 mark:

Note the presence of spectators with small children outside the park’s chain link fence, watching armed soldiers hunting down ordinary Americans. Here’s a screenshot I took at the 0:12 mark:

Marines assault exercise Yuma1

The YouTube video clearly is a shortened version of the original footage because the beginning of the video speeded up or rushed through the arrival of the Marines in choppers into a public park somewhere in the city of Yuma.

The original 7:10 minutes-long video is posted on DVIDS.

What is interesting about the original video is that there is imagery only at the beginning, showing a chopper landing in the park and Marines talking to spectators — including small children — on the other side of the chain link fence. But after the 01:15 mark, there is no imagery for the rest of video until just before the video ends. In other words, the images of Marines subduing and hand-cuffing “civilians” were blocked.

There is, however, audio — of male voices talking, shouting, metallic clanking, a hoarse voice (at around the 05:04 mark), and the sound of machine gun fire (?) or a chopper at around the 05:45 mark. Finally, beginning at the 05:50 mark, the imagery returned — of soldiers carrying a “wounded” man on a stretcher to a waiting chopper, soldiers cleaning up, the landing of another chopper, and the deserted park at nightfall.

Go to DVIDS and verify for yourself about the censored-out imagery of Marines subduing and handcuffing crisis actors posing as civilians.

While I understand the U.S. military must train our soldiers in simulated scenarios, what is the need or rationale for a drill depicting armed soldiers subduing civilians in a public park, seen by families with small children? Does the U.S. Army think we’re so stupid as to think the Marines could not have conducted this training exercise on a military base or in that fake city in Virginia constructed with millions of hard-earned taxpayer dollars? (See “U.S. Army builds $96m fake city in VA to train for what?”)

Many Americans already are freaked out by Operation Jade Helm — a 2-month Special Operations Exercise by élite members from all four branches of the U.S. military, unprecedented in its size and scope. (See “Operation Jade Helm, Posse Comitatus, and why we should be concerned“)

This “training exercise” by the 1st Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division will just add to the fears.

H/t FOTM’s Gingercake

~Éowyn

Top adviser to Australia PM: Global warming is a NWO fraud led by UN

A brave man in the Australian government is telling the truth about “climate change,” formerly called anthropogenic (man-made) global warming.

He is Maurice Newman, a former chairman of the Australian Broadcasting Corp., who is the chairman of Australia Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s Business Advisory Council and, as such, the government’s top business adviser.

In an op/ed for The Australian newspaper, Newman asserts that:

  • “Climate change” is a myth fostered by the United Nations for political reasons — to create a new authoritarian world order under its control.
  • 95% of the climate models we’ve been told which “prove” human activities — specifically carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions — have caused and are causing Earth’s temperatures to be warmer, are in error. Instead of warming, world temps have been “in stasis,” i.e., unchanged, for the last two decades.

Instead of giving you second-hand sources to Newman’s op/ed (which is what Drudge Report inexplicably did yesterday, with a link to an AFP/Jiji article in the Japan Times), it is always better to go to the original or primary source because then there is no filtering and added commentary by the middle-man.

So here is Maurice Newman’s op/ed in its entirety. Maurice Newman

The UN is using climate change as a tool not an issue

By Maurice Newman The Australian, May 8, 2015

It’s a well-kept secret, but 95 per cent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error. It’s not surprising.

We have been subjected to extravagance from climate catastrophists for close to 50 years.

In January 1970, Life magazine, based on “solid scientific evidence”, claimed that by 1985 air pollution would reduce the sunlight reaching the Earth by half. In fact, across that period sunlight fell by between 3 per cent and 5 per cent. In a 1971 speech, Paul Ehrlich said: “If I were a gambler I would take even money that ­England will not exist in the year 2000.”

Fast forward to March 2000 and David Viner, senior research scientist at the Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, told The Independent, “Snowfalls are now a thing of the past.” In December 2010, the Mail Online reported, “Coldest December since records began as temperatures plummet to minus 10C bringing travel chaos across Britain”.

We’ve had our own busted predictions. Perhaps the most preposterous was climate alarmist Tim Flannery’s 2005 observation: “If the computer records are right, these drought conditions will become permanent in eastern Australia.” Subsequent rainfall and severe flooding have shown the records or his analysis are wrong. We’ve swallowed dud prediction after dud prediction. What’s more, the [UN] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which we were instructed was the gold standard on global warming, has been exposed repeatedly for ­mis­rep­resentation and shoddy methods.

Weather bureaus appear to have “homogenised” data to suit narratives. NASA’s claim that 2014 was the warmest year on record was revised, after challenge, to only 38 per cent probability. Extreme weather events, once blamed on global warming, no longer are, as their frequency and intensity decline.

Christiana Figueres

Why then, with such little evidence, does the UN insist the world spend hundreds of billions of dollars a year on futile climate change policies? Perhaps Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN’s Framework on Climate Change has the answer?

In Brussels last February she said, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.”

In other words, the real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook.

Figueres is on record saying democracy is a poor political system for fighting global warming. Communist China, she says, is the best model. This is not about facts or logic. It’s about a new world order under the control of the UN. It is opposed to capitalism and freedom and has made environmental catastrophism a household topic to achieve its objective.

Figueres says that, unlike the Industrial Revolution, “This is a centralised transformation that is taking place.” She sees the US partisan divide on global warming as “very detrimental”. Of course. In her authoritarian world there will be no room for debate or ­disagreement.

Make no mistake, climate change is a must-win battlefield for authoritarians and fellow travellers. As Timothy Wirth, president of the UN Foundation, says: “Even if the ­(climate change) theory is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.”

Timothy Wirth Having gained so much ground, eco-catastrophists won’t let up. After all, they have captured the UN and are extremely well funded. They have a hugely powerful ally in the White House. They have successfully enlisted compliant academics and an obedient and gullible mainstream media (the ABC [Australian Broadcasting Company] and Fairfax in Australia) to push the scriptures regardless of evidence.

They will continue to present the climate change movement as an independent, spontaneous consensus of concerned scientists, politicians and citizens who believe human activity is “extremely likely” to be the dominant cause of global warming. (“Extremely likely” is a scientific term?)

And they will keep mobilising public opinion using fear and appeals to morality. UN support will be assured through promised wealth redistribution from the West, even though its anti-growth policy prescriptions will needlessly prolong poverty, hunger, sickness and illiteracy for the world’s poorest.

Figueres said at a climate ­summit in Melbourne recently that she was “truly counting on Australia’s leadership” to ensure most coal stayed in the ground.

Hopefully, like India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Tony Abbott isn’t listening. India knows the importance of cheap energy and is set to overtake China as the world’s leading importer of coal. Even Germany is about to commission the most coal-fired power stations in 20 years.

There is a real chance Figueres and those who share her centralised power ambitions will succeed. As the UN’s December climate change conference in Paris approaches, Australia will be pressed to sign even more futile job-destroying climate change treaties.

Resisting will be politically difficult. But resist we should. We are already paying an unnecessary social and economic price for empty gestures. Enough is enough.

Maurice Newman mocked by climate fascistsGood students of satanist Saul Alinsky that they are, Global Warming Nazis are already deploying Alinsky Rule No. 5 by mocking Maurice Newman as a crazy tinfoil hatter. (Source of pic)

See also:

~Éowyn

FCC commissioner warns about political censorship of websites; is threatened for opposing net neutrality

Ajit Pai is one of two Republicans on the board of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and he’s warning that the federal government will use net neutrality to censor political content on websites. That, of course, is a violation of the American people’s right of free speech that’s guaranteed by the United States Constitution.

For his warnings, Pai has received threats to him and his family.

Ajit Pai

Rudy Takala reports for CNS News that speaking on a panel at the annual “Right Online” conference in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, May 2, 2015, FCC member Ajit Pai said he foresees a future in which federal regulators will seek to regulate websites based on political content, using the power of the FCC or Federal Elections Commission (FEC).

Pai also revealed that his opposition to “net neutrality” regulations had resulted in personal harassment and threats to his family: 

“I can tell you it has not been an easy couple of months personally. My address has been publicly released. My wife’s name, my kids’ names, my kids’ birthdays, my phone number, all kinds of threats [have come] online.

Pai, one of two Republicans on the five-member FCC, has been an outspoken critic of net neutrality regulations passed by the agency on Feb. 26. The rules, which are set to take effect on June 12, reclassify Internet providers as utilities and command them not to block or “throttle” online traffic. But Pai said:

“I could easily see this migrating over to the direction of content… What you’re seeing now is an impulse not just to regulate the roads over which traffic goes, but the traffic itself. It is conceivable to me to see the government saying, ‘We think the Drudge Report is having a disproportionate effect on our political discourse. He doesn’t have to file anything with the FEC. The FCC doesn’t have the ability to regulate anything he says, and we want to start tamping down on websites like that’…. The First Amendment means not just the cold parchment that’s in the Constitution. It’s an ongoing cultural commitment, and I sense that among a substantial number of Americans and a disturbing number of regulators here in Washington that online speech is [considered] a dangerous brave new world that needs to be regulated.

In February, Pai co-authored an editorial with former FEC Chairman Lee Goodman that warned of efforts by those agencies to regulate content online.

In comments to CNSNews.com, Pai also talked about the FCC’s finances, the imposition of taxes on Internet usage, and subsidies for Internet service.

Internet tax: The reclassification of Internet providers as utilities allows the FCC to impose a “Universal Service Fund” (USF) tax on their revenue. The USF has grown exponentially in recent years, and presently stands at $12 billion annually – so large that the FCC has requested it be allowed to transfer $25 million of the money to its own budget to “administer” the fund. As a result, some in Congress have proposed limiting the size of the USF to $9 billion. Pai said the USF tax should be lower than what a majority of the FCC wants it to be… Whatever it is, there has to be a cap. What we’ve found is that USF funding has exploded over the past couple of years so that the USF tax is 67 percent higher than it was in 2009.”

Welfare programs of phone and Internet subsidies: Those USF taxes are being used to fund government programs such as the Lifeline program (commonly known as the Obama Phone program) and the E-Rate program that subsidizes broadband access for schools and libraries.

And the government wants to expand those programs, which means even higher USF taxes.

Pai is in favor of reducing the budget of the FCC:

We should deny funding for some of the things the FCC wants to spend money on. Any funds, for example, to enforce these net neutrality regulations, [and] this shift of $25 million from the Universal Service Fund to the FCC itself in order to pursue its own policy priorities – I think we need to do more with less. I don’t think we’re doing that by asking for a much higher budget.

~Éowyn