Category Archives: illegal immigration

Enemies on the Left, False Friends on the Right – Part 11

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen” . . . Samuel Adams 

Richard Mellon Scaife

Richard Mellon Scaife (born July 3, 1932) was an American billionaire and newspaper publisher. Scaife owned and published the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. With $1.2 billion, Scaife, a principal heir to the Carnegie-Mellon banking, oil, and aluminum fortune, was No. 283 on the 2005 Forbes 400. In May, 2014, he announced that he had untreatable cancer. Link On Friday, July 4th, 2014, Richard Mellon Scaife died at the age of 82. Link Scaife has been a huge financial supporter of Heritage Foundation for many decades, as well as being on their board of trustees for years. Link

SCAIFE

Scaife provided support for a variety of organizations through the private, non-profit foundations he controlled: the Sarah Scaife Foundation (2012-990), Carthage Foundation, and Allegheny Foundation, and until 2001, the Scaife Family Foundation 2012-990), now controlled by his daughter Jennie and son David, children by his first wife. He was thought of as a neo-conservative donor, yet he funded both sides of the aisle.

Then there’s the Colcom Foundation (2012-990), run by Scaife’s sister, Cordelia Scaife May, until her death in 2005. Scroll down in the 990 form to the grants, and you’ll see that Cordelia May funded population control proponents, environmentalists, Carnegie-Mellon, the Nature Conservancy, John Tanton’s organizations, etc. Cordelia Scaife May was an environmentalist committed to population control, and believed limiting immigration was the best way to do it. She founded the Colcom Foundation to advance this goal, providing tens of millions to anti-immigrant groups, as well as funding environmental organizations. I would agree to limiting immigration, but not for the same reasons Cordelia and Richard had for funding these organizations.

Cordelia May was a close friend of John Tanton, another conservationist turned anti-immigration activist, responsible for the creation of a network of anti-immigrant groups, such as the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) and Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) and Numbers USA, headed by Roy Beck. The latter is promoting E-Verify, which would subject all Americans to an international databank. How would you like to go through a federal data bank in order to get a job?  Since 2001, Colcom has been the primary funder for many groups in the anti-immigrant John Tanton Network, giving over $17 million to Numbers USA, almost $15 million to FAIR, and more than $6 million to CIS.

Richard Mellon Scaife had long agreed with his sister, Cordelia Richard Scaife. Through his management of the Carthage Foundation and the Sarah Scaife Foundation, and together with the Scaife Family Foundation (controlled by Richard Scaife’s children since 2001), he strongly supported Tanton’s organizations with huge donations. He has donated more than $4 million to FAIR and more than $3 million to CIS since the early 1990s. Additionally, since 2001, the Scaife foundations have given Numbers USA $987,500. So let’s take a closer look at the Tanton Network.

John Tanton’s Numbers USA

Many conservatives are familiar with Roy Beck from Numbers USA. Roy Beck is the heir apparent to John Tanton’s network. Numbers USA has maintained a number of questionable contacts, such as the brazen Holocaust denier Jim Rizoli, who was listed as the group’s state contact for Massachusetts in early 2011. In its 2009 video, “Immigration 103—American Trauma: Jobs and the Economy,” Numbers USA featured the testimony of Roan Garcia-Quintana, a board member of the white nationalist organization, Council of Conservative Citizens. At a CofCC national conference, Garcia-Quintana stated, “There are three types of people in the world: Negroids, Mongroids, and Caucasians.”

From 1977 to 1981, columnist Samuel T. Francis was a policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C., specializing in foreign affairs, terrorism, and intelligence and internal security issues. Francis also wrote the Council of Conservative Citizens‘ platform, the “Statement of Principles.” Francis was editor of the Citizens Informer quarterly newsletter (published by the Council of Conservative Citizens) and an editor of The Occidental Quarterly, a white nationalist journal edited by Kevin Lamb and sponsored by William Regnery II.

Roy Beck’s writings have appeared on the anti-immigrant blog VDARE.com. VDARE was founded by the white nationalist, Peter Brimelow, and regularly features anti-Semitic, homophobic, and flagrantly racist authors and articles. VDARE has long allowed Tanton personnel to bridge the gap between the more concealed bigotry of their anti-immigrant project and their explicit white nationalist tendencies.

Just who is John Tanton, and what does he represent? Here is a list of his networks, and notice population control and eugenics. John Tanton M.D. is “publisher of The Social Contract,” and served as editor for its first 8 years. He is a retired eye surgeon whose boyhood on a farm made him into an ardent “greenie” conservationist and advocate for the environment.

His conviction that continued human population growth was a large part of the conservation problem led him to chair the National Sierra Club Population Committee (1971-74), and to the national board of Zero Population Growth (1973-78, including a term as president, 1975-77). In 1979, Tanton shifted his focus towards fighting immigration to reduce the U.S. population, and organized the anti-immigrant Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) based in Washington, D.C. Since then, Tanton has formed, funded, or otherwise been affiliated with many prominent anti-immigration organizations, in what has been termed the John Tanton Network. He is also closely affiliated with a number of white supremacist organizations such as the Pioneer Fund, whose founders included CNP charter member, Senator Jesse Helms. Tanton’s close relationships with white nationalists and eugenics is documented at the Center for New Community. And here is a map ofhis network.

tanton network

Planned Parenthood Funding

Both Richard Mellon Scaife and his sister, Cordelia, were major donors to abortion rights advocates, and both have given millions to Planned Parenthood. Their mother, Sarah Mellon Scaife’s, favorite causes were population control, environmental conservation, and hospitals. As a matter of fact, Dick Scaife took out a full page ad in the Wall Street Journal on Monday, April 4, 2011. It was an open letter from Scaife to fellow conservatives, entitled, “Why Conservatives Should Oppose Efforts to Defund Planned Parenthood.” Obviously from his statements in this letter, he loved Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger. Scaife called abortions a “minor aspect of Planned Parenthood’s mission” even though they recently announced that all affiliates should prepare to operate at least one abortion clinic over the course of the next two years. If abortions are so minor, why the plan for expansion? Link

It has always been my belief that our nation has lost the blessings of God because of our murder of innocents in their mothers’ wombs, and euthanizing our elderly. We are a culture of death. Yet, politicians, Tea Parties, and even our churches will not speak of these social issues which have destroyed the fabric and culture of American life and lifted the blessings of God from our nation.

In Part 12, of this series, we’ll take a look at a few of the top organizations funded by this so-called conservative, Richard Mellon Scaife, as well as his devotion and funding of Heritage Foundation.

To Read the entire series, I would start with ” ONE” and work and work your way through them.  All are very short.

Here are the Prior 10 Parts to the series.

Enemies on the Left, False Friends on the Right – Part 10

Enemies on the Left, False Friends on the Right – Part 9

Enemies on the Left, False Friends on the Right – Part 8

Enemies on the Left, False Friends on the Right – Part 7

Enemies on the Left, False Friends on the Right – Part 6

Enemies on the Left, False Friends on the Right – Part 5

Enemies on the Left, False Friends on the Right – Part 4

Enemies on the Left, False Friends on the Right – Part 3

Enemies on the Left, False Friends on the Right Part 2

Enemies on the Left, False Friends on the Right, Part 1

Obama calls for mandatory voting in U.S.

fuckhead

Ahhhh yes, you can never have enough illegal alien voters:

– The Washington Times – Wednesday, March 18, 2015

President Obama, whose party was trounced in last year’s midterm election due in part to poor turnout among Democrats, endorsed the idea of mandatory voting Wednesday.

“It would be transformative if everybody voted,” Mr. Obama said during a town-hall event in Cleveland. “That would counteract [campaign] money more than anything. If everybody voted, then it would completely change the political map in this country.”

Mr. Obama raised the subject during a discussion of curbing the influence of campaign donations in U.S. elections. The president said he had never discussed the idea publicly before, but said Australia and some other countries have compulsory voting.


SEE ALSO: Marco Rubio on Obama’s mandatory voting comments: ‘Not voting is also a legitimate choice’


The president didn’t commit to pushing a mandatory voting initiative at the federal level but said, “that may end up being a better strategy in the short term” than finding a solution to curbing campaign donations.

Australia is one of 11 nations worldwide with mandatory voting. Australians who fail to vote can be fined, or even jailed for repeatedly not casting a ballot.

The president repeated his frequent complaint that Democrats tend to stay home in midterm elections. Last November, Republicans regained control of the Senate and added seats to their majority in the House despite Mr. Obama’s massive fundraising efforts for his party.

“The people who tend not to vote are young, they’re lower income, they’re skewed more heavily towards immigrant groups and minority groups,” Mr. Obama said. “And they’re the folks who are scratching and climbing to get into the middle class and they’re working hard. There’s a reason why some folks try to keep them away from the polls. We should want to get them into the polls.”

General election voter turnout for the 2014 midterms was 36.4 percent, the lowest in any election cycle since World War II, according to the United States Election Project.

In the presidential election year of 2012, about 58.2 percent of eligible voters went to the polls. Mr. Obama defeated Republican Mitt Romney, 51.1 percent to 47.2 percent — a margin of about 5 million votes.

But in House races nationwide last November, about 5 million more Republican voters cast ballots than Democratic voters.

The president, who raised $1.1 billion for his re-election, said the “blitzkrieg” of campaign spending is “bad for our democracy.”

“I speak as somebody who has raised a lot of money,” Mr. Obama said. “I’m very good at it. It just degrades our democracy generally.”

Referring to the Supreme Court’s “Citizens United” ruling that resulted in increased campaign spending by third-party advocacy groups, the president said it would be difficult to change the law with a Constitutional amendment.

“We have to think about what are other creative ways to reduce the influence of money,” he said. “There are other ways for us to think creatively, and we’ve got to have a better debate about how we make our democracy better and encourage more participation.”

Mr. Obama also said the process of gerrymandering is harmful to democracy.

“I don’t think the insiders should draw the lines and decide who their voters are,” he said. “Democrats and Republicans do this, and it’s great for incumbents. It pushes parties away from compromise.”

Police departments hire non-US citizens as officers

Claiming difficulty in finding people to staff their ranks, especially in remote places, police departments across America are hiring non-citizens to be police officers, including legal immigrants, those with green cards, those with work permits, and even people with just temporary visas.

global citizenship

Alan Gomez reports for USA Today, March 21, 2015:

Law enforcement agencies struggling to fill their ranks or connect with their increasingly diverse populations are turning to immigrants to fill the gap.

Most agencies in the country require officers or deputies to be U.S. citizens, but some are allowing immigrants who are legally in the country to wear the badge. From Hawaii to Vermont, agencies are allowing green-card holders and legal immigrants with work permits to join their ranks.

At a time when 25,000 non-U.S. citizens are serving in the U.S. military, some feel it’s time for more police and sheriff departments to do the same. That’s why the Nashville Police Department is joining other departments to push the state legislature to change a law that bars non-citizens from becoming law enforcement officers.

Department spokesman Don Aaron said they want immigrants who have been honorably discharged from the military to be eligible for service.

[…] Current rules vary across departments.

Some, like the Chicago and Hawaii police departments, allow any immigrant with a work authorization from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to become an officer. That means people in the country on temporary visas or are applying for green cards can join.

Colorado State Patrol Sgt. Justin Mullins said the department usually struggles to fill trooper positions in less populous corners of the state, including patrol sectors high up in the mountains. He said immigrants from Canada, the Bahamas, the United Kingdom, Mexico and Central America who are willing to live in those remote places have helped the agency fill those vacancies.

[…] Other agencies, like the Cincinnati Police Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, require that officers at least have a pending citizenship application on file with the federal government. And others, like the Burlington, Vt., and Boulder, Colo., police departments, require that officers be legal permanent residents, or green-card holders.

With more immigrants moving to places far from the southern border or away from traditional immigrant magnets like New York City or Miami, agency leaders say it’s important to have a more diverse police force to communicate with those immigrants and understand their culture. Bruce Bovat, deputy chief of operations in Burlington, said their immigrant officers help the agency be more “reflective of the community we serve.”

Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, said he has no problems with green-card holders becoming police officers because they’ve made a long-term commitment to the country and have undergone extensive background checks. But he worries about the security risks associated with allowing any immigrant with a work permit to become an officer, especially considering that the Obama administration has given hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants work permits.

“We’re handing over a gun and a badge to somebody whose background we don’t really know a lot about,” Krikorian said.

Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said any immigrant authorized to work in the U.S. has already undergone a thorough background check and will undergo even more screening in the police application process.

“The security risk is a straw man,” he said. “This is about people who have gone through criminal background checks, who are meeting the very high standards that we set as a country to stay here and who only want to serve and protect their communities.”

With an official unemployment rate currently of 5.5% but an unofficial rate that’s much higher of at least 11%, I don’t understand why police departments are finding it difficult to fill their ranks. From a March 20, 2015 article in U.S. News and World Report:

[T]here remains considerable “slack” in the labor market (see chart), meaning that an abnormally large number of people who want to work aren’t working or people with a job are not working as many hours as they’d like. The official unemployment rate is the most well-known indicator of slack, but it only counts people who are actively looking for a job.

[…] The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ most comprehensive alternative measure of unemployment and underemployment (which it calls U6) includes the unemployed, the marginally attached and those involuntarily working part-time. It stood at 11 percent in February, 2.2 percentage points higher than at the start of the recession. By that measure, about 17.5 million people are unemployed or underemployed, or twice the 8.7 million people in the official unemployment measure.

What do you think of law enforcement hiring non-U.S. citizens as police officers? Sound off in our poll!

See also “Texas police officers are members of Mahmoudberg jihadist compound.”

~Éowyn

Texas attorney general: U.S. is heading toward a constitutional crisis because of Obama flouting Congress and courts

Ken Paxton

In an interview on Fox News yesterday, Ken Paxton, the attorney general of the State of Texas, was asked whether America is heading toward “a constitutional crisis” because of Obama’s total disregard for Congress and now the courts. (The segment begins at the 2:55 mark in the Fox News video, here.)

Paxton replied:

“I think we are. If you think about what’s going on here — the President is violating federal law, the U.S. Constitution, which is going past what Congress is supposed to be doing, and now we’ve got the administration in court not being forthcoming about they’re supposed to be forthcoming about. We definitely have a huge issue here related to whether the Obama administration is going to follow the Constitution, and then once they get into court, whether they’re going to tell the truth.”

Paxton’s stunning remark was precipitated by Obama’s latest “F-you” to the court, specifically to Andrew Hanen, the federal judge who is single-handedly doing the job of the useless Congress by standing up to Obama’s reckless amnesty.

Judge Andrew Hanen

Judge Andrew Hanen

On Feb. 16, 2015, U.S. District Judge Hanen issued a preliminary injunction to temporarily block Obama’s amnesty so as to give a coalition of 26 states the time they need to pursue a lawsuit to permanently stop the amnesty orders. If the implementation of Obama’s amnesty were not blocked, Hanen reasons, the 26 states will “suffer irreparable harm in this case” because once the millions of illegals obtain amnesty, “the genie would be impossible to put back into the bottle.” (See “Federal judge stops Obama’s executive amnesty for illegals”)

At issue are two executive memoranda signed by Obama last November:

  1. The first memorandum expands eligibility for Obama’s 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which halts deportations and allows work permits for certain undocumented immigrants brought to the country as children.
  2. The second executive memo, known as DAPA, would extend similar benefits to the parents of U.S. citizens and permanent legal residents.

See also “Obama has issued more executive orders than any U.S. president in history.

Combined, DACA and DAPA could affect as many as 5 million immigrants living in the country illegally. Some estimates are as high as 10 to 12 million illegals.

4 days after Judge Hanen’s order blocking the implementation of Obama’s amnesty, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced it would seek an emergency stay of the judge‘s injunction. (See “Obama emergency order to restart amnesty in defiance of federal judge Hanen”)

Hanen responded by denying the DOJ’s request. So the federal government has asked the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans to lift Hanen’s injunction while the case is appealed.

Obama vs. Hanen

 

The latest tussle between Judge Hanen and Obama took place last Thursday, March 19, 2015.

As reported by FoxNews, at a Texas hearing on Obama’s amnesty executive actions, Judge Hanen sharply scolded a DOJ attorney — that the administration had misled Hanen on a key part of the program, for which Hanen fell “like an idiot.” Hanen said he could order sanctions against the administration if he finds the DOJ indeed had misrepresented the facts.

At issue is whether the DOJ had misled the judge into believing that a plank of the Obama amnesty program would not go forward before he made the Feb. 16 ruling to temporarily halt it. The program is the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) that gives deportation reprieves (i.e., effective amnesty) to thousands of young illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. as “minors.” The problem is that even before Hanen’s ruling on Feb. 16 to block DACA’s implementation, federal officials had already given 3-year reprieves and work permits to more than 108,000 illegal aliens.

Kathleen Hartnett Associate White House Counsel Kathleen Hartnett, a Harvard Law grad like Obama, successfully worked on repealing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.

At the Thursday hearing, Hanen chided DOJ attorney Kathleen Hartnett for telling him at a January hearing before the Feb. 16 injunction was issued that nothing would be happening with regard to DACA until Feb. 18.

“Like an idiot I believed that,” Hanen said.

A flustered Hartnett repeatedly apologized to Hanen for any confusion related to how the reprieves and work permits were granted. “We strive to be as candid as possible. It truly became clear to us there was confusion on this point,” she said.

“Can I trust what the president says? That’s a yes or no question,” Hanen asked.

“Yes your honor,” Hartnett replied.

The coalition of 26 states have asked that Hanen consider issuing sanctions against the Obama administration because, in the words of the coalition’s lead attorney Angela Colmenero (who is also a lawyer with the Texas Attorney General’s Office), DOJ attorneys had made “representations (that) proved not to be true or at a minimum less than forthcoming.”

Obama’s DOJ lawyer Hartnett insists “There is absolutely no basis for sanctions here. The government is absolutely trying to do the right thing.”

Hanen said he would issue a ruling “promptly” on what action, if any, he will take against the Justice Department.

See also:

~Éowyn

Move along. There’s nothing to see here.

WCVB 5 Boston

Man soliciting for Islamic State charity reported at Harvard

Kennedy School spokesman says ‘no threat’

Kennedy School of Government

Kennedy School of Government

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. —Harvard University police are investigating reports that a man came to the university’s Kennedy School of Government to solicit donations for a charity connected to the Islamic State.

Kennedy School spokesman Doug Gavel said in a statement Friday that there “does not appear to be a threat to the community.”

He says an email was sent to members of the Kennedy School community on Thursday informing them of the solicitations, which occurred Tuesday.

The man has not been seen since.

The internal email said the man in his late 20s or early 30s identified himself as a Harvard student, but it does not appear is if he had any affiliation with the Ivy League school.

Story at http://www.wcvb.com/news/man-soliciting-for-islamic-state-charity-reported-at-harvard/31651678


“…does not appear to be a threat to the community.”

Now when have we heard that before? Hmmmm… 
Oh yeah, the innocent islamic chemical engineering graduates who converged from several states to “visit” the Quabbin Reservoir at midnight a couple of years ago. Nothing out of the ordinary. Move along

Obama’s amnesty: Illegals to take over America by creating “a country within a country”

On Feb. 26, 2015, Sue Payne of WCBM, Baltimore, MD, was interviewed by conservative talk radio host Mark Levin. Payne is the co-host of WCBM’s Pat McDonough Radio Show.

Unbeknown to Obama, Payne had been invited to listen in on three conference phone calls of the 16 members of Obama’s cabinet. The calls were about Obama’s executive amnesty to illegal aliens in this country.

parasite bursts out of human

Obama is committing treason.

His executive amnesty to millions of illegal aliens is more than amnesty. Obama’s plan is to use these 13 to 15 MILLIONS of illegals, most of them from Central America, especially Mexico, to create — in the words of his Task Force on New Americans — “a country within a country.”

Obama’s plan is to implant these millions of “immigrants” parasites — the word is “seedlings” — into innocent, unaware “receiving communities” across the United States. Those parasites will be nurtured with food, medical care, credit cards, no-interest loans, and Social Security — all provided by innocent, unaware taxpayer dupes. Then, when the parasites become mature, they will “emerge from the shadows” and take over and supplant the “receiving communities”. (All words between quotation marks are the words of Obama’s Task Force on New Americans.)

This is the movie plot of Invasion of the Body Snatchers, except it’s not a movie. This is real — a Real and Present Danger to the United States.

Here is the audio of Sue Payne’s interview with Mark Levin, followed by my transcript of the interview.

Levin: Sue, we don’t have a lot of time, so go ahead and summarize what took place in that call.

Payne: Well, what took place on the calls was there was the Task Force on New Americans which Obama established on November 21 when he went to Las Vegas. The media said he was signing an executive order for [the deportation of] 5 million illegal aliens to become deferred. In reality, what he did was sign a memorandum that created the Task Force on New Americans, which was going to be implement amnesty now for the 5 million illegals which I believe is going to be more than that mark I think he [Obama] was planning. And on this conference call, it became clear that he’s looking at 13 to 15 million to give protection and move them on to [U.S.] citizenship.

What happened in the conference calls was there was a representative from 16, each of the members of his cabinet. So there was 16 representatives there. And Cecilia Munoz was on the first [conference] call. And they began to talk —

Levin: Hold on now. And she [Munoz] is a top adviser to the president on this, and the former senior official with…La Raza. Go right ahead.

Cecilia Munoz

Cecilia Munoz

Note: Cecilia Munoz, a former senior official of the racist La Raza (“The Race”), is director of the White House Domestic Policy Council. See “La Raza: Racist Hispanic group funded by taxpayers“.

Payne: Yeah, and she’s chairing this Task Force. And so…what became clear is that once these illegals “come out of the shadows” so to speak, their communities that they’re living in now are going to be re-designated as “receiving communities.” And what this Task Force is designed to do is to create a welcoming feeling among these “receiving communities” to bring in these immigrants, to bring them out in the open, but the “receiving communities” will then soon morph into what was established — an emerging immigrant community. And to do that, what they said was that we need to start looking at the immigrant as a seedling. And for the seedling to grow, the seedling needs to be in fertile soil, and the fertile soil —

Levin: Alright, let’s hold on. We got the seedling, the fertile soil in these new communities. Good lord, this sounds like Plato’s Republic. It sounds like Marxism. It sounds like Mao’s China. Don’t hang up, Sue, we’ll be right back. [music]

Levin: So Sue, we have these special little communities and seedlings and fertilizer and then what?

Payne: Well, eventually the seedlings will take over the host, and the immigrants who come out of the shadows and what I got from the meetings is they would be pushing the citizens into the shadows, they would be taking over the country. In fact, one of the members of the Task Force actually said that we would be developing “a country within a country.” There was a couple of buzz words that were really disturbing to me, that [“a country within a country”] was one of the them. One was from the White House spokesman that immigrants need to be aware of the benefits they are “entitled” to, which led to another comment saying that this group that Obama was going to pardon, give amnesty to, would not be interested in assimilating — they would “navigate,” not assimilate and go into —

Levin: Now, stop there, that’s very important. So these are officials in the White House talking about people not assimilating, but “navigating.” And you know, Sue, this is, this plays into what Obama was saying, and erh, I’d played a clip of that, erh, again, he’s not talking about assimilation either. He’s actually talking about, almost, he doesn’t use the word, about conquering. Did you get that impression?

Payne: Oh yes, especially when it became very clear the “receiving communities” would be morphing into the “emergent immigrant communities.” And he also, there was also a couple of things that were very disturbing. One was that as soon as this decision was pushed through, these immigrants needed to be treated as refugees. They need to be given cash, they need medical care, they need credit — they need to use a credit card to pay for any documents that they need, and also they need to convince state and local governments to cut these people no interest loans with taxpayer dollars so they [illegals] can then pay for their papers, as if we were funding our own destruction here.

Levin: This is amazing. What amazes me, Sue, is how this is progressed, how advanced this strategy is. Obviously this has been in the works for years and years. It’s just incredible! I mean, uh, if you haven’t been in on this phone call, we wouldn’t even know about this!

Payne: No, you wouldn’t. It was a series of three [conference] calls. And Mark, also they said there was going to be a great deal of older immigrants in this batch, and that we needed to make sure that the “receiving communities” knew that the older or elderly unskilled can contribute to these “receiving communities,” and that the government should understand that immigrants need to “age successfully”…and we need to get them into Social Security as soon as possible, so that they can “age successfully” within “their country within a country.”

Levin: This is, this is unbelievable what’s going on inside this country, inside the gates of the White House, without any authority, without the knowledge of the American people. I feel like this is a completely surreptitious government. I feel like we are the ones in the shadows. I feel like we are the ones being cut out of the information flow. Like I said, this is no republic. I don’t know what the hell this is.

The interview ended with Levin asking Payne if her information is posted anywhere. She said no.

Well, here’s the information! Right here in this transcript that I took of what Sue Payne said about this undemocratic unAmerican Task Force of the treasonous, terrifying Obama White House.

Spread the word!

Disseminate this transcript far and wide via email and social media. And call and email your useless representatives in Congress.

Do this! If not for yourself, then for your children and grandchildren.

H/t Susan Duclos of Wake Up Americans and FOTM’s maziel

See also:

~Éowyn

Crime Does Pay…Illegals With Three Kids Will Collect $35,000

Isn’t this just lovely.  Those of us who have worked hard and been good citizens all our lives, and have paid our taxes for the VERY FEW things the Constitution allows the Congress to spend our dollars on, are now being raped to support law breakers and invaders.  This is absolutely unconscionable.  Write your congress criminal and get a letter back that says nothing and makes no sense whatsoever.  Call them up and what do you get?  Pablum that is spewed from the mealy mouths of the so-called representative’s aides.

I certainly am not happy about the thousands we send to DC every year being spent in this fashion.  I know many Mexicans who have come to this country legally and they are not happy about this invasion either.  Where can I sign up to be an illegal and collect tax dollars of the working Americans?  And by the way, the amount of working Americans is dwindling every day.

free-money

Posted on February 27, 2015 by Steven Ahle on DC Clothline

The old adage that says “Crime Doesn’t Pay” is no longer operable. Illegal aliens who have invaded the country will be the beneficiaries of your tax dollars once their work permits and Social Security cards are approved. The IRS in their infinite wisdom (My tongue is planted firmly in my cheek) has decided that illegal aliens will be able to collect a fortune from US taxpayers even though they haven’t paid a penny in taxes themselves. A family of three would be eligible for just over $35,000.

It’s bad enough that these criminals are allowed to stay here against duly passed and signed laws of the land because some American hating SOB in the White House decides to scrap the constitution and US law.

The IRS has determined that these illegal aliens can take advantage of both the Child Tax Credit (CTC) (1,000 per child) and the EITC. (Earned Income Tax Credit) A family with three children earning $22,000 per year would be eligible for the maximum amount of $35,521. Nice non work if you can find it. I wonder if I went to the immigration office, if they would let me apply for illegal status. Free money, free education, free housing, free abortions, free medical, free electricity, free food, free education. And now free tax refunds.

Sens. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Ben Sasse (R-NE) wrote to Barry and objected to what they called amnesty bonuses:

“This is basic economics: if you want more of something, you subsidize it. By subsidizing illegal entry with four years’ worth of new tax credits, the IRS would promote lawlessness,” Sasse said in a statement at the time. “This program severely undermines the White House’s lip-service to enforcing the law and would increase the burden on law-abiding taxpayers.”

Courtesy of Red Statements.