Category Archives: conspiracy

Obama has DHS agents in Ferguson; pays protesters to justify martial law

It is alleged by blogger Dave Hodges that his unnamed “trusted source” spoke to an unnamed “member” of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) who said that undercover DHS agents are posing as members of the New Black Panthers “encouraging and exacerbating” the rioting and violence in Ferguson. The anonymous “trusted source” said that DHS is running the Ferguson Police Department and that DHS agents’ mission is to antagonize and provoke the locals to violence. The ultimate goal is to inflame the local citizens to such a point martial law will be declared. (Source: Patriot Action Network)

I don’t like information, especially incendiary information, being relayed to us from a twice-removed anonymous source (an unnamed “trusted source” who spoke to another unnamed person inside the DHS).

I much prefer this source — a young black man who claims to be a government agent in Missouri, wearing a blue St. Louis baseball cap and a white t-shirt with the word “TAKEN” (pic below) — who says the same thing as Hodges’ anonymous “trusted source.”

Let’s call the young black man Mr. Agent Provocateur.

Ferguson

The video below of Mr. Agent Provocateur was taken by Jimmy So Ambitious Wen-Birdboyz and uploaded to his Facebook page on August 18, 2014. This is what Jimmy wrote about the man in the video:

“I debated with myself over an hour about whether I should post this or not. Earlier, while on the 2nd shift of our U. City [University City, a suburb of St. Louis] protest, a guy pulled up, called all of us over, and said he worked with the government. He asked if we had a cell phone or something we could record him with. He said he was on his way out of here and wanted this recorded. I shid you not, and between my research on this government, & history, I’m inclined to believe him. Watch, like, share, tag, flood the news fb pages, WE ARE ALMOST OUT OF TIME!!!”

Below is my transcript of what Mr. Agent Provocateur said in the video:

“I’m gonna say this one thing and I’m sayin’ no more. The shit that we’re doing out here as far as this protest, it’s a beautiful thing … don’t get me wrong. But … they’re bringing these National Guards today. By next week, we’ll have St. Louis locked down.

I’m tryin’ to tell y’all these protesters that they’ve plant in the neighborhoods. They’re gonna plant them in Chesterfield, they’re gonna plant them in Clayton, they’re gonna plant them in Hazelwood. [Note: Like Freguson, those towns are all suburbs of St. Louis.] They’re gonna have people standing outside that’s paid. Protesters are paid hundreds of dollars to stand holding signs to say ‘Free My People,’ ‘No Fighting, No Shoot’. But that shit is propaganda; it’s agenda. They put you on the hood and … in three days this is gonna be a big-ass group of people around, and next thing you know, there’s gonna be some troops. They’re trying to do this so they can get in our cribs, so Obama signs martial law … the shit is going to go down.

This is no peace from here, brother. No peace. So get your families, get your loved ones and love them. This is the heart of America. They chose this state for a reason. Get this agenda, man. This agenda is wrong, man. They plant people in our neighborhoods that look just like us, niggers … and say, ‘Go outside and protest.’ And they’re gonna have … assault rifles shooting at everybody on the block. That’s how they do it. That’s how the news will present it — aw, we got shot! They shot at us! And that’s what it’s gonna look like. That’s what people’s gonna believe. The agenda is St. Louis down. The heart of America.”

Jimmy So Ambitious Wen-Birdboyz

Jimmy So Ambitious Wen-Birdboyz

In another posting to his Facebook page today, Aug. 21, Jimmy So Ambitious Wen-Birdboyz had this picture of a suspected government agent fomenting mischief in Ferguson:

Agent provocateur in Ferguson

Jimmy writes:

“Wake up people !!!

You won’t see this blood sucking vampire during daylight because he doesn’t blend in well. If you see him tonight give a swift kick in the nuts and tell him to get out our community! THIS is the fire starter at night he’s is who is going to get more of our youth killed.

Don’t think I didn’t remember you from the NATO demonstration Veterans For Peace had in Chicago.. I’m not brand new to this..I don’t forget faces. — with Benita Hannett.”

I’m glad some blacks, like Jimmy So Ambitious Wen-Birdboyz, are savvy and alert to government moles and agents provocateur who are doing Obama’s dirty work by infiltrating and inciting the protesters in Ferguson and elsewhere in America. As Jimmy warns on his FB page:

“Wake up people, they are trying to start a race war on purpose. Don’t fall for it !!”

Obama’s DHS had done this before. Please see:

~Eowyn

This Just In. Obama Broke The Law….Again. No Really.

Feds: Obama Broke Law with Bergdahl Swap

President Obama violated a “clear and unambiguous” law when he released five Guantanamo Bay detainees in exchange for Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, the Government Accountability Office reported Thursday.

“[The Department of Defense] violated section 8111 because it did not notify the relevant congressional committees at least 30 days in advance of the transfer,” the GAO report said. “In addition, because DOD used appropriated funds to carry out the transfer when no money was available for that purpose, DOD violated the Antideficiency Act. The Antideficiency Act prohibits federal agencies from incurring obligations exceeding an amount available in an appropriation.”

The GAO rejected the idea that the action was legal and sidestepped the Obama team’s suggestion that the law is unconstitutional.

Can we impeach him now?

Rest Here

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/385979/feds-obama-broke-law-bergdahl-swap-joel-gehrke#
 
~Steve~

Dr. Michael Baden Did Not Do Michael Brown Autopsy. Then Who Did?

Shawn Parcells Did.  Who Dat You Say? Well Let Me Do some splainin.

Seems Like Missy Plays nice with her subjects

Seems Like Missy Plays nice with her subjects.

Quick Update!

I’ve added some additional copy. Seems reporter pictured above is a bigger part of story then I gave her credit for. Shucks as you can see by the above tweet she was playing with Crump way back when St. Trayvon was Canonized. 

—————————————————————————————–———-

By, Frances Robles, and Julie Bosman.   Aug, 17 2014

FERGUSON, Mo. — Michael Brown, the unarmed black teenager who was killed by a police officer, sparking protests around the nation, was shot at least six times, including twice in the head, a preliminary private autopsy performed on Sunday found.

One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Brown’s skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the family’s request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said. 

[...]  Prof. Shawn L. Parcells, a pathologist assistant based in Kansas, assisted Dr. Baden.

“You do this for the families,” Mr. Parcells said.

The two medical experts conducted the four-hour examination Sunday at the Austin A. Layne Mortuary in St. Louis. Benjamin L. Crump, a lawyer for Mr. Brown’s family who paid their travel expenses, hired them.  (link)

Reading this article by Frances Robles would give you the impression Dr. Michael M. Baden actually “conducted” the autopsy on 8/17/14.

Alas a review of the timeline shows a divergent reality.   The Scheme Team are up to their old tricks.

parks-and-crump

parks-and-crump

1) Wed Aug 13 – Professor Parcells was contacted by attorney’ Benjamin Crump and Gray (allegedly just to assist Baden).  Parcells was on MSNBC’s The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnelllast night and stated he was contacted by attorneys Crump and Gray on Wednesday 8/13.

2) Fri Aug 15 – Daryl Parks gave a press conference sharing his disgust the Ferguson Police had release the strong arm robbery footage.   During the presser he told the media that their 2nd independent autopsy had already been performed (citation link)

Knowing they were going to bring in Dr. Baden, that’s why when questioned about the second autopsy Parks said:

…”it’s done, and we’ll talk about that later, we’re not answering any questions about the 2nd autopsy at this time; we will -in time- do that”….

3) Sun Aug 17 – According to the NYT Dr. Baden was flown in.

If Parcells was just supposed to be assisting Baden, why was Parks stating that the autopsy had already been performed two days before Baden was even flown in?

The actual truth appears to be – a rather controversial person Shawn Parcells, who is NOT a forensic pathologist, was used by the Scheme Team to conduct an autopsy – and then Professor Baden was brought in AFTER to meet with Parcells and give his OPINION of it.

In essence lend his credibility toward it.

Shawn Parcells is not a pathologist,  he is a voice for hire.  Here’s some articles on the lack of credentials for Parcells and the concerns therein:

“[...]  some coroners and medical examiners in Missouri say Parcells has inflated his qualifications and performed autopsies without a medical license. Others allege that doctors whose signatures were on some autopsy reports were not present at the autopsies, did not review the work or never actually signed the documents.”

“Police in Andrew County are looking into allegations that a pathologist Parcells listed on a 2012 autopsy was never consulted.”

“Shramek said he became alarmed when Parcells asked what to put down as the cause of death on an autopsy report instead of following the evidence.”

“Others, such as Dr. Mary Case, the medical examiner for St. Louis, St. Charles, Franklin and Jefferson counties, have been outspoken about the allegations against Parcells.

“It’s very bad for our state if there’s someone doing autopsies without a medical license,” she said. “This is a huge atrocity, an invitation to disaster, and it needs to stop.”   (link)

The guy is not a DR. He’s a fraud.

More HERE, and HERE, and HERE

The bottom line is that Dr. Michael M. Baden never performed an autopsy on Mike Brown.  Instead he signed off on an opinion of a forensic examination completed by a controversial Forensic Pathologist Assistant, who did an evaluation of Mike Brown’s body at the request of the Scheme Team.

Dr. Baden was flown in later to review the findings of the Forensic Pathologist Assistant, Shawn Parcells, and give it credibility in the eyes of a non-questioning media.

The Scheme Team then took Dr. Baden’s evaluation of the Shawn Parcell review, and handed it off to their New York Times friend and cohort, Frances Robles.  Selling it as if Dr. Baden had actually conducted the physical exam himself.

Frances worked with the Scheme Team in 2012 while she was at the Miami Herald and was part of their inner circle of media types willing to sell the Trayvon Story.   The Trayvon Martin Story was also full of similarly false and manufactured media evidence.

The Rest From  Here

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/08/19/busted-the-mysterious-mike-brown-autopsy-and-how-the-scheme-team-used-their-new-york-times-cohort-frances-robles-to-sell-the-lie/

~Steve~                                              H/T  Reader Snuffy

Officer Darren Wilson Suffered “Orbital Blowout Fracture to Eye Socket”

Gateway Pundit has a new report., But before we get to that some words from our sponsor….er, me   :)

I wish they would just release whatever they have instead of this piecemeal crap.

I’d put another one in the “Dorian Johnson”  (Browns accomplice) A big fat stupid liars column.

Dorian Johnson should be arrested along with the atty who coached him in this vid. Watch as he says Brown shot in back. (Lie) Did not hit Wilson (Lie) And listen to the words he uses. The best is the big ole crocodile tears. NOT!

——————————————————————————————–

The Gateway Pundit can now confirm from two local St. Louis sources that police Officer Darren Wilson suffered facial fractures during his confrontation with deceased 18 year-old Michael Brown. Officer Wilson clearly feared for his life during the incident that led to the shooting death of Brown. This was after Michael Brown and his accomplice Dorian Johnson robbed a local Ferguson convenience store.

Local St. Louis sources said Wilson suffered an “orbital blowout fracture to the eye socket.” This comes from a source within the Prosecuting Attorney’s office and confirmed by the St. Louis County Police.

Umm, I think it's a generic type anybody scan

Umm, I think it’s a generic type anybody scan

A blowout fracture is a fracture of one or more of the bones surrounding the eye and is commonly referred to as an orbital floor fracture. (AAPOS)

This comes after St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter tweeted out last night that a dozen local witnesses confirmed Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson’s version of the Brown shooting story.

Rest of Gateway Pundit Here

~Steve

 

Media make public Ferguson cop’s photo and address

This is beyond outrageous.

On August 9, a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, allegedly shot to death an unarmed black teen, 18-year-old Michael Brown.

Michael Brown

Michael Brown

Six days later on the morning of Aug. 15, buckling under pressure brought by Brown’s family, Ferguson Police Chief Tom Jackson released 28-year-old Officer Darren Wilson’s name.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, now national, international, and local media have published not only Wilson’s photo, but his home address. The media outlets that did this include:

  • CNN was the first. After police chief Jackson released Darren Wilson’s name on Friday, CNN broadcast a report that very day showing Wilson’s house, including the street number. In the video report, CNN reporter Ed Lavandera is seen walking in the street where Wilson lives (see pic below). The CNN video shows a wide view of Wilson’s house and then pans around the street to show its relative position in the neighborhood. While Lavandera does not name the street, he gives its approximate location.

CNN reporter in front of Darren Wilson's house

  • On the same day, USA Today named the community in which Wilson lives — Crestwood, a suburb of St. Louis.
  • The next day, Saturday, Aug. 16, Yahoo News also named the community and published photos of Wilson receiving a commendation six months earlier for his “extraordinary effort in the line of duty.” Yahoo had obtained the photos from Wilson’s proud dad’s Facebook page.

Darren Wilson

  • The same day, Saturday, Washington Post named the street where Wilson lives — Manda Lane.
  • On Saturday, the UK Daily Mail also named the community, posted photos of officer Wilson, gave a description of his house, and pointedly emphasized that the residents of Crestwood are 94% white and only 1.6% black.
  • A version of the video being aired by CNN affiliate Newschannel 13 in Orlando, Florida (and likely other affiliates around the country) shows a brief close-up of the house number by the front door such that someone could freeze and enlarge the image to get the address.
  • St. Louis TV station KSDK, which like USA Today is owned by Gannett, also broadcast a video of Wilson’s home, then hypocritically issued an apology Saturday afternoon. By then, of course, the damage’s been done.
  • A local newspaper, Call, named the street where Wilson lives, adding that the area high school closed and sent students home when Wilson’s name was made public.

Beginning at 6:28 mark of the video below, you can hear a male eyewitness testify to Brown struggling with Officer Wilson in the truck, then running away, then doubling back and coming at the officer in spite of Wilson drawing his gun and firing warning shots. To read the actual transcript of what the eyewitness said, go to Steve’s post, “Smoking Gun to Clear Cop in Shooting of Michael Brown“.

Darren Wilson and his family have gone into hiding.

If anything untoward happens to Wilson, his family, or his neighbors, the above media outlets have blood on their hands.

H/t Gateway Pundit

~Eowyn

Scientists now admit many vaccines were made with cells from aborted babies

This is a follow-up on a post I did in 2011, “Aborted Human Fetal Cells in Your Food, Vaccines & Cosmetics.”

After decades of ignoring the issue, scientists finally are acknowledging that many vaccines were made with cells from aborted fetuses babies.

We must ask ourselves about the morality of vaccines — whether the end justifies the means.

When we treat human beings, albeit very small human beings, as things — as mere means to our ends — we’ll soon discover that all human life is cheapened and objectified, including our own.

8-week-aborted-fetus

The dark story of immortality

Michael Cook | MercatorNet | 22 August 2013

After decades of ignoring the issue, Nature, the world’s leading science journal, has finally acknowledged that creating life-saving vaccines from tissue from aborted foetuses is a deeply controversial ethical issue.

In 1964, an American researcher obtained cells from a Swedish foetus aborted because her mother already had enough children. He coaxed them into multiplying into a cell line which he called WI-38. Since they were normal and healthy, they were ideal for creating vaccines. Two years later, scientists in the UK obtained cells from a 14-week male fetus aborted for “psychiatric reasons” from a 27-year-old British woman. This cell line is called MRC-5.

It is undeniable that the vaccines made from WI-38 and MRC-5 cells have saved millions of lives. Scientists have made vaccines against rubella, rabies, adenovirus, polio, measles, chickenpox and shingles, as well as smallpox, chicken pox and hepatitis A.

But protests by opponents of abortion have been largely ignored by the scientific community. If you Google “vaccines” and “abortion”, only Catholic groups, right-to-life organisations and sites warning about the dangers of vaccinations mention the topic. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention barely alludes to it even though it has abundant information on vaccines. A website called Vaccine Ethics at the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics fails to mention it.

The reason is clear: vaccines save lives and the abortions happened a long time ago. Get over it. Who cares? “At the time [the fetus] was obtained there was no issue in using discarded material. Retrospective ethics is easy but presumptuous,” says Stanley Plotkin, the American scientist who developed the rubella vaccine. “I am fond of saying that rubella vaccine has prevented thousands more abortions than have ever been prevented by Catholic religionists.”

But now even Nature – which supports abortion rights and reproductive technology – has expressed its misgivings. “More than 50 years after the WI-38 cell line was derived from a fetus, science and society [have] still to get to grips with the ethical issues of using human tissue in research,” its editorial declared in June.

What has changed?

If you could single out a reason, it would be the intensely moving 2010 best-seller, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, by Rebecca Skloot. This book has nothing to do with abortion, but it highlights the deep respect, almost sacredness, that the body of a human person must command, even something as insignificant as discarded tissue.

Henrietta Lacks was an African-American woman who was 31 when she died of cervical cancer in 1951. Cells from her tumour became the first human cells cultured continuously for use in research. HeLa cells have helped to make possible some of the most important medical advances of the past 60 years, including modern vaccines, cancer treatments, and IVF techniques. They are the most widely used human cell lines in existence. More than 300 scientific papers are published every month using HeLa cells.

There is no question about their usefulness – but were they obtained ethically? Is it ethical to continue using them?

The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks raises disturbing questions which transcend “usefulness”. Henrietta Lacks was poor and black. Her children, it seems, are even poorer. A doctor at Johns Hopkins removed her cells without asking her. He cultivated the cells without informing her. He distributed the cells without asking permission of her family. Companies became rich by using her cells without paying royalties. Her family only learned that their mother’s cells had been scattered around the world in 1973. Their complaints were ignored for many years – after all, they were only poor, uneducated black folks.

No one cared about the woman called Henrietta Lacks who was overdosed with radium, who died leaving five children behind, one of them an epileptic housed in a filthy, chaotic institution called The Hospital for the Negro Insane. Some people even thought that HeLa cells originated with a woman named Helen Lane. Her daughter wrote in a diary, “When that day came, and my mother died, she was Robbed of her cells and John Hopkins Hospital learned of those cells and kept it to themselfs, and gave them to who they wanted and even changed the name to HeLa cell and kept it from us for 20+ years. They say Donated. No No No Robbed Self.”

It was only earlier this year that the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) negotiated an agreement with the family. All researchers who use or generate full genomic data from HeLa cells must now include in their publications an acknowledgement and expression of gratitude to the Lacks family.

Incredibly, despite all the publicity, scientists continued to ignore the concerns of the Lacks family. Just a few months ago, German researchers published the first sequence of the full HeLa genome. This compromised not only Henrietta Lacks’s genetic privacy but also her family’s. (The researchers have removed the sequence from public view.)

The story of HeLa cells, in short, is twofold: a story of towering scientific achievement and a story of exploitation by ambitious and callous scientists.

Less famous, but even more important, says Nature, have been WI-38 cells [from an aborted Swedish fetus baby]. HeLa cells multiply prolifically, but they are cancerous. WI-38 cells are healthy and normal and have been used to develop vaccines against rubella, rabies, adenovirus, polio, measles, chickenpox and shingles. Their origin is even more controversial than the dark story of Henrietta Lacks.

In 1962 a Swedish woman who was four months pregnant had a legal abortion because she did not want another child. The lungs of the foetus were removed and sent to Philadelphia. At the Wistar Institute for Anatomy and Biology they were minced up, processed and cultured by Leonard Hayflick. He had been culturing cells from aborted foetuses for years, even though abortion was technically illegal in Pennsylvania at the time, except for medical emergencies.

Leonard Hayflick examines WI-38 cells which were derived from an aborted Swedish girl.

After he successfully multiplied the WI-38 cells, Hayflick created more than 800 batches and distributed them freely around the world to drug companies and researchers. He eventually quarrelled with Wistar authorities because he thought that his contribution was being ignored. Without permission, he took all the remaining batches to California and his new job at Stanford. This led to years of bitter legal battles over who owned the cells. No one worried about where they had come from.

The abortion connection is beyond dispute, although, as Nature points out, “until now, that story has failed to reach the broad audience it deserves.” As in the Henrietta Lacks case, no informed consent was given by the Swedish mother. Her identity is known but she refuses to talk about the case. The doctors involved are all dead. A Swedish medical historian told Nature that in Sweden, “research material like tissues from aborted fetuses were available and used for research without consent or the knowledge of patients for a long time”, both before and after consent rules were tightened later in the 1960s.

The drug companies and institutions which have used WI-38 deny that there are serious ethical concerns either with the use of cells from aborted foetuses or with the lack of consent.

The institution which has examined this issue most closely is the Vatican. In 2005 it released a meticulously researched study of the ethical issues involved in using vaccines which had been developed with tissue from aborted foetuses. Even though it contended that parents could have their children vaccinated with a clear conscience, it did not dismiss the question as irrelevant or absurd. On the contrary, it concluded that “there is a grave responsibility to use alternative vaccines and to make a conscientious objection with regard to those which have moral problems.”

And it said that the existing situation was completely unjust. “Parents… are forced to choose to act against their conscience or otherwise, to put the health of their children and of the population as a whole at risk. This is an unjust alternative choice, which must be eliminated as soon as possible.”

What is the way forward?

I am writing from suburban Sydney which long ago lost its connection to the Aboriginal tribes who once lived here. Yet at every civic ceremony we acknowledge the memory of the Cammeraygal and Wallumedegal peoples. It is a form of reparation for the dispossession, disease and death which carried them away, leaving neither names nor descendants.

Doesn’t the story of Henrietta Lacks suggest that drug companies should do something similar with their vaccine products? From now on, the NIH says, scientists who use HeLa cells must include “an acknowledgment and expression of gratitude to the Lacks family for their contributions”.

Why shouldn’t drug companies and researchers who use the WI-38 (or the MRC-5 cells) do the same? “This vaccine was developed with the cells of a Swedish child who was aborted in 1964. We are grateful for her contribution and grieve at her absence.”

H/t California Catholic Daily

To find which vaccines are morally acceptable go to Children Of God For Life.

See also:

~Eowyn

New study finds ordinary Americans have no impact on public policy

Click pic to enlarge!

9-12-2009 march on WashingtonPhoto by Michael A. Beck

Do you remember the Tea Party March on Washington, D.C., of Sept. 12, 2009? At least a million marched, but nothing changed.

A new study confirms our frustration at making ourselves heard. We ordinary Americans have a near-zero impact on public policy, which instead is controlled and determined by monied élites.

Wynton Hall reports for Breitbart, Aug. 12, 2014, that according to the study by Princeton University Professor Martin Gilens and Northwestern University Professor Benjamin Page, titled “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens,” which will be published in an upcoming issue of Perspectives on Politics, corporate interests and mega wealthy individuals control U.S. policy to such a degree that “the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.”

You can read an early draft of their study here.

Noted American University Historian Allan J. Lichtman highlighted the piece in a Tuesday article published in The Hill. Lichtman calls Gilens and Page’s research “shattering” and says their scholarship “should be a loud wake-up call to the vast majority of Americans who are bypassed by their government.”

Gilens and Page’s statistical research looked at public attitudes on nearly 1,800 policy issues and determined that government almost always ignores the opinions of average citizens and adopts the policy preferences of monied business interests when shaping U.S. laws.

The study’s findings align with recent trends, where corporate elites have aggressively pursued pro-amnesty policies despite the fact that, according to the most recent Reuters poll, a bipartisan 70% of Americans believe illegal immigrants threaten the U.S. economy and our traditional beliefs and customs.

Gilens and Page propose that the solution is a reinvigorated and engaged electorate because “If policymaking is dominated by powerful business organizations and a small number of affluent Americans, then America’s claims to being a democratic society are seriously threatened.”

Declaration of Independence

238 years ago, the Declaration of Independence was the clarion call of a populist revolution to install “a government by the people, for the people, and of the people.” The Declaration declared that:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

So is the Declaration’s promise a chimera? Given the Gilens-Page research findings, what do we do? Do we give up and sink into apathy, thereby ensuring the élite’s grip on power? Or do we harken to Thomas Jefferson’s undying words:

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

See also “A message for apathetic Christians and Conservatives.

~Eowyn

Who Said Bin Laden Is Dead. Try Our Border.

Folks, just watch from :40 – 1:30 and watch your blood pressure spiral.

——————————————————————————————-

Patrick Howley

Political Reporter          dailycaller.com

James O’Keefe Crosses The US-Mexico Border Dressed As Osama Bin Laden

Hey, the camel's cute.  :)

Hey, the camel’s cute. :)

Investigative filmmaker James O’Keefe exposes the U.S.-Mexico border’s vulnerability to terrorism in his latest undercover project, obtained exclusively by The Daily Caller.

O’Keefe’s Project Veritas video reminds viewers of recent statements by the president and Obama administration officials that the southern border is secure. O’Keefe then proceeds to Hudspeth County, Texas, to easily cross back and forth cross the Rio Grande wearing the costume of modern history’s most recognizable terrorist.

“I see no border patrol. I see no security,” O’Keefe said in the video before donning a bin Laden mask. “Thousands of people have stood in my footsteps right now. They’ve come from South America, Honduras, Guatemala, and they’ve all crossed the border. And if they can cross, anybody can cross.”

O’Keefe’s work often distinguishes itself for proving taboo but accurate premises – in this case, that Islamic extremists are able to gain entry to the United States from Mexico, where drug cartels are linked to numerous terrorist organizations including Hezbollah and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), the strongest al-Qaida-like organization in the heart of the Middle East.

~Steve~

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/11/new-video-james-okeefe-crosses-the-border-as-osama-bin-laden/#ixzz3A69rGzTK

 

Texas just published a map of gunowners’ location!

The Sandy Hook massacre hoax of December 14, 2012, unleashed a paroxysm of gun control legislation across the United States. (See here, here, and here.)

One response that received relatively scant notice was what a suburban New York City newspaper, The Journal News, did.

As reported by NewsMax, on December 24, 2012 — Christmas Eve! — the paper published an article, “The gun owner next door: What you don’t know about the weapons in your neighborhood,” with an interactive map showing the addresses of thousands of handgun permit holders across Westchester, Rockland, and Putnam Counties, the northern suburbs of New York City where the paper is read.

Not only was the information a violation of gunowners’ privacy, it also provided a map for criminals to use to find homes to rob that have no guns.

Hard to believe, but Texas has followed the example of The Journal News and released a map of the location of all its gun owners.

Their locations are marked by red dots on the map below. :D

arrows-down

Texas gun map

H/t FOTM’s josephbc69

~Eowyn

More and more Americans think Michelle Obama is a man

The whispers began on the blogosphere several years ago.

That led me, finally, to post about it on March 14, with the hypothetical non-committal title of “Michelle Obama is a transexual?,” wherein I simply laid out the speculations and evidence.

Then all hell broke loose on July 3, when comedienne Joan Rivers said to a reporter: “We already have [the first gay president] with Obama, so let’s just calm down. You know Michelle is a tranny… a transgender. We all know.“ (See “We all know Obama is gay and Michelle is a tranny” and “Where are Obama’s daughters’ baby pics and birth records?“.)

Judging by the readers’ comments to a brief AP article and photo of FLPOS Mooch and former First Lady Laura Bush at the US-Africa Summit on Aug. 6, 2014, the cat is REALLY out of the bag.

Below is the AP news photo and article, followed by a sample of readers’ comments.

Michael Obama & Laura Bush, Aug. 6, 2014

Susan Walsh reports for the AP, Aug. 6, 2014:

First lady Michelle Obama, left, points out her hairstyle as she sits with former first lady Laura Bush as they participate in the “Investing in Our Future” a discussion at the Kennedy Center in Washington, Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2014, as part of the US Africa Summit. Michelle Obama and Laura Bush, first ladies of different generations and opposing political parties, are uniting for the second time in just over a year to promote U.S. relations with Africa. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

Here is another image of Michael Obama at the same “Investing in Our Future” discussion. Look at those massive shoulders and muscular arms! s_shocked-16

Michael O at US-Africa Summit 2014

And here are some of the readers’ comments (you can read them for yourself by going here), beginning with reader Eatmyshorts, whose comment was lifted straight from my “Michelle Obama is a transexual?” post, but without attribution:

Eatmyshorts: “Bafflingly, even the text of the speech on WhiteHouse.gov says the same thing: ‘Secretary Panetta, thank you for your introduction and for your extraordinary leadership. Members of Congress, Vice President Biden, members of the Joint Chiefs, service secretaries, distinguished guests, and men and women of the finest military in the world. Most of all, Admiral Mullen, Deborah, Michael and I also want to also acknowledge your son Jack, who’s deployed today. All of you have performed extraordinary service to our country.’ Admiral Mullen’s first name is Michael. However, throughout his speech, Obama referred to Mullen as ‘Mike,’ not Michael.”

Mr. UN-PC: “Obama is referring to ‘Michelle’, who is rumored to be ‘Michael’, a tranny. Obama is gay and the daughters are adopted. What an incredible hoax, perpetrated on the American people!!!”

420d: “Michelle has the grace of a Neanderthal.”

Paul: “Michelle Obama’s body language is telling me she is a man. Look at the shoulders on it, and how it slumps them forward to appear smaller. Look at the face! It towers over Barry like an Amazon.”

Lee Goodwine: “OK, I don’t have anything against gays, but I was not aware that Yahoo was so gay-friendly. Here’s a picture of a man in a dress pointing to his head with this rather sizable right hand, and holding a wiener in his left hand. I don’t get what’s going on here. He’s pointing to his head, as if to say, ‘Empty’ and is holding a phallus-like ape-aratus in his other hand, as if to say, ‘I have one of these.’ Well at any rate, it’s good to see that Magic Johnson is still alive and well. I guess his Johnson really is magic…”

joe_the_plumber: “What an angry, ugly, man the U.S. has to represent us at world events.”

Gnu: “Did you ever wonder why there are zero pictures of Michelle Obama while pregnant and also zero images of either of the Obamas holding either of their infant daughters? I wonder whose kids they really are?”

Ahna Capri: “Mrs. Bush is really scraping the bottom of the barrel by beeing seen with Moochell aka Michael. With all the debasing the Odumr’s have done against her husband I wouldn’t be seen within a mile of this pile of trailer trash.”

Sniper: “On the right, you have grace, class, and elegance. On the left, you have Bernie Mac in drag.”

David: “Michael Obama should not be wearing dresses in public.”

CS: “Actually, MO does look like a man.”

Rich: “Transgender Michelle (or should it be Michael?) couldn’t make a good pimple on Laura’s behind!”

TonyZ: “Obama will never be half the man his wife is.”

Michael: “Laura is a classy lady and Michelle is an angry transvestite.”

MackieS: “The First Dominatrix looks like an Oakland Raider fullback after a botched sex change procedure.”

David: “Look at the shoulders and overall muscle tone on Michelle O. I don’t believe she is a woman. The main reason to believe she is a man is because it’s so rediculous to believe the other option. Tranvestite. No joke.”

MOOK: “Michelle looks like a man wearing a sleeveless casual summer dress… He really is classless..”

Joe Schmo: “Incidentally, look at the shoulders and size of the hands on the present first “lady”. Look at the huge feet. Now, tell me you really believe that’s a “lady”.”

Dooki Fried: “And who is the Tr/\nny sitting next to First Lady Bush?”

Lori: “Is that a Chicago Bull in drag?”

Commenter: “Michelle… or is it Mike ? It’s looking more and more like it’s Mike, history will tell…”

Two Wings Downs: “don’t look now BUT I think ‘she’ is actually a HE.”

Glut: “Well one is a man and one is a woman, mrs ovomit is a tranny. i think thats a self evident truth.”

Hilarious!

Michael Obama, your gig is up.

~Eowyn