Michelle Obama is a transexual?

I’ve had this post in draft for MONTHS. I’ve hesitated to publish this because of the gravity of what is being asserted, and the uncertainty of the evidence to support the assertion.

The startling assertion is that the current First Lady of the United States of America, known as Michelle Robinson Obama, is a biological male posing as a woman.

That anyone would make such an assertion is a mark of how much distrust and suspicion the Obamas have engendered, due entirely to Barack’s secretiveness concerning his Selective Service registration, school records (including even his kindergarten record!), and medical records; his refusal to explain why his Social Security number has a Connecticut prefix; and his outright deception about his birth certificate, an image of which he made public on April 27, 2011, but which forensic experts have determined to be a fake. It doesn’t help that the Hawaiian official, Loretta Fuddy, who had signed off on Obama’s purported birth certificate was the only passenger who recently died in a small plane crash.

Startlingly, even the Obamacare sign-up website healthcare.gov cannot verify Barack Obama’s identity! (See also “Investor’s Business Daily editorial asks if Obama’s entire life is a fiction.”)

So I decided to just present what I’ve found and leave the reader to draw his/her own conclusions as to whether Mooch is a transexual.

Obama calls his wife “Michael”

In a speech on September 30, 2011, at the transition or change-of-office ceremony of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at Fort Myer, Virginia, Obama referred to his wife not as Michelle but as Michael.

As you can verify for yourself in the video below, Obama clearly said: “Distinguished guests, men and women of the finest military in the world, most of all, Admiral Mullen, Deborah, Michael and I also want to acknowledge your son Jack who was deployed today, all of you have performed extraordinary service to our country….”

Note: Deborah is Admiral Mullen’s wife.

Bafflingly, even the text of the speech on WhiteHouse.gov says the same thing:

“Secretary Panetta, thank you for your introduction and for your extraordinary leadership. Members of Congress, Vice President Biden, members of the Joint Chiefs, service secretaries, distinguished guests, and men and women of the finest military in the world. Most of all, Admiral Mullen, Deborah, Michael and I also want to also acknowledge your son Jack, who’s deployed today. All of you have performed extraordinary service to our country.”

Admiral Mullen’s first name is Michael. However, throughout his speech, Obama referred to Mullen as “Mike,” not Michael.

Michelle’s birth name was Michael?

Even before Obama’s gaffe, there were bloggers who said Michelle’s real (birth) name is Michael.

As an example, three months before Obama publicly referred to his wife as “Michael,” blogger Matthew B. Glosser wrote on June 30, 2011 that he was contacted by “an anonymous source” who claimed to be a former White House staff member of the Obama administration, specifically “a former member of the First Lady’s personal staff.” The source claimed to have sensitive information regarding a stunning revelation about Michelle Obama and wanted to arrange a meeting with Glosser in person to present the evidence for this claim.

Though initially skeptical, Glosser nevertheless met with the “anonymous source” on June 25, 2011. The source said “the major alphabet networks … are in the tank for Obama and it is network policy to cover up any critical stories regarding the President and his family. The White House has officially created a State media.” Then the source said the following about Michelle Obama:

Michelle Obama, First Lady of the United States, was born Michael LaVaughn Robinson in Chicago, Illinois on January 17th, 1964. He was the second son born to Fraser Robinson III, a well known cocaine dealer and union thug for Crime Lord/Mayor Richard J. Daley, and Marian Shields Robinson, a transient street prostitute who was diagnosed with the HIV virus in 1998. He [Michael] was a popular high school athlete and in 1982, he accepted a scholarship to play middle linebacker for the Oregon State Beavers.

After finishing a respectable rookie season with 88 tackles and 7.5 sacks, he suddenly dropped out of the school. Fellow teammates observed that Robinson could regularly be heard lamenting over how he is a “woman trapped inside a man’s body”, and on January 13th, 1983, he underwent sex reassignment surgery at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. To hide the shame of his new identity, Michael left Oregon State to attend Princeton University under his new legal name, “Michelle Robinson”. Years later, he met Barry Obama Jr. a Kenyan immigrant who later became aware of “Michelle’s” true identity. They subsequently married and adopted two children.

Writing for Examiner.com, Jan. 11, 2014, Dean Chambers says: “I have been unable to find any proof that a Michael LaVaughn Robinson even existed, and there is reasonable proof that Michelle LaVaughn Robinson (later Obama after marriage) has existed. Furthermore, there is no proof of a Michael Robinson playing linebacker for the Oregon State Beavers in 1981 or 1982.”

Pictures of Michelle’s strange crotch

Here are two pictures of Michelle Obama with a strange crotch-level protuberance suggestive of a shrunken penis. I have no way to ascertain whether the pictures are photoshopped. The sources of the pictures are Barack Ovomit and I Hate the Media.

Mooch's weenieMichelle was wearing this aqua blue dress when she gave a speech at the Democratic National Convention on August 25, 2008. One way to verify the pic’s authenticity is to find this image in a video of her appearance at the convention. 

Mooch's weewee2

The Video

The most recent claim that Michelle is a man is this fascinating video that systematically argues that physical traits, including her fingers, shoulders, neck muscles, head-to-body ratio and trace of an Adam’s apple, all point to her being a biological male.

If this is true, it certainly would explain why we’ve seen no pictures of a pregnant Michelle, nor has anyone found birth records of “her” two daughters.

H/t FOTM’s Glenn47, Miss May, and swampygirl.

See also:


I found the YouTube video of Mooch’s speech at the 2008 Democratic National Convention:

A full-figure view of Mooch is at the beginning and at the end of the video. The problem is she was moving so quickly, it’s difficult to spot the weenie. I found a way to slow down the video. Click here or go to http://www.youtubeslow.com/watch?v=sTFsB09KhqI.

Here are some screenshots I took from the video. Mooch’s aqua dress is of a clingy fabric that reveals every bump and bulge. Unlike most women, Mooch has ZERO abdominal fat, but there definitely is something at crotch-level which tugs. No wonder Mooch hasn’t worn another tight clingy dress since. LOL

0:16a mark

0:16a mark

0:16b mark

0:16b mark

0:16c mark

0:16c mark

0:17a mark

0:17a mark

0:17b mark

0:17b mark

0:17c maark

0:17c mark

0:18a mark

0:18a mark

0:18b mark

0:18b mark

0:27 mark

0:27 mark

17:33a mark

17:33a mark

17:33b mark

17:33b mark

17:33c mark

17:33c mark

See also:


227 responses to “Michelle Obama is a transexual?

  1. Dr. Eowyn

    I am telling you the facts in a clinical manner. I am not trying to win friends and influence people (which is perhaps a weakness of mine).

    I am absolutely not saying that you are a disinformation agent. I am clearly saying that if you don’t want people to THINK you are a disinformation agent, you should issue a retraction. I am implying that if you don’t want your credibility to be compromised, you should issue a retraction.

    I was taken in by this hoax of Michelle Obama being a transsexual before I even viewed your article above. I just hadn’t told anybody about it yet. I am not blaming your article above for my mistake in sending an email out about it. I am simply telling you what happened.

    The incriminating photograph of Michelle Obama’s crotch in the blue/green dress at the 2008 Democratic Convention is photoshopped because this image cannot be found in the corresponding video.

    I would not be surprised if Barack Obama deliberately referred to “Michael and I” in his speech that you cite in your article above in order to give credibility to the false story of blogger, Matthew B. Glosser, about “Michael Obama” at the following website which you link to:


    There is absolutely no doubt that this is a spoof website pretending to be a Christian website. If you spend ten minutes reading over it, this becomes readily apparent. The red flags are all over it. It was foolish of me not to check this website out carefully before falling for this hoax. You are annoyed because you think that I am deliberately implying that it was foolish of you to not check it out, but I’m not deliberately implying that. What I am saying is that I feel stupid, though lately I have gotten used to it.

    Barack Obama needed to take the heat out of all the people rightly claiming back in earlier years after his election in 2008 that he wasn’t eligible to become the president of the United States of America because he was born overseas, probably in Kenya. He obviously hasn’t provided a legitimate, authentic birth certificate to date proving that he was born in Hawaii as he claims he was. The birth certificate he has provided is fake.

    So it is quite possible that it was decided to create this hoax about Michelle Obama being a transsexual in order to discredit the people complaining about his place of birth, if they ended up falling for this hoax. People who think that this whole scenario of creating this hoax is too fantastical don’t know how the current office of the President of the United States of America operates. It operates based on one fabrication after another.

    Very few people fell for the hoax. It lay dormant for a couple of years. Then along comes somebody stupid like me who is a bit frayed around the edges and who doesn’t check the sources. Idiot that I am, I fell for it. I’m talking about me.

    Regarding the twenty-plus minute, banned YouTube video about Michelle Obama being a transsexual, it may have been flagged by one or more people in the truth movement who recognised that is was disinformation and who didn’t want to see other people in the truth movement falling for it and being discredited. In any case, it cannot be argued that because it was banned, it must be true. This is simply not logically valid. I am not trying to pointed criticise you by saying this. I am simply making an important point.

    I honestly respect your website. It reflects very well on you that you have posted my comment above, rather than blocking it. I understand if you think that I am criticising you but I really am not. It is obvious that you’re interested in the truth, otherwise you wouldn’t have allowed my comment.

    I don’t like the fact that I fell for this hoax. It reflects very badly on me and calls into question my ability to discern truth from falsehood. However, it is very important to get to the bottom of this issue, hence my comment above and this comment. I think that these will show a lot of other people just how easy it is to be taken in by a hoax if the proper due diligence of scrutinising it carefully is neglected.

    The truth movement is making enormous progress. It’s important to fully admit mistakes that I make such as believing this hoax about Michelle Obama being a transsexual, which is designed to discredit the truth movement, because none of us want to see our progress being impeded. I don’t care if making this admission reflects badly on me. In the medium to long term, it strengthens the truth movement. The politicians rarely admit when they get it wrong, do they. That’s a full-stop, not a question mark. We need to admit when we get it wrong. Only with the truth can we progress.

    I’m really sorry that you got taken in by this hoax like I did. I really am. Politicians whose daily bread and butter is lying don’t admit when they get it wrong. But we are different. We know we’re not invincible and we admit when we get it wrong.

    Then everybody benefits.

    Some people only get it wrong very infrequently like you. Other people like me have started to make a bad habit of it.

    Maybe this whole rigmarole will teach me to check my sources carefully. This hoax of Michelle Obama being a transsexual is disinformation 101. They’re playing hard-ball – putting out false information to trip us up.

    Onward and upward and best wishes to you.

    • Thank you for the clarification, Andrew. I’m leaving this post up, as a historical record. And the question mark at the end of the post title also stays.

      Best wishes.

      • traildustfotm

        Agreed! And the question mark stands, not only as a defense of our blog, but as a demand for answers from Washington, DC. There are too many deceptions surrounding this president.

        • Thank you, TD. Whether these rumors are true or false, they are a testament to the total absence of trust many Americans have in Obama — a distrust that is well-founded in his secretiveness, lies and deception.

          • Think of the slogan of the Israeli Mossad….”by way of deception thou shall do war.” Deception is hostile by it’s very nature and Obama is deceiving America. The American media are his co-conspirators and the spiritual descendants of Doctor Joseph Goebbels in that they gaslight the American people in order to cover for Obama.

      • One doesn’t have to rely on any phony pictures or articles to wonder about this. The video footage of Michelle herself playing football or doing a workout is enough to make one reasonably wonder.

      • How many people die as a result of vocal chord surgery gone awry? In my opinion Joan River’s death is suspicious considering her very recent commentary on Michelle / Michael Obama on national television. That’s right, I’m floating the theory that Joan Rivers was murdered!

    • @Andrew Mackinnon

      Clearly a disinfo agent/shill.
      Why would someone get soooo emotionally involved unless to distract and to show that they oh-so loved ‘the truth movement’ and wanted the ‘real’ truth out so this site wouldn’t be discredited. BULLSHIT.

      Until you start controlling the internet because terrorists/pedophiles/illegal-downloaders/hackers/hacking banks (cos, you know, the banks are sooo important to humanity) et-fucking-cetera,
      the people will come together and see EVERY SINGLE HOAX you try to perpetrate to install your one-world fascist zionist government.

      It read so heart-felt, if I were a moron, I would’ve believed your false sincerity.

      Au revoir!! *waves*

  2. Michelle is a tranny in my opinion furthermore her friends Venus and Serena Williams are two transsexuals whipping the tar out of real female Olympic and professional tennis players. Could you imagine the fallout that would occur if there was a professional sport traditionally dominated by Black women and two White transsexuals came along and started whooping all the women and collecting all the prize monies and accolades? You can bet the ranch that somebody would have pipped up about it by now but being that Serena and Venus are two Black transsexuals whipping the tar out of White female professional athletes it’s deemed “correct” therefore not cheating.

  3. Is she or isn’t she? Maybe Air Force One is complicit. Let them go through TSA and the world will know.

  4. Damntherebstupidpeopleontheinterwebs

    Fellowship of the stupid.

    • Actually, “Damn…”, I beg to differ. Given that you made up an email address that contains the words “EataDick” and “yourmoms,” it’s you whose IQ is in the single-digit percentile.

      • I think this creep is the same troll who went along the comments and gave a ‘thumb down’ to them. We don’t know if s/he can read or write: s/he may just dictate their offal to someone to put down and send. “For it matters not what goes into one’s mouth, but rather what comes out of it.”

    • Normally this is where I would tell you to go blow yourself, troll.

      But I don’t think they make tweezers that small.


  5. To the guy who said MO had voluminous hair. Michelle Obama wears Great Lengths extensions on her hair (or s/he may have access to an even finer brand of hair extensions). That is how s/he got those bangs and that is what many wealthy women use on their hair. It is voluminous–the extensions are made of Remy hair–and bonded on to one’s hair near the scalp. S/he also wears wigs for some of her updos. Most celebrities and peeps on television wear extensions these days.
    She does have voluminous armpits–those are real.

  6. Who cares where it get’s it’s hair done or where it buys it’s wigs and extensions? Look at the bone structure of it’s brows and see how the brow paint mismatches the brow bone structure and you don’t have to be Rue Paul to know that the First Lady has a ten inch penis hanging out of her dress!

  7. I was wondering where crazy Nan Nan was getting her First Lady is Tranny from… lmao. Bunch of nuts in here. Funny thing is you still booted Nancy. She’s even to out there for this place. And Mike, you unfortunately had the wrong name. nancy thinks everyone who speaks against her crazy rants on social media is her ex husband Mike… and well you even have his name. Funny stuff. You were smart to get rid of her… but really, reading over all the ideas in here (the way someone stands facing or not facing their children makes you a transexxual, please.) And trust me, the government would never cover this up. proof could and would be found and the right wing would crucify the pres. Again, it’s so funny to me that a post like this could not accept nancy (nfigit) and her crazy ramblings.

  8. To the appropriately self-named “zero”:

    Being called “nuts” by a narcissistic arrogant “useful idiot” like you is a signal honor.


  9. lmao Doc… yea.. I get that alot.

  10. First of all, I despise this person as much as you or anyone. But answer me this, how is it that both girls resemble both her and obama? Is it possible she used a surrogate? But even then, she would still have to provide the “female eggs”. So, as I said, while I despise this person for a whole host of reasons, I don’t think I quite buy into this——unless it happened after the two girls were born. Just my opinion.

  11. Pingback: Michael LaVaughn Robinson | Andelino's Weblog

  12. Pingback: Joan Rivers Bombshell: Barack is Gay and Michelle is a Tranny |

  13. Pingback: Michelle Obama is a transexual? | Charlenecleoeiben54123's Blog


  15. I say that Michelle is a man.I am not 100% sure of it but I am sure that Barack is a spermburper.

  16. Pingback: Michelle Obama is a transexual? |

  17. It makes perfect sense given the times we find ourselves in. She’s transgender and Obama is definitely had a gay past amongst his mysterious and all so secret past.

    BTW – Serena Williams is the other fraud posing as a female.

  18. I believe Serena Williams is one too. She blows Mooch out of the water with those biceps of hers! However, considering all the many photos of her in skintight/skimpy bathing suits, I would say that she has gone all the way and had the useless appendage removed.

  19. Anne. You are a hermaphodite and so is your husband and children. Please do the research. Yes you can have children although you are a hermaphadite. Look up hormone and estrogen in babies development regarding fingers. Sorry but your parents hide it from you. I know because it happened to me.

    See more Pictures at:


    Joan Rivers claims very MATTER-A-FACT that Obama IS gay and Michelle IS transgender and it should be obvious to those with fully functioning braincells, HER STATEMENT WAS NOT SAID AS A JOKE OR INSULT.
    Joan Rivers has a great deal of respect for “gay” people and a huge advocate of alternative lifestyles. – She appeared annoyed by the hypocrisy within the media – HER COMMENT WAS OUTING THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA – as many of the media she believes “ALL KNOW” THE TRUTH .

    July 3, 2014
    AFTER she officiated a GAY MARRIAGE in NYC.

    P: Do you think the county will see the first GAY president
    or the first woman president ?

    JR: Well, we already have it with OBAMA –
    so let’s just calm down.

    P: Got it.

    JR: YOU KNOW Michelle is a TRANNY.

    P: I’m sorry she’s a what ?

    JR: A transgender. WE ALL KNOW.

    P: Oh my gosh.

    JR: It’s O.K . . .What’s it matter ?

    Super Freak Scandalous Satire from Michelle and Obama –

    A collection of scandalous twisted politically incorrect everyday photos can be humorous when in the right frame of mind of Michelle and Barrack Obama collected from the internet. Warning ADULT CONTENT.

    See more at:


  21. This could also explain the flagrant audacity in all of the executive orders Obama has been signing. His handlers can make him do virtually anything if blackmailing him with his spouse’s past. He’s probably at the point now where he just doesn’t care and would like to come clean so his handlers have had to resort to narcotics dependency and possibly death threats. Of course this is all just speculation and theory.

    • traildustfotm

      “Of course this is all just speculation and theory.”

      Funny how these theories no longer seem so far fetched.
      Great points, Jim.

  22. The frustrating thing is that some naysayers will still claim that when Obama is referring to “Admiral Mullen, Deborah, Michael, and your son Jack”, that he’s referring to Admiral Mullen, Mullen’s wife Deborah, Mullen’s son Michael and Mullen’s son Jack, rather than Admiral Mullen, Mullen’s wife Deborah, Michelle “Michael” Obama, and Mullen’s son Jack.

    The Connecticut birth certificate makes this a logical impossibility!!

    • You know your comment might have some small grain of logic in it…except for one indisputable fact. This administration lives and dies with the teleprompter. The man can’t give his correct address unless it appears on the teleprompter. Actually, this man can’t find his ass in the dark with both hands, a flashlight and a yahoo map but that’s a whole other discourse…back to the teleprompter…did the prez mis read the teleprompter? Did it say “Michael” in reference to the admiral’s son who was there? MAYBE…but frankly at this point I think that logic is completely wasted on anything the obamas do, say, think or feel…and if there is a logical explanation, discard it immediately because it is wrong. he said MICHAEL….referring to michelle…and I believe that this was not the first time he had done so. Freudian slip? Maybe. I doubt it.

  23. Woah

    This is a particularly telling moment, because Obama chooses to call his wife “Michael” right smack in the middle of addressing the honoree, Admiral Mullen, and his family:

    Most of all, Admiral Mullen, Deborah, Michael, and I also want to also acknowledge your son Jack, who’s deployed today. All of you have performed extraordinary service to our country.

    …even though the First Lady was not, in fact, actually at this event. HOW STRANGE!

    And on top of that, you forgot to mention Admiral Mullen’s own son Michael, who actually was there!

    Try as I might, I just cannot come up with any sort of simple and obvious explanation for this blatant and revealing gaffe. Its not like your President could have been including the name of the good Admirals son in the list with the other members of his family, right?

    No no the simple explanation is that your President left out the Admiral Mullen’s son Micheal who was there, and instead was talking about his wife who wasn’t. Phew, things make so much sense when you think birther. NOT.

    • No, I totally get this. When he says “Michael,” he’s not referring to Michael Mullens (who is there) but Michelle Obama (who is not) because teleprompter. Also, Benghazi.

  24. It only needs a couple of strands of hair, the odd nail clipping or a saliva sample on a drinking cup to work out whether he/she is carrying XX or XY sex chromosomes. DNA tests these days are extremely sensitive and probably 99.999% reliable. Surely a hairdresser, manicurist, kitchen hand, waiter or somebody else to have gotten close enough to procure a sample of anything like the above? And provided a definitive answer. But BO’s speech does leave me perplexed, as do all the other loose ends, esp. the birth certs.
    I wonder what really is going on?

    • Or, you know, her being a female woman who looks like a woman to anyone that’s not a raving nutter, and who gave birth to two children, spent her entire life as a woman, and all that.

      But I do admit that the speech that Michelle Obama was not at, where Obama referred to Michael Mullen as “Michael”, is certainly perplexing.

      • hcvisigoth…

        If you have any proof that Michelle gave birth to the two daughters, I’d be interested in what you have! The only pics I have seen is Michelle and Barry standing beside a baby….. This isn’t proof she gave birth! It could be proof though of when they adopted the baby.

        • Er, other than normal garden variety “what you are proposing is utterly ridiculous” kind of proof, no. So, enjoy. I’m out.

    • DNA tests are not 99.999% reliable. More like 70 percent at best (research grade) and 50-60 percent for usual work. I have experience in this (computational geneticist). Also, a 46-XY karotype analysis would not discriminate an XY-female or XX-male (naturally occurring instances).

  25. @hcvisigoth,

    Oh…. Your comment sounded as if you had some sort of proof that Michelle gave birth to her daughters and that Michelle was definitely a woman….

    I don’t think it’s totally ridiculous to ask for proof of your statement you made with utter conviction as if it was the truth. You call people nutters for perhaps believing that Michelle is not a woman…..

    That is what I would call ridiculous…..

    • No, it’s pretty much how the bulk of the planet deals with reality. We figure that extreme theories without any proof are in fact extreme unproven theories, and that commonplace occurrences are what they appear to be without requiring extraordinary proof.

      For example: without ever having met you other than in this fine forum, I am perfectly willing to believe that you were not adopted by a transsexual. I do not require that you provide me with a timestamped photo of you popping out of your mom’s whatzit. Unless you want, to, of course. I do not judge.

      Most people (statistically, all people, in fact) extend the same courtesy to the first lady.

      • Welcome to the site, hevisigoth. Please spend a few hours reading the various postings here before passing judgement.

      • Trannies aren’t “extreme theories”, they are a demographic. That Michael Obama is a tranny is hardly a “extreme theory”, they exist in all walks of life and in every geographical local except maybe Saudi Arabia and a few other Islamic states. By they way, is it merely coincidence that Michael Obama never visited Saudi Arabia with his husband Barry? They don’t fool around over there do they? Having a dick and wearing a dress gets you the death penalty in Saudi Arabia, that’s why Michael doesn’t go along on those trips. You won’t see the Saudi Arabians, the Egyptians, Yemenis or the Pakistanis extending any courtesy to the (roflmfao) “First Lady” because they have serious prejudices against transvestites. Slapping two young girls next to Michael doesn’t automatically imply that he birthed them in the usual way.

        • “‘Trannies’ exist'” is not an extreme theory.

          “Michelle Robinson Obama, who to 99.99999999999999% of the planet is clearly a female, has left a substantial documentary trail of her existence from birth to date on the aforementioned planet as a female, has to no evidence to the contrary given birth to two children, has otherwise maintained the charade of a cisgendered female, and has weathered scrutiny in state and national elections assayed by her husband to now become First Lady of the United States of America, without any domestic or foreign intelligence agency, press organization, political ally or opponent of Barack Obama, or–let us cut to the chase–anyone on the planet other than a brave band of keyboard warriors who coincidentally have a noticeably obsessive sociopolitical axe to grind against her husband, discovering the RIll and SHOCKING Truth, is a ‘trannie'” is an extreme theory.

          • How much thin air did it take for you to pluck that “99.99999” statistic from? There’s also no photographic evidence that Michael birthed those children in the usual way.

        • Thank you, Mike; I will!

        • It is true that Mooch had never accompanied Barry in his trips to Arabic countries. Excellent point, Patrick!

      • Putting all this bantering aside…..why on earth would you ever believe ANYTHING that comes from the mouth of either of the O’s? Obama has lied from before he was ever elected and continues to do so to this day. As a matter of fact, he lies more and more the longer he is in office. Is this something, in good conscience, you are ALSO willing to dispute? If so, I think somewhere on this site there is a very concise and validated list of each and every lie this usurper has told from day one. This will gladly be supplied to you upon request.

        As for me, it doesn’t take me year upon year of hearing lies emanating from the same pair of lips, to come to the logical conclusion that this man is a liar and has absolutely no credibility what so ever.

    • By the way, by “whatzit” I meant “automobile arriving home from the hospital.” I realized after posting that there was room for misinterpretation here.

  26. A wig makes one a tranny? Our forefathers wore them, you know. Fingers absolutely prove that one is a tranny? Not! Bulges near a woman’s crotch, now what could that be? Maybe her time of the month? Just maybe? You are a rotten, evil person. Your insinuations are a disgrace. The God you serve friend is not Christ, in fact you use him like a too or weapon. Shame!

    • June Layton, age 69, of Minneapolis, MN:

      You are so seething with rage that you can’t even properly comprehend what you read:

      1. “A wig makes one a tranny?”
      I dare you to point to anyone actually saying that. The pic of Mooch wearing a wig was in response to a commenter who thinks s/he has a full lustrous head of hair.

      2. “Fingers absolutely prove that one is a tranny?”
      Again and again, I stated to commenters that the length of fingers is NOT a necessary condition (what you call “absolute proof”) of a person’s gender, but it can be ONE of the indicators.

      3. “Bulges near a woman’s crotch…”
      Once again, Mooch’s crotch bulge is one of the visual signs that ALTOGETHER suggest she’s not a biological female. But I do find it fascinating that, whereas I retain my skepticism, YOU however fully acknowledge her crotch bulge. Too funny.

      As for “You are a rotten, evil person”: So in Obama’s Amerika, merely asking questions makes me “a rotten, evil person”? You really are in the wrong place and time, for you would be a perfect “useless idiot” in Nazi Germany, Stalinist Russia, and Maoist China.

    • June….
      “Maybe her time of the month?” You ask……

      IMHO…that would be one heck of a big sanitary napkin she’s wearing if it shows through like that! She better get to an ER , ASAP, cause she’s hemorrhaging!

      So we ask….is it a sanitary napkin or what…Depends?

    • Get a life, June.

  27. I believe the science of human anatomy on this one. The person who put that together provided a convincing scientific analysis between the anatomy of men compared to women…..you can’t make that stuff up.

  28. Or……maybe she had her period and was wearing one of those thick old-fashioned sanitary towels! Those things always did stick out like that when I was a young girl and I got caught in the wind on a blustery day. Had the same bulge!!! :o

  29. If she/he underwent sex reassignment surgery back in 1993 as I recall it saying , there shouldn’t be a bulge in 2008 at a convention. A dikectomy removes it.

  30. You miserable cunts. He was elected and reelected. Get the fuck over it.

  31. Pingback: More and more Americans think Michelle Obama is a man |

  32. Pingback: Synchronicity of Truth, There Are No Accidents….The Apocalypse Of Saint John (Revelation) 17 and Michelle Obama | K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC

  33. While I am not sure whether Michelle Obama may really have been born a male, you have to research everything you can before making a flat assertion. Regarding the video with Admiral Mullen, yes, Obama does mention someone by the name of Michael. Simple research shows who this “Michael” is–and it is NOT a reference to Michelle Obama. There is part of a speech by Admiral Mullen on the web, that took place during or around the time of the ceremony in which Obama spoke. In this speech, Admiral Mullen acknowledges his two sons. Their names are Jack and MICHAEL. The Michael to whom Obama is referring in his speech, in conjunction with mentioning the admiral’s wife, is Michael Mullen’s son, Michael Jr. We really have to be careful to get our facts straight and make sure we know what we’re talking about before publicly declaring false information. It makes us look like kooks, and do we really want to look like kooks? I don’t think so.

    Here is a link to Admiral Mullen’s comments, which include mention of his two sons, Jack and Michael:


  34. We all know Barack is a faggot, and Michael is some kind of tranny, but are they even human? Their kids don’t even make any sense, where are their birth records?

  35. okay so we all saw and heard joan rivers say Obama is the first gay president and michelle is a tranny “and we all know it”…and now Joan rivers is in a “medically induced coma” which I am betting my favorite cat that she does not recover from. She may “wake up” although I doubt it…but I suspect she will either die or be unable to appear in public if she lives. Coincidence? How could anyone think that that was a coincidence???

    • It was FDR who famously remarked that “In politics, there are no coincidences,’ and as the supremely masterful politician that he was, he surely knew whereof he spoke!

  36. Its a lock from a chastity belt!

  37. And now Joan Rivers is dead less than a month after saying Obama was gay and Michelle a transgendered!

    • Makes one wonder.

        • wonder hell…I predicted this! I believe that it was less than a month from the time she said “michelle is a tranny and we all know it”…until her death. How can any reasonable person think that that is a coincidence?? So…I’m guessing michelle and barney were pissed????

          can we talk about the Williams sisters????

          In my heart, I know that joan rivers is talking to robin Williams tonight, telling him about the huge outpouring of love from all over the planet after his passing and confessing that she was so jealous that she had to die to see if she could get that much attention. I just know it. Rest in peace….

  38. Let me offer am alternate explanation to the “crotch”. It might be just the edge of a corset! Wearing one all the time, often with clinging dresses like Michelle is wearing, leaves exactly that kind of “mark”; if you wish take a look at some of my videos, where the edge of the corset is quite visible with a very similar mark.

    There are ways to disguise the mark but it’s not that easy. Specially-fitted corsets might fit much better and not leave “bulges” like that; and, yes, there are a few tricks to make them disappear. Michelle might just not be aware of those and be a casual corset user…

    What tipped me off was the comment that she had a flag tummy with apparently zero body fat there. Exactly what I would expect if she was wearing a corset…

    • What tipped me off was the comment that she had a flag [sic] tummy with apparently zero body fat there. Exactly what I would expect if she was wearing a corset…

      Exactly what one would expect if she is really a he.

      • That’s unfair; women do wear corsets, you know… :) They have done so for a couple of centuries!

        • This is not a question of fairness. Nor does the fact that women have worn corsets “for a couple of centuries” necessarily means Mooch’s strange bulge is from a corset.

          • Of course not. There might be a billion possible explanations. It could be a strange form of personal weapon, designed on Area 51 specially for the Obamas. It can be a wireless receiver. It can be a dead mouse who crawled up her legs and died in a strange position. It can be an oversized navel (it’s too high to be a ‘crotch’). It could be a couple of paper handkerchiefs that Mrs. Obama had used before her appearance and, not having any place to put them away in a hurry, quickly stuffed them under her clothes, using the elastic band from her panties to keep them in place. It could be an elemental from another dimension that Mrs. Obama channeled to assume a strange configuration under her navel just to get us to discuss over this endlessly. And, of course, the pictures and the movie can all be faked and deliberately Photoshopped as a layered strategy, devised by the Secret Service, where sometimes showing the ‘truth’ is the better strategy to ‘cover up’ (because nobody believes the ‘truth’ anyway).

            If you wish to pursue all sorts of ‘what if’ scenarios, we cannot rule out any of the above.

            However, we can also reason with the stuff we got between our ears and see what is more logical and what is not. The corset/undergarment theory is consistent with the imagery and would be a reasonable, logical choice for a First Lady to wear who might have been slightly out of shape. But of course that doesn’t say anything about her physical genitalia.

            On the other hand, if Mrs. Obama is, in fact, a transexual, then there would be absolutely no way for anyone, except an expert gynecologist, to figure out any differences between her reconstructed genitalia as a neovagina and a ‘real’ vagina. It most certainly wouldn’t ‘bulge’.

            • “On the other hand, if Mrs. Obama is, in fact, a transexual, then there would be absolutely no way for anyone, except an expert gynecologist, to figure out any differences between her reconstructed genitalia as a neovagina and a ‘real’ vagina. It most certainly wouldn’t ‘bulge’.”

              Ever heard of pre-op transexuals?

  39. Pingback: World Bank whistleblower says Michelle Obama is being blackmailed, caught in honey trap -

  40. Who cares if she is transexual or not?
    Only uncivilized Muslims and far right wing nut jobs stoop down to this level of stupidity.
    If Obama is the president of France they will criticize him because he’s Corrupt, not talk about his family and their sexuality.
    I Will not be surprised if you delete my comment.

    • “If Obama is the president of France they will criticize him because he’s Corrupt, not talk about his family and their sexuality.”

      1. Why is France a role model for the United States?
      2. You obviously are so low-information you never saw the news of the brouhaha in France over the recent discovery that their current president François Hollande, a socialist, was two-timing his PUBLIC mistress with a covert mistress.

      • France might not be, but the overall European stance is that what leaders do in their beds, so long as its legal, has little bearing on what they do in politics. Political leaders in Europe are judged by their political abilities, not about what happens in the privacy of their homes.

        Of course there are sex scandals in Europe too (France is a good example) and other kinds of scandals do have an influence as well. I’m sure that Spanish King Juan Carlos eventually had to abdicate after so many scandals surrounding his person; i.e. bragging about his hunts while being the president of the WWF as well as having lots of mistresses, etc… not exactly the image one wants to associate with a royal person. And naturally these kinds of scandals happen throughout Europe as well and are openly discussed and condemned.

        The difference is that they are not the main issue for their ability in holding office. They’re judged about their political abilities, for their honesty, for their ability to resist corruption and manipulation.

        • Good grief. How and where did you get the idea that this post asking whether Mooch is a biological male is our “main issue” about Obama? See “The Obama Chronicles” beneath Fellowship of the Minds masthead? Click that, and you’ll see the links to THOUSANDS of posts we’ve done on Obama’s “political inabilities, dishonesty, corruption, manipulation” and more.

          I’m actually embarrassed for you. Cringe….

    • Rima, do you seriously believe that it makes no difference that aka Obama’s “wife” is a guy? Seriously? Perhaps this applies to you:


  41. ISIS isn’t Islamic, you can keep your doctor, the First Lady gave birth to two bouncing baby girls and Joan River’s death resulted from complications of vocal chord surgery!

    • ohhh pat….you forgot I am an American citizen and here is my birth certificate to prove it, this IS my SS number, I am NOT Kenyan, I am NOT a muslim, bowing before the Saudi king, I went to Columbia (although no one remembers him)…there must be more. Vocal CORD and not chord. Chord is a series of 3 or more notes played simultaneously. OF COURSE joan rivers was murdered. It was a hit without doubt. I am really not certain Robin Williams was not murdered as well. And poor ignorant RIMA who thinks our major issue with Obama is his alleged wife…..if this is so insignificant, why are people still commenting about it months after the original post? Clearly someone cares about Michael’s anatomy. it is NOT insignificant and it is not our only gripe with the thief in chief. Michael is just going to be the straw that broke the camel’s back to start the revolution. Make no mistake…revolution is coming.

  42. I believe that michelle obama is a man pretending to be a woman…..period

  43. It is the LIE, the deception that is the main thing. We have had enough of them from Obama! And the moron here who said Obama said “Michael” to mock and humiliate the people that would dare make such a ridiculous claim, is way off course. Why? Because everything Obama has mocked as fake and ludicrous is the truth, including the Holy Bible. This is, and has been his way of bringing an allegation to the public as though it is nothing more than a laughable opinion. He makes a joke of it and gets a lot of applause and laughter…case closed. His saying Michael was clearly a mistake, it was not an intentional remark to rebuff those that say Mooch is a man. Michelle Obama is bigger and taller than any women she is photographed with, and half of the men. Yet, in pictures with Obama alone, she never looks that big and Obama is a slight , almost effeminate creature. Does he stand on platform shoes or is it expert photography by partisan photographers that know what the effect must be. Michelle has given us all reason to doubt her being a natural born woman, just as Obama has given us reason to doubt whether he is a natural born citizen , and anyone that poo poos this is an ostrich that does not seek to find the truth, no matter what it is!!

  44. Pingback: Michelle Obama is a Man, Barack Obama is Gay! - A Sheep No More

  45. Andrew is right. Obama is a criminal in his own right. I think it’s his supporters who raise all the disinformation so simple things like “African” on his forged birth certificate get lost in tomfoolery. Don’t be Obama’s fool by parroting specious and spurious nonsense. His birth certificate is a forgery. That’s the issue that NOT QUESTIONABLE!

  46. Pingback: “Unnatural deeds Do breed unnatural troubles” Steven (Tyler) said Alice. | K2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC

  47. U guys have no life !

  48. If Michelle Obama was born a man a SIMPLE DNA test would prove it because No sex change operation or hormone therapy will hide the truth . If I was betting right now I would bet on the odds being more that She was born a man . Especially because they are pushing the transgender issue to the fore front

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s