For Feminazis, heterosexual intercourse is rape

Andrea DworkinRadFem lesbian Andrea Dworkin

The late Andrea Dworkin (1946-2005) is a Jewish radical feminist (radfem), lesbian, anti-pornography activist and author.

_____________

Though a public lesbian, Dworkin was married twice — to men. Her second husband, John Stoltenberg, “considers himself gay” and also a radfem. Please note that Stoltenberg is the former managing editor of the AARP’s magazine.

_____________

In her 1987 book, Intercourse, Dworkin argues that in our patriarchal (male-dominated) society, all heterosexual sex is really rape and not that different from pornography in that it’s coercive and degrading to women. Sexual penetration of vagina by penis may by its very nature doom women to inferiority and submission, and “may be immune to reform.”

Nearly 9 years after Dworkin had died, nothing has changed in radical feminists’ view of sexual intercourse or PIV (Penis In Vagina).

On a radfem blog called radical wind (note the lack of capital letters), blogger witchwind writes in her post of Dec. 15, 2013 that “a basic fact” is that “Intercourse/PIV is always rape, plain and simple.” Here are some excerpts (my editorial comments are colored teal):

Intercourse is the very means through which men oppress us, from which we are not allowed to escape [...]

First, well intercourse is NEVER sex for women. [...] Sex for men is the unilateral penetration of their penis into a woman (or anything else replacing and symbolising the female orifice) whether she thinks she wants it or not – which is the definition of rape: that he will to do it anyway and that he uses her and treats her as a receptacle, in all circumstances [...] men use women as useful objects and instruments for penetration, and women are dehumanised by this act. It is an act of violence.

[...] intercourse is inherently harmful to women and intentionally so, because it causes pregnancy in women. [Now we know why feminists are pro-aborts and regard the unborn baby in the womb as a tumor. Of course, this means that witchwind and other radfems themselves were once "tumors" in their mothers' wombs.] The purpose of men enforcing intercourse regularly (as in, more than once a month) onto women is because it’s the surest way to cause pregnancy and force childbearing against our will, and thereby gain control over our reproductive powers. [What "reproductive powers"? Aren't babies mere cancerous tumors?] There is no way to eliminate the pregnancy risk entirely off PIV and the mitigating and harm-reduction practices such as contraception and abortion are inherently harmful, too. Reproductive harms of PIV range from pregnancy to abortion, having to take invasive, or toxic contraception, giving birth, forced child bearing and rearing and all the complications that go with them which may lead up to severe physical and emotional damage, disability, destitution, illness, or death [...] If we compare this to even the crappiest online definition of violence: “behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something”. Bingo. It fits: Pregnancy = may hurt, damage or kill. Intercourse = a man using his physical force to penetrate a woman. Intention / purpose of the act of intercourse = to cause pregnancy.  PIV is therefore intentional harm / violence. Intentional sexual harm of a man against a woman through penile penetration = RAPE.

[...] PIV is a man mounting on a woman to thrust a large member of himself into her most intimate parts, often forcing her to be entirely naked, banging himself against her with the whole weight of his body and hips, shaking her like he would stuff a corpse, then using her insides as a receptacle for his penile dejection. How is this a normal civilised, respectful way to treat anyone? Sorry for the explicit picture, but this is what it is and it’s absolutely revolting and violating.

The term “fuck you” is not an insult for nothing, men know why – it’s the worst thing you can do to a human being. It [...] causes all sorts of tears, bruises, swelling, discomfort, STDs, vaginal infections, urinary infections, genital warts, HIV and death. [...] 

The fact intercourse causes so many infections and tears and warts attests to the unnaturalness of intercourse, that it’s not meant to be. The vagina’s primary function isn’t to be penetrated by a penis but to eject a baby for birth. [...] Penetration of the penis into the vagina is completely unnecessary for conception. [Uh? Before modern science, artificial insemination and test-tube babies, how did the human species reproduce ourselves?]

[...] Through an all-pervasive and powerful male propaganda, they stuff our minds from infancy with the idea that PIV is normal, desirable and erotic [...] The fact we may not immediately feel raped doesn’t mean it’s not rape, objectively speaking. [...] our subjective feelings or thoughts may be colonised by men’s perspectives [...]

Here are the 10 bloggers who clicked the “like” button on witchwind’s “PIV is always rape, ok?”:

  • Hecuba Hecuba
  • Branjor Branjor
  • Mary Sunshine Mary Sunshine
  • Terre Spencer Terre Spencer
  • Cammy Cammy
  • talkingtomyself16 talkingtomyself16
  • Ann Tagonist Ann Tagonist [get it?]
  • wwomenwwarriors wwomenwwarriors
  • skulldrixskulldrix
  • blackmetalvalkyrie blackmetalvalkyrie

On the blog’s effective “About” page, which witchwind pretentiously calls “On Writing and Creativity,” she says that her blog’s purpose is to write about her “insights” on “maledom” which are “relevant to radical feminism, to our liberation”.

On the blog’s “Comments” page, witchwind declares that only “women interested in forwarding radical feminist discussion and thought are invited to comment. Men, don’t even try commenting on my blog, because I’m not going to publish it.”

Here are some more brilliant [sarc] man-hating insights from witchwind:

1. Science is male, dead, boring, and full of lies:

Men have made science to be full of endnotes, dead-talk, lies and boredom. I will never thank Mary Daly enough for coining the word “academentia”. They are not interested in the truth, but interested in concocting fake evidence to support their lies and propaganda against women, to legitimise their totalitarian regime and political agenda of destroying the universe. In particular, Male science, as everything male, is modelled on the male ideal relationship to the world: men as god, who position themselves as external observers of life from the top, separate from life itself: life is viewed as underneath, as an object, a dead object, ripped from its environment and from the life that surrounds and sustains it. To be studied it is imprisoned, held captive, fragmented, cut up, penetrated, prodded, tortured in the most unimaginable ways. From this murder and torture they deduce “objective laws”.

Their science is as objective as pornography, that is, it couldn’t be a worse perversion of truth. [...] So-called “modern western science” is simply Male Religion re-branded as science, with the only difference being that men replaced the omniscient (omni-science) god with themselves – religious paradigm and the male god’s overpowering/towering relationship to the world became the scientific paradigm, ontology and methodology.

2. witchwind blames the problems she experienced with writing when she was a university student to “male writing”:

[...] One thing I’ve noticed is that one reason why writing felt so much like a chore is that the process was separated from the ends. Men focus everything on an end product, which is a dead object, a finished object, a square frame. It is very much based on ejaculation, or perhaps male notion of extinction. [...] It’s not living work. University essay-writing was all about deadlines, dead ends. This is deeply alienating. [...] What made writing so joy-killing and draining was that I wasn’t focused on the process itself and what it did to me, but on the end-product idea I wanted to express. [...] It was basically a chore.

3. Everything male is dead, oppressive, and stultifying:

In contrast, “Joy and serenity are fundamental to feminism.”

On one thing, I do agree with witchwind. In her post “intercourse and manufactured female pleasure: politics of love part III,” on Jan. 2, 2014, she rails against the women’s liberation movement as being “the great scam of the 20th century” which is not in the best interests of women. But I would phrase it differently. LOL

As witchwind puts it, instead of liberty, “women’s liberation” is really about:

  1. “being free to be fucked by any man

  2. having orgasms in being fucked by men

  3. achieving equality to men with the pill, so we can now be fucked by men without consequences, that is dissociate PIV from reproduction.”

H/t Clash Daily

~Eowym

39 responses to “For Feminazis, heterosexual intercourse is rape

  1. If you think THESE liberated fems are something. Check out this link to some real FEMS. These women are scary.

    http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/topless-pro-abort-activist-leaps-on-top-of-altar-during-christmas-mass-in-c

  2. Leftism is mental illness… and this is proof.

  3. I saw this…nuclear weapons-grade stupdity abounds over there.

  4. Oh bother…
    Is there no end to the lunacy?

  5. All I have to say about twisted ideas from morons like her is Hog manure

  6. Too bizarre to even come up w/ a comment for it :(

  7. Crazy, Backward ,Mentally ill , Bi-Polar IDIOT! LOLOL ! STUPIDITY AT ITS WORST!!!!!! Get a life broad! And Im a real WOMB-MAN Who loves my man and I speak for MILLIONS who feel the same! STOP forgetting to take your MEDS!!!

  8. Mind boggling stupidity from these freaks. It all boils down to one simple reality, a total hatred and rejection of the created universe, and of course, a hatred of it’s creator, God. On a deep level, these tribadistic feminazis, and their neutered male supporters, simply hate the existence of life itself.

    Swampygirl7, I feel your pain. What normal human being could possibly comprehend such self-nullifying, existence-nullifying nonsense as that spewed by Andrea Dworkin. and other feminazi’s of her ilk?

  9. ROFL… This is sooooo funny!!! Wait, was I supposed to take this seriously??? Sorry, I can’t… It’s so retarded!!! BTW, if you find the idea of having sex so appalling, just become a celibate. It is that easy!!! :-)

  10. I do agree though with your points, Eowyn…

  11. PIV…that’s a new one…I feel like making a t-shirt

    • Lol! Just don’t place a picture of Andrea Dworkin on it. Somehow, I just don’t think it would sell like the el Che shirts did, which incidentally, thanks to some enterprising entrepreneur (and whether they realized it or not), gives Capitalism the last laugh over el Che’s communism, something likely over the collective heads of the young, brainless libtards who actually bought the detestable shirts.

  12. Wow, just wow. She looks like she could have had sex with a backhoe. I’d love to see what kind of parents she had, particularly her dad, to set her off like that. Perhaps her size and unattractiveness (she’s a Singularity of Ugly) initiated a lot of harassment in school – middle school kids can be so cruel to someone who does not “fit in.” Let those taunts simmer through middle school, sprinkle in a complete absence of prom dates in high school and then fold with a few lesbian professors in college – presto! A high calorie, self-sustaining, man-hating feminist reactor with a half life of much too long whatever it is.

    At any rate, there’s a definite pathological context to her rantings, but even more troublesome is that there are many others who believe as she does.

    And of course they infest our liberal colleges like fleas on a junk yard dog. Where else would a college graduate with a degree in gender studies find employment that isn’t related to the placement of frozen meat patties on a hot surface?

    • I hear she or I mean it came with her own 100LB bag of organic, free range WHITE flour.

      Oh, the stupidity of such hatred by these feminazis.

      Did the backhoe survive?

      On a serious note, one of the best books ever on why feminism like this is wrong, evil and hateful, read the following book:

      “Domestic Tranquility” by F. Carolyn Graglia.

      Superbly written and researched and it should be required reading in high school as far as I am concerned.

    • Thanks alot Sig94, I will never again look at a backhoe in the same light again :(

  13. She would while away the hours,
    while talking to the flowers,
    conversing with the rain,
    on her head,
    she would be scratchin’
    while a thought was busy hatchin’
    if she only had a brain.

    -Leeann

  14. Wow – their daddies must be soooooooooo proud of them. Kinda makes us wonder what weed daddy and mommy were smoking on sperm-egg-unite nite! To think my grandmother got upset over the KFC ad back in the 50s – she should come back for an hour or so and see what’s going on today. UNBELIEVABLE!

  15. Back again – started rereading this and thinking about God’s admonition: “…[B]ut you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.” There is way too much knowledge of evil. Our human nature craves the abnormal, apparently. I’ve noticed through the years that UGLY has overtaken the throne. What a pity….

  16. Need ban all mental sick and murder like murder American baby in abortion.

  17. I’d leave a comment BUT there are so many truly brilliant ones above that it’s a waste of space here. I’d heard of her, but never seen a photo, which explains all-too-much that never should have been asked, IMO. I have never hit so many ‘thumbs up’ before as I did above: there are a LOT of really intelligent people here, and I cannot say that of all the sites I visit, as vile trolls abound.

    By the bye, I don’t see any trolls here, but maybe that’s because we’re far too much ‘on point’ here on this subject, and too close for their comfort….

  18. using her insides as a receptacle…

    I was shocked just over this phrase… or was it the fact a woman wrote this….really???!!

  19. wow, a good thing this happen to me yesterday or I would not have known what to call it! (snark)

  20. Oh, I’m too sexy for my skirt, so big that I’m inert
    Too heavy to exert.
    And I’m too sexy for dessert, a high calorie alert
    So fat that it hurts.

    • You are way too good! This on top of winning the last caption contest…you need to be awarded something more than a fancyshmancie certificate.

  21. Wow, this disgusting woman seems to have brought out the poet in some of you…..can’t rightly find the connection myself…… :)

  22. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this important post. This is just more of satanic behavior and an attack on Life. I have learned that Satan and his human supporters live in a fantasy world of their own, such as these women. That fantasy world consists in calling good, evil, and evil, good, wherein, everything is upside down. This is satan’s motis operandi. As traildust put it, “more lunacy”.

  23. The Witch’s wind is nothing but sheer flatulence.

    She’s talking out her backside.

  24. I just had to visit that detestable site of “witchwind’s.” The sheer lunacy and stupidity of those whiners is simply unreal. They’re nutters! Self-hate, insecurity and projectionistic drivel. Men are the target and scapegoats of their own dismal failures in life. They are extremely unhappy and completely deluded to the point of insanity. Frankly, I don’t know how they can function in the real world with real people of both sexes. The vibe I caught from their writings is that their goal is to bring about the extinction of the human race.

    Antisocial misfits, they are.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s