Paging Code Pink

hope

12K troops may stay in Afghanistan

Detroit News: The U.S. and its NATO allies revealed Friday they may keep as many as 12,000 troops in Afghanistan after the combat mission ends next year, largely American forces tasked with hunting down remnants of al-Qaida and helping Afghan forces  with their own security.

Patience with the 11-year-old war has grown thin in the U.S. and Europe, yet  Washington and its allies feel they cannot pick up and leave without risking a  repeat of what happened in Afghanistan after Soviet troops withdrew in 1989:  Attention turned elsewhere, the Taliban grabbed power and al-Qaida found  refuge.

In disclosing that he and his NATO counterparts were discussing a residual  force of between 8,000 and 12,000 troops in Afghanistan beyond 2014, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said most allied defense ministers assured him they are  committed to remaining part of a U.S.-led coalition.

“I feel very confident that we are going to get a number of nations to make that contribution for the enduring presence,” Panetta told a news conference at  NATO headquarters in Brussels.

The U.S. and its allies have managed to stick together throughout the war,  despite differing views. The Europeans have seen the military mission as mainly  aimed at promoting stable governance; the Americans have viewed it as mainly  combat. Some allies, including France, have already pulled out their combat  troops.

The Obama administration has not said how many troops or diplomats it intends to keep in Afghanistan after 2014; it is in the early stages of negotiating a bilateral security agreement with Kabul that would set the legal parameters.  There currently are 66,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, down from a 2010 peak of  100,000.

In addition to targeting terrorists, the post-2014 missions are expected to be defined as training and advising a still-developing Afghan army and police force and providing security for the U.S. and allied civilian and military presence, officials said.

The largely unspoken assumption on which the post-2014 plan is built is that  Afghanistan’s own forces will be strong enough to hold off the Taliban on their  own starting in 2015 and to prevent the country’s relapse into civil war. The  worry is that if the Taliban regained power they would allow al-Qaida to return  in large numbers, defeating the original purpose of the U.S. military action in  2001.

It’s a touchy topic at this stage of a still-unfolding war, with Afghans fearful of being abandoned by their foreign partners and Washington and its NATO  allies wary of committing too heavily to a corrupt Kabul government facing an  uncertain future.

Panetta is expected to retire as soon as his successor is confirmed. The  Senate could vote on the confirmation of former Sen. Chuck Hagel as the next  Pentagon chief as early as Wednesday.

deaths

Where’s the outrage from Code Pink? They never let up on Bush and the Afghanistan War. So far the U.S. has lost 2,177 troops in Afghanistan – 1,547 (71%) of those during Obama’s presidency. Course he ommitted the fact that troops may stay after 2014 when he stated in his SOTU address, “Tonight, I can announce that over the next year, another 34,000 American troops will come home from Afghanistan,” Obama said. “This drawdown will continue.  And by the end of next year, our war in Afghanistan will be over.

Don’t expect the SRM to hold him to any accountability for what he says/does. I say enough, bring all our troops home by 2014.

DCG

3 responses to “Paging Code Pink

  1. Send COde Pink to Afganastan.

  2. 32 of them were in Pakistan this past October to protest our drone strikes. Their focus this month has apparently been against John Brennan. I have no idea what kind of resources they have at their disposal. I know their protests depend greatly on media coverage, which nowadays focuses less and less on humanitarian causes and peaceful protests that SHOULD be newsworthy. With the MSM today operating as the state’s propaganda arm, I don’t expect them to concern themselves over crimes of empire.

    Even so, the manpower and casualty figures in Afghanistan do not reflect contractors and their hirelings that operate there in conjunction with our military campaign. These figures are often overlooked and are not public knowledge. There is no plan to draw down these ‘forces’. We are still paying them, big time.

    Another oft times overlooked fact is that we are the very ones that established what today is called al-Qaida (or al-CIA da, as some refer to it), arming and training them to fight the Soviets during the cold war.

    I still remember Reagan entertaining the Taliban chiefs in the White House and proclaiming how like our founding fathers they were.

    Americans have notoriously short memories.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s