More evidence that Sandy Hook parent Laura Phelps is actress Jennifer Sexton?

Laura and Nick Phelps are parents of two children who are among the students who survived the Dec. 14, 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

Or so they claim.

In the video below, beginning at the 1:34 mark, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer is interviewing the Phelps about slain Sandy Hook school principal Dawn Hochsprung.

But as shown in my post of Jan. 11, “Remarkable resemblance of Sandy Hook victims and professional crisis actors,” Laura and Nick Phelps look remarkably like Jennifer Greenberg and Richard Sexton. Jennifer Greenberg Sexton is a professional actress whose photo is on Stars Color, a website with pictures of actors, actresses, and movie directors.

Now there is more evidence pointing to Laura Phelps and Jennifer Greenberg Sexton being the same person.

Citizen journalists have discovered a video of Laura Phelps performing in a play called “Expressing Motherhood,” in Los Angeles in August 2009:

You can verify the video for yourself by going to the website of Expressing Motherhood, click on the “Videos” page, then click item no 6: Laura Phelps, Los Angeles, August 2009, which will bring you to a Vimeo video of Phelps.

Here’s a screenshot I just took of the “Expressing Motherhood” site, showing the link to Phelps’ video, as well as the time and date when I took the screenshot (9:18 AM – 1/23/2013), in case the site scrubs the link:

Laura Phelps video site

~Eowyn

62 responses to “More evidence that Sandy Hook parent Laura Phelps is actress Jennifer Sexton?

  1. EXCELLENT FIND! Thank you! You are tireless in pursuit of the truth.

  2. Un-be-friggin-lievable. Mind-blowing.
    We linked you.

  3. The only way to prove they’re NOT the same person is to bring them together for a joint appearance. If that doesn’t happen, it’s like the old tv show Bewitched where Elizabeth Montgomery played the parts of both Samantha and Serena.

  4. This keeps getting stranger and stranger…. where will it end?

  5. Laura Phelps is not Greenberg.Very similar.Sexton has a much thinner finer face.

    • Yes. And I’m sure you think Nick Phelps (bottom row) isn’t Richard Sexton (top row) either.
      .

      Laura Phelps (bottom row); Jennifer Greenberg Sexton (top row):
      .

    • tak, just in case you don’t read my response to Jim, I’ll post it for you, too. :)
      I would tend to believe that there’s a chance it’s just a “look alike” (don’t “they” say we all have a twin?) BUT chances suddenly grow EXPLICABLY INFINITESIMAL when you consider it’s not JUST ONE WOMAN LOOKING LIKE ANOTHER WOMAN….IT’S A COUPLE LOOKING LIKE ANOTHER COUPLE……statistically, that chance just shrank to near impossible…. :O

    • I bet if you look at your own pictures throughout the years you will find that some pics, even though taken close together make you look like totally different people. I have some pics where I look fat, old, ugly, and others where people would swear I was a model. c’mon. This is def. them. Plus if you browse her picassa page, you will also find pics of “Carlos Soto” & “Noah Pozner” which are undeniable. This could not be a coincidence. They are all taken on family vacation with the Rockefellers. Keep researching and you will find the truth.

  6. Hannity just said 9-11 truthers and people who don’t believe Sandy Hook happened are crazy!

    • How nice of Sean Hannity. And Glen Beck too. It’s the mark of someone with no substantive argument or evidence to simply dismiss another with gratuitous insults and mockery. But then after the Nov 6 election, Hannity also said the GOP must change to be more appealing to Hispanics and women, as if becoming a pale copy of the Democrat Party would actually salvage the GOP.

      I stand by the meticulous research and compilation of facts undertaken in the posts I’ve done on Sandy Hook. Let Hannity, Beck, et al debate the evidence and questions. Gratuitous insults roll off my back like water off a duck. Molon Labe!!!

    • SPARROW:
      Who said Sandy hook didnt happen?
      We ALL know it happened. DUH!
      We just know MORE than you all because you hate the truth.
      Go worship satan, your dad.

  7. Molon Labe.
    Amen.
    They think we ‘like’ this!!!
    You keep going Dr!!
    These idiots KNOW that this is screwed up. They just REFUSE to look at it for fear it might make them blow a gasket b/c their OWN govt is SICK.

    God bless Dr.

  8. Incredible!

  9. Is Sean Hannity a Traitor?

    Great find! Just one more item to expose the truth that this whole event is looking like a complete fraud.

    “Remarkable resemblance” LOL

    Way back in the day.. circa 2000 A.D. or so… it used to be a Liar was a bad thing. Now Truther is a bad thing

    What a PoS meme we have allowed to be created around us in such a short time

  10. Pretty compelling……..

  11. I’m not sure this is one of the strongest pieces of evidence of a hoax. Aren’t people just going to say that Jennifer Greenberg Sexton and Laura Phelps do look a bit alike and they both did a bit of acting, but what’s the big deal?!

    • Who says this is “one of the strongest pieces of evidence of a hoax”? Not I. Seems to me the only person mentioning that is you.

      But this is one piece in the jigsaw puzzle.

      • I never claimed anyone said that. Yes, I know it’s another piece in the jigsaw. I’m just saying it will be easier for people to dismiss this one than a lot of the other pieces. It wasn’t a criticism.

  12. originally i was blown away by the connection, but after alot of searching found the laura phelps video and another photo of laura phelps and I’m 100 percent sure the woman in expressing motherhood is thew same lady on the cnn interview, not greenburg/sexton. I mean if you look at the dallas goldbug site where i believe this comparison began, it is ridiculous unbeleivably moronic crap on that site. He is either delusional or disinfo, disinfo put out to discredit and deter people investigating. have a look for yourself and see. Its mostly rubbish, this is the only possible link he makes that is even close. this whole thing absolutely stinks, but i think this sexton/phelps thing is a false lead.

    • Jim, you know, I would tend to believe that as well(don’t “they” say we all have a twin?) BUT chances suddenly grow EXPLICABLY infinitesimal when you consider it’s not JUST ONE WOMAN LOOKING LIKE ANOTHER WOMAN….IT’S A COUPLE LOOKING LIKE ANOTHER COUPLE……statistically, that just shrank to near impossible…. :O

      • Sunny, I have to disagree. My hunch would be that, statistically, there’s a very good chance that one couple in a large country could look similar another couple in the same country.
        If they looked identical, that would be hard to believe (esp. in the context of Sandy Hook) but, from the photos I’ve seen, it’s not clear that that’s the case here.

        • James, awww, shucks, sir, you may goad me into pulling my Advanced Stats I and II books out, blowing the dust off my SPSS software and running some numbers. I’ve been watching those inanimate devils with a baleful eye anyway…supposed to be working on that blasted dissertation! YUCK!!! But this statistical analysis just may be fun! :)
          Respectfully, I would ask, exactly WHY would you have to disagree….ARE you a statistician? Geneticist? Even a medical doctor? I found a really interesting statistical explanation, from a medical doctor from Harvard, explaining the probability of you being you…..maybe this will help make clear just how unique we really are…. Enjoy the read. I did.

          What are the chances of your coming into being?123
          Ali B – June 15, 2011 @ 3:22 pm · Science, Spirituality

          A little while ago I had the privilege of attending TEDx San Francisco, organized by the incomparable Christine Mason McCaull. One of the talks was by Mel Robbins, a riotously funny self-help author and life coach with a syndicated radio show. In it, she mentioned that scientists calculate the probability of your existing as you, today, at about one in 400 trillion (4×1014).

          “That’s a pretty big number,” I thought to myself. If I had 400 trillion pennies to my name, I could probably retire.

          Previously, I had heard the Buddhist version of the probability of ‘this precious incarnation’. Imagine there was one life preserver thrown somewhere in some ocean and there is exactly one turtle in all of these oceans, swimming underwater somewhere. The probability that you came about and exist today is the same as that turtle sticking its head out of the water — in the middle of that life preserver. On one try.

          So I got curious: are either of these numbers correct? Which one’s bigger? Are they gross exaggerations? Or is it possible that they underestimate the true number?

          First, let us figure out the probability of one turtle sticking its head out of the one life preserver we toss out somewhere in the ocean. That’s a pretty straightforward calculation.

          According to WolframAlpha, the total area of oceans in the world is 3.409×108 square kilometers, or 340,900,000 km2 (131.6 million square miles, for those benighted souls who still cling to user-hostile British measures). Let’s say a life preserver’s hole is about 80cm in diameter, which would make the area inside

          3.14(0.4)2=0.5024 m2

          which we will conveniently round to 0.5 square meters. If one square kilometer is a million square meters, then the probability of Mr Turtle sticking his head out of that life preserver is simply the area inside the life preserver divided by the total area of all oceans, or

          0.5m2/3.409×108x106m2 = 1.47 x 10-15

          or one in 6.82×1014, or about 1 in 700 trillion.

          One in 400 trillion vs one in 700 trillion? I gotta say, the two numbers are pretty darn close, for such a farfetched notion from two completely different sources: old-time Buddhist scholars and present-day scientists. They agree to within a factor of two!

          So to the second question: how accurate is this number? What would we come up with ourselves starting with first principles, making some reasonable assumptions and putting them all together? That is, instead of making one big hand-waving gesture and pronouncing, “The answer is five hundred bazillion squintillion,” we make a series of sequentially-reasoned, smaller hand-waving gestures so as to make it all seem scientific. (This is also known as ‘consulting’ – especially if you show it all in a PowerPoint deck.)

          Oh, this is going to be fun.

          First, let’s talk about the probability of your parents meeting. If they met one new person of the opposite sex every day from age 15 to 40, that would be about 10,000 people. Let’s confine the pool of possible people they could meet to 1/10 of the world’s population twenty years go (one tenth of 4 billion = 400 million) so it considers not just the population of the US but that of the places they could have visited. Half of those people, or 200 million, will be of the opposite sex. So let’s say the probability of your parents meeting, ever, is 10,000 divided by 200 million:

          104/2×108= 2×10-4, or one in 20,000.

          Probability of boy meeting girl: 1 in 20,000.

          So far, so unlikely.

          Now let’s say the chances of them actually talking to one another is one in 10. And the chances of that turning into another meeting is about one in 10 also. And the chances of that turning into a long-term relationship is also one in 10. And the chances of that lasting long enough to result in offspring is one in 2. So the probability of your parents’ chance meeting resulting in kids is about 1 in 2000.

          Probability of same boy knocking up same girl: 1 in 2000.

          So the combined probability is already around 1 in 40 million — long but not insurmountable odds. Now things start getting interesting. Why? Because we’re about to deal with eggs and sperm, which come in large numbers.

          Each sperm and each egg is genetically unique because of the process of meiosis; you are the result of the fusion of one particular egg with one particular sperm. A fertile woman has 100,000 viable eggs on average. A man will produce about 12 trillion sperm over the course of his reproductive lifetime. Let’s say a third of those (4 trillion) are relevant to our calculation, since the sperm created after your mom hits menopause don’t count. So the probability of that one sperm with half your name on it hitting that one egg with the other half of your name on it is

          1/(100,000)(4 trillion)= 1/(105)(4×1012)= 1 in 4 x 1017, or one in 400 quadrillion.

          Probability of right sperm meeting right egg: 1 in 400 quadrillion.

          But we’re just getting started.

          Because the existence of you here now on planet earth presupposes another supremely unlikely and utterly undeniable chain of events. Namely, that every one of your ancestors lived to reproductive age – going all the way back not just to the first Homo sapiens, first Homo erectus and Homo habilis, but all the way back to the first single-celled organism. You are a representative of an unbroken lineage of life going back 4 billion years.

          Let’s not get carried away here; we’ll just deal with the human lineage. Say humans or humanoids have been around for about 3 million years, and that a generation is about 20 years. That’s 150,000 generations. Say that over the course of all human existence, the likelihood of any one human offspring to survive childhood and live to reproductive age and have at least one kid is 50:50 – 1 in 2. Then what would be the chance of your particular lineage to have remained unbroken for 150,000 generations?

          Well then, that would be one in 2150,000 , which is about 1 in 1045,000– a number so staggeringly large that my head hurts just writing it down. That number is not just larger than all of the particles in the universe – it’s larger than all the particles in the universe if each particle were itself a universe.

          Probability of every one of your ancestors reproducing successfully: 1 in 1045,000

          But let’s think about this some more. Remember the sperm-meeting-egg argument for the creation of you, since each gamete is unique? Well, the right sperm also had to meet the right egg to create your grandparents. Otherwise they’d be different people, and so would their children, who would then have had children who were similar to you but not quite you. This is also true of your grandparents’ parents, and their grandparents, and so on till the beginning of time. If even once the wrong sperm met the wrong egg, you would not be sitting here noodling online reading fascinating articles like this one. It would be your cousin Jethro, and you never really liked him anyway.

          That means in every step of your lineage, the probability of the right sperm meeting the right egg such that the exact right ancestor would be created that would end up creating you is one in 1200 trillion, which we’ll round down to 1000 trillion, or one quadrillion.

          So now we must account for that for 150,000 generations by raising 400 quadrillion to the 150,000th power:

          [4x1017]150,000 ≈ 102,640,000

          That’s a ten followed by 2,640,000 zeroes, which would fill 11 volumes of a book the size of The Tao of Dating with zeroes.

          To get the final answer, technically we need to multiply that by the 1045,000 , 2000 and 20,000 up there, but those numbers are so shrimpy in comparison that it almost doesn’t matter. For the sake of completeness:

          (102,640,000)(1045,000)(2000)(20,000) = 4x 102,685,007 ≈ 102,685,000

          Probability of your existing at all: 1 in 102,685,000

          As a comparison, the number of atoms in the body of an average male (80kg, 175 lb) is 1027. The number of atoms making up the earth is about 1050. The number of atoms in the known universe is estimated at 1080.

          So what’s the probability of your existing? It’s the probability of 2 million people getting together – about the population of San Diego – each to play a game of dice with trillion-sided dice. They each roll the dice, and they all come up the exact same number – say, 550,343,279,001.

          A miracle is an event so unlikely as to be almost impossible. By that definition, I’ve just shown that you are a miracle.

          Now go forth and feel and act like the miracle that you are.

          Think about it,

          Ali B
          (Ali Binazir, M.D)

          http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/abinazir/2011/06/15/what-are-chances-you-would-be-born/#comments

        • OH! and IRONY of IRONIES, guess who Dr. Ali Binazir writes for…just guess(gleefully chuckling to myself at the karma of it all)……the LIBERAL Huff Post! Hehe! Was that relevance lost on you?
          AND, and… he simply LOVES science, I’m particularly interested in science….wait for it…….especially neuroscience and physics…..neuroscience….? LOVING this. ;)

          • “I’m particularly interested in science”…..wait for it….”especially neuroscience and physics”, he says. :)

            • I’m very open to both the possibilities that the info is true or false. I just want truth, no matter what that might be. So I’m not being critical but am genuinely curious about why neuroscience and physics invalidates what this guy is claiming. I don’t know if I misunderstood your comment or if it’s just referring to something of which I’m unaware. Please elaborate for me, if you wouldn’t mind. Thanks. :)

              Ok, I just scrolled up and checked the date of the comment I’m replying to. I doubt the lady will ever see my message to her, so can anyone else fill me in? I subscribed to these comments so I’ll be notified if someone replies. I am very curious about the information on this page and on the whole topic, which is new to me.

  13. The ears always show the truth! They are the same. At least here in Richard Phelps/Nick Sexton, too bad we can’t see hers. Nice work!

  14. I mean if you look at the dallas goldbug site where i believe this comparison began, it is ridiculous unbeleivably moronic crap on that site. He is either delusional or disinfo, disinfo put out to discredit and deter people investigating. have a look for yourself and see. Its mostly rubbish, this is the only possible link he makes that is even close. this whole thing absolutely stinks, but i think this sexton/phelps thing is a false lead.

    I agree.The woman in the video is not the Greenberg/Sexton lady in the photos.Laura Phelps in the video has a slightly rounded nose she even has a slightly nasal quality to her voice.The video you posted is bad quality by the way.Here is a better one which I´ve already posted on this site.Now pay attention.Laura starts at 1min 54secs.
    Not the same lady,,ie NOT Sexton/Greenberg

  15. Dr. Eowyn, I think I found something new and possibly important………… go to this video
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx9GxXYKx_8&bpctr=1358970846&bpctr=1359011425&bpctr=1359011432
    and find 14:06…………behind “Gene” is a strange sign that says “everyone must check in”,,,,,,,,,,,,is this something they typically do at crime scenes?????!!!!!

  16. or movie sets?

  17. Is it any surprise that hannity and his like call us crazy? Let us not ever forget that those at the top, even those who wear the badge of conservatism, are very rarely on our side. They have their role to play too and it is NOT exposing the truth. Dr. E., thank you for all your hard work!

  18. Dr. Eowyn, you have presented the most compelling information, along with photos/videos, of anyone I have come across.
    You just present the evidence, and let people make their own conclusions.
    If anyone has been following this closely, and doesn’t find some things that are puzzling to say the least, it amazes me.
    Again, thanks for your exceptional “coverage” of this.
    I would like to ask the naysayers what they think is negative about wanting questions answered.
    I think the victims of this tragedy deserve the whole truth to be available.
    I feel it is less than genuine to not want to connect the dots where there seems to be spaces—it is the least we can do for the victims and their families.

    • Thank you and God bless you, Lily. ♥

      I was despairing this morning — by Hannity’s and Beck’s mockery and attacks. But your and Katy’s words have put steel back into my spine. I will continue to be a gadfly and look into this and ask questions that make some uncomfortable.

      • Dr. Eowyn, I would never allow the likes of Hannity & Beck -who also never took seriously the anamolies about Obama’s past for one, to get serious commentary.
        They would do well to allow you to do their research–not the likes of Snoops.!

  19. If there’s nothing to hide, why all the silence about this?

  20. [url=http://boston.cbslocal.com/2013/01/23/swat-team-drill-catches-students-off-guard-at-silver-lake-schools/]Last week, more than two dozen SWAT team members descended on Silver Lake Regional Middle and High Schools.Their weapons were drawn, but not loaded. They ran through the building, simulating their approach to a scenario in which a shooter or shooters were also inside. It’s called a “Code Yellow” and is meant to be a drill that prepares teachers and students for an unthinkable – but possible – reality. “We’re looking for it to be as realistic as possible,” explains Silver Laker Superintendent of Schools John Tuffy. “The doors are locked, the lights are turned off, and the students are asked to go to a safe place in the room, an area where you can’t be seen through a window or a door.”[/url]

  21. I do not put anything past our current administration regime. Our FAI runs around enabling would be terrorists to obtain devises they would other wise not be able to get on their own. Department of Justice put weapons in the hands of drug cartels. Ambassador Stevens was gun running in Libya.

  22. I think the main problem with the Laura and Nick Phelps photos are that they have toothy smiles in the old photos, but not in the new (unlike Robbie Parker!…). Makes it a bit harder to compare.

    Anyone got any old and new photos with more similar facial expressions so we can compare more conclusively?

    • James, and everyone else…. this shows it all….there’s absolutely no way that so many of the same family(of which some CLAIM to be crisis actors), look like so many of the “victims” we are seeing in the news…..NO WAY…..NOT statistically possible.

  23. I have seen most of the Greenberg-Sexton/Phelps comparisons. Look at her “part line” in the hair and the way in which it hangs……I can agree there may be other similar looking couples out there, but both with the same hair features (or lack there of hair) is hard to imagine. Maurice Greenberg just happens to be on the Council Of Foreign Relations. and He is chairman of the U.S. Korea Business Council, and a member of the U.S.China Business Council and the Business Roundtable. Now which country was it again that wants the USA to ban guns?

  24. If you click on the link leading to Jennifer Greenberg’s profile on the acting website, StarsColor, you find that it’s not really her. Just click on her name at the top and it shows who the profile really belongs to. Someone obviously put Jennifer Greenberg Sexton’s photo over the real image to make it look like it was really her page. Are there any other links to Jennifer Greenberg being an actress or being linked to crisis actors? I am not saying she and Laura Phelps and the husbands are not the same couples or that they are, just trying to weed through everything to find out what’s true and what’s not. However, I do find the resemblances uncanny, and it’s not just one or the other of them it’s both of them that resemble the other husband and wife.

  25. jared farmington

    The comments are always just as good as the article! LOL

  26. Do you guys also think it is no coincidence that also The Rockefellers are one of the number 1 top Illuminati families and these people happen to be related to them? They also were satantist, and then somehow this town is linked to that in a weird way, even if it’s like the weird crap with those Parker kids using devil horns hand gestures or it could just be ASL, who knows. But, I’m tired of people always telling me things are just a coincidence and I’m crazy. SOMETHING ain’t right, I KNOW that much!

  27. I agree Grace, why this town, how far away from his home? Too many intelligent people have found too much to ignore. When something stinks, check for skunks.
    After Columbine, we drowned in news, pictures, videos, interviews. This time, sealed up tight. You would think he would be exploiting it all the more to further his agenda.

  28. Haha, wow, you’re all complete idiots. Yes, my cousins were in that school. NO Laura and Nick Phelps are not those people from Florida. Can you all stop inhaling conspiracies and go outside? Leave my aunt and uncle ALONE! It was terrifying enough going there on Christmas and being thankful that I could hug my cousins, can this shit stop- NOW?!

    • Yes, you — whose IP address is in a city and state 120 miles from Newtown, CT — just know Laura & Nick Phelps of Newtown, Connecticut, are “not those people from Florida.” Yeah, right.

      If you’re countering “conspiracies,” you might actually try providing substantive evidence, instead of insults.

      • Sick of this bullshit

        The fact that you nut jobs can’t even tell the difference from the photographs way above this is all the proof I need to tell that no matter what proof I give you it will never be good enough. Please delete my location. Just because you can get that information does not mean I want it shared with the Internet.

  29. What are the other parents and teachers saying about them? Have they ever seen them before? Who do their kids hang out with? Teachers would recognize them and some other parents have to have seen them around.

  30. GracieJean Kelly

    CR/Sick:

    LOL, oh you think he’s going to do you favors now after you’re rude to us and call us idiots? And your location isn’t “shared” with any of us. We don’t know where you live. 120 miles could be anywhere, and quite frankly, I don’t care. Because you saying you’re related to them is like when a kid in school wanted to be cool and was like, “oh well my uncle is a cop” or “I have black friends!” so, please, save it for people who are dumb enough to believe you.

  31. Yes, because I asked nicely for my location to be removed, and I am grateful that it was. Sorry that I’m actually related to them, and no, not saying that for attention. I’m distressed that my family has become even more of a victim because of this tragedy that yes, actually happened. Sure, enjoy your conspiracy theories, but think of those whom you’re hurting by actually being ignorant. My little cousin was one room over and he knew. He knew what those sounds were. Please. Please stop these accusations. This are actual people. My family was affected by this. Seeing this hurts me and makes me sick to my stomach.

    • C,

      This post is about whether Laura and Nick Phelps, who claim to be parents of ALIVE children, may not be who they claim to be. Neither Laura nor Nick nor their children are victims. They are all alive, not dead.

      I’d appreciate it if you stop smearing Americans as “ignorant” “hurtful” “conspiracy theorists” who are only exercising their 1st Amendment rights by asking the questions the Establishment Media refuse to ask and investigate. There are too many anomalies about this massacre that one would have to be an unthinking automaton NOT to ask questions.

      Asking questions about why SSDI had Adam Lanza’s date-of-death as Dec. 13, 2012, one day BEFORE the massacre is NOT being heartless. Asking questions why CNN’s live news footage on Dec. 14, 2012, showed first law enforcement officers running into a building supposed to be Sandy Hook Elementary School — but isn’t — is NOT being heartless. See other anomalies on our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page: http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/sandy-hook-massacre/

      You’re the one being ignorant, and your smearing of me/us is hurtful.

    • GracieJean Kelly

      I know, I don’t see what is so heartless about wanting to get to down to the bottom of things! Why were websites for some of these children posted before it even happened, why was Adams SSD records posted a day before? Seems like he probably died from something else and was used in as a patsy in the ultimate scheme of things if you ask me. I’m not saying that these events did not exactly happen, just like the towers did not fall, but by golly, you’d have to be a bloody moron if you’re going to sit here and tell me “oh those towers and building 7 fell from the planes”, like come on. We KNOW it happened, but it DIDNT happen the way people try to say it did. AND THAT my friend is the same thing we are SAYING with this situation. I mean, even with what happened at Virginia Tech, they had so much news coverage, it was ridiculous, why not so much news coverage for this? WHY? Why is an event like this written in a book that I’ve had since the 90′s, Behold a Pale Horse, and other events? Because THEY ARE PLANNED. If you want to be ignorant enough to believe it, then go ahead and believe it. And if these kids are so traumatized though, for real, why the hell did they sing at the Grammys? That seems so utterly inappropriate. Let me fly my kids that supposedly just be involved in a horrific tragedy just 2 months early to be put on a show case for the Hollywood puppets and illumanti and sing a song, like get real. Unless there was something more to the story. I can’t even deal. I could go on and on and on.

  32. SANDYHOAX ACTORS

    EVERYBODY INVOLVED WITH THIS HOAX NEEDS TO BE TAKEN CARE OF..

  33. I would like to see the Phelps and the Sextons together in the same room…

  34. What made me convinced me is that sotos and laura phelps kids are same one. Thats not the one clinched me. Its bozner kid. They all in same family photo.

  35. Lori Phelps Dorman

    I guess none of you know the real Nick & Laura Phelps cause I’ve known the family for the last 40 years… I’m related… Don’t be so STUPID… Laura Phelps is NOT anyone but herself

    • Why, bless your heart, Lori Phelps Dorman!

      We’re so stupid we’ll just take the word of a commenter whom we don’t know from a hole in the ground!

  36. Check out James Holmes science presentation at LaJolla http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5oVUqFF_mU Notice his eye color and voice and face shape and demeanor. Not the person shown by the media in court. NOT. Also notice the very last where he thanks John Jacobson, CNL, Sloan Center, and especially The Helmstetter Family and hopes they will give him an allowance bonus… When I searched google Helmstetter family a while ago, I found one family that had two girls who were among those the media presented as witnesses at the Aurora massacre. This is the Helmstetter girl Kaylan, claims to be babysitter to a dead http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obq8zst6PyY&list=PLvcUu-_9FeS-OcHJZa8sS6UA-9j_9hcCP
    contradictions:

    Watch what the people in the background are doing and Notice the time of DAY – they all came back the next day to be interviewed? come on! Look at the background!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8MadpBRusI&list=PLvcUu-_9FeS-OcHJZa8sS6UA-9j_9hcCP

    how many shots, how many guns, where were you? how many dead bodies? Where were the stairs? heros trying to save, dragging weak pulse dude, This might be the Helmstetter older girl, was just there a couple seconds at 1:34 with the caterpillar eyebrows – where are these girls being interviewed?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RztV9x41b48&list=PLvcUu-_9FeS-OcHJZa8sS6UA-9j_9hcCP&index=23

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s