Why the GOP won’t challenge vote fraud

Friends and Patriots,

It’s major duct tape time ’cause you’ll need it to keep your head from exploding.

Are you ready for this?

Here we go….

There is now compelling and undeniable evidence that MAJOR vote fraud had been perpetrated in the November 2012 Election. See FOTM’s posts chronicling the extensive pervasive fraud by going to our “2012 Election” page below our FOTM masthead, and click on those post links colored dark green.

But our screaming and hollering are to no avail. No one is listening to us. Not even the Republican Party.

Here’s why….

The Republican Party made an agreement 30 years ago with the Democrat Party NOT to ensure voting integrity and NOT to pursue suspected vote fraud.

Yes. You read it correctly.

In fact, legally the GOP cannot ensure voting integrity, nor can it prevent vote fraud.

Here’s the astounding reason, which is kept from the American people.

PolitiJim writes for Gulag Bound, November 13, 2012, that during the weekly True the Vote webcast, Catherine Engelbrecht (see her photo below) related a meeting she had with Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC), asking what the GOP would do about voter integrity.  The answer?

Nothing.  They aren’t legally able to.

True the Vote’s Catherine Engelbrecht (read more about her, here)

This all goes back to a lawsuit 31 years ago, in 1981. The following is compiled from an account on The Judicial View, a legal website specializing in court decision research and alerts, and from “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615.

In 1981, during the gubernatorial election in New Jersey (NJ), a lawsuit was brought against the RNC, the NJ Republican State Committee (RSC), and three individuals (John A. Kelly, Ronald Kaufman, and Alex Hurtado), accusing them of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

The lawsuit was brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the NJ Democratic State Committee (DSC), and two individuals (Virginia L. Peggins and Lynette Monroe).

The lawsuit alleged that:

  • The RNC and RSC targeted minority voters in New Jersey in an effort to intimidate them.
  • The RNC created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters. Then the RNC put the names of individuals whose postcards were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge at the polls.
  • The RNC enlisted the help of off-duty sheriffs and police officers with “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands, to intimidate voters by standing at polling places in minority precincts during voting. Some of the officers allegedly wore firearms in a visible manner.

To settle the lawsuit, in 1982 — while Ronald Reagan was President (1981-1989) — the RNC and RSC entered into an agreement or Consent Decree, which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The following is what the RNC and RSC, in the Consent Decree, agreed they would do:

[I]n the future, in all states and territories of the United States:

(a) comply with all applicable state and federal laws protecting the rights of duly qualified citizens to vote for the candidate(s) of their choice;

(b) in the event that they produce or place any signs which are part of ballot security activities, cause said signs to disclose that they are authorized or sponsored by the party committees and any other committees participating with the party committees;

(c) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their agents or employees to remove or deface any lawfully printed and placed campaign materials or signs;

(d) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their employees to campaign within restricted polling areas or to interrogate prospective voters as to their qualifications to vote prior to their entry to a polling place;

(e) refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose;

(f) refrain from having private personnel deputized as law enforcement personnel in connection with ballot security activities.

The RNC also agreed that the RNC, its agents, servants, and employees would be bound by the Decree, “whether acting directly or indirectly through other party committees.”

As modified in 1987, the Consent Decree defined “ballot security activities” to mean “ballot integrity, ballot security or other efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud.”

Since 1982, that Consent Decree has been renewed every year by the original judge, Carter appointee District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, now 88 years old. Long retired, Debevoise comes back yearly for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year.

U.S. District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise

In 2010, the RNC unsuccessfully appealed “to vacate or modify” the Consent Decree in “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615 (C.A. 3, Mar. 8, 2012). (I paid The Judicial Review $10 for the PDF of Case No. 09-4615 and uploaded the 59-page document to FOTM’s media library. To read Case No. 09-4615, click here!)

This is a summary of the appeals judge’s ruling, filed on March 8, 2012:

In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”) and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”), which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The RNC appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying, in part, the RNC’s Motion to Vacate or Modify the Consent Decree. Although the District Court declined to vacate the Decree, it did make modifications to the Decree. The RNC argues that the District Court abused its discretion by modifying the Decree as it did and by declining to vacate the Decree. For the following reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.

Surprise! The judge who denied the RNC’s appeal to “vacate” the 1982 Consent Decree is an Obama appointee, Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit

Guy Benson of Townhall.com points out that in last Tuesday’s election, Obama only won by 406,348 votes in 4 states:

  • Florida: 73,858
  • Ohio: 103,481
  • Virginia: 115,910
  • Colorado: 113,099

Those four states, with a collective margin of 406,348 votes for Obama, add up to 69 electoral votes. Had Romney won 407,000 or so additional votes in the right proportion in those states, he would have 275 electoral votes.

All four states showed Romney ahead in the days leading up to the election. But on November 6, Romney lost all four states by a substantial margin, all of which have precincts that inexplicably went 99% for Obama, had voter registrations that exceeded their population, and had experienced  problems with voting machines.

This election was stolen by the Democrats via vote fraud. Despite all the evidence of fraud, the Republican Party has been strangely silent about it.

Now you know why.

I’ll leave you with one last, even more disturbing thought:

The RNC and DNC made their Consent Decree 30 years ago, in 1982. The agreement in effect gives a carte blanche to the Democrat Party to commit vote fraud in every voting district across America that has, in the language of the Consent Decree, “a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations.” The term “substantial proportion” is not defined.

The Democrat Party knew this 30 years ago, more than enough time to put a plan in place to identify and groom their “perfect candidate” — in the words of Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) in 2008, a “light-skinned” black Democrat who has “no Negro dialect unless he wanted to have one.”

  • Being a black Democrat, this perfect candidate would get the support of almost all black Americans (96% in 2008!) and other racial minorities (two-thirds of Hispanics in 2008).
  • Being a “light-skinned” black with “no Negro dialect”, this perfect candidate would get the support of white Americans perpetually guilt-ridden about America’s original sin of slavery.

It doesn’t matter if this “perfect candidate” has dubious Constitutional eligibility to be president. They would see to it that his original birth certificate (if there is one) would never see the light of day. The same with his other documents — his passports, school and college records, draft registration, and medical records (so we’ll never know why Obama has that very long scar running from one side of his head, over the crown, to the other side).

Now, we understand the significance of the account Tom Fife wrote during the 2008 presidential campaign. Fife, a U.S. government contractor, claims that in 1992 while he was visiting Moscow, a woman with undying allegiance to Soviet Communism (the Soviet Union had recently collapsed, on December 31, 1991) told him that a black man named Barack, born of a white American woman and an African male, was being groomed by communists to be, and would be elected, President of the United States.

Now, we finally understand the cryptic remark made in May 2010, by Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan: “Obama was selected before he was elected.”

In 2008, this “perfect candidate” won the presidential election. And despite his many failures in his first term, he would be reelected in 2012 for a second term via massive vote fraud. But nothing would be done about the vote fraud, because of that Consent Decree signed by the RNC 30 years ago.

The Republican Party is dead — and with it, the U.S. two-party system as well — and the sooner we voters recognize that the better.

The question that remains is whether the American Republic is also dead.

UPDATE (Nov. 16, 2012):

Since I published this post yesterday, we’ve been asking each other: “What can I/we do about this?” Here are my suggestions:

1. If you are a registered Republican, QUIT! Switch your voter registration ID to non-partisan Independent.

2. Stop donating money, not even one penny, to the GOP. Tell them why.

3. Spread the word. Please send the URL of this post (http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/) to:

  • EVERYONE on your email list.
  • Media people for whom you have email addresses.
  • Tea Party groups you know.
  • Post the link on your Facebook page.
  • Post the link as your comment on websites and blogs you visit.

4. Write your state’s attorney general and ask him/her to investigate vote fraud in your state. Click here!

UPDATE (Nov. 21, 2012):

5 days after I’d published this and 7 days after PolitiJim of GulagBound published his acount, someone in the conservative establishment media is writing about this — WND’s Bob Unruh. Click here for his article, “GOP Legally Barred From Fighting Vote Fraud”. But it’s still the sound of crickets from conservative talk radio, even though I’ve sent my post to Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, and a reader had also sent it to Mark Levin.

Just so you know: It makes no monetary difference to us how many people read this post. Fellowship of the Minds (FOTM) is an ad-free blog. We don’t make even a penny in revenue because we deliberately don’t have ads. In fact, I paid WordPress a $99 annual fee so WordPress can’t insert ads on FOTM either. All of our writers work our butts off, for no pay, as a labor of love for our country.

~Eowyn

321 responses to “Why the GOP won’t challenge vote fraud

  1. The issue is far larger than the GOP and voter fraud, as bad as it is. The battle, and the Republic, was already lost (roughly) two or three generations ago when the Right ceded control over the entirety of information flow in this country – print and broadcast media, popular entertainment, and the public and private educational system – essentially without a fight, to the radical Left. (Add more recently to that the fact that hardcore Leftists run Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and virtually every other major player in the Internet) That we are just now realizing how badly we have been overrun it only indicates how much that the Left has been able to get away with thanks to their absolute control over access to information. What to do about it? I am at a loss for suggestions. With no free press, and no real, meaningful access to information by a sadly uninterested American Public, I see no path forward.

  2. The reason there were Black Panthers, etc, at black polling places was as much to intimidate black voters to vote for Obama, as it was to keep an eye on legal voting. Read about a precinct in Detroit that had a little over 3000 registered voters, but aver 6000 showed up at the polls, and were allowed to vote. Obama is as crooked as a barrel of fish hooks ! He gives blacks, and other minorities all the want to get their vote !. It wouldn’t suprise Me if there weren’t a race war before the next election. I guarantee Obama is going to try to run again !

  3. Having worked with both parties I can say I am truly disappointed in each The RNC is not the only committee for Republicans and let me tell you. If this binding consent decree is valid, it wouldn’t make any difference.

    I was recruited by the “Official” (but not published) Democratic Dirty Tricks Committee of the DNC. I quit after learning several things. First, that they weren’t joking about the title. They believe even their own electorate is too stupid to vote and they hire psychologists and practitioners of NLP and sales persuasion, to craft the best lie their followers will buy. If you look closely at Obama, Sanchez, Frank etc. you will see where they have used lies and the law to overturn the will of the people. All that wonderful ideology that I was indoctrinated with, went right out the window. I was considered one of the three percent they considered intelligent enough to vote, On that they were right, I vote conservative.

    Democrats have gotten so bold they have become careless with their lies and I have been nearly apoplectic over gaping holes the Republican leadership (and Fox) fails to exploit. Its a wrestling match where Democrats go for the jugular with a rusty razor blade and Republicans pull out a checker board. RNC has to be bought-off.

  4. Reblogged this on aplusgardener and commented:
    The government does what it Wants (or what the bankers Say!)

  5. Pingback: Only rebellion can save America | I AM is at the doors

  6. Pingback: LAMAR ALEXANDER – Part 1 of 5 | Lamar Alexander U.S. Senator

  7. Keep that “Blame the Republicans button” handy democrats & libertarians. Obama is not done yet.

  8. Pingback: Voter fraud is rampant on the left - Shooting Sports Forum

  9. Catherine Lucas

    Why won’t the conservatives do something about it. I knew deep in my heart something went wrong with the swing states.

  10. For some good news (and believe me, I only just discovered this article and another article today on Conservapedia), Conservapedia reported this article and another article on the same subject on its news section.

    And I strongly suspected that election fraud was involved since at least a month after the election, when the turnouts indicated 0% went for Obama (even the extreme fringes of polling communities do not realistically do 100% or 0% voter turnout for either party), not to mention reports on Breitbart and some other blog. Didn’t expect this to be the reason why no one (not from the GOP, anyways, can’t say I expected the Harry Reid-run Democrats to do anything about it) is doing anything about it, though. I’m not even a member of the GOP, as I’m an independent voter (I did like the GOP at one point on Facebook in 2012, though knowing Facebook, I can’t really “unlike” what I’ve liked). That being said, I do think we should just try to A. get all 50 states to become voter ID states (no need to do so here in Georgia, though. It’s already a voter ID state), B. try to either modify the 1982 provision to make sure that both parties actually make sure to actually enforce voter fraud, regardless of skin color, or if it really can’t be modified, throw out the whole provision so the GOP doesn’t end up having its hands tied behind its back and actually has a chance to fight back (since they are pretty much having their hands tied behind their back, and I’d rather we try to make sure there is a means to untie them, since that would probably be more effective in the long run), and C. probably throw out the appeals judge if he is proven to be unethical (and considering Obama’s hiring policies, there’s more than a chance that his appointee judge has at least some skeletons in his closet), and hire someone who is PROVEN to be very ethical and willing to do the right thing, regardless of party loyalties.

  11. For those of you expecting the Tea Party to Help in Finding Voter Fraud in those Particular Districts, well don’t hold your Breath. Some of these Tea Party Members are apt to falling into the Same Dung Pit as the Republicans find themselves mired in!!
    For all American Loving Patriots that want to Save this Union from itself. We better start Relying on Ourselves, and not ANY Particular Party!! All these Politicians seem to Systematically somehow fall into this Contagious Power Grab that Plagues these People. And instead of doing what is good for Us as a Country. They tend to Rally and do the Age Old Trickery, and Do what is Good for Them to Get them Elected, and therefore in Power of Position within Government!!
    Until we Learn, or Remember that we are a People of all Creeds, Races, Nationalities, and Religions (Certainly excluding the Religions that seek to Destroy us), and become accepting and inclusive of ALL People and their Beliefs. We will Lose this Country to the Ones that is Molding it into what THEY want us to Live in!!
    Some of us have become Not Much better than what we are all Fighting against. We have been unconsciously Indoctrinated into thinking that Our Way is the Best way or The Only Way it should Be!!! And it is one of the Causes for this Whole Nation Slipping away from us. It has Divided us into Groups, Sects, Religions, Colors, Beliefs. Which keeps us from being what we were intended to Be all along since Our Founding…………A Unified American Nation!!!!
    Our Founders Gave us a Republic form of Government. Which Allows us to Do and Be whatever we want in Our Lives!! We were never intended to Think or Behave how Our Government Deems Necessary!! It was to be if Only One Person had a Belief or a Lifestyle, and it didn’t interfere with their Neighbor Physically or Monetarily, then that Person was to be allowed to Follow that Dream!!
    And we have allowed Prying People and Politicians to Pervert Our Laws and Government to suit their Own Needs. And it has allowed a Cancer to Grow on this Whole Nation!! And Now that Cancer is Killing us as a Nation!!
    If we don’t Collectively bring ourselves back to the Basics of Our Founding Principles. Then we might as well Quit the Fight, and Let this Cancer Kill us!!

  12. Maybe independent candidates can stop voter fraud by filing voter fraud charges against democrats or any one else screwing with the american voters to have fair elections.

    • I’d like to think so;my big concern is that this alleged president’s concerted effort to stack the Courts with Judges with wide streaks of Socialism/Communism,so it’d be hard to get a fair,Constitutional ruling.

  13. A thought to expand on my last comment;Remember what has happened EVERY time anyone has brought charges against Obama to challenge his eligibility to run for President,his claim of Citizenship,his parentage,the validity of his Social Security Card(s) or any of his still unseen,unproven probably fictional records to prove who he really is. Ironically,even with documented proof of wrongdoing,they’ve all been summarily thrown out of Court. This tells ME he has placed himself solidly(Though unconstitutionally) ABOVE THE LAW. I really believe our only real option,the only recourse with the power to bring him down,would be the World Court of Justice,but I think I read in their bylaws that they won’t deal in this kind of issues.

  14. Pingback: 28 January 2014 | My Daily Dive – News of the Day

  15. Why isn’t anyone talking about switching away from DEMOCRATIC voter registration to independent, Libertarian, or another non-Dem/Rep party because of this situation?

    • I don’t believe the Democrats will want to tamper with this subject,since they have things pretty good right now. Having their votes split off to the non-Democratic parties would be counter-productive to their agenda.

  16. The RNC may be legally enjoined from preventing voter fraud but this does not apply to independents, tea party or any other citizen groups from conducting their own programs of voter fraud elimination. Where does it say that only the RNC can sue for voter fraud relief?

    • Excellent point,and I think the Tea Party will have enough standing to get some real traction on this in the next few years. They’re getting more credible people running for office,and they’ve improved a LOT in their planning,operation and presentation.People are actually listening and agreeing with what they say.

  17. How can this judgment go on like this? How can it restrain one party from filing a lawsuit against the other party for violating election laws? That’s like telling a child you should not hit another child and allowing the other child to hit him back. It’s absolutely criminal. It’s a judgment against every American citizen and is causing The People to be harmed. Should we not have the right to sue the DNC in every state for the massive fraud? The GOP does not have to do it?

  18. “That’s like telling a child you should not hit another child and allowing the other child to hit him back.”

    The schools are currently doing this.

  19. State parties, Tea Party, etc would not be party to this consent decree – even if all of this is true. Voting fraud is a state issue, traditionally governed by each voting district directed by the state guidelines. Even if there was a RNC consent decree, it would not bind the state parties and individual politicians from protesting fraud. Withdrawing funding from the only party that can fight the liberals? Are you actually democrats in disguise?

  20. Pingback: Anonymous

  21. The American People face the same enemy that our Founders risked life and limb to free us from. Both Parties, the Liberals and their cohorts (the Conservatives) both rake Foreign cash into their campaigns. This is the reason WTO and NAFTA stole our Middle Class jobbie jobs… Do you expect to remain FREE while your rock-star Politician takes Foreign bribes?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s