Agenda 21: Global Warming Theory is Baloney

NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth’s atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.

Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA’s Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models Full Story Here

H/T Kelleigh

~LTG

4 responses to “Agenda 21: Global Warming Theory is Baloney

  1. Sage,you say it all, I would really just like 5 minutes alone with al gore,and MY PITCHFORK.

    • Sage,

      I commend Mel Gibson for casting a creepily androgenous-looking person in the role of Lucifer in “The Passion of the Christ.” Afterall, Angels, being incorporal pure spirits, have no gender.

      It is so sad Gibson fell so precipitously after The Passion. I remain baffled as to how a man who had the insight and gifts to make that movie could then commit adultery, conceive a child out of wedlock, be physically and emotionally abusive of the mother of his baby (no matter how manipulative she may be), and abuse alcohol. I believe it began with the alcoholism, which was/is the gateway for possession.

  2. They’ve gone from being Warmists to being Coldists. now they are predicting a mini ice age! Well if one doesn’t work let’s try the other! As for carbon taxes it goes to pay for the OWG agenda.

    • Lone,

      That’s the diabolical ingenuity of their new term “Climate Change.” The Warmists switched to that, from the previous “Global Warming” because the empirical data no longer support global warming. the new label “Climate Change” allows the same evil cabal to say “See, we’re right” no matter what the weather does — warming, cooling, extreme heat, extreme cold. After all, the weather never stays the same. It’s always changing, and so the pseudo-theory of “Climate Change” is always right!

      So scientific (sarcasm) — a theory that can never be proven wrong. In scientific parlance, the theory doesn’t have a Null Hypothesis. In epistemology, it flunks the necessary criterion of falsifiability.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s