The Truth About Obama’s Teaching At Chicago Law School

A big h/t to FellowshipOfMinds member FS!

This is MAJOR news.

One of the accomplishments much trumpeted by Obamabots is that their man, after his graduation from Harvard Law School, was a “professor” at Chicago University Law School. Finally, a leading faculty member at Chicago Law has come forth with the truth on Obama’s teaching, including:

  • How Obama got a job teaching law: It was a political favor. The law school actually had turned down his application to teach there.
  • What his academic title was: Obama was a “lecturer,” never a “professor,” not even an “adjunct” professor. The distinctions between/among these academic titles are important. A lecturer (or “instructor”) is someone who is hired on a year-by-year basis, without going through a competitive rigorous screening or possessing sterling academic credentials.
  • How other faculty members regarded him: They thought him lazy and unqualified.
  • What he taught at the law school: Although he was hired to teach Constitutional Law, Obama instead taught Machiavellian power politics à la Saul Alinsky, the Marxist ideologue who dedicated his book on community organizing, Rules for Radicals, to the fallen evil angel Lucifer.

I hope this revelation of Obama’s Chicago Law School “teaching” will be the first of more truth-tellings by those who had known The One the Fraud.


Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “The Professors Hated Him because he was Lazy, Unqualified & Never Attended any of the Faculty Meetings”

Jim Hoft – First Things – March 31, 2010

The highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law spoke out on Barack Obama saying, “Professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings.”
Doug Ross reported this and more:

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about “Barry.” Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn’t even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn’t have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

This photo of Barack Obama teaching in Chicago was posted in February 2008 at PrestoPundit. In this class Barack Obama was teaching his students the principles of Saul Alinsky. Notice the flow chart indicating the flow of money and power out of productive businesses (“CORP”) and into the political class (“MAYOR”):

The heading at the top reads “POWER ANALYSIS”. The sub-heading reads “RELATIONSHIPS BUILD ON SELF INTEREST”. The symbol on the arrow between “CORP” and “MAYOR” is the “$” sign.

Saul Alinsky came up with the idea of power analysis, which looks at relationships built on self-interest between corporations, banks and utilities. Barack Obama was teaching students in Chicago the Alinsky Principles.

Of course, this is not a surprise. After watching the bribes, kickbacks, lies and threats this past year as Democrats fought to take over the health care industry, it’s obvious that the only subject Obama excels at is Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals.

More… Isn’t it a bit odd that the only photo we’ve seen of Obama teaching, he’s explaining the Alinsky principles?

32 responses to “The Truth About Obama’s Teaching At Chicago Law School

  1. I just dugg this post. Perhaps we are squeezing the toothepaste tube. I suggest we as yours and my readers to make this go viral. If I can find a way, I will send this to Phil Berg.


  2. He is still teaching Saul Alinsky. The only difference is he now has the ability to put it into action !!!!

  3. I’ve seen this photo numerous times, but this is the clearest and highest res version I’ve seen. Glenn Beck has shown it on his TV show at least twice and nothing’s really come of it. The informed already know this is what Obama’s already about, the uninformed will never be told by the brown-nosing media, and the truely ignorant would need to be told so much back history (Saul Alinsky etc) that their minds would be wandering into thoughts of the next episode of Entertainment Tonight before you could explain it to them.

  4. I imagine that if Obama was a pro-life Republican, these same background facts would elicit a huge outcry from Big-Liberal-Media.

  5. I taught in college and if I can do it then the requirements are mighty low.

  6. This is some silly-ass, right-wing propaganda, “conspiracy nonsense.” You uneducated “conservatives” are “haters.” Mad at the world for being ignorant.
    yet arrogant.

    Hopefully a virus will come and remove all you filth.

    • Why don’t you refute this post with facts instead of insults and namecalling? No, you can’t? Truth hurts, doesn’t it, looier?

      As for the virus that “removes all you filth,” we already have one! It’s called AIDS/HIV.

    • NOW who’s the hater?

    • No, it’s not some “right-wing propaganda”. I WISH it were, but the truth remains. Your dear and beloved leader is a communist and you’re an idiot. But I think you already knew that, you just wanted to see your stupidity in print.

  7. Ok, so he’s teaching Alinksy.

    The question you haven’t answered is “in what context”?

    • I think if you could check that was not the curriculum. Of course the education system has been infiltrated for many years. Most of my friends who taught were left wing zealots and we drifted apart. Difficult to maintain a friendship with narrow minded people who have never had a JOB where they were responsible for a bottom line. Many are flukes. The independent private schools seem to be successful.

  8. If you whack jobs only knew anything about college! lol And geuss what… Lecturer is a promotion from professor! Lecturers are often paid positions for judicial appointees.

    But AHHHH …. ignorance is bliss!

    • “Lecturer is a promotion from professor”

      ronnie hansen is a moron
      What universe are you in? Not this one for sure.
      Has DeKalb, Illinois — where you are in — become an alternate universe?

      Unlike you, I actually do know the faculty titles system in U.S. universities. You see, I am a Full Professor. I started my academic career teaching part-time as a Lecturer, while finishing my Ph.D. program. Then I was a Visiting Assistant Professor (i.e., not tenure-track ladder faculty). Then, I was appointed Assistant Professor, on tenure-track. Then, I was promoted to Associate Professor and achieved tenure. Finally — and this does not happen to every Associate Professor — I was promoted to the last rank of Full Professor.

      If you’re gonna lie, at least try to be minimally credible. You really should change your alias to “Left is wrong” to more accurately reflect yourself.

    • That isn’t true. I wonder what YOU know about the university system. My husband is the Chair of the Language and Literature department and an Associate Professor who teaches two classes per semester. He hires the professors, adjuncts and lecturers for the department and they are NOT paid the same, they are not awarded tenure and they are on a year-to-year contract that is always re-evaluated on in-class reviews and merit.

    • …ignorance is bliss!

      True enough, but in your your case, dumbass goes clear to the bone.


    • And why is it I think your school bus was a little shorter than most?



  9. UC Law School statement: The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as “Senior Lecturer.” From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School’s Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.

    • So?

      Since you are so knowledgeable, why don’t you explain to us how this Senior Lecturer taught law for 12 years but never wrote anything on law — not a book, not a refereed journal article, not even a court brief? Given his total absence of professional publication, that Chicago Law School invited him to a full-time tenure-track position can only be understood as an Affirmative Action hire that violates every policy and standard of academic hiring — which demands and expects applicants to demonstrate he or she has at least ONE professional publication, no matter how modest.

      Unlike you, I speak from personal knowledge and experience, having sat on countless Search Committees for new hires. Never had any Search Committee considered an applicant for a tenure-track assistant professor position who doesn’t have even one professional publication. Even ABDs (all but dissertation) have at least one refereed journal article.

      And yes, I am a tenured Full Professor — not a “senior lecturer” that’s “regarded as professor” — with 4 singly-authored books, 6 co-authored books, and refereed journal articles too numerous to count.

    • Of course he declined that would have meant WORK. He is known as lazy and unqualified. Even as a senator he voted present so as not to have an opinion? I think he did not know enough to voice an intelligent opinion. He was not supplied with a teleprompter yet.

  10. This is for Looier. Hey Looier, go buy a dictionary and reread the article. In a few years you may grasp the meaning of a couple of words in that article. Until then I suggest you remove your head from that place where the sun don’t shine. Oxygen deprivation is affecting your judgment.

  11. Dr. Eowyn. WELL SAID SIR!!!

    • Thank you, Sir!

      and a warm WELCOME to Fellowship of the Minds, Sir! :D

      • While it will be very difficult to prove once Barry gets done having the evidence removed, I believe that it will come out that not only was he NOT any kind of “professor”, but that any offers of a “full time job” were his delusions of how good he thought he was, not reality. Obama has a very clear way of seeing only what he wants to believe. It doesn’t have to be TRUE, just that he wants it to be so, therefore we must all bow and scrape to his wishes.

        Dr. Eowyn, thank you for your insight into the real workings of universities. But I’m surprised sir, that you aren’t arm in arm with all this nonsense Barry is spouting! Be careful sir! They shall take away your accreditation as an educator for being too conservative! :-)

  12. This reminds me of the Birther Battles… HAHAHAHAHAHAH! Nobody ever gets anywhere no matter what anyone says to anyone else… particularly when someone posts a FACTCHECK that contradicts the subject of the post. Unreal.

    • As if Annenberg and Ayers are unbiased. Unreal.

    • You poor brain dead Obamabot. Don’t you know that Sheriff Arpaio has document forensics experts examine that online image of Skippy’s alleged birth certificate and their expert judgment is that it’s a fake. Are you a document forensics expert? Hmm?

      Besides, just answer this simple question:

      Why won’t Skippy just produce his ORIGINAL hard-paper birth certificate already. I have mine. You have yours. I don’t show an online project “image” of my birth certificate to get my passport. You don’t either. How hard is it for Skippy, the President of the United States, to produce his? Very hard, apparently.


    • The most disturbing and yet amusing thing about the “birther battles” is this. Conservatives didn’t start it, Hilary Clinton did. And it has STILL not been resolved to millions of citizen’s satisfaction, yet the liberals act like it’s all a conservative idea. Hypocrisy apparently knows no bounds if you’re a liberal.

      Maybe that’s why Barry threw her under the bus for Benghazi, in payback for bringing up something he doesn’t want anyone to know about?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s